My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 09 - Fairview Street Improvement Project
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
02/04/2025
>
Item 09 - Fairview Street Improvement Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 10:45:12 AM
Creation date
1/29/2025 10:37:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Architectural History Evaluation <br /> 1.4 Regulatory Context <br /> The CEQA lead agency for this Project is the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency. A review of the <br /> regulatory context is provided below; however, the inclusion of any of these laws and regulations in this <br /> report does not make a law or regulation apply when it otherwise would not. Similarly, the omission of <br /> any other laws and regulations from this section does not mean that they do not apply. Rather, the <br /> purpose of this section is to provide context in explaining why the study was carried out in the manner <br /> documented herein. <br /> 1.4.1 Federal Evaluation Criteria <br /> 1.4.2 National Environmental Policy Act <br /> The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) establishes national policy for the protection and <br /> enhancement of the environment. Part of the function of the federal government in protecting the <br /> environment is to "preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage." <br /> Cultural resources need not be determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) <br /> through the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended) to receive consideration <br /> under NEPA. NEPA is implemented by regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality(40 Code of <br /> Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508). <br /> The definition of effects in the NEPA regulations includes adverse and beneficial effects on historic and <br /> cultural resources (40 CFR 1508.8). Therefore, the Environmental Consequences section of an <br /> Environmental Impact Statement [see 40 CFR 1502.16(f))] must analyze potential effects to historic or <br /> cultural resources that could result from the proposed action and each alternative. In considering whether <br /> an alternative may"significantly affect the quality of the human environment," a federal agency must <br /> consider, among other things: <br /> Unique characteristics of the geographic area, such as proximity to historic or cultural resources <br /> (40 CFR 1508.27(b)(3)), and <br /> The degree to which the action may adversely affect districts, sites, highways, structures, or <br /> objects listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP (40 CFR 1508.27(b)(8)). <br /> Therefore, because historic properties are a subset of cultural resources, they are one aspect of the human <br /> environment defined by NEPA regulations. <br /> 1.4.3 National Historic Preservation Act <br /> The federal law that covers cultural resources that could be affected by federal undertakings is the NHPA <br /> of 1966, as amended. Section 106 of the NHPA requires that federal agencies take into account the effects <br /> of a federal undertaking on properties listed in or eligible for the NRHP.The agencies must afford the <br /> Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment on the undertaking. A <br /> federal undertaking is defined in 36 CFR 800.16(y): <br /> ECORP Consulting, Inc. 3 January 2025 <br /> Fairview Street Widening Project 2024-088.03 <br /> 9-94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.