My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
03/04/2025
>
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2025 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 9:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
17
Date
3/4/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street Widening Project Warner Ave to Saint Andrew Place (Phase IV) <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.10 Land Use and planning <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />subsection A, Landforrn Modification, of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. <br />(a) Physically divide an established community? <br />The project area is developed with various urban uses and the proposed widening would not divide an <br />established community. Although there would be partial and full takes, the project would not create a <br />physical barrier to separate a community. The proposed project would not introduce any significant land use <br />impacts than previously analyzed. No significant impact would result from the project implementation. <br />Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction <br />over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal <br />program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an <br />environmental effect? <br />The proposed project would not result in changes to the land use designation of the acquired parcels. The <br />proposed project is in compliance with the existing designation and would not create a new conflict. No <br />significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />(c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community <br />conservation plan? <br />The project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan. The project site is already fully developed and <br />the proposed widening would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community. No <br />impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 Final EISIEIR. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No new additional mitigation measures are required. <br />3.11 Mineral Resources <br />This section corresponds with Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, <br />subsection W, Consumption of Renewable and Non -Renewable Resources of the 1990 Final EISIEIR. <br />(a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the <br />region and the residents of the state? <br />The project site is currently developed and does not contain any areas for the extraction of mineral <br />resources. The proposed project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously <br />ANA 305-194 (PER 02) GSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU <br />43 <br />75C-59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.