Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4

Home Browse Search

New Impacts of Project Changes. Previous FOR and FEIS No Impact Less an Significant Less an Significant otentia y Significant Imppacts Disc]osed? uppp ement al EIRIEfS Impact. After Impact Required? Mitigation d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or X YES NO with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological X YES NO resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 5,CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a X YES NO historical resource as defined in § 15064,5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X YES NO archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064,5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or X YES NO site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X NA NO formal cemeteries? 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project' a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- PrVo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the X YES NO State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Dlvision of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C-79