Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4

Home Browse Search

Appendix A New Impacts: of. Project. Changes Previous FEIR and FEIS No Impack Less an Significant Less an Significant Potentially. Significant Impacts Disclosed? uppp ement al E.IR/EIS . Impact After Impact.. Required.? Mitigation j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or X NIA NO mudflow? 10. LAND USE.ANp PLANNING. Would the project, a) Physically divide an established X NIA NO community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local X YES NO coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservatlon plan or natural X NIA NO community conservation plan? 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would X YES NO be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X YES NO general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local X YES NO general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X YES NO groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise levels in the project X YES NO vicinity above levels existing without the project? ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133967 YU 75C-S3