My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
03/04/2025
>
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2025 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 9:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
17
Date
3/4/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix A <br />Neva Impacts of Project Changes <br />Previous FOR and FEIS <br />No <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />ess an <br />Significant <br />otentfa y <br />Significant <br />Impacts <br />Disclgsed7 <br />Supplement <br />al EIRlEIS <br />-Impact, <br />After <br />impact <br />Required.? ,. <br />Mitigation <br />d) Parks? <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />e) Other public facilities? <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />15. RECREATI0N <br />a) Would the project increase the <br />use of existing neighborhood and <br />regional parks or other recreational <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />facilities such that substantial <br />physical deterioration of the facility <br />would occur or be accelerated? <br />b) Does the project include <br />recreational facilities or require the <br />construction or expansion of <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />recreational facilities that might have <br />an adverse physical effect on the <br />environment? <br />16. TRANSPORTATI0NITRAFFIO. <br />Would the prpject: . <br />a) Conflict with an applicable plan, <br />ordinance or policy establishing <br />measures of effectiveness for the <br />performance of the circulation <br />system, taking into account all <br />modes of transportation including <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />mass transit and non -motorized <br />travel and relevant components of <br />the circulation system, including but <br />not limited to intersections, streets, <br />highways and freeways, pedestrian <br />and bicycle paths, and mass transit? <br />b) Conflict with an applicable <br />congestion management program, <br />including, but not limited to level of <br />service standards and travel demand <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />measures, or other standards <br />established by the county <br />congestion management agency for <br />designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic <br />patterns, including either an increase <br />X <br />NO <br />NO <br />in traffic levels or a change in <br />location that results in substantial <br />safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards <br />due to a design feature (e,g., sharp <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />curves or dangerous intersections) <br />or incompatible uses (e,g„ farm <br />equipment)? <br />ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU 75C—Q5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.