My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
03/04/2025
>
Item 17 - Appropriation Adjustments for Bristol Improvement Project Phase 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2025 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 9:36:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
17
Date
3/4/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix A <br />New Impacts of Project Changes <br />Previous FEIR and FEIS <br />No <br />Impact <br />ess Irian <br />Significant <br />Less I han <br />Significant <br />otenUa ,1y <br />Significant <br />Impacts <br />Disclosed? <br />uppp ement <br />al EIRlEIS <br />Impact <br />After <br />Impact <br />Required? <br />Mitigation <br />18. MANDATORY <br />FINDINGS OF <br />SIGNIFICANCE. <br />a) Does the project have the <br />potential to degrade the quality of <br />the environment, substantially <br />reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife <br />species, cause a fish or wlidffe <br />population to drop below self- <br />sustaining levels, threaten to <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />eliminate a plant or animal <br />community, reduce the number or <br />restrict the range of a rare or <br />endangered plant or animal or <br />eliminate important examples of the <br />major periods of California history or <br />prehistory? <br />b) Does the project have impacts <br />that are individually limited, but <br />cumulatively considerable? <br />("Cumulatively considerable" means <br />that the incremental effects of a <br />X <br />YES <br />N <br />project are considerable when <br />0 <br />viewed in connection with the effects <br />of past projects, the effects of other <br />current projects, and the effects of <br />probable future projects)? <br />c) Does the project have <br />environmental effects which will <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />cause substantial adverse effects on <br />human beings, either directly or <br />Note: N/A = Not applicable <br />19. EARLIER ANALYSES. <br />Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EI R, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately <br />analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached <br />sheets: <br />a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. <br />b) Impacts adequately addrossed Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier <br />document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier <br />analysis. <br />ANA 305-194 (PER 02) CSA (AUGUST 2014) 133867 YU Q <br />75C-S7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.