Laserfiche WebLink
<br />intervention, and/or other services needed by type of program, geographic area, age, <br />and culture-based factors. The identification of service providers will begin upon receipt <br />of the Case Plan. Within 48 hours of the youth's intake, the youth will be "enrolled" in a <br />training program and/or school. <br /> <br />9.4. Meet Individually with Each Youth to Proyidc Mentoring, Guidance, and <br />Advocacy <br />Whether the mentoring relationship occurs through natural or planned processes, <br />sustained interactions through youth of all ethnicities and committed adults can create <br />positive and enduring results7 Recent data from an evaluation of the nationwide <br />personal development mentoring programs operated by Big Brothers/Big Sisters <br />document astounding outcomes. Youth who participated in a sustained mentoring <br />relationship were 46 percent less likely to use illicit substances, 53 percent less likely to <br />have unauthorized absences from school. and 27 percent less likely to consume alcohol <br />than their similarly-positioned peers who were unmentored. Still another study of the <br />outcomes associated with mentoring among Big Sisters of Central Indiana indicates that <br />160 of 200 mentored juvenile offenders did not experience another arrest within the <br />timeframe of the studyB Similarly, a study of the Baltimore mentoring effort, PROJECT <br />RAISE, discovered that a continuous and intensive mentoring effort can increase school <br />attendance and improve grades in English9 Other studies have found that youth <br />mentored over a long-term period: <br /> <br />. Experience heightened life goals and expectations; <br />. Become more interested in completing high school and, in some cases, going to <br />college; <br />. Are less prone toward violent behavior; <br />. Report feelings of increased confidence; <br />. Demonstrate augmented personal skills; <br /> <br />7 Flaxman, E.and C. Ascher, Mentorinl2. in Action. New Yark Institute for Urban and Minority Education, Teachers <br />College, Columbia University, 1997. <br />8 Flaxman, E., Evaluating Mcntoring Programs. New York lnstitute for Urban and Minority Education, Teachers <br />College, Columbia University, 1992. <br />9 McPartland. James M. and Saundra M. Nettles, "Using Community Adults as Advocates on Mentors for At-Risk <br />Middle School Students. ^ Two-Year Evaluation of Project Raise," American Journal of Education, 199], 99(4), <br />pp.568-86. <br /> <br />CHCADA's Response to RFP# PY2002 <br /> <br />Page 33 <br />