Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten <br />to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number <br />or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or <br />animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods <br />of California history or prehistory. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval and implementation of the proposed project would not <br />result in the development of land uses or result in activities <br />that would adversely impact sensitive wildlife and plant species <br />or sensitive cultural resources. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Does the project have impacts that are individually limited <br />but cumulatively considerable? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed project would not result in any <br />individually limited impacts to the environment and therefore <br />would not result in any cumulative impacts to the environment as <br />well. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Does the project have environmental effects, which will <br />cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either <br />directly or indirectly? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed revisions to the procedures for the preparation and <br />implementation of neighborhood traffic plans would establish <br />both City and community processing requirements and standards to <br />evaluate and implement neighborhood traffic management plans to <br />protect and maintain the quality of life of neighborhoods in the <br />City of Santa Ana. The proposed General Plan Amendment would <br />make technical modifications to the text of the Circulation <br />Element regarding the implementation of neighborhood traffic <br />plans so as to better conform the preparation and implementation <br />of neighborhood traffic plans to State law requirements. <br />Approval and implementation of the proposed project would not <br />result in adverse impacts to human beings. <br /> <br />XVIII DETERMINATION <br /> <br />Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented <br />in the above environmental evaluation and cited references, I <br />find that the proposed project could not have a significant <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />Pa'5F.241 <br /> <br />