My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75F - GP AMEND NO. 2004-06
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/06/2004
>
75F - GP AMEND NO. 2004-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:02:10 PM
Creation date
7/2/2004 3:17:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75F
Date
7/6/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten <br />to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number <br />or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or <br />animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods <br />of California history or prehistory. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval and implementation of the proposed project would not <br />result in the development of land uses or result in activities <br />that would adversely impact sensitive wildlife and plant species <br />or sensitive cultural resources. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Does the project have impacts that are individually limited <br />but cumulatively considerable? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed project would not result in any <br />individually limited impacts to the environment and therefore <br />would not result in any cumulative impacts to the environment as <br />well. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Does the project have environmental effects, which will <br />cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either <br />directly or indirectly? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed revisions to the procedures for the preparation and <br />implementation of neighborhood traffic plans would establish <br />both City and community processing requirements and standards to <br />evaluate and implement neighborhood traffic management plans to <br />protect and maintain the quality of life of neighborhoods in the <br />City of Santa Ana. The proposed General Plan Amendment would <br />make technical modifications to the text of the Circulation <br />Element regarding the implementation of neighborhood traffic <br />plans so as to better conform the preparation and implementation <br />of neighborhood traffic plans to State law requirements. <br />Approval and implementation of the proposed project would not <br />result in adverse impacts to human beings. <br /> <br />XVIII DETERMINATION <br /> <br />Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented <br />in the above environmental evaluation and cited references, I <br />find that the proposed project could not have a significant <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />Pa'5F.241 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.