75F - ONE BROADWAY PLAZA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Moreover, what guarantee does the City have that this project will even be completed as proposed? What is to prevent the developer from walking away prior to completion or even afterward if the hoped-for tenants fail to materialize, leaving Santa Ana with not just another empty building, but a monstrous eyesore in the bargain? Has the financing been obtained? Have architects and other designers already utilized actually been paid? Where is the ironclad commitment from the developer that legally locks him in and puts him at substantial risk? What recourse is there by the City if the proponents' rosy assurances or expectations don't pan out in the future? Will Santa Ana be left holding the bag? And why does it have to be so gosh-darned tall? There already is a "tallest building in Orange County" somewhere and I'll bet not one in ten thousand residents could even care less, much less identify it. Such a moniker only lasts until the next one is built anyway, and whatever temporary cache it supposedly brings frankly smacks more of a phallic obsession than anything else. I understand the building trades and commercial real estate industry favor this project. Yet it takes about the same number of people to build a 10 - 15 story building as it does to build a 35 story building-they're just not employed for as long a period of time. In any event, these aren't permanent jobs. I recently took a trip to Paris, and in one part of that otherwise beautiful city, an enormous boxy skyscraper, the Montparnasse Tower, stands all alone amid a sea of older 2 to 4-story buildings. As one travel writer aptly noted, "it looks like the box the Eiffel Tower came in." It looks so grossly out of place and is such an unattractive structure, one can only wonder, what were the city leaders thinking? Completed in the early 1970's, it was then the tallest building in Europe, but, inevitably, it soon lost that claim as well. The building is now fairly seedy and not fully occupied (if it ever was), but is nevertheless a permanent blight on the cityscape, and is the towering monument to a gross lapse in responsible city planning. (After it was built, a disgusted public passed a law preventing buildings over 7 stories from being built in the area.) Of course, Santa Ana is not Paris, but many of the issues about the reasonableness of this proposed project are similar. You have another opportunity to reconsider whether this ugly glass tower is really a legacy you'd like to leave behind in Santa Ana. What's the worst that could happen if this project is not approved? This is not the only opportunity that will come the City's way. The known negatives clearly outweigh the glossy, but largely illusory, positives. Please vote NO on One Br dway Plaza. Thank you for your consideration, JPH:bm Julie Hum\QJ' ," e, ::'homeowner and voter i ; I ' / 75F-55