My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75F - ONE BROADWAY PLAZA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/19/2004
>
75F - ONE BROADWAY PLAZA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:54 PM
Creation date
7/15/2004 11:29:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75F
Date
7/19/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />02/27/2017 11:27 FAX <br /> <br />1lJ00J <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />Roberta Reed, Comments to Planning Commission <br />June 14, 2004 <br /> <br />either a traffic signal or a rai~ed median at the Halesworth Street and Broadway <br />intersection 8S determined by the Public Works Agency," These two appear to be in <br />conflict. Figure T-17 of the EIR shows a median at Halesworth and the EIR states that a <br />signal will be installed at the egress from the Palting Structure approximately 80 feet north <br />of Halesworth. It is unclear if the One Broadway Plaza Development District document is <br />referring to the same traffic sigr'làl as Exhibit C or an additional signal. Regardless, any 01 <br />these scenarios: removal of the msdian, removal of the traffic signal. or the addition of a <br />traffic signal all result in changing the mitigation measure as stated in the EIR. To make <br />such a change, without allowing for adequate review and comment by the interested <br />public, would be improper under CEOA regulations. <br /> <br />Secondly, the Development Agreement states that as a condition of issuance of building <br />permits, the OWner must obtain binding commitments of lease for at least 50% of the <br />leasable space of the project from tenants who would qualify as "Investrnr¡¡nt G~de <br />Tenants," ¡;¡ rating of BSB. or greater, as rated by either Standard and Poor's or Moody's. <br /> <br />According to Standard and Poor's definition, a BBB- rating is the lowest rating before non- <br />investment grade. The next lower rating, BB, Is defined as "less vulnerable in the near <br />term but faces major on-going uncertainties to adverse business, 1inanci;¡;¡I, and economic <br />conditions." <br /> <br />It would appear that almost any business that is not in current financial difficulty wI;Juld be <br />able to qualify to lease space in One Broadway Plaza, per this agreement. The question <br />must be asked: if this development is so necessary, and Class A office space is so <br />desperately needed to bring desirable tenants to downtown Santa Ana, is this the level of <br />tenant we want to attract? Or does this send a subtle mèssage to the community that we <br />do not have confidence that this building can attract tenants with higher credit ratings and <br />that we must be content with those with a credit rating of "the lowest rating before non- <br />Investment grade"? <br /> <br />Again, I urge you to carefully consÎdèr your decisions in this matter. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />WoJwrfo. a-.~ <br /> <br />Roberta A. Reed <br /> <br />cc: <br /> <br />Santa Ana City Council <br /> <br />7SF-66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.