My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75F - ONE BROADWAY PLAZA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2004
>
07/19/2004
>
75F - ONE BROADWAY PLAZA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 5:01:54 PM
Creation date
7/15/2004 11:29:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75F
Date
7/19/2004
Destruction Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 1 of 1 <br /> <br />Ousley, Mardy <br /> <br />From: Randi Iggulden [cyberwife@sbcglobal.net] <br />Wednesday, July 07, 2004 4:10PM <br />Bist, Lisa; Garcia, Mike; Solorio, Jose; Christy, Alberta; Franklin, Brett; Alvarez, Claudia; Pulido, <br />Miguel <br />Subject: More comments about OBP. <br /> <br />Sent: <br />To: <br /> <br />Another comment on OBP ftom Floral Park Neighborhood Message Board: <br /> <br />I will admit that it sounds like the city is really lacking in the inftastructUre planning on this project--at least from what I am <br />seeing discussed here on the board. I am very much in favor of the building, but I think that they need to be more diligent in <br />the actual urban planning. There is no such thing as insunnountable traffic problems. There are many creative ways to make <br />the traffic less of a problem. Just like the ideas of the pedestrian bridges (of course they would need to be ADA, I had no <br />intention of implying that they wouldn't be) --almost everything is possible with planning, time, and MONEY. If the <br />developers really want to pull this off, the city has to put down some rules and tell the developer that we as a city have some <br />needs that must be met in exchange for your big project(this includes OUR little traffic speed bumps! :)). And if these things <br />are done before the construction of the building, it is much more fair for those of us who do live in the inner city. If the <br />traffic, trash, transportation, etc. are done after the building is up, it is pretty miserable. It just takes urban planning. If they do <br />this right it will be a great start to the revitalization of our city. <br /> <br />We cannot keep growing out--our sprawl is already sprawled! We now need to go up in density. We do live in the city and it <br />seems selfish to basically say, "ok, I am here, now we are closing the growth off so that it stays just like this forever." We, in <br />Floral Park have done our best and continue to defend the wonderful oasis we have here in the middle of the city. I don't see <br />that changing for a long long time-if ever. But the reality is that we do live in the city-owe do have traffic problems, we do <br />have crime, we do have areas right next door to our oasis that are not that great. We aren't out in Coto De Caza or some other <br />bedroom community where no one knows their neighbor, because they get home ftom work at 10 PM. We will feel the <br />growing pains that cities go through, that is part of city life. The population is growing and there is no way to avoid that. I <br />think that the tax monies that the new businesses bring into our city are also going to be necessary to maintain the services for <br />the ever growing population. We as homeowners certainly cannot pay for the services that will continue to grow--especially <br />with prop 13 in place. And I don't think any of us want that to go away! These kinds ofprojects--OBP and centerline are BIG <br />pictUre kinds of projects that take many many years to complete and more years for the actUal benefits to be evident. The <br />process can be painful, but the needs that will be met for our future population is worthwhile. Portland, Oregon is such a <br />wonderful living study of this idea. They put in growth boundaries and forced the density and businesses to increase in the <br />downtown area. Now 35 years later, the defunct run down downtown is booming. If anyone is interested in really getting into <br />the meat of this idea, read up on Portland and their urban planning. <br /> <br />How many blocks is the nearest centerline stop ftom OBP? I was figuring about 6-8 blocks--is that about right? Maybe if <br />people would walk those 6-8 blocks briskly every morning and afternoon, we could start to deal with another problem in this <br />country--obesity! In DC and New York people walk everywhere--they don't even own cars (and they have horrible weather to <br />deal with). We should be pleased to get out in our mild climate, walk, and make a little eye contact with passers by. Driving <br />up and parking in ftont of the building is just not a possibility in the city, that is why blocking off more streets and creating <br />walking streets is another important part of the urban planning. That is why I love to go down to 2nd street and hang out. <br />Walking streets are so friendly and inspire conversations with those you are walking with. If you haven't sat on a bench down <br />there lately--or ever, you must try it. Sit and watch people or read a book. Enjoy the city where you live! <br /> <br />As you can see I keep emphasizing the planning. I will send this off to the council members....ARE YOU LISTENING- <br />MAKE SURE YOU HAVE A PLAN!!! <br /> <br />Randi Iggulden <br /> <br />2461 Riverside Drive <br /> <br />Santa Ana, CA 92706 <br /> <br />7/8/2004 <br /> <br />75F-113 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.