My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2005-02-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
02/07/2005
>
FULL PACKET_2005-02-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:58:41 PM
Creation date
2/11/2005 4:23:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
676
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />proposed proj ect <br />standards of the <br />Uniform Building <br />hazard impacts to <br /> <br />would be subj ect to the seismic safety <br />Uniform Building Code. Compliance with the <br />Code would reduce potential liquefaction <br />a level considered less than significant. <br /> <br />A-4. Landslides <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The project area is flat without any topographical relief. <br />According to City's General Plan Land Use Element ErR, <br />there are no landslide planes or slopes on the proj ect <br />site. Therefore, implementation of the proj ect would not <br />result in adverse impacts in regards to landslides. <br /> <br />B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion <br />or the loss of topsoil? <br /> <br />No Impac t <br /> <br />Erosion refers to the removal of soil from exposed bedrock <br />surfaces by water or wind. The effects of erosion are <br />intensified with an increase in slope, the narrowing of <br />runoff channels and by the removal of groundcover, which <br />leaves the soil exposed. Construction operations for the <br />proposed project would not require excavation and grading <br />activities. Therefore, implementation of the proposed <br />project would not result in erosion and sedimentation <br />impacts to onsite and offsite drainage facilities. <br /> <br />c. Would the project result in the loss of a unique <br />geological feature? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element ErR <br />the proposed proj ect does not contain any unique geologic <br />features. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project <br />would not result in adverse impacts to any unique geologic <br />feature. <br /> <br />D. In the project located on strata or soil that is <br />unstable or that would become unstable as a result of <br />the project and potentially result in on-or off-site <br />landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br />or collapse? <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />3~~36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.