My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2005-02-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
02/07/2005
>
FULL PACKET_2005-02-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:58:41 PM
Creation date
2/11/2005 4:23:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
676
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />indicated that it is feasible that existing drainage <br />facilities within the project area would be able to <br />adequately drain the proposed project. <br /> <br />F. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped <br />on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance <br />Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped <br />on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance <br />Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />H. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which <br />would impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />According to the Flood Rate Insurance Map 0602320257H, the <br />project site is located within Flood Zone X and not subject <br />to 100-year flood risks. Implementation of the proposed <br />project would not increase the risk of flooding. <br /> <br />J. Result in significant alteration of receiving water <br />quality during or following construction. <br /> <br />K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion <br />downstream? <br /> <br />Less Than Significant Impact <br /> <br />The majority of the construction operations for the <br />proposed project would be interior tenant improvements. <br />Construction activities would not involve any earthwork <br />operations that would uncover soils that would facilitate <br />potential soil erosion. Additionally, the potential for <br />construction operations to degrade storm water runoff would <br />be minimal. <br /> <br />IX. LAND USE/PLANNING <br /> <br />A. Physically divide an established community? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed project would not physically divide any <br />established community, in that no existing residential uses <br />are located on the project site. The proposed project would <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />3~1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.