75A - CITY PLACE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Place Focused Environmental Impact Report Findings and Facts in Support of Findings (c) A list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR, provided in the R TC Report; (d) The City's responses to the comments received on the Draft EIR, provided in the RTC Report; (e) The Final MMP and (f) Other information added by the City, including all documents incorporated by reference. 4.0 PROJECT IMPACTS AND DISPOSITION OF RELATED MITGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN THE FINAL EIR The analysis in the Final EIR identifies all the significant adverse environmental impacts of the City Place project. All the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR are included in the project approval and are made conditions of the City Place project. The following Findings are made with respect to each significant adverse environmental impact of the City Place project. In addition, the following Findings provide a description of the potential adverse impacts of the project and the mitigation measures in support of the Findings. Potentially significant adverse impacts of a project can be divided into two categories: · Potentially significant adverse impacts, which can be mitigated to below a level of significance, based on implementation of identified project enhancement measures, project mitigation measures and/or City of Santa Ana standard conditions of approval. · Potentially significant adverse impacts which can be partially mitigated, but not to below a level of significance. As described later in these Findings, the City Place project will result in some significant adverse impacts, which cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance. For each potentially significant adverse impact of the City Place project, one of the following findings must be made, including the provision of facts supporting each finding: · Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. · Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. · Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. U: \DBottlwp51 ICity Place findings. doc September 29, 2004 Page 6 75A-128