My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-004 - Downtown Santa Ana Business Improvement Area for the Year 2005
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
2005-004 - Downtown Santa Ana Business Improvement Area for the Year 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:27:48 PM
Creation date
2/25/2005 4:28:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2005-004
Date
1/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />..-..-........, <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Fax:714-647-ó515 <br />. ..' " n. -...."'''- ,. " ....~:,'.-"'.,"'-...... ",- : . <br /> <br />Jan 18 '05 15:19 P.03 <br />,"" ,," ':'ò' :~,~:;:~~;:,~: ~r-c",/, .~..'-.~~;~"~:~::};:':~5~;.~~~f~~:-;"Þ"" .~ <br /> <br />". .'..'-' .r" ... .-~ -. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />OFFICE OF THE CITY AITORNEY <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Patricia C. WJaitüer, Executivt Director of CommuDity Developmeøt <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Joscph W. Fletcher, City Attorney <br />Juual}" 18, 2005 <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />Re: <br /> <br />Review of PeUdoD8 F1led on December 20t %004 <br /> <br />Cc: <br /> <br />City Manager, ÅSlistant City Maa.8Ier, Clerk of the Council <br /> <br />My staff assisted the Treasury Division of the Finance and Management Services Agoncy in very <br />caret\1Uy evaluating the petitions lodSed with the Clerk of~eCounci1 on DecOInba 20, 2004. <br />lbese all are related to either the Downtown Santa Ana. Business Impro'Vmnent Area (BID) or <br />the Downtown Santa Ana Business Association (DSABA) which u5Cd to 5CrVC as the advisory <br />board for the BID. Our review deteaDincd that tlwy fall into one or more of 3 categorie.s: <br /> <br />(1) those which in some way object to orprotcst the uscumc:nts in general. <br /> <br />(2) those calling for dissolution of the BID, and <br /> <br />(3) thO$c roquestin¡ to withdraw from membeI'$bip in DSABA. <br /> <br />We advised City Staft'that none of the documents qualify as It valid protest to the 2005 Annual <br />BID ~iment because they arc IlDt addressed to the specific annua1 Miessmcmt in quoation as <br />called for Û1 City Council Resolution 2005-093. In IIlOst C&$e$, the petitions addressing the <br />asSe&smcnts arc not dated. Those that are dated were executed in FebruêU)' through April of <br />2004. It was impossible, therefore, for the signer to bë considering the propoied usessment .uQ <br />budget for 2005 wlùch was delivered to the City Council on Dccember 20, 2004. <br /> <br />Resolution 2005-004 <br />Page 69 of 72 '; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.