Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for denial of the appeal of Green's Furniture to receive <br />additional funds for relocation assistance. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Assistant Director <br />following statement: <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />Redevelopmen t <br /> <br />then <br /> <br />read <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />"In August 1982, we received a <br />assistance from Mr. Richard L. <br />Green's Furniture in the amount of <br />of the claim is in your packet. <br />Attorney Riemer's request to each <br />claim and reasons for our denial," <br /> <br />claim for relocation <br />Riemer represen ting <br />$237,170.00. A copy <br />We have responded to <br />of the issues in the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"Several years agc the Redevelopment Agency began <br />planning for the development of the Second Street Mall. <br />This effort resul ted from concepts prov ided by Bissell <br />and August in their 1976 plan for the redevelopment of <br />the Downtown. Beginning in approximately 1976-77, the <br />Agency staff began discussions wi th Mr. Billy Greenberg <br />regarding the rehabilitation of the Grand Central <br />building which would face the southern half of the <br />mall. 'lt1ese discussions led to the actual drafting of <br />an agreement between the Agency and Billy. <br />Subsequently, we found that the property was actually <br />owned by Harry and Evelyn Greenberg, the parents of <br />Billy Greenberg. In 1979, the Agency proceeded to <br />construct the Second Street Mall and formulated a Major <br />Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program with Wells <br />Fargo. In addition, Agency staff proceeded to assist <br />Mr. and Mrs. Greenberg in getting a 312 HUD loan in the <br />amount of $250,000 to add to the Wells Fargo loan of <br />approximately $650,000. The major impediment to the <br />Greenberg's moving ahead with their planned rehabili- <br />tation of the Grand Central building was a long-term <br />lease wi th the ir son, Billy, which called for a low <br />rate of return which would not sustain the debt serv ice <br />on the cost of rehabilitation. In order to make the <br />mcnthly payments on the new loans, Billy would have to <br />pay a higher monthly rent than his lease called for or <br />vacate the portion of the Grand Central building which <br />he occupied so that it could be reoccupied by a tenant <br />who was willing to pay a higher rent. We felt this was <br />a matter between the father and son who we had worked <br />with for several years on this project and left it as <br />str ictly a family matter, In December of 1980, the <br />Greenbergs decided to proceed with the rehabilitation <br />of the building with loan funds provided from Wells <br />Fargo Bank and HUD." <br /> <br />"Because Federal funds were available from HUD for a <br />portion of the project, the residential tenants in the <br />twenty-nine (29) apartments upstairs were eligible for <br />relocation benefits. In addition, staff determined <br />that the commercial tenants downstairs may be eligible <br />for certain relocation benefits. D.>r ing the several <br />years we discussed this rehabilitation project with the <br />Greenbergs, the question of relocation benefits to <br />Billy was explored with him. Agency staff determined <br />that he should receive $4,000.00 for moving expenses on <br />what he was moving out of the Grand Central building <br />into the Green's Furniture building next door, In <br />addition, staff authorized a payment of $2,100.00 for <br />the relocation of a sign on the Broadway side of the <br />building to the First Street side of the building, as <br />well as a payment of $600.00 for the moving and <br />reinstalling of shelving. Mr. Riemer, the attorney for <br />Mr, Greenberg has stated that we did not properly <br />advise Mr. Greenberg of his relocation rights by not <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />A,,") '6 <br /> <br />6A <br />