My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - 2800 N FARMERS DR
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2005
>
11/07/2005
>
75C - 2800 N FARMERS DR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:50:43 PM
Creation date
11/2/2005 11:19:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75C
Date
11/7/2005
Destruction Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Shea Homes Residential Proj ect <br />Environmental Impact Report <br /> <br />Findings and Facts in Support of Findings <br /> <br />6.2 ALTERNATIVES ADVANCED FOR FURTHER EVALUATION IN THE EIR <br /> <br />6.2.1 No ProjectlExisting Conditions Alternative <br /> <br />Under the No Project Alternative, the project site would be developed in accordance with the City's <br />current Single Family Residential (R-l) zoning on the property. Under the current zoning, a total of <br />36 residential units could be developed. Additionally, the R-l zoning would only permit a <br />maximum 8- foot sound wall to be constructed along the rear yards of residential uses adj acent to the <br />Santa Ana Freeway, unless a variance was granted. Therefore, the existing 10- foot to 16- foot <br />CalTrans sound wall would provide the primarily sound attenuation for the proposed residential <br />uses. Under the No Project Alternative, the project would not be able to meet the City's exterior <br />noise standard and the second story of residential units adjacent to the sound wall would not be able <br />to meet the City's interior noise standard. Because the alternative would not reduce the significance <br />of noise impacts, the No Project Alternative would not be considered an environmentally superior <br />alternative. <br /> <br />6.2.2 Compliance with Noise Standards by Construction of Sound Wall Alternative <br /> <br />Under the Compliance with Noise Standards by Construction of Sound Walls Alternative, the <br />proposed project would be able to comply with the City's exterior and interior noise standards <br />through the construction of a sound wall ranging in height from 16.5- feet to 50-feet. However, the <br />City has deteTll1ined that a sound wall exceeding 20-feet would result in significant aesthetic <br />impacts and would not be feasible to construct. While the alternative would allow the project to <br />comply with the City's noise standards, it would result in significant aesthetic impacts. Because the <br />project would still have unavoidable significant impacts, the Compliance with Noise Standards by <br />Construction of Sound Walls Alternative would not be considered environmentally superior. <br /> <br />6.2.3 Compliance with Noise Standards by Building Setback Alternative <br /> <br />Under the Compliance with Noise Standards by Building Setback Alternative, the proposed <br />project would be able to comply with the City's exterior noise standard by locating the proposed <br />residential units at a distance where the project would be within 65 CNEL contour. However, in <br />order to do this, the residential units would need to be located 3,497- feet away from the existing <br />sound wall on the project site. At this distance the 65 CNEL would extend beyond the property <br />and would preclude the development ofresidential uses on the project site. Because the project <br />would not meet the objective to provide residential uses on the project site, the compliance with <br />Noise Standards by Building Setback Alternative would be not considered environmentally <br />supenor. <br /> <br />6.3 COMPARISON OF IMPACTS <br /> <br />Table 1 compares potentially significant impacts of the Shea Homes Residential Project with the No <br />Project Alternative, Sound Wall Alternative and the Building Setback Alternative. <br /> <br />Page 22 <br /> <br />7 SCr89 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.