Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The amendments to correct, clarify and update residential front <br />yard fences, definitions, second dwellings units, laundromats, <br />vending machines, townhouses, specific development standards and <br />Specific Development No. 40 zone district would not result in <br />any significant drainage impacts. <br /> <br />F. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a <br />federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />or other flood hazard delineation map? <br /> <br />G. Place within a 100-year floOdplain structures which would <br />impede or redirect flood flows? <br /> <br />H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, <br />injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as <br />a result of failure of a levee or dam. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to the single family <br />residential standards would not increase the risk of 100-year <br />flood impacts, in that the proposed amendment does not involve <br />the construction of any permanent structures within any <br />designated flood zones. However, single-family dwellings <br />developed under the amended standards could be subject to <br />potential flood impacts. Through the City's development review <br />process, single-family dwellings developed under the amended <br />standards would be evaluated for potential flood impacts. <br /> <br />The amendments to correct, clarify and update residential front <br />yard fences, definitions, second dwellings units, laundromats, <br />vending machines, townhouses, specific development standards and <br />Specific Development No. 40 zone district would not be subject <br />to flood impacts. <br /> <br />J. Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality <br />during or following construction. <br /> <br />K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion <br />downstream? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to the single family <br />residential standards would not result in or increase the <br />potential for soil erosion or sedimentation impacts, in that the <br /> <br />75a~58 <br />