My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2006-05-01
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
05/01/2006
>
FULL PACKET_2006-05-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:46:40 PM
Creation date
4/26/2006 2:15:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact ^ ^ ~ ^ <br /> to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow <br /> rates or volumes? <br /> <br />N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as ^ ~ ^ ^ <br /> listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list: If <br /> so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of <br /> which the water body is already impaired? <br />O. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? ^ ~ ^ ^ <br /> If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive <br /> conditions? <br />P. Have a potentially significant environmental impact ^ ~ ^ ^ <br /> on surface water quality to either marine, fresh, or <br /> wetland waters? <br />Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact on ^ ^ ^ <br /> groundwater quality? <br />R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable ^ ~ ^ ^ <br /> Surface or groundwater receiving water quality <br /> objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? <br />S. Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? ^ ~ ^ ^ <br />IX. Land Use and Planning-Would the project <br />A. Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ~ ^ <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, ^ ^ ~ ^ <br />or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over <br />the project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ^ ^ ^ <br />or natural community conservation plan? <br />X. Mineral Resources -Would the project: <br /> <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally <br />^ <br />^ <br />^ ~~// <br />yCl <br />important mineral resource recovery site delineated /~ <br />on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land <br />use plan? <br />Issues & Su Potentially Potentially Less Than No <br />pporting Information Sources Significant Significant Significant Impact <br />tlb\Env Form CEOA Chklst Page 7 Of 12 <br />AT~M~Z B <br />05 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.