My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - CRAZY HORSE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2006
>
06/19/2006
>
75A - CRAZY HORSE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:45:53 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 2:17:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
6/19/2006
Destruction Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />rnt~~ANTA <br />ANA <br /> <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact 0 ~ 0 0 <br /> to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow <br /> rates or volumes? <br /> N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as 0 ~ 0 0 <br /> listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list: If <br /> so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of <br /> which the water body is already impaired? <br /> O. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? 0 ~ 0 0 <br /> If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive <br /> conditions? <br /> P. Have a potentially significant environmentally 0 ~ 0 0 <br /> impact on surface water quality to either marine, <br /> fresh, or wetland waters? <br /> Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact on 0 r/ 0 0 <br /> ground water quality? <br /> R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable 0 ~ 0 0 <br /> surface or groundwater receiving water quality <br /> objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? ~/ <br /> S. Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? 0 0 0 <br />X Land Use Planning - Would the project: <br /> A. Physically divide an established community? 0 0 ~ 0 <br /> B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or 0 0 ~ 0 <br /> regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br /> project (including, but not limited to the general <br /> plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br /> ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br /> mitigating an environmental effect? <br /> C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation 0 0 0 if <br /> plan or natural community conservation plan? <br /> <br />db\forms\environmental checklist <br /> <br />Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br />7~'r>>3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.