Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout FULL PACKET_2006-06-19ORDINANCE NO. NS-2713 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROPRIATING MONIES TO THE SEVERAL OFFICES, AGENCIES AND DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 2006 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The City Manager has prepared and submitted to this Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 605 of the City Charter, a proposed budget for expenditures for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006, together with his budget letter dated May 15, 2006. B. In accordance with Section 606 of the City Charter, a public hearing has been held upon the said proposed budget of expenditures after notice of such public hearing had been published in the manner prescribed in said Section 606 of the City Charter. C. The proposed budget of expenditures duly submitted and considered as hereinbefore stated, together with any supplemental revisions and amendments thereto, was approved, adopted and fixed by the Council as the annual budget of the City for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2006, in the amounts and for the funds, purposes, functions, department activities and programs as therein set forth. Said adopted budget, including said supplemental revisions and amendments, together with a copy of this appropriation ordinance, shall be placed in the official files of the Clerk of the Council. SECTION 2: There are hereby appropriated to the several offices, agencies, and departments of the City, being the respective objects and purposes specified in that certain document entitled "City of Santa Ana Annual Budget 2006-2007," a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Council, out of the various funds of the City, for fiscal year 2006-2007, the several amounts stated as proposed expenditures from said funds, respectively, in those columns of said Budget that are headed "Approved Budget 06-07." Each aggregate of expenditures so specified in said Budget for said fiscal year for each program shall be deemed to be an appropriation for a single object and purpose within the meaning of Section 609 of the Charter, except that as to any office, department, or agency of the City for which more than one program is designated in Section 2 (General Fund Operating Budget) of the said Budget, the aggregate expenditure authorized for all programs in said Section 2 of each such office, department, or agency shall be deemed to be an appropriation for a single object and purpose within the meaning of Charter section 609. Ordinance NS-2713 Page 1 of 3 11 A-1 SECTION 3: The appropriations hereby made shall constitute the maximum expenditures authorized for the several offices, agencies, and departments opposite which the amounts of such appropriations are shown in such Budget. SECTION 4: No warrant shall be issued or indebtedness incurred for any purpose which exceeds the unexpended balance of the appropriations established by this ordinance, unless such appropriation shall have been amended or supplemented by the City Council in the manner set forth in Section 609 of the Charter. The City Manager is hereby authorized to make revisions between the items included within any such appropriation if, in his opinion, such revisions are necessary and proper. SECTION 5: The Executive Director of Finance and Management Services is hereby authorized to transfer monies in accordance with the Interfund Transfers listed in said Budget in such amounts and at such times during the fiscal year as he may determine necessary to the competent operation and control of City business, except that no such transfer shall be made in contravention of State law or City ordinance or exceed in total the amount stated herein or as amended by the City Council. SECTION 6: One certified copy of this appropriation ordinance together with a certified copy of each amendment thereto shall be transmitted by the Clerk of the Council to the Executive Director of Finance and Management Services. SECTION 7: Upon and from the effective date of this ordinance, expenditures of monies appropriated hereby are authorized beginning July 1, 2006. SECTION 8: The Clerk of the Council shall cause the title of this ordinance to be published as required by law. SECTION 9: All presently applicable documentation pertaining to the number, titles, qualifications, powers, duties, or compensation of officers or employees of the City, which has been previously approved by resolution or order of the City Council and which is currently on file with the Executive Director of Personnel Services is incorporated herein and is hereby approved. The City Manager is authorized to create, alter, or abolish any position of employment, or the number, title, qualifications, powers, duties, or compensation thereof, when such action is appropriate to promote the efficiency of the City administrative organization; provided, however, that no such action shall be effective unless and until approved by resolution or order of the City Council. ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Ordinance NS-2713 Page 2 of 3 11 A-2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney Bv: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS-2713 to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance NS-2713 Page 3 of 3 11 A-3 11 A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT FOR THORNTON PARK RECREATIONAL TRAIL REFURBISHMENT GRANT AWARD CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $102,752 in the Thornton Park Recreational Trail revenue account (account no. 172-01-5363) and appropriate same to the Thornton Park Recreational Trail expenditure account (account no. 172-251-6631) for recreational trail improvements at Carl Thornton Park. DISCUSSION The City of Santa Ana Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency was successful in receiving a $102,752 Recreational Trails Program grant from the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation for the refurbishment of the recreational trail located at Carl Thornton Park. Renovation of the trail is necessary in order for the City restore the trail to its original condition and continue to provide its residents with the facilities for bike riding, jogging, and exercising. The project includes regrading of the trail, asphalt replacement, and installation of edging along the sides of the trail. FISCAL IMPACT The appropriation adjustment will enhance the Thornton Park Recreational Trail revenue account (account no. 172-01-5363) and expenditure account (account no. 172-251-6631) by $102,752. Acquisition and Development funds will provide the 35 percent matching funds required for this project. I.CC~ Gerardo Mouet Executive Dir ctor Parks, Rec. & Comm. Svcs. Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: i Francisco Gutierrez ~~ Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 20A-1 20A-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT ACCEPTING COUNTY OF ORANGE, FAMILY AND CHILDREN TOGETHER FUNDS FOR THE CORBIN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^` As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1 S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $35,248 in County of Orange, Family and Children Together funds in revenue account (account no. 169-01-5361-700) and appropriating funds to the Families and Communities Together program expenditure account (account no. 169-272- various). DISCUSSION The Family and Children Together (FaCT) Program operates out of the Corbin Family Resource Center and provides services promoting safe and stable families to at-risk-youth and families with children ages birth through 18 years. The Center has received FaCT funding from the County of Orange since 1999. The Corbin Family Resource Center received $225,000 in FY 2006-07 funding. The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency will receive $35,248 of the total grant award to provide information and referral services and childcare for clients attending programs at Corbin. Among the partners participating with the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency are: Children's Bureau of Southern California, Olive Crest Treatment Centers, and Human Options. The funding will begin July 1, 2006, and allows for four additional one-year renewals. 20B-1 FaCT Appropriation Adjustment June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT The appropriation adjustment will enhance the County of Orange Families and Children Together program revenue account (account no. 169-01-5361- 700) and Families and Children Together program expenditure account (account no. 169-272-various) by $35,248. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: 'L-C~ Gerardo M et Executive irector Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 20B-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CORRECTIONS STANDARDS AUTHORITY'S TITLE II PROGRAM GRANT CITY M NAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15' Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $200,000 in the State Corrections Standards Authority - Title II Program Year 3 revenue account (account no. 155-01-5369-2) and appropriate same to the Corrections Standards Authority - Title II Program Year 3 expenditure accounts (account nos. 155-358-various). DISCUSSION In January 2004, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency was successful in receiving a Title II grant award from the State Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Corrections Standards Authority for the implementation of the Leadership Development Strategy. The program was successfully developed and implemented at the McFadden Learning and Technology Center. This appropriation adjustment will recognize $200,000 from the Corrections Standards Authority, formerly the Board of Corrections, for the third year of a three-year agreement. The intent of the program is to provide a comprehensive, coordinated approach to the problems of juvenile delinquency through the cooperative efforts of the community and law enforcement. The Leadership Development Strategy was developed as a supplemental service with the purpose of reducing the number of suspensions and expulsions at target area schools. Program activities include leadership development opportunities, peer and police officer mentoring, teen club activities, tutoring, educational excursions, family oriented recreation activities, and parent education workshops. The program will continue to serve a total of 60 students and their families from the Santa Ana Unified School District. 20C-1 State Department Title II Program Grant Award June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT The appropriation adjustment will enhance the Corrections Standards Authority - Title II DPI Program Year 3 revenue account (account no. 155- 01-5369-2) and expenditure accounts (account nos. 155-358-various) by $200,000. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS & ACCOUNT Gerardo Mou t Francisco Gutierrez Executive 'rector Executive Director Parks, Rec & Community Svcs. Agency Finance & Mgmt Services Agency 20C-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT ACCEPTING BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION GRANT FUNDS CITY MANAGER APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve an appropriation adjustment accepting Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant funds for the Public Access Computer Hardware Upgrade Program of $45,000 in revenue account (account no. 153-O1-5376) and appropriate the funds into expenditure account (account no. 153-247- 6641) . DISCUSSION The purpose of the Public Access Computer Hardware Upgrade Program is to assist libraries in disadvantaged communities in meeting their communities' public access needs by providing the funds necessary to replace and/or upgrade public access computers and related equipment. With this grant Santa Ana Public Library will acquire replacement public access computers. FISCAL IMPACT The appropriation adjustment will enhance the Gates Foundation Computer Hardware Upgrade revenue account (account no. 153-01-5376) and the expenditure appropriation for the Gates Foundation Computer Hardware Upgrade account (account no. 153-247-6641). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: I~ a ~ Ro Ri and ~rancisco Gutierrez Executive Director ~ Executive Director Library Finance & Management Services Agency 20D-1 20D-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT RECOGNIZING THE RECEIPT OF MEASURE M METROLINK FUNDS FOR THE SANTA ANA SECOND MAIN TRACK PROJECT (PROJECT NO,.Q6-1724)^ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $190,000 in unanticipated Measure M Metrolink funds in account no. 32-01-5054, and appropriating it to the Santa Ana Second Main Track project account no. 32-551-6631, project no.06-1724. DISCUSSION On January 6, 2003, the City Council approved a settlement agreement with the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, commonly referred to as Metrolink, relating to Metrolink's Santa Ana Second Main Track project. The settlement agreement stipulates that Metrolink will pay the City $190,000 within thirty (30) days following receipt of the notice to proceed with construction. The funds received by the City are to be used to construct project enhancements that are designed to enhance the character, appearance and quality of life of the community in the project area. The project enhancements consist of the following improvements: 1) replacement of existing windows on homes fronting Lincoln Avenue between Fairhaven Avenue and Seventeenth Street with double pane windows, 2) installation of three neighborhood entrance markers at Seventeenth Street, Santa Clara and Fairhaven Avenues, and 3) planting of additional 25-gallon size trees between the railroad right-of-way from Fairhaven Avenue to Santiago Creek to provide a visual screen from passing trains. The project enhancements are to be constructed by the City concurrently with the second main track project. The project schedule calls for the project to be completed by May 2008. 20E-1 Appropriation Adjustment Second Main Track June 19, 2006 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Metrolink has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report for this project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. FISCAL IMPACT Upon approval of the appropriation adjustment, funds available in Measure M Metrolink (account no. 32-01-5054) will be appropriated to the Metrolink Second Main Track project account (account no. 32-551-6631, project no. 06-1724). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: 1 __ , ~ ,~ _ James G. oss ~h_F_rancisco Gutierrez Executive Director ~ -Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 6-19-06 Appropriation Adjustment Second Main Track 20E-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACTS RENEWAL FOR CAR WASH AND DETAILING (SPEC. NO. 04-062) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15~ Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Renew. the contracts for car wash and detailing for a one-year period in the annual aggregate amount not to exceed $25,000 with the following vendors: Harbor Blvd Main Street Z & H Happy DISCUSSION Car Wash Car Wash Hands Corp. The Santa Ana Police Department and Finance and Management Services Agency's Fleet Maintenance Division use car wash and detailing services to perform vehicle washing and detailed interior cleaning on approximately 500 vehicles. Maintaining the vehicle interiors and exteriors contributes to overall vehicle longevity as well as the ability to obtain top dollar during auction. In addition, a clean, maintained vehicle demonstrates a positive and professional image to the community. On June 7, 2004, the City Council awarded contracts for a two-year period, with provision for two one-year renewals. The Santa Ana vendors have performed satisfactorily during the past contract period and have agreed to renew the contracts without an increase in pricing. Staff recommends the first renewal of the contracts. 22A-1 Contracts Renewal (Spec 04-062) June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT for Car Wash and Detailing Funds are available in the Equipment Maintenance Garage Operation Maintenance & Repair Machinery & Equipment account (account no. 75-111- 6281) and the Police Special Investigations Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-342-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ` { ~A Paul M. Walters Chief of Police PMW/KM/04-062R.27:uc '~~ , ~ ~(Fra~fcisco Gutierrez Executive Director ~~ Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 22A-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AMENDMENT WATERWORKS FITTINGS (SPEC. NO. 04-094) CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended FOR ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2~d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Amend the contract with Wells waterworks fittings by $15,000 $43,060. DISCUSSION CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Supply Company for the purchase of for an annual amount not to exceed In order to perform maintenance and repairs on the City's water systems, the Public Works Agency requires an assortment of materials such as couplings, clamps, and valves. The materials are purchased through the Central Stores warehouse for distribution. The contract for the supplies is designed to provide quality products at significant savings based on quantity pricing. On September 7, 2004, the City Council awarded a contract to Wells Supply Company, a Santa Ana vendor, for waterworks fittings. An increase in demand on waterworks fittings and special purchases of non-contract items such as copper tubing and clay pipe by the Central Stores warehouse caused the current contract limit of $28,060 to be exceeded and requires City Council approval. Staff requests approval to increase the contract limit for Wells Supply Company to provide uninterrupted purchases of waterworks fittings. FISCAL IMPACT Funds. are available in the Water Utility Water Systems Maintenance Operating Materials & Supplies account (account no. 64-575-6391). '~~~~,~? z James G. Ross ~$xecutive Director ~` Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~F a cisco Gutier z j~ E ecutive Director 0 Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency JGR/WO/06-068.9:uc 2 2 8 ~~ 22B-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM INSTALLATION (SPEC. NO. 06-063) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Freeway Electric for drainage system installation in the amount not to exceed $27,335. DISCUSSION In order to enhance the visitor experience at the Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park, a subsurface drainage system will be installed adjacent to the main entrance. Due to a surface depression in this area, flooding occurs after every rainfall, which results in the closure of the main entrance walkway and concession area and prevents restroom access. The proposed drainage system will remove excess water from the area and ensure full accessibility to the facilities. The notice inviting bids was advertised on April 26 and 28, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 17 Invitations For Bid mailed 6 Invitations For Bid mailed to Santa Ana vendors 4 Bids received Bids were received, opened on May 15, 2006, and evaluated (Exhibit 1) The bid received from Freeway Electric is responsive to the specification and meets the City's requirements. To allow for unanticipated requirements, an additional ten percent contingency has been included in the award amount. _~-- ~ ~. 22C-1 Contract Award for Drainage System Installation (Spec No. 06-063) June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Recreation & Community Service Facilities Maintenance Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-260-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Gerardo Mouet Executive Dire for Parks, Rec. & omm GM/BP/06-063.8:uc . Svcs. Agency ~/Fr Cisco Gutierre ~°~ Executive Director o~ Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 22C-2 ABSTRACT OF BIDS CONTRACT AWARD FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEM INSTALLATION (SPEC. 06-063) Vendor Freeway Rick Hamm S. Parker Flemming Electric Construction Engineering, Inc. Environmental, Inc. Location Riverside Orange Costa Mesa Buena Park Trenching $ 24,850.00 $ 25,240.00 $ 26,700.00 $ 36,225.00 Exhibit 1 22C-3 22C-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR RE-ROOFING SOUTIiWEST SENIOR CENTER (SPEC. NO. 06-065) CI M AGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Foam Experts Roofing, Inc. for the re-roofing of the Southwest Senior Center in an amount not to exceed $71,500. DISCUSSION The roof of the Southwest Senior Center has been evaluated and is recommended for replacement. The existing roof is approximately 17 years old and no longer cost effective to repair and maintain. The foam roofing system proposed is comprised of a seamless layer of rigid polyurethane foam covered with two coats of protective silicone rubber. The completed system provides a durable and effective insulation with superior protection against all weather conditions. The replacement roof will include a 25- year warranty and, if properly maintained, should withstand 50 years. The notice inviting bids was advertised on May 1 and 3, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 9 Invitations For Bid mailed 1 Invitation For Bid mailed to a Santa Ana vendor 2 Bids received Bids were received and opened on May 18, 2006. The results are as follows: Vendor: Foam Experts Roofing, Inc. Best Contracting Services Location: Cost: Mesa, Arizona $65,000 Gardena $65,850 The bid received from Foam Experts Roofing, Inc. is responsive to the specification and meets the City's requirements. To allow for unanticipated requirements, an additional ten percent contingency has been included in the award amount. 22D-1 Contract Award for Re-Roofing Southwest Senior Center (Spec No. 06-065) June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds. are available in Building Maintenance Other Contractual Services account (account no. 73-105-6291). //~~ Francisco Gutierrez `7'Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency FG/BP/06-065.2:uc 22D-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR BRASS WATER SERVICE FITTINGS (SPEC. NO. 06-068) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Award a contract to Ferguson Waterworks for brass water service fittings for a one-year period, with provision for three one-year renewals in an annual amount not to exceed $171,429. DISCUSSION In order to perform maintenance and repairs on the City's water systems, the Public Works Agency requires an assortment of materials such as bushings, flanges, nuts, and stops. The materials are purchased through the Central Stores warehouse for distribution. The contract for brass water service fittings is designed to provide quality products at a significant savings based on quantity pricing. The notice inviting bids was advertised on May 3 and 5, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 13 Invitations For Bid mailed 5 Invitations For Bid mailed to Santa Ana vendors 2 Bids received 1 Bid received from a Santa Ana vendor CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Bids were received, opened on May 24, 2006, and evaluated. The bid received from Ferguson Waterworks, a Santa Ana vendor, is responsive to the specifications and meets the City's requirements. Bid results are as follows: Vendor: Location: Amount: Ferguson Waterworks Santa Ana $171,429 Hughes Supply Rancho Santa Margarita $204,193 22E-1 Contract Award for Brass Water Service Fittings (Spec. No. 06-068) June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Public Works Water Systems Maintenance & Water Quality & Measurement Operating Materials & Supplies accounts (account nos. 64-575-6391 and 64-578-6391). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: r /"_„ Jam s G. Ross Fr ncisco G ierr D~ Ex cutive Director E ecutive Director P blic Works Agency Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency JGR/WO/06-068.9:uc 22E-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR TRAILER MOUNTED MOBILE DIESEL ENGINE GENERATOR (SPEC. NO. 06-073) APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CI Y MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Award a contract to Associated Power, Inc., for the purchase of trailer mounted mobile diesel engine generator in the amount of $61,061.93. DISCUSSION On August 16, 2004, the City Council accepted a $15 million Urban Area Security Initiative grant from the federal Department of Homeland Security, through the State of California, Office of Homeland Security. This initiative was designed to enhance the domestic preparedness of urban areas by ensuring that all emergency first responders have adequate equipment and systems to prevent, respond to and recover from acts of terrorism. The grant provides total reimbursement to local agencies for equipment purchases approved and authorized by the Office of Disaster Preparedness. The City of Santa Ana's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) will be activated in the event of an emergency. The EOC requires a trailer mounted mobile diesel generator to replace the existing generator which staff has determined is obsolete and no longer adequate for the current needs of the EOC. The recommended action will allow for the purchase of a mobile generator that will meet current needs and enhance the EOC by providing the City with the back up power when responding to an emergency, Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) events, or acts of terrorism. The notice inviting bids was advertised on May 10 and 12, 2006, and bids were solicited. A summary of the bid invitations and bids received is as follows: 27 Invitations For Bid mailed 5 Invitations For Bid mailed to Santa Ana vendors 5 Invitations For Bid received 1 Invitation For Bid received from Santa Ana vendor 22F-1 Contract Award for Trailer Mounted Mobile Diesel Engine Generator (Spec No. 06-073) June 19, 2006 Page 2 Bids were received and opened on received from Associated Power, Inc and meets the City's requirements. May 24, 2006 (Exhibit 1) The bid . is responsive to the specifications FISCAL IMPACT Funds ,for are available in the Office of Emergency Services (OES) Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Machinery & Equipment account (account no. 125-331-6641). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: } ~y,~ -~ Paul M. Walters r Cisco Gut erre Lf~i Chief of Police Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency PMW/TO/06-073.7:uc 22F-2 ABSTRACT -- BID SPEC. 06-073 TRAILER MOUNTED MOBILE DIESEL ENGINE GENERATOR BIDDER: LOC: GENERATOR TRAILER SUBTOTAL: 7.75% TAX: TOTAL: ASSOCIATED POWER, INC. CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC LLC FONTANA, CA IRVINE, CA $47,490.00 $48,317.00 $ 9,180.00 $ 8,845.00 $56,670.00 $57,162.00 $ 4,391.93 $ 4,430.00 $61,061.93 $61,592.00 BIDDER: PENGUIN ENGINEERING QUARTZ CASTLE INC DUTHIE POWER CO. DBA GENERATOR JOE SERVICES LOC: SANTA ANA, CA SANTA ROSA, CA LONG BEACH, CA GENERATOR $53,458.00 $59,397.00 $49,395.00 TRAILER $ 9,784.00 $12,985.00 $ 9,242.00 SUBTOTAL: $63,242.00 $72,382.00 $58,637.00 7.75°s TAX: $ 4,901.26 $ 5,609.60 $ 4,544.37 TOTAL: $68,143.26 SUMMARY OF BID AWARD: ASSOCIATED POWER, INC. $77,991.60 $61,061.93 EXHIBIT 1 22F-3 $63,181.37 22F-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR LIBRARY MEDIA EQUIPMENT (SPEC. NO. 06-084) CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1s1 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Amend the contract with Card Meter Systems Inc. to increase the aggregate limit by $10,000 for the Library media equipment program for an annual amount not to exceed $20,000. DISCUSSION The Santa Ana Public Library provides adult and youth programs to 134,000 patrons annually. In addition to lending over 400,000 books, magazines and CD/DVDs each year, the library also offers adult and youth computer labs, microfilmed archived newspapers, extensive online databases and reference resources, information services and support for adults and youth, and story time for children. The Library established a patron pay-per-use media equipment rental program in 2000, which included copiers in the Central Library, Newhope Learning Center and the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency operated McFadden Learning Center. All copiers, microfilm reader/printers and computer printers are operated via coin or debit card. The Library funds the program utilizing the revenue from public use. When revenue falls short of the required monthly minimum rental fee, the Library pays the balance. Card .Meter Systems Inc. is terminating their equipment rental program. Staff requests approval to increase the aggregate limit for Card Meter Systems Inc. to provide uninterrupted equipment use and service while a new contract is solicited. 22G-1 Contract Amendment for Library Media Equipment (Spec No. 06-084) June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Library Administrative & Support Services Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-214-6291) and Recreation & Community Services Youth Guidance Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-275-6291). i` Ro is and Library Director APPROVED AS TO FUND AND ACCOUNTS: ~(Fr~ncisco Guti~rrez~( ~. Executive Director )) Finance & Mgmt Services Agency u~ Gerardo Mouet Executive Director Parks, Rec. & Comm. Svcs. Agency RR/GM/KM/06-084A.48:uc 22G-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR BROADWAY REHABILITATION AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM FIRST STREET TO CIVIC CENTER DRIVE (PROJECT NOS. 05-1705 AND 06- 3199) :~ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Award a contract to All American Asphalt, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in the estimated amount of $1,499,494 for construction of Broadway rehabilitation and water main improvements from First Street to Civic Center Drive. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $1,874,300. DISCUSSION Broadway between First Street and Civic Center Drive has been identified as a high priority on the City's Pavement Management System (Exhibit 1). The pavement is deteriorating due to weather, age and heavy usage. Some of the adjacent curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveway approaches are also in various state of disrepair. The existing water mains were built in the 1950's. This project provides for the construction of new street pavement and the replacement of damaged concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveway approaches. Additionally, since the street is being repaved and the water mains are near the end of their useful lifespan, they should also be replaced. Once completed, these improvements will enhance the ride quality, surface drainage and visual appearance of the street. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on April 14 and 17, 2006, and bids were opened on May 9, 2006. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. 23A-1 Broadway Rehabilitation and Water Main Improvements from First Street to Civic Center Drive June 19, 2006 Page 2 Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: Contractors requesting bidding documents: Bids received: Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 10 16 5 1 NAME OF BIDDER CITY BID AMOUNT 1. All American Asphalt Corona 1,499,494.00 2. R.J. Noble Company Orange 1,697,969.48 3. Sequel Contractors, Inc. Santa Fe Springs 1,842,683.60 4. Palp, Inc. DBA Excel Paving Company Long Beach 1,893,662.25 5. Hardy & Harper, Inc. Santa Ana 2,711,552.86 A total of five bids were received and all were responsive. The lowest bid was submitted by All American Asphalt for $1,499,494, which is above the Engineer's estimate of $1,106,020. The high bid is attributed to the recent escalation in material costs. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption ER no. 2005-79 was filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The funding analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $1,874,300 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available in the Measure M Street Construction Fund (account no. 32-551-6631), the Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-551-6631), and the Water Capital Improvement Fund (account no. 66-579-6631). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ',,f James G. Ross Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 23A-2 c, ~~ c c~~ r~, 9 D,~ SANTA AN BLVD. STH ST. 4TH ST. 3R0 S . 2N0 ST. f IRST ST. ~o,~cT a~n~ CYW~' 1 SANTA ANA P W A `~ ` BROADWAY REHABILITATION Ac~NDA D~4~ .x~ ~, 2ooa Ate WATER MAIN IAM'ROVEMENTS ~~~ (SECTS os nos/os-~s~ i 23A-3 FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 05-1705 BROADWAY REHABILITATION AND WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM FIRST STREET TO CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Construction Contract $1,499,494 Contract Administration 49,857 Inspection and Testing 105,000 Survey Staking 70,000 Contingencies 149,949 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 51,874,300 Exhibit 2 23A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR SANTA ANA ZOO AT PRENTICE PARK CENTRAL RESTROOM RENOVATION (PROJECT NO. 04-6403A) ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15f Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED FILE NUMBER 1. Award a contract to Unique Performance Construction, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with a lump sum price in the amount of $249,500 for the Santa Ana Zoo central restroom renovation. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $311,800. DISCUSSION The restroom facilities at the Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park have become worn (Exhibit 1). In addition, with increased attendance at the Zoo, the existing restroom building is not sufficient to handle the quantity of visitors. To address the capacity issue, staff is recommending the renovation of the existing restroom building and refurbishment of an abandoned restroom building. This renovation will increase capacity, provide modern fixtures and improve the visual appearance of the zoo. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on April 10 and 12, 2006, and bids were opened on May 4, 2006. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 10 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 9 Bids received: 4 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0 23B-1 Santa Ana Zoo At Prentice Park Central Restroom Renovation June 19, 2006 Page 2 NAME OF BIDDER CITY BID AMOUNT 1. Unique Performance Construction, Inc. Costa Mesa $249,500 2. MJ Contractors, Inc. Lake Forest $285,000 3. Plyco Corporation Mira Loma $335,750 A total of four bids were received and three were responsive. Coppertop Construction failed to sign their bid bond as required by the bidding documents and therefore, Coppertop Construction's bid is non-responsive. The lowest bid was submitted by Unique Performance Construction, Inc. for $249,500, which is above the Engineer's estimate of $188,000. The high bid is attributed to the recent escalation in material costs. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended action is exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption ER no. 2002-304 was filed for this project. FISCAL IMPACT The funding analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $311,800 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available in the Roberti Z'Berg Harris Grant Fund (account no. 161-270-6631) and the Park Acquisition and Development Fund (account no. 301-232-6631). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~r ..t' Z ~ i-L,~ .~ ~ James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency Gerardo Mouet~ Executive Dir for Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\04-6403A 2006-06-19 60 WD 23B-2 ~----- ~-- - - -\ ~ \\ ~ C \ i _ RESTROOMS 1 BE RENOVATE ~\ ~' a J ,~ ~~i ii I~ -- ~ -. , l~ ~' ~ ~~ ~~ ,! \~ 1\ ~~ ~ / \~ ~~ ~I ~ .: ~ ~ ---~f ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I+~ .~ ~ qy ~ ANA Zoo ``~,, . \\ ~ ~ H~fl~~I~ ~~i~i~i~i~iuo --t----- ~ ~~~~~_-nm-~~~~~~m~~~~~ CHESTNUT AVE PROJECT LIMffS EXHIBIT 1 SANTA ANA cxnr oo~c~ T~ PROJECT NO.04-6403A P W A AC#ENDA DATES SANTA ANA ZOO CENTRAL RESTROOM `~ ~ zoos RENOVATION ~~~ 23B-3 FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 04-6403A SANTA ANA ZOO CENTRAL RESTROOM RENOVATION Construction Contract $249,500 Contract Administration 16,800 Inspection and Testing Contingencies 20,550 24, 950 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5311,800 Exhibit 2 23B-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD FOR SANTA ANA SCHOOL CROSSING SIGNAGE (PROJECT NO. 06-5011) ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15i Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For / CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER CITY M NAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Award a contract to Sudhakar Company International, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in the estimated amount of $108,000 to upgrade school crossing signage. 2. Approve a Funding Analysis with a total estimated construction cost of $135,000. DISCUSSION To comply with the new federal and state sign standards, this project will provide for the replacement of existing school signs with signs with high visibility fluorescent yellow-green color (Exhibit 1). Once completed, the new signs will increase safety for pedestrians. The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on May 3 and 5, 2006, and bids were opened on May 24, 2006. A summary of the bid invitations mailed, the bids received, and the bid results follows. Santa Ana Contractors receiving notices: 10 Contractors requesting bidding documents: 16 Bids received: 3 Bids received from Santa Ana Contractors: 0 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED 23C-1 Santa Ana School Crossing Signage June 19, 2006 Page 2 NAME OF BIDDER 1. Sudhakar Company International 2. Sadie Construction, Inc. 3. Sterndahl Enterprises, Inc. CITY BID AMOUNT Rialto $108, 000 Placentia 137,100 Sun Valley 155, 060 A total of three bids were received and all were responsive. The lowest bid was submitted by Sudhakar Company International for $108,000, which is below the Engineer's estimate of $170,650. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT An Environmental Review No. 2006-13 has been completed and a Categorical Exception will be filed for this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. FISCAL IMPACT The funding analysis shows a total estimated construction cost of $135,000 for the project (Exhibit 2). Funds are available in the Traffic Management System Fund (account no. 148-651-6631}. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: James G. Ros Francisco Gutierrez ~,~~'' Executive Director Executive Director Public Works Agency Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency K:\Construction\RFCA-draft\06-5011 2006-06-19 35 WD 23C-2 ~~~3 FUNDING ANALYSIS PROJECT 06-5011 SANTA ANA SCHOOL CROSSING SIGNAGE Construction Contract $ 108,000 Contract Administration 7,800 Inspection and Testing 8,400 Contingencies 10,800 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $135,000 Exhibit 2 23C-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH THE ABBEY GROUP TO PROVIDE AUTOMATED BOOKING SYSTEM 4 CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with The Abbey Group for the purchase of an Automated Booking System in an amount not to exceed $355,000. DISCUSSION The United States Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) awarded a MORE Technology grant to the Police Department. COPS MORE is a grant program that supports the use of technology to improve the effectiveness of the department's police officers. This grant provides funds to assist the department with the purchase of a multi-faceted Automated Booking System (ABS). The system will consist of an integrated jail management system with jail reporting, fingerprinting, and booking modules that can be operated by non-sworn police personnel. This would enable the sworn personnel to spend more time patrolling the streets. The use of this grant funding is limited to technology purchases. On April 11, 2005, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an Automated Booking System. A total of seven proposals were received. Each of the proposals was reviewed by staff members of the Technology and Support and Jail Bureaus, and was evaluated on the following criteria: interoperability, userability, warranty, service, price and compliance with minimum specifications. Following staff evaluation, the Abbey Group was selected based on interoperability, value of modules, and past proven installations. Refer to Exhibit A for RFP evaluation results. 25A-1 Agreement for Police Department Automated Booking System June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the DOJ, COPS MORE 2003 Grant Other Contractual Services account (account no. 127-355-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~ /- ~ ~_. Paul M. Walters Francisco Gutierrez ~'/.,~ Chief of Police Executive Director Police Department Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25A-2 Agreement for Police Department Automated Booking System June 19, 2006 Page 3 Exhibit A Automated Booking RFP Response Evaluation Scores Company Name: The Abbey Group DSI Compudyne Intellitech New World DSSI IPI Mobile Booking Sub-Component Evaluation Score Company Name: Visiphor Evaluation Scores: 292.82 277.50 251.78 247.88 221.84 199.70 156.24 Evaluation Scores: 286.90 25A-3 2 5A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENTS FOR LEISURE CLASS INSTRUCTORS CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with National Heritage Foundation FBO Academy of International Dance for dance instruction, increasing the agreement amount $7,000 and extending the term one year, for a total agreement amount not to exceed $22,000. 2. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with Martin Torres for Karate Do Kai instruction, increasing the agreement amount $7,000 and extending the term one-year, for a total agreement amount not to exceed $22,000. 3. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with Choc Le for Tae Kwon Do instruction, increasing the agreement amount $6,000 and extending the term one-year, for a total agreement amount not to exceed $30,000. DISCUSSION The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency Leisure Services Program offers low-cost courses and activities to Santa Ana residents in the areas of Music and Dance, Arts, Nature and Science, Equestrian and Aquatics, Sports, and other special interests. The new semi-annual Leisure Services Program brochure has been instrumental in increasing the number of students registering for many classes. Since last summer, the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency has expanded the Leisure Services Program to include 87 new recreational and educational classes. 25B-1 Agreements for Leisure Class Instructors June 19, 2006 Page 2 The Leisure Services Program is a revenue-generating program that uses registration fees to pay for instructors and supplies. The recommended actions will allow the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency to meet additional demand for leisure class instruction at six recreation centers and two senior centers. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Recreation, Other Contractual Services account (account no. 11-275-6291). Gerardo Mou Executive Director Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: i Francisco Gutierrez .~,, f Executive Director I' Finance & Management Services Agency 25B-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH AWS NATIONAL ACCOUNTS FOR WIRELESS SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15f Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager to sign an amendment to the agreement with AWS in an amount not to exceed $120,000. DISCUSSION The Police Department currently employs wireless data communications from AT&T Wireless to link officers in the field with computerized systems. These systems allow officers to obtain critical information faster and in visual format which greatly assists them in the performance of their duties. The wireless links also enable field-based officers to submit reports and other administrative documentation without leaving the field. This aids the productivity patrol/policing activities. The Fire Department is in the process of implementing a wireless data based system to communicate with its vehicles in the field. Other City Agencies including Planning and Building, the Library and Community Development, employ wireless data communications to improve the delivery of services to the community. To provide wireless data communications, the City utilizes services from AT&T Wireless (AWS National Accounts) under an agreement through the Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) As a member, the State of California extends eligibility to join to cities in the state. This contract with AT&T Wireless provides extremely competitive pricing with protections on future price increases. The current contract is under renegotiation and the term has been extended six months, to the end of December 2006, to allow for this process. The term and compensation of the City's participating agreement needs to be extended to coincide with the master WSCA agreement. 25C-1 Wireless Data Services and Equipment June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted and are available in the Communication Services Internal Service Fund account for contractual services (account no. 102- 171-6291) . (~,_.. Francisco Gutierrez ~ Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 25C-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AMEND AN AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTED ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SERVICES WITH URBAN STUDIO CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1 S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with Urban Studio for contract urban design services in an amount not to exceed $76,000. DISCUSSION John Kaliski of Urban Studio is currently under contract to provide architectural and urban design input for development projects. The Planning Division is currently reviewing an overlay zone for Metro East as well as development projects that will have long range architectural and urban design impacts on the city. To enhance the streetscape and public spaces, a public realm improvement plan will be developed. This firm has expertise in developing such plans as well as a unique understanding of the City of Santa Ana. An agreement was approved in March 2003 for $10,000 and amended in November 2004 for an additional $50,000 for the contracted services of Urban Studio. The contract was later extended to a time period through December 2006. Approval of this amendment would increase the contract amount by $16,000. Staff is recommending a sole source agreement with Urban Studio due to the firm's technical expertise, ability to meet tight deadlines and unique familiarity with the City. Environmental Impact The amendment of a contract for architectural and urban design services and consultation is statutorily exempt from CEQA. 25D-1 Agreement Amendment with Urban Studio June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds in the amount of $16,000 are available in the Planning and Building Agency account for other contractual services (account no. 11-505-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ay Trevino Francisco Gutierrez ~ tive Director Executive Director Planning and Building Agency Finance & Management Services Agency SK:rb sk\reports\Urban Studio Contract Amendment 25D-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH GEOMATRIX CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM INSPECTION SERVICES r ~' ~-~ CITY MANAGER ,: ,RECOMMENDED ACTION APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S' Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute a second amendment to the agreement with Geomatrix Consultants Inc. in the amount of $100,000 for a total contract amount of $600,000 and extending the agreement for one year to provide National Pollution Discharge Elimination System services. DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency is responsible for the implementation of the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit. In accordance with the City's permit requirements, all high priority industrial sites need to be inspected annually, medium priority industrial sites inspected semi-annually, and low priority commercial sites inspected once every three years. Additionally, the City is required to respond to any illegal discharges that emanate from private property onto public property. On July 18, 2005 City Council approved Geomatrix Consultants Inc. in the amount amount of $500,000 for inspection facilities. A one-year extension is $100,000 in the contract amount is needE upcoming fiscal year. an amendment to a contract with of $100,000 for a total contract of commercial and industrial recommended and an additional 'd to complete these tasks in the ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. 25E-1 Second Amendment to Agreement with Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Federal Clean Water Enterprise (account no. 57-635-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: a es oss E cutive Director Public Works Agency Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 25E-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT WITH THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU) AND RESOLUTION FOR UNREPRESENTED PART TIME EMPLOYEES APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S' Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute agreements with the Service Employees International Union Local 347 regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for part time employees. 2. Adopt a Resolution regarding salary for Unrepresented part time classifications of employment. DISCUSSION The City and Service Employees International Union (SEIU) recently completed contract negotiations, resulting in new, four-year agreements, with both Part Time (less than 20 hours) and Part Time Civil Service employees (30 hours), since the previous Memorandums of Understanding expired on June 30, 2004. Key elements of each agreement include: PART-TIME EMPLOYEES (19 HOURS OR LESS PER WEEK): 1. Term: A four-year term, from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008. 2. Salary Increase: July 1, 2004 = Oo July 1, 2005 = Oo July 1, 2006 = 4.50 July 1, 2007 = Minimum 3.5o up to 4.50 (me, too) 3. Equity Adjustment: Effective July 1, 2006 = Account Clerk II: 30 Clerical Aide: 30 Clerk Typist II: 3a Equipment Service Attendant: 3% 25F-1 Agreement with SEIU Local 347 and Resolution June 19, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Library Assistant: Library Clerk I: Maintenance Aide II: Page (Library): Park Maintenance Assistant: Program Coordinator: Program Leader I: Program Leader II: Senior Clerical Aide: Senior Program Leader: PART TIME CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES (30 HOURS PER WEEK): 3% 0 3% a 3% 0 3% 0 3% 0 3% a 1.5% 3% a 3% 0 2.5% 1. Term: A four-year term, from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2008. 2. Salary Increases: July 1, 2004 = 0% July 1, 2005 = Oo July 1, 2006 = 4.5% July 1, 2007 = Minimum 3.5% up to 4.5a (me, too) 3. Sick Leave and Vacation Accruals: Effective July 1, 2005 = Increase annual accruals from 30 hours to 72 hours per year, respectively. 4. Holiday Leave: Effective July 1, 2006 = Allow employees to take 48 hours of paid holiday leave, per year. 5. Health Insurance: Effective January 1, 2007 = Provide $100 per month toward medical or dental premiums for any employee who participates in the City's medical or dental insurance programs. In addition, the subject actions will provide salary increases to unrepresented part time employees consistent with those provided for represented part time employees. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the affected departmental accounts: Salary account (Object Code 6131). Estimated total cost for Fiscal Year 2006-07 of the agreement for part time SEIU represented employees is $216,393. Estimated total cost for Fiscal 2006-07 for unrepresented part time employees is $42,696. APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: rique J lv ~ - Francisco Gutierrez Executiv ire t r ~ _ xecutive Director Personne Services Department finance & Management Services Agency RESOLUTION NO. 2006- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO AMEND RESOLUTION NOS. 82-110 AND 85-27 TO REFLECT CHANGES REGARDING REPRESENTED PART-TIME TITLES AND PROVIDE PAY INCREASES FOR ALL PART-TIME TITLES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2006-2007 AND 2007-2008 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Section 1004, Article X of the City Charter of the City of Santa Ana requires the City Manager to prepare, install and maintain a position classification and pay plan subject to civil service rules and regulations and the approval of the City Council. B. On August 2, 1982, the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 82-110 revising and re-establishing the Basic Classification and Compensation Plan for all officers and employees of the City of Santa Ana. C. On February 4, 1985, the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 85-27 establishing the exempt classification of Management Intern in the office of the City Manager. D. On July 20, 1992, the City Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 92-071, amending Resolution No. 82-110 to set forth wage rates for Unaffiliated and Represented Part-Time titles, respectively. E. The City Council has approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Santa Ana City Employees, Chapter 1939/Service Employees International Union Local 347 AFL-CIO Part Time Employee Representation Unit for fiscal years 2004-2008 providing equity adjustments for fourteen Represented Part-Time classification titles, plus an across-the-board four and one-half percent (4.5%) base hourly wage increase effective July 1, 2006, plus an additional across-the-board increase effective July 1, 2007, to be determined per Article IV, Section 4.1 of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Part-Time MOU. F. It is now proposed to provide Unaffiliated Non-Civil Service Part-Time classification titles with the same across-the-board increases on the same effective date(s) and in the same manner as those provided for Represented Non-Civil Service Part-Time classification titles, and to set 25F-3 forth a comprehensive listing of hourly wage rates for both Unaffiliated and Represented Part-Time titles in the City's Basic Classification and Compensation Plan. G. It is now desired to amend the City's Basic Classification and Compensation Plan in order to effect these changes. Section 2: That Section 3.5.1 Classification Titles and Wage Rates for Unaffiliated Categories of Non-Civil Service Part-Time Employment of Resolution No. 82-110, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: "Section 3.5.1 Classification Titles and Wage Rates for Unaffiliated Categories of Non-Civil Service Part-Time Employment. Part-time employees in Unaffiliated classification titles listed in Attachment A, hereto, shall receive wages based on the hourly pay rates shown in this attachment effective July 1, 2006, and July 1, 2007, respectively. Attachment A is hereby incorporated into and made part of this section." Section 3: That Section 3.5.2 Classification Titles and Wage Rates for Long-Term Represented Categories of Non-Civil Service Part-Time Employment of Resolution No. 82-110, as amended, is hereby further amended to provide equity adjustments effective July 1, 2006, as negotiated for the following fourteen Represented Part-Time classification titles: Classification Title Percent Equity Adjustment Account Clerk II 3.0% Clerical Aide 3.0% Clerk Typist II 3.0% Equipment Service Attendant 3.0% Library Assistant 3.0% Library Clerk I 3.0% Maintenance Aide II 3.0% Page 3.0% Park Maintenance Assistant 3.0% Program Coordinator 3.0% Program Leader I 1.5% Program Leader II 3.0% Senior Clerical Aide 3.0% Senior Program Leader 2.5% Note: The above equity adjustments are included in the hourly wage rates effective July 1, 2006, as shown in Attachment B and described in Section 4 below. Section 4: That Section 3.5.2 Classification Titles and Wage Rates for Lonq_ Term Represented Categories of Non-Civil Service Part-Time Employment of Resolution No. 82-110, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: 25F-4 "Section 3.5.2 Classification Titles and Wage Rates for Long-Term Represented Categories of Non-Civil Service Part-Time Employment. Part-time employees in classification titles listed in Attachment B, hereto, shall receive wages based on the hourly pay rates shown in this attachment effective July 1, 2006, and July 1, 2007, respectively. Attachment B is hereby incorporated into and made part of this section." Section 5: That Section 2 of Resolution No. 85-27, as amended, is hereby further amended by increasing the assigned hourly rates for the exempt classification of Management Intern from ($16.05 - $16.84) to ($16.77 - $17.60) effective July 1, 2006. Effective July 1, 2007, said rates shall be increased by the same percentage as provided to Unaffiliated Part-Time Non-Civil Service classifications. Section 6: That except as amended by this Resolution, all other provisions of Resolution Nos. 82-110 and 85-27 shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7: That except as stated otherwise above, this Resolution shall be operative from and after July 1, 2006. ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Joseph Straka Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers 25F-5 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 25F-6 RESOLUTION NO. 2006- ATTACHMENT "A" Page 1 of 1 CLASSIFICATION TITLES AND WAGE RATES FOR UNAFFILIATED CATEGORIES OF NON-CIVIL SERVICE PART TIME EMPLOYMENT Effective July 1, 2006 JOB TITLE ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN ANIMAL SERVICES COORDINATOR BACKGROUND INVESTIGATOR BUDGET INTERN ENGINEERING INTERN FIRE COMMUNICATIONS OPERATOR FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANT FORENSIC BALLISTICS TECHNICIAN JAIL TRANSPORTATION OFFICER LAW CLERK POLICE CADET POLICE SPECIAL EVENTS OFFICER PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS INVESTIGATOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COORDINATOR SR. ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN STUDENT INTERN STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E $10.98 $11.54 $12.12 $12.72 $13.36 46.29 48.67 51.05 53.59 56.25 25.54 26.81 28.16 29.57 31.06 14.53 15.25 16.02 16.80 17.65 14.53 15.25 16.02 16.80 17.65 25.41 26.69 28.03 29.44 30.90 22.48 23.61 24.79 26.03 27.33 22.05 23.16 24.32 25.54 26.81 23.16 24.32 25.54 26.81 28.16 13.55 14.22 14.93 15.69 16.47 9.15 9.60 10.11 10.61 11.16 16.62 17.45 18.32 19.25 20.22 25.54 26.81 28.16 29.57 31.06 37.75 39.64 41.62 43.69 45.88 13.22 13.88 14.59 15.30 16.06 7.30 7.67 8.06 8.46 8.88 CLASSIFICATION TITLES AND WAGE RATES FOR UNAFFILIATED CATEGORIES OF NON-CIVIL SERVICE PART TIME EMPLOYMENT Effective July 1, 2007 Effective July 1, 2007, hourly wage rates for Unaffiliated Non-Civil Service Part-Time classification titles shall be increased in the same manner and by the same percentage amount as provided for Represented Non-Civil Service Part-Time classification titles, as determined per Article IV, Section 4.1 of the SEIU Part-Time MOU. 25F-7 RESOLUTION NO. 2006- ATTACHMENT "B" Page 1 of 3 CLASSIFICATION TITLES AND WAGE RATES FOR LONG-TERM REPRESENTED CATEGORIES OF NON-CIVIL SERVICE PART TIME EMPLOYMENT Effective JULY 1, 2006 JOB TITLE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E ACCOUNT CLERK I $16.49 $17.29 $18.16 $19.06 $20.02 ACCOUNT CLERK II 18.24 19.15 20.12 21.11 22.16* ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE 20.91 21.95 23.05 24.21 25.42 ANIMAL KEEPER I 10.27 10.79 11.32 11.89 12.48 ANIMAL KEEPER II 11.91 12.50 13.13 13.78 14.47 ANIMAL SERVICES ASSISTANT 12.25 12.84 13.49 14.17 14.88 ASSOCIATE VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR 18.14 19.03 19.99 20.99 22.05 BUILDING MAINTENANCE ASSISTANT 17.96 18.86 19.80 20.81 21.84 CASHIER 10.08 10.58 11.12 11.68 12.27 CLERICAL AIDE 11.80 12.37 13.02 13.68 14.34* CLERICAL ASSISTANT 7.60 7.97 8.37 8.78 9.22 CLERK TYPIST I 12.97 13.61 14.30 15.01 15.75 CLERK TYPIST II 15.23 15.99 16.79 17.63 18.50* COMBINATION INSPECTOR 25.54 26.81 28.16 29.57 31.06 COMMUNITY CENTER AIDE 15.57 16.35 17.16 18.03 18.94 COMPUTER TECHNICIAN 16.62 17.45 18.32 19.25 20.22 CROSSING GUARD 8.58 9.02 9.46 9.93 10.43 CUSTOMER SERVICE CLERK 17.12 17.96 18.87 19.81 20.81 DATA ENTRY CLERK 14.20 14.92 15.68 16.46 17.28 EQUIPMENT SERVICE ATTENDANT 15.98 16.77 17.63 18.49 19.43* EVIDENCE & PROPERTY CLERK 17.67 18.56 19.51 20.46 21.50 GENERAL ASSISTANT 7.30 7.67 8.06 8.46 8.88 GRAPHICS AIDE 11.65 12.25 12.84 13.49 14.17 HOUSING AUTHORITY ASSISTANT 18.39 19.31 20.29 21.31 22.37 JANITOR 13.09 13.75 14.43 15.16 15.93 LEARNING CENTER CLERK I 12.97 13.61 14.30 15.01 15.75 LIBRARIAN (PART-TIME) 19.04 20.00 21.00 22.07 23.17 LIBRARY ASSISTANT 16.04 16.84 17.67 18.57 19.50* LIBRARY CLERK I 13.36 14.01 14.72 15.46 16.22* LIBRARY CLERK II 14.79 15.53 16.30 17.12 17.96 LOSS CONTROL OFFICE ASSISTANT 16.54 17.37 18.22 19.14 20.10 25F-8 RESOLUTION NO. 2006- ATTACHMENT "B" Page 2 of 3 CLASSIFICATION TITLES AND WAGE RATES FOR LONG-TERM REPRESENTED CATEGORIES OF NON-CIVIL SERVICE PART TIME EMPLOYMENT Effective JULY 1, 2006 JOB TITLE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E MAINTENANCE AIDE I $7.60 $7.97 $8.37 $8.78 $9.22 MAINTENANCE AIDE II 8.97 9.41 9.87 10.39 10.89* MOBILE LIBRARY CLERK 16.28 17.12 17.95 18.86 19.80 MUNICIPAL UTILITY READER/COLLECTOR 16.38 17.20 18.05 18.96 19.91 PAGE 7.52 7.90 8.30 8.72 9.15* PAINTER 15.52 16.28 17.11 17.95 18.86 PARK MAINTENANCE ASSISTANT 13.88 14.57 15.31 16.10 16.89* PARK SECURITY GUARD 16.62 17.45 18.32 19.25 20.22 PERMIT PARKING AIDE 17.67 18.56 19.51 20.46 21.50 PLANNING TECHNICIAN 21.00 22.05 23.16 24.32 25.54 POLICE RECORDS CLERK I 14.27 14.99 15.73 16.53 17.35 POLICE RECORDS CLERK II 15.52 16.28 17.12 17.95 18.86 POLICE SUPPLY CLERK 15.57 16.35 17.16 18.03 18.94 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 13.49 14.16 14.86 15.62 16.40* PROGRAM LEADER I 7.41 7.79 8.18 8.59 9.02*'~ PROGRAM LEADER II 9.31 9.77 10.26 10.79 11.30* PUBLIC WORKS SURVEY AIDE 13.22 13.88 14.59 15.30 16.06 PURCHASING CLERK 16.42 17.23 18.12 19.01 19.96 RECREATION LEADER II (T) 7.46 7.84 8.21 8.63 9.06 RECREATION PROGRAM LEADER (T) 7.30 7.67 8.06 8.46 8.88 RIGHT OF WAY TECHNICIAN 13.22 13.88 14.59 15.30 16.06 SECURITY GUARD 8.12 8.52 8.97 9.42 9.86 SENIOR CLERICAL AIDE 13.36 14.01 14.72 15.46 16.22* SENIOR PROGRAM LEADER 11.02 11.55 12.14 12.74 13.38**~` SPECIAL EMPLOYMENT COUNSELOR I 8.84 9.28 9.76 10.23 10.75 SPECIAL EMPLOYMENT COUNSELOR II 10.87 11.41 11.98 12.59 13.22 SPECIAL EMPLOYMENT COUNSELOR III 12.25 12.84 13.49 14.17 14.88 SPECIAL EVENTS LEADER I 10.75 11.27 11.84 12.43 13.05 SPECIAL EVENTS LEADER II 13.09 13.75 14.43 15.16 15.93 SPORTS ATTENDANT 7.30 7.67 8.06 8.46 8.88 SR. LIBRARY ASSISTANT 17.03 17.87 18.76 19.71 20.69 25F-9 RESOLUTION NO. 2006- ATTACHMENT "B" Page 3 of 3 CLASSIFICATION TITLES AND WAGE RATES FOR LONG-TERM REPRESENTED CATEGORIES OF NON-CIVIL SERVICE PART TIME EMPLOYMENT Effective JULY 1, 2006 JOB TITLE STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E SR. MAINTENANCE AIDE I $10.21 $10.72 $11.24 $11.81 $12.39 SR. MAINTENANCE AIDE II 11.59 12.18 12.78 13.41 14.10 SR. MAINTENANCE WORKER 14.53 15.25 16.02 16.80 17.65 SR. SPECIAL EMPLOYMENT COUNSELOR 13.22 13.88 14.59 15.30 16.06 SR. TUTOR 12.90 13.55 14.22 14.93 15.69 STORES AIDE 15.25 16.02 16.80 17.65 18.53 STREET LIGHTING ENGINEER 29.54 31.09 32.60 34.24 35.97 STRUCTURAL PLAN EXAMINER I 28.03 29.44 30.90 32.45 34.07 STRUCTURAL PLAN EXAMINER II 30.01 31.51 33.08 34.74 36.47 TUTOR 10.87 11.41 11.98 12.59 13.22 YES PROGRAM COORDINATOR 23.97 25.16 26.42 27.73 29.13 Hourly wage rates shown for this classification title include a 3.0% equity adjustment per Article IV, Section 4.1 of the SEIU Part-Time MOU. ~`* Hourly wage rates shown for this classification title include a 1.5% equity adjustment per Article IV, Section 4.1 of the SEIU Part-Time MOU. ~`*~` Hourly wage rates shown for this classification title include a 2.5% equity adjustment per Article IV, Section 4.1 of the SEIU Part-Time MOU. CLASSIFICATION TITLES AND WAGE RATES FOR LONG-TERM REPRESENTED CATEGORIES OF NON-CIVIL SERVICE PART TIME EMPLOYMENT Effective JULY 1, 2007 Effective July 1, 2007, hourly wage rates for Represented Non-Civil Service Part-Time classification titles shall be increased as determined per Article IV, Section 4.1 of the SEIU Part-Time MOU. 25F-10 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT FOR GOVERNMENT LIAISON SERVICE WITH THE FERGUSON GROUP OF WASHINGTON, D.C. ITY MANAGER CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15i Reading ^ Ordinance on 2~d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare an of the Council to execute an agreement the Ferguson Group in an amount not to d authorize the City Manager and Clerk for government liaison services with exceed $75,000. DISCUSSION The Ferguson Group has served as the City's representative in Washington, D.C. since 1987. The service includes the review and monitoring of federal executive proposals and legislation, as well as administrative rules and regulations that may affect the City. The Ferguson Group also assists the City with grant applications and other special programs for which the City may qualify. In the current fiscal year, the Ferguson Group assisted with appropriations for the Bristol Street Widening Project totaling $4.4 million. Since 2000, the Ferguson has successfully advocated on the City's behalf for water well rehabilitation projects, Workforce Development monies, Empowerment Zone funding, arts and technology projects, and various others, for a total of $27 million. 25G-1 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Other Contractual Services accounts from the Public Works Administrative Services account (account no. 101-601-6291), the Community Development South Main Administration account (account no. 550- 932-6291), and the City Manager's Office account (account no. 11-011-6191). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: James G. Ross Executive Director P,,t'blic Works Agency ~~ Patricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Community Development Agency ~~C~M(~ ~S~ ~~~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25G-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT FOR GOVERNMENT LIAISON SERVICE WITH TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS CITY MANAGER CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15i Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement for government liaison services with Townsend Public Affairs in an amount not to exceed $25,000. DISCUSSION Townsend Public Affairs has served as the City's representative in Sacramento for six years. The service includes the review and monitoring of state legislation and funding opportunities. Townsend Public Affairs has provided information to the City on legislative issues such as local government finance, the 2006-2007 state budget, and state enterprise zone bills. In addition, Townsend Public Affairs has pursued grant opportunities on the City's behalf. Specifically, this past year they advocated and helped secure a grant to fund synthetic turf at the Santa Ana Stadium. They also research other funding and grant opportunities that may be applicable to the City. Over the years, Townsend Public Affairs has secured funding for the Discovery Science Center, the Delhi Community Center, and the Bowers Museum. 25H-1 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Other Contractual Services accounts from the Public Works Administrative Services account (account no. 101-601-6291), the Community Development South Main Administration account (account no. 550- 932-6291), and the City Manager's Non-Departmental account (account no. 11- 012-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~ / ~~ / J es G. Ross E cutive Director P~iiblic Works Agency Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency (I.~ ~ G~ Patricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Community Development Agency 25H-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR A PORTION OF MACARTHUR FAIRVIEW PARK, LLC PROPERTY AT 2961 MACARTHUR (PROJECT 0 5 - ~.,7 0 7 ) _ " CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with MacArthur Fairview Park, LLC for the purchase of a portion of 2961 MacArthur Boulevard in the amount of $63,970. DISCIISSION The proposed improvements to the Fairview Street and MacArthur Boulevard intersection include the addition of right-turn-only lanes for the southbound and eastbound approaches. These improvements are needed to improve traffic flow through the intersection which currently is not operating at an acceptable level of service. Construction is estimated to begin in March of 2007. To accommodate the widening, acquisition of a 1,166 square-foot of the property located at 2961 MacArthur Boulevard is needed (Exhibit 1). A 3,661 square-foot temporary construction easement will also be required from the owner. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in previously prepared Negative Declaration No. 2002-440. 251-1 Purchase Agreement with MacArthur Fairview Park, LLC June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the proposed acquisitions are available in the Measure M Street Construction (account no. 32-551-6631, Project No. 05-1707). James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: rancisco Gu ierr n;~ Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 251-2 i i i i i i N,T,S. I I .. .~ J: :~ ~: .' (~ ~ ~ i~ ' .Proposed Acquisition ~' ~~ ~ 1,166 sqf~ :~~ ;1 I' ;t I~ #• •~ . ~ 3 W Q: Q ~_~_ ' I MACARTHUR BLVD. ~ APN # 414-161-09 2961 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD E~H I BIT ~ SETA ~~. T~tie: 9 ~ CiT~ COt~NC~~ Purchase A reement For A Portion Of 4• ` ;~ ^ aGEr~t~A QAT~ Macarthur Fairview Park, LLC Property At June 19, 2006 2961 Macarthur (Project 05-1707) 251-3 251-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: PURCHASE AGREEMENT RODRIGIIEZ PROPERTY 310 S. BRISTOL FOR THS LIDIA LOCATED AT APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1s1 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO ~. FILE NUMBER f CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with Lidia Rodriguez for the purchase of 310 S. Bristol Street in the amount of $560,000. DISCIISSION On March 6, 2006 the City Council approved the cooperative agreement between the City and the Orange County Transportation Authority to fund Bristol Street improvements from Warner Avenue to Seventeenth Street. In order to meet the funding cash flow availability, the widening will be done in phases. Phase I of the four phase improvements is between McFadden Avenue and Pine Street. Improvements include widening of the street from four lanes to six, construction of landscaping in the parkways and the median islands, traffic improvements, drainage structures, sound walls, and other amenities as outlines in the Specific Plan. In order to accommodate the widening, the acquisition of entire property located at 310 S. Bristol Street is required (Exhibit 1). The amount of $560,000 is the appraised value prepared by an appraiser licensed in the State of California. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been determined to be adequately evaluated in the previously prepared Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Assessment EIR No. 89-O1 approved by City Council in 1990. 25J-1 Purchase Agreement with Lidia Rodriguez June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available from the proceeds of OCTA's $125 Million Select Street Construction Fund (account no. 59-553-6631) APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: James G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency rancisco Gutierrez 'Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 25J-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: CONTRACT AWARD TO SYMCO GROUP, INC. FOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OF UNISYS COMPUTER SYSTEMS ITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S1 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and the City Manager to execute a one-year agreement with an option for two one-year renewals, with SYMCO Group, Inc. for equipment maintenance of a Unisys Corporation V380 model computer and related equipment in an amount not to exceed $64,500 and authorize the Executive Director of the Finance and Management Services Agency and the City Attorney to execute the optional renewals pursuant to the terms of the original contract. DISCUSSION The City utilizes the Lawson financial system to record and process accounting related transactions. The Lawson financial system resides on the Unisys V380 mainframe computer equipment. Both systems have been in place since 1988. The original manufacturer of the Unisys V380, Unisys Corporation, no longer provides service and support for the mainframe computer. SYMCO Group, Inc. is currently the only firm in this geographical area providing V380 model equipment maintenance. The City has contracted with SYMCO Group, Inc. since 1998 for computer equipment maintenance. Their service has been highly satisfactory and very responsive. The agreement will provide very difficult to obtain maintenance service. In addition, the City is currently seeking proposals to conduct a financial requirements and an accounting needs assessment in order to ultimately replace the City's current Lawson financial software. Replacement of the Lawson financial software would provide an opportunity to replace the aging equipment with modern hardware. Prior to implementation of a new financial system, the agreement with the Symco Group would allow the City, with 60 days notice, to cancel coverage on any or all of the equipment maintenance without cost penalty. 25K-1 Agreement for Mainframe Computer Maintenance Services June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Finance & Management Services, Information Services, General Fund, Other Contractual Services account (no. 11-179- 62 911, . Fr~n~isco Gutierrez Q Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agenc 25K-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR CUSTODIAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE DEPOT AT SANTA ANA CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S' Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the :City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the contract with Pacific Building Care for custodial maintenance services at The Depot at Santa Ana to increase the annual amount by $10,000 for an amount not-to- exceed $117,280. DISCUSSION The Depot at Santa Ana is a regional transportation hub, combining Amtrak, MetroLink, Orange County Transit Authority and other bus services with office space for various State, County and City departments. Additionally, the facility includes a five-story theme tower that houses additional office space and conference rooms. Patronage at the facility has escalated in recent years, which requires that consistent, high-level custodial service be maintained at all times in order to keep the facility clean and attractive. On June 6, 2005, City Council awarded a contract with Pacific Building Care (PBC) for a twenty-four month period with three 12-month renewals in an annual amount of $107,280. PBC is entering into its second year of its first term. PBC has been diligent in addressing its work plan in detail, and the company's efforts at The Depot have achieved the required level of cleanliness. Under the original Request for Proposal, an additional cleaning request above the daily operation specifications was an option to the annual amount. Staff is recommending increasing the yearly amount by $10,000 to include regular carpet cleaning in the office space and special cleaning for events held at The Depot. 25L-1 Amendment to Contract for Custodial Maintenance Services at The Depot at Santa Ana June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds for this contract agreement in the amount of $117,280 will be available in the FY 06-07 Depot at Santa Ana Maintenance and Repair Buildings and Grounds account (account no. 67-615-6241). { ~ ` `' ~~ W Patricia C. Whitaker Executive Director ~ Community Development Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ,Francisco Gutierrez ~~ Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency PCW/DM/mlr H:\ACTIONS\2006 CC\AmendContCustodialMaintServsatDepot 6-19-06.doc 25L-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT FOR CITYWIDE PROMOTIONAL VIDEO ~~~ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Direct the City Attorney to prepare and the Clerk of the Council to execute Creative, LLC. in an amount not to exceec citywide promotional video. CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER authorize the an agreement $45,000 for t: City Manager and with Post Modern ie production of a DISCUSSION The City of Santa Ana is experiencing a renaissance with tremendous growth in new development and investment. In an effort to showcase the exciting business opportunities in the City, and to highlight Santa Ana's cultural amenities and historic treasures, the production of a new citywide promotional video is being proposed. The video will highlight several of the City's assets such as the Zoo, Bowers Museum, and historic downtown. It will also show the new projects under development including City Place, Skyline at MacArthur Place, The Cordoba courtyard townhomes, One Broadway Plaza, Promenade Place at MacArthur Place, and the Santiago Lofts. The video will be shown throughout the community at neighborhood meetings, various association gatherings, Chamber of Commerce events and industry tradeshows. It will also be incorporated into the City's web site and the new interactive business attraction CD-Rom which is currently being produced to inform business owners and developers of Santa Ana's economic development opportunities and incentive programs. The Economic Development staff received three cost estimates from Post Modern Creative, LLC. located in Irvine, California; Brian Kelly Productions located in San Diego, California; and Batiz.com located in Vista, California. Based on the quality of past experience and similar projects, the reasonableness of cost, and the need for a high quality 25M-1 Agreement for Citywide Marketing Video June 19, 2006 Page 2 production in high definition recording, Post Modern Creative, LLC. is recommended for the production of this new citywide promotional video. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for this agreement are available in the General Non-Departmental Other Contractual Services account (account no. 011-012-6291). C~ Patricia C. Whitaker Executive Director Community Development Agency APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~sns.~c;~ ~ :" Francisco Gutierrez ,~,! Executive Director T~ Finance & Management Services Agency PCW/MSM/mlr H:\ACTIONS\2006 CC\AgreeCitywideMarketingvideo 6-19-06.doc 25M-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JiTNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH CDM FOR STORMWATER RELATED SERVICES FOR THE CITY'S DRAINAGE FACILITY INSPECTION, GIS INVENTORY, AND SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM ~~ ~' CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute an amendment to the agreement with CDM in the amount of $20,000 for a total cost of $355,000 and extend the agreement for one year to provide stormwater related services for the City's Drainage Facility Inspection, GIS Inventory and Source Control Program. DISCUSSION In September 2002, the Public Works Agency applied for and received Proposition 13 grant funding for the City's Drainage Facility Inspection, GIS Inventory and Source Control Program. This project includes the development of a GIS database of drainage and industrial facilities utilized to inspect and identify possible sources of pollution and the development of a source control program. To comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board's extensive requirements to fulfill of the terms of the grants, an additional $20,000 in professional services is needed to complete the project. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed request is not considered a project. No further action is required. 25N-1 Agreement with CDM to Provide Stormwater Related Services June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Federal Clean Water Enterprise (account no. 57-635-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: -~,~Ja s G. Ross Ex cutive Director Public Works Agency 25N-2 Executive Director ~jCFinance & Management Services Agency REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH GEORGE & ANCA CABAN DBA CAFE EXPRESS C TY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute a Lease Agreement with Cafe Express for a restaurant at The Depot at Santa Ana. DISCUSSION The Cafe Express has been located in Suite 102 at The Depot at Santa Ana since June 1988. In this location, Cafe Express has provided food products for travelers, visitors and tenants of The Depot. The previous Lease Agreement has expired, and their tenancy has continued on a month- to-month basis. Therefore, staff is recommending entering into a new Lease Agreement with Cafe Express for a term of three years beginning July 1, 2006, and ending June 30, 2009, with two 3-year extensions by mutual agreement. Under the new agreement, monthly compensation to the City will be $2,275 per month for year one and a Consumer Price Index increase for years two and three. This agreement includes provisions for tenant improvements and operational enhancements to ensure a positive image for the Cafe Express and The Depot at Santa Ana. The alternative is not to execute the Lease Agreement with Cafe Express and terminate its operations at The Depot. This alternative would result in the loss of revenues of $27,300 for FY 06-07 and would create a void in services for our travelers, visitors and tenants. 250-1 Lease Agreement with Cafe Express June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds from the Lease Agreement payments will be deposited into The Depot at Santa Ana Rental - Cafe Express revenue account (account no. 67-01- 5495) . APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~o~t,Patricia Whitaker //~,,F-rancisco Gutierrez Executiv Director /I'~'~Executive Director Community Development Agency ,,,,~~VVVV// Finance & Management Services Agency PCW/CF/mlr H:\ACTIONS\2006 CC\LeaseAgreeGeo&AncaCabandbaCafeExpress 6-19-06.doc 250-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AGREEMENT FOR eCIVIS GRANTS LOCATOR ~~. ---~~ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Direct the City Attorney to prepare and authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute an agreement with eCivis for the Grants Locator system in an amount not to exceed $20,804. DISCUSSION Since 2001, the City has utilized eCivis' Grants Locator, a complete grant research system designed specifically for local governments. Grants Locator combines accurate and comprehensive grant information with structured service and accountability in a central online database to improve grant research. In addition, Grants Locator provides original analysis on Federal, select State, and foundation grant opportunities. Features of the service include customized email alerts, search agents, and reports to save time and increase efficiency in the grant process. Through this program, the City has been able to identify applicable grants in a timely manner, and has utilized the service to secure a number of grants, including a $250,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Education and a $150,000 Land and Water Conservation Fund grant. The proposed agreement includes unlimited user accounts for use by City staff and on-site training. 25P-1 Agreement for eCivis June 19, 2006 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the Other Contractual Services accounts from the City Manager's Office account (account no. 11-012-6291) and the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency account (account no.11-231-6291). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~~ Gerardo Mouet ~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Dire for Executive Director Parks, Recreation, & Community Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency~~ Services Agency ,~~ 25P-2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: INSURANCE RENEWALS c C Y MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Approve the City's continued membership in the Big Independent Cities Excess Pool for an additional three years beginning July 1, 2006 at an annual premium cost not to exceed $1,825,000 for the first year. 2. Approve the City's continued participation in the Public Entity Property Insurance Program from July 1, 2006 to July 1, 2007 at a premium cost of $387,188. 3. Approve the City's continued participation in the Crime Bond Program at a premium cost not to exceed $11,500 from July 1, 2007 to July 1, 2008. DISCUSSION On September 23, 1988, the Big Independent Cities Excess Pool (BICEP) Joint Powers Authority was formed with five cities. The current cities are as follows: Santa Ana, Huntington Beach, San Bernardino, Oxnard, and West Covina. The purpose of BICEP is to provide insurance coverage for its members, shielding them from financial debt due to large liability claims, judgments, and settlements. BICEP operating documents require each city to enroll for a succeeding three-year commitment. Each member city has a $1 million self-insured liability retention that is similar to a deductible. The current excess workers' compensation insurance policies will expire on July 1, 2006, and the liability policies will expire on October 1, 2006. The total BICEP insurance premium for the July 1, 2006 to July 1, 2007 period will not exceed $1,825,000; an estimated $1,215,000 of which covers liability claims from $1 to $25 million per occurrence. The balance of $610,000 purchases $150 million of excess workers' compensation insurance coverage per occurrence with a $500,000 self-insured retention. The City Manager will review the quotations and make the final approval and coverage will be bound. 29A-1 Insurance Renewals June 19, 2006 Page 2 of 3 The Public Entity Property Insurance Program (PEPIP) was established on May 15, 1993 with seventeen public agencies that included the City of Santa Ana. The purpose of PEPIP is to provide public agencies with group purchasing strength in a challenging property insurance market. Since 1993, PEPIP has grown to include over 4,000 members in 35 states, which has allowed the group to purchase adequate property insurance at affordable premiums. Renewal of the City's participation in PEPIP will ensure the City's ability to continue purchasing property insurance at competitive rates. The $387,188 premium will provide $500 million dollars or more of coverage for most City properties. PEPIP will provide the City with $100 million for boiler and machinery damage and $82.5 million in flood damage. All PEPIP members share $110 million of terrorism coverage with a $400 million annual aggregate. However, due to the excessive premium cost of earthquake insurance, the City will not seek this coverage. Current insurance deductibles are as follows: Coverage Deductible Vehicles Fire Fighting $50,000 Vehicles All other $25,000 All other occurrences $10,000 Boiler & Machinery $2,500 to $375,000, depending on the pieces of equipment involved Through BICEP, the City purchases excess workers' compensation and liability coverage through the California Public Entity Insurance Authority (CPEIA) The City joined the CPEIA Crime Bond Program in 2004, and the current expiration date of this jointly purchased coverage is July 1, 2007. The program's insurers offered to extend the coverage now for another year to July 1, 2008 at attractive pricing, not to exceed $11,500. The Crime Bond Program provides a $10 million limit with a $25,000 per occurrence deductible and covers the following: 1. Employee dishonesty with faithful performance coverage 2. Forgery and alteration 3. Theft, disappearance and destruction 4. Robbery and safe burglary 5. Computer fraud including funds transfer coverage 6. Money orders and counterfeit paper currency 29A-2 Insurance Renewals June 19, 2006 Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted in the proposed 2006-07 Liability & Property Insurance account (account no. 80-180-6521) and Workers' Compensation account (account no. 82-178-6521). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Enrique J. A a Francisco Gutierrez Executiv D'rec or ~~E'xecutive Director Personnel Services Finance & Management Services Agency /, 29A-3 29A-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: NOVEN~ER 7, 2006 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ,~ _ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1S` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Adopt an ordinance ordering, calling, and giving notice of a General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Santa Ana on November 7, 2006 for the election of certain officers. 2. Adopt a resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors of Orange County to consolidate a General Municipal Election of the City of Santa Ana with the State's General Election. 3. Adopt a resolution establishing a charge for candidates' statements to be submitted to the electorate in the November 7, 2006 General Municipal Election. DISCUSSION In order to conduct an election, State law and the City Charter require the City Council to adopt an ordinance calling for a general municipal election. The subject ordinance establishes November 7, 2006 as the date for the election of the Mayor and Members of Wards 2, 4, and 6 of the City Council. Additionally, pursuant to Section 10403 of the California Elections Code, the City Council is required to formally request consolidation of the City's general election with the State's general election. The subject resolution fulfills this requirement by requesting that the Board of Supervisors of Orange County consolidate the general elections of November 7, 2006 and authorizes the Board of Supervisors to canvass the election returns. Finally, candidates for Mayor and the City Council may choose to have a candidate's statement sent to each voter as part of the Voter Information Pamphlet. Candidate Statements are produced at the candidate's option, not mandated, and the election code allows the Council to establish a charge to be levied against candidates in order to recover the cost of printing, handling and mailing these statements. The Orange County Registrar of 50A-1 Voters has advised the City that the estimated cost to the individual candidates for the November 2006 Election is $1,406. The adoption of the recommended resolution will establish this charge for these services. FISCAL IMPACT The cost to consolidate the general municipal election with the State's general election is estimated to be $85,000. Funds for these administrative costs will be available in the 2006-07 Fiscal Year budget in the Clerk of the Council Other Agency Services Account (Account No. 11-021-6251). APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: Patricia Healy Clerk of the Council _~ Francisco Gutierrez Executive Director Finance & Mgmt. Services Agency 50A-2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CALLING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S CHARTER NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that under provisions of the Charter of the City of Santa Ana, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 7, 2006 for the election of certain municipal officers; SECTION 2. That pursuant to the requirements of the Charter, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Santa Ana. California, on Tuesday, November 7, 2006, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two years; and Members of Wards 2, 4 and 6 of the City Council for the full term of four years each. SECTION 3. That the said general municipal election shall be conducted in accordance with the Elections Code of the State of California, and the Clerk of the Council is hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or appropriate with respect thereto, except to the extent such actions may be undertaken by the Registrar of Voters of the County of Orange upon consolidation of the said special municipal election with the statewide general election. SECTION 4. That the notice of the time and place of holding said general municipal election is hereby given, and the Clerk of the Council is hereby authorized and directed to give such additional notice thereof as required by law. ADOPTED this day of 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Ordinance No. Page 1 of 2 50A-3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Deputy City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. Page 2 of 2 50A-4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. A general election of the City of Santa Ana will be held on November 7, 2006, for the purpose of electing a mayor for the full term of two (2) years and council members from City Wards 2, 4 and 6 for the full term of four (4) years each ward. B.. There will be a statewide general election on this same November 7, 2006. C. It is desirable that this general election for the City of Santa Ana be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on the same date and that within the City of Santa Ana, the precincts, polling places and election officers be the same for both elections, and that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange canvass the returns for both elections, in all respects as if there was only a single election. Section 2. That pursuant to the requirements at Section 10403 of the Elections Code of the State of California, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby requested to consent to and order the consolidation with the general election of November 7, 2006, of a general election of the City of Santa Ana to be held upon the same date for the purpose of electing the mayor and council members from City Wards 2, 4, and 6. Section 3. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said general municipal election pursuant to Section 10411 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 4. The City of Santa Ana recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County of Orange for any such costs. Resolution No. 2006 Page 1 of 2 50A-5 Section 5. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and a certified copy of this resolution with the Registrar of Voters of the County of Orange. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Benjamin Kaufman Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006 Page 2 of 2 50A-6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING A SYSTEM FOR CANDIDATES WHOSE STATEMENTS ARE SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE IN THE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION TO PAY THE PRO RATA SHARE OF THE COST OF INCLUSION OF THE STATEMENT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. That Section 13307(c) of the Elections Code of the State of California authorizes the governing body of any local agency to require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the local agency his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. Section 2. The Clerk of the Council shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidates' statements, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, and shall determine the pro rata share of each candidate filing a statement based upon such estimate. The payment in advance by each such candidate of his or her pro rated share shall be a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. Section 3. Prior to the period in which candidates' statements may be filed, the Clerk of the Council shall prepare a written notice distributed to all candidates at the time of issuance of the nomination papers, informing them that payment of the pro rata share amount must be made at the same time the candidate's nomination papers are filed and no later than 5:00 p.m. August 11, 2006. Section 4. The Clerk of the Council's receipt for the payment shall include a written notice that the estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Council shall not be bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense, or refund any excess paid, depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the Clerk of the Council may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the Clerk of the Council shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election. Resolution No. 2006 Page 1 of 2 50A-7 Section 5. The Clerk of the Council shall provide each candidate a copy of this resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued by the Clerk. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006 Page 2 of 2 50A-8 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: NOVEMBER 7, 2006 SPECIAL MUNICPAL ELECTION FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS QUESTIONS RELATING TO CHANGES IN THE CITY CHARTER CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15` Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Adopt ordinance ordering, calling, and giving notice of a Special Municipal Election to be consolidated with the City's General Municipal Election and held in the City of Santa Ana on November 7, 2006 for the submission of questions to the voters relating to changes in the City's Charter. 2. Adopt ordinances implementing proposed charter amendments, as follows: a. An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending section 2-101 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code relating to Council organization; b. An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana adding section 2-110 to the Santa Ana Municipal Code, relating to council member salaries; and c. An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana amending Chapter 2, Article 8 Of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, relating to City Manager's authority to enter contracts. 3. Adopt resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors of Orange County to consolidate the Special Municipal Election of the City of Santa Ana with the City and State's General Election. 4. Adopt resolution authorizing Councilmembers to file written arguments for or against the various proposed charter amendments. 5. Direct the Clerk of the Council to prepare guidelines for preparation of arguments for/against the proposed charter amendments, fix August 1, 2006 as the date for the submission of arguments, and post the notice for the argument process in accordance with the provisions of the California State Elections Code. 50B-1 November 7, 2006 Special Municipal Election June 19, 2006 Page 2 of 4 6. Direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis for each of the charter amendments submitted to the voters. 7. Approve ballot question groupings and direct City Attorney to prepare a ballot question resolution to be considered in conjunction with second reading of ordinance calling election. DISCUSSION On May 2, 2005, the City Council created an Ad Hoc Committee on Charter Review comprised of Mayor Pro Tem Bist, and Councilmembers Alvarez and Garcia. The Ad Hoc Committee reviewed the current City Charter and made several recommendations for changes to various sections in the charter. On September 19, 2005, at the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee, the City Council created the Charter Amendment Citizens' Task Force and directed members to review and comment on the Ad Hoc Committee's recommended amendments. The Task Force made several suggestions related to the proposed changes and submitted the revised proposals to the Ad Hoc Committee for final consideration. The Ad Hoc Committee met on January 31, 2006 and approved proposed charter amendments. The Ad Hoc Committee further recommended that the proposals be submitted to the voters at a special election to be consolidated with the General Municipal Election to be held on November 7, 2006. Council work studies were held on April 3, April 17, May 1, and June 5, 2006 to discuss the various proposed charter amendments. On June 5, 2006 the Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance calling a special election for the purpose of submitting charter amendments to the voters. Staff recommends to format the changes for purposes of the ballot questions as follows: • Charter Amendment XX - combine Section 400 (start date for term of office), Section 413 (ordinance introduction) and Section 1200 (calling of elections) into one ballot measure • Charter Amendment X - Section 402 (Council and Mayor salaries) • Charter Amendment XX - combine Sections 421 and 422 (contract provisions) into one measure • Charter Amendment XX - Section 401 (eight year eligibility waiting period for councilmembers • Charter Amendment XX - Section 404 (mayoral term limits) • Charter Amendment XX - Section 901 (board/commission appointment process) • Charter Amendment XX - combine Section 901.1 (prohibition against serving as treasurer, Section 910 (Planning Commission responsibilities), Section 911 (prohibition against City employment for Personnel Board members) and Section 912 (jurisdiction of Personnel Board) 50B-2 November 7, 2006 Special Municipal Election June 19, 2006 Page 3 of 4 The City Attorney will then prepare a resolution with the ballot question language to be considered at the July 3, 2006 meeting along with second reading of the election ordinance. In order to conduct an election for placing the above measures on the ballot, State law requires the City Council to take an action calling for a special municipal election. The subject ordinance establishes November 7, 2006 as the date for this election. The ordinance calling for the special municipal election provides for the submission of the various charter amendments and includes the text of the proposed amendments to be adopted by the voters. In addition to the proposed charter amendments, both the Ad Hoc Committee on Charter Review and the Charter Amendment Citizens' Task Force recommended that the Council adopt ordinances amending relevant sections in the Municipal Code prior to placement of the charter amendments on the ballot. This was recommended to make the voters aware of the Council's intent, specifically with respect to establishing a monthly salary for the Mayor and Councilmembers, and in setting monetary limits relating to the City Manager's Authority to enter contracts. These implementing ordinances all contain a provision stating that they shall become effective only upon the approval of the respective charter amendments by a majority of the voters of the City at the special election. The implementing ordinance amending SAMC section 2-101 will refer to the Charter to set the time at which the newly elected council will convene. The implementing ordinance adding SAMC section 2-110, will set council member salaries at a level that conforms to general law cities. The implementing ordinance amending Chapter 2, Article 8 of the SAMC, will increase the City Manager's authority to bind the City on any one contract from $10,000 to $25,000. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Elections Code, the City Council is required to formally request consolidation of the City's general election and/or special election with the State's general election. The subject resolution fulfills this requirement by requesting that the Board of Supervisors of Orange County consolidate the special municipal election of November 7, 2006 and authorizes the Board of Supervisors to canvass the election returns. California State Elections code Section 9281 provides that arguments for and against any city measure may be submitted to the qualified voters of the city. The Elections Code specifies that the legislative body, or any member or members of the Legislative body authorized by that body, may submit a written argument for or against the measure. This section further authorizes any individual voter or bona fide association of citizens to write arguments, however, the Elections Code specifies that 50B-3 November 7, 2006 June 19, 2006 Page 4 of 4 Special Municipal Election members of the Council would be given preference and priority, if authorized by the City Council. The subject resolution would give that authorization to any member of the Council desiring to submit an argument. The resolution further authorizes any member of the Charter Amendment Citizens' Task Force to submit arguments for or against any of the measures, and gives Task Force members preference and priority second only to that of members of the Council. The procedures for filing ballot arguments are detailed in the Elections Code. The Clerk of the Council is recommending that August 1, 2006 be fixed as the date after which no arguments for or against any city measure may be submitted for printing and distribution to the voters. The Election Code procedures, as well as general guidelines for preparing arguments will be provided in a notice prepared by the Clerk of the Council and posted following final adoption of the election ordinance. Whenever any city measure qualifies to be on a ballot, the City Council may direct the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the measure (Elections Code ~ 9280). The analysis is printed in the Voter Information Pamphlet preceding the arguments for and against the measure. FISCAL IMPACT The County Registrar of Voters office has estimated that the cost of consolidating a special election for charter amendments with the State's general election would be $5,000 per measure ($35,000 for the proposed seven measures), based on current voter registration in the City. Funds for these administrative costs will be available in the 2006-07 Fiscal Year budget in the Clerk of the Council Other Agency Services Account (Account no. 11-021-6251) APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: vR Patricia E. Healy Clerk of the Council /~,F'rancisco Gutierrez cVh Executive Director Finance & Management Services Agency 50B-4 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CALLING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006 FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE AMENDMENT OF THE CITY CHARTER. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: By Ordinance No. NS- ,the City Council has declared that a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 7, 2006 for the election of municipal officers. SECTION 2: Under provisions of the Charter of the City of Santa Ana and the California Elections Code, a special election shall be held in conjunction with the General Municipal Election to be held on November 7, 2006 and the following proposed amendments to the City Charter shall be submitted to the voters: A. A proposal to amend Section 400 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; B. A. A proposal to amend Section 401 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; C. A proposal to amend Section 402 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; D. A proposal to amend Section 404 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit D, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; E. A proposal to amend Section 413 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; F. A proposal to amend Sections 421 and 422 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; G. A proposal to amend Section 901 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; H. A proposal to amend Section 901.1 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit H, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; Ordinance No. Page 1 of 18 50B-5 I. A proposal to amend Section 910 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit I, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; J. A proposal to amend Section 911 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit J, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; K. A proposal to amend Section 912 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit K, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; L. A proposal to amend Section 1200 of the Charter to read as set forth in Exhibit L, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; ADOPTED this day of , 2006 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. Page 2 of 18 50B-6 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. Page 3 of 18 50B-7 Exhibit A Sec. 400. Number, selection and terms of members. The city council shall consist of seven (7) members elected at the times and in the mm~manner} provided in this charter, each of whom, except for the mayor, shall serve a term of four (4) years. The term of each member shall begin el•es+~~.;~t~e-~i~~t-~eges#ed-eled-r~eet+ng e~t~ie-si#~ee~sitat 6:00 pm on the second Tuesday of December following certification of election results, and each shall serve except as otherwise provided for in this charter, until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each office of councilmember shall be a separate office and, except for the mayor, one (1) of such offices shall be assigned to each of the wards of the city. Candidates for each office of councilmember other than the mayor shall be nominated from such ward by the electors of such ward and candidates for mayor shall be nominated by electors of the city, but all councilmembers shall be elected by the vote of the electors of the city at large. Ordinance No. Page 4 of 18 50B-8 Sec. 401. Qualifications of members. Exhibit B To be eligible to be elected to the office of councilmember, a person must be a ~er~dgualified voter and a thirty (30 day resident of the ward from which #ethe candidate is nominated at the time nomination papers are issued +~as provided for in c°^+;^„ ~~Q^~ ^+ the Elections Code of the State of California, except that the mayor need only be a registered voter and thirty (30) day resident of the city at such time. In the event any councilmember other than the mayor shall cease to be a resident of the ward from which #~ethe councilmember (or, in the case of an appointee, #isthe councilmember's predecessor) was elected, or in the event the mayor shall cease to be a resident of the city, #~+sthe office shall immediately become vacant and shall be filled in the same manner as herein provided for other vacancies; provided, that where a councilmember ceases to be a resident of the ward from which ~iethe councilmember (or, in case of an appointee, #+s-the councilmember's predecessor) was elected solely because of a change in boundaries of any ward as in this charter provided, fiethe councilmember shall not lose fi+sthe office by reason of such change. If a member of the city council shall be convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, #+sthe office shall immediately become vacant and be so declared by the city council. A ep rson who has served two (2) consecutive terms of four (4) years each shall be eligible for appointment, nomination for or election to the office of councilmember (regardless of wards represented by that person during such period) no sooner than for a term beginning eight (8) years after completion of that councilmember's second consecutive full term. Short or partial terms shall not be considered- in determining eligibility for appointment, nomination or election. For purposes of this charter, short or partial terms shall only be those where the councilmember was elected or appointed to replace another councilmember who left office before the latter official's term expired. Any councilmember who assumed office at the beginning of a term and left office early for any reason whatsoever shall be deemed to have served a full term. Ordinance No. Page 5 of 18 50B-9 Exhibit C Sec. 402. Compensation of members. €a~Effective after the 2008 general election, each member of the city councils including the Mayor, shall receive as compensation for "~,,,~-^~„~~heir services as-sesl+a mnn4_ h~l~~l•+n~_ n~ ~m of nnn h~ ~nrlr~~o,rn,Trl~Tr ~~-fc'-riv~yyiTa~rJ-~i~~.nn~yj- Tm~ ,^~~"2#~eF2~G'6t2d tA-~~l•I- a monthly salary established by ordinance in an amount up to that as may be established bv, and calculated in accordance with, the provisions of state law for general law cities of the size of Santa Ana. This reference to general law shall not be deemed to constitute adoption of such law in Santa Ana, but shall only be used for reference purposes in calculating city council salary. The Mayor shall receive the additional amount of seventy-five dollars ($75.00) fey-eask~~er month .,,a rnomhor ~h.~ll fill +ho nffino of .v,~.,nr Further, each member of the city council shall receive reimbursement for required travel and other expenses while on official business of the city as authorized and approved by the city council. Absence of a member of the city council from all regular and special meetings of the city council during any calendar month shall render him or her ineligible to receive the monthly salary for such a calendar month unless by permission of the city council expressed in its official minutes. Ordinance No. Page 6 of 18 50B-10 Sec. 404. Presiding officer, mayor Exhibit D The mayor shall be a member of the city council and shall preside over the meetings of the city council. The mayor shall have voice and vote in all of the city council's proceedings and shall be recognized as head of the city government for all ceremonial purposes. The mayor shall have no administrative duties but shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this charter, or imposed by the city council, consistent with #+sthe office. The mayor shall be elected by the voters of the city at large at each general municipal election in November of even-numbered years for atwo-year term commencing on the same date as the terms of other council members elected in such year. No person may be a candidate for mayor and a candidate for any other office on the city council in the same election. ~^ +F'° °~i°n~ on inns ~mF~°n4 nifii nn~ ~nnil .,,,°m~,°r n~F~°r +hon fF,° mo~inr i~ A person who has already served five (5~ consecutive terms of two (2) years each as mayor shall be eligible for nomination for or election or appointment to the office of mayor or council member no sooner than for a term beginning after at least two mayoral terms have passed following completion of that person's fifth consecutive term. Short or partial terms shall not be considered in determining eligibility for appointment, nomination or election as mayor. For purposes of this charter, short or partial terms s__h_all__only be those where the mayor was elected or appointed to replace another mayor who left office before the latter official's term expired. Any mayor who assumed office at the beginning of a term and left office early for any reason whatsoever shall be deemed have served a full term. The provisions of this section related to short or partial terms is deemed to be declaratory of existing law. Ordinance No. Page 7 of 18 50B-11 Exhibit E Sec. 413. Adoption (Ordinances). Every ordinance shall be introduced in writing~^ +"o f.,,-.,,, ;^ ,.,";,. T.~i? +~QO fly passed. A copy of each ordinance and written resolution shall be available in the council's chambers for public inspection during any council meeting at which the same is to be passed or adopted. No ordinance shall be passed finally on the day it is introduced, except for emergency ordinances as hereinafter defined in Section 415, nor within six (6) days thereafter, nor at any time other than at a regular or adjourned regular meeting.~tl~~ent~f}a+~rvrr! ~,~~~Qt#er +"~-~,a ;-a,Tee~erge+~s3~d~afls~ A proposed ordinance may be amended or modified between the time of its introduction and the time of its final passage, providing its general scope and original purpose are retained. The rights and powers conferred on the city council shall be exercised by ordinance L resolution or motion as may be prescribed by the Constitution or Laws of the State of California, and the provisions of this Charter; provided, that each act of the city council establishing a fine or other penalty or granting a franchise shall be by ordinance. No order for the payment of money shall be adopted or made at any other than a regular or adjourned regular meeting, except when a state of emergency has been declared or at an emergency meeting properly convened. All ordinances and written resolutions shall be signed by the mayor and attested by the clerk of the council. Ordinance No. Page 8 of 18 50B-12 Exhibit F Sec. 421. Non-Public Works Contracts, ^~~r,.h,~e~~ r.,.h~;,. •~i~rLc. C~r.v,.~l;4:ec~~ The city shall not be bound by any contract, °~^°^+ ~~ {~°r°in~f+°r .,rn~iiiJ°rl~ unless the same shall be made in writing by order of the city council, except as hereinafter provided, and signed by mean officer +r~on behalf of the city who has been authorized to do so by the city council. The approval of the form of all contracts shall be endorsed thereon by the city attorney, or his or her designated representative. The city council may by ordinance authorize "%,rm~+..,° .,^+°~ ^f ^ ,the city manager to bind the city on contracts for such amounts as may be established from time to time. At least quarterly, the City Manager shall place on the City Council agenda for information, a report of contracts let by the City Manager pursuant to authority granted hereby. That report shall include the identities of contractors and amounts of each contract.' . (c) The city council shall establish by ordinance rules and procedures for competitive bidding for purchase of, or contracts for materials, supplies, equipment, or services, including exceptions from formal bidding as the city council may deem appropriate, including providing for emergencies. Nevertheless, such rules and procedures shall provide, where feasible, for review of such alternative sources of such materials, supplies, equipment, or services, including professional services, as may be available in competition with one another and selection therefrom on the basis of obtaining maximum quality goods, services, or performance at minimum cost, and may provide for use of other public agency bidding and contracting processes where found to be otherwise consistent with this charter. Nothing herein contained shall authorize any person to bind the city on any such contract if the same be a portion of a larger purchase or series of purchases which, in the aggregate, exceed the authority Fri 5~261~F2d-Set by the city council hereunder. Sec. 422. Public Works Contracts. (a) For purposes of this section, "public works construction" shall be deemed to mean a project for the erection or improvement of public buildings streets drains sewers, or parks. Maintenance and repair of public buildings, streets, drains, sewers or parks shalt not be considered as public works construction. Every contract ;~e~i~g a~-e~.~t~T~~t"~-t°~ "~a~~'le,=s • , for public works construction ~^c "°r°innf4°r ,~°f,.,°a~in excess of that amount set from Ordinance No. Page 9 of 18 50B-13 time to time by ordinance of the city council pursuant to (c below, shall be made by the city council with the lowest and best bidder after publication for at least two (2) days in a newspaper of general circulation in the city of notice calling for bids and fixing a period during which such bids will be received, which shall be for not less than ten (10) days after the first publication of said notice, except where alternate contracting procedures are utilized pursuant to (c), below. (c) The city council shall adopt by ordinance rules and procedures for competitive bidding for all public works contracts, which rules and procedures shall establish limits for public works contracts approved by the city manager. Such rules and procedures shall establish criteria for thresholds for formal and informal bidding, and notice requirements therefor; standards for resection of bids and dispensing with bidding; criteria and procedures for preguailifying bidders and contractors; and utilization of alternate project delivery systems such as design-build contracts. For purposes of this Article, "design-build" means a range of methods of procuring design and construction from a single source, where the selection of the single source occurs before the development of complete plans and specifications. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any rule permitting dispensing of bidding and/or performing work with city forces for any reason including an emergency shall require the affirmative votes of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the city council. • , n~ i ~e ~~ee~ ~- t~nuie r~a~ 5 ° ' ' iie$ i' ~~~e1~~r' ~vt~ } I~ uvie v~ , . , ~ . c~ pp cr ~ v VTPU zu e 3~ e6kFte ~ ~~~e- ~df~ f•Fef~~a~ed -wFt~9 N~f HftheF-9 ~ o r+rr~,i i~ii+n of +hi~ . c r cf~~ v f sa# -seur~s r +l--te e --f3~e~-e-- e'r}~n 'ese ~i4~ r T}ham n~~ ~- ~i~{irin of lif o h T4~ ~ ~ g J ~ , •~ ~~ 1~ ~ ~ T e ~ e of ~hic• ~ e eses - - " ,~~ es#~e ~t+s er~ n }n ~n~inn" ~# II rlc ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~ ~--~ ~ ~s ~e~~~T,-~ aT,-- ~ ~ ear-,a-~ A fes~fs~t#~e-ereE# +e r~eH~p r^.,.Q.~~ ef-pe~l+s h~ ~gs~t~ eets, ~'~T sewers~ erl~~s;-e~~a~gr~~~ ~~a;T ~er~ans~Td- repair ef~abfis bu;td+ flgs~eet~ ~i-~i7-F~ ~ ~ e w~5 ,~-~a~l~cS. , n a~~~e ~r~~~.~ Ida I In--nvc -v° `~~vrrcir`-re~~ n i ~ h I i n , ~ in r , e Ordinance No. Page 10 of 18 50B-14 r r r rl °r'r "~ c m 'iTe~ h ne~r~° " ' ~i ~n~i nfFi6' e ~e a'I~e' ~ ~6' ~f ~ ~ ~ cgaTp $-r-unc r rnx ~FFc omnln~ioo of +ho nifii n r r> q v rniornmon+ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ Ft e r r r r r r r r r r Ordinance No. Page 11 of 18 50B-15 Exhibit G Sec. 901. Appointments, removals, vacancies, terms. Except as otherwise specified in this charter, the member of each of the appointive boards and commissions shall be appointed, and may be removed, by the city council, subject in both appointment and removal by the affirmative votes of a majority of the members. For boards or commissions having at least seven (7) members, the city council shall select seven (7) members from nominations made by the council member (or the mayor in the case of the city-wide seat) whose term coincides with that board or commission seat, (as determined by the city council in accordance with subsection (e) below, together with nominations from any other member of the council. All other appointments shall be as determined by this charter, or by the city council from time to time. Beginning with terms starting after the 2006 General Election, at least fifty-percent (50%) of those persons nominated from time to time. by a council member shall be residents of the ward represented by such council member. At the request of a council member, this rule may be waived by a 2/3 vote of the__City Council for any one appointment if the requesting member is unable to find a qualified and acceptable ward resident to nominate. For purposes of this rule, residency is only required at the time of nomination. Vacancies from whatever cause arising shall be filled in the same manner. Upon a vacancy occurring leaving an unexpired portion of a term, any appointment to fill such vacancy shall be for the unexpired portion of such term. All terms shall begin on the same date as city councilmember terms as provided in section 400 of this charter. ~If a member of a board or commission absents himself from-##ree two (~2) regular meetings of such board or commission, consecutively, unless by permission of such board or commission expressed in its official minutes, or fails to attend at least one-half (1/2) of the regular meetings of such board or commission within a calendar year, or is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude, or ceases to be a qualified elector of the city, #+sthe office shall become vacant and shall be so declared by the city council. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the members of such boards and commissions shall serve for a term of four (4) years and until their respective successors are appointed and qualified, but in no event shall any person be eligible for reappointment who has served two (2) consecutive terms of four (4) years each3 irrespective of what seat or seats the member is appointed to by the city council. Notwithstanding the foregoing, one seat shall be a city-wide seat having a (2) year term which coincides with that of the Mayor, and which shall be limited to four (4) consecutive terms of two (2) years each. Short or partial terms (as defined for city council in Section 401 of this Charter) shall not be considered. Unless otherwise provided by ordinance of the city council for a board or commission having more or less than seven (7) members, the terms of three (3) of the members of each such board or commission shall begin on the date of the beginning of the term of office of council members elected at every second general election commencing with the April, 1983 general election, a~dthe Ordinance No. Page 12 of 18 50B-16 terms of thc~~ °~,~g-three (3) other members shall begin on the date of the beginning of the term of office of council members elected at every second general election commencing with the November, 1984 general election, and one (1 as designated by the city council, shall coincide with the term of the mayor. It is the intent of this section that the term of office on boards and commissions shall be concurrent with the term of office of council members. Thereafter, any appointment to fill an unexpired term shall be for such an unexpired period. No person shall be eligible for appointment to a board or commission who completed a term on the City Council immediately preceding that board or commission term. The city council shall determine which members of such boards and commissions serving as such at the time of the April, 1983 general election shall serve shortened or extended terms. Beginning with terms starting immediately following the 2006 general election, for board and commissions with at least seven (7) members, the city council shall designate seven (7) board and commission seats by ward, and one city-wide. These designations shall be solely for the purpose of nominations and calculations of terms as provided in this Section 901. Except for purposes of the fifty- percent (50%) nomination rule in subsection (a) above, residency in that ward is not required. Ordinance No. Page 13 of 18 50B-17 Exhibit H Sec. 901.1. Prohibition against serving as treasurer for campaign committee. If any member of an appointive board or commission shall become the treasurer of a campaign committee which receives contributions for any candidate for mayor or councilmember, his or her office shall become vacant and shall be so declared by the city council. Any provisions of this Article IX notwithstanding, no person who serves as the treasurer of a campaign committee which receives contributions for any candidate for mayor or councilmember shall be eligible for appointment to any appointive board or commission. Ordinance No. Page 14 of 18 50B-18 Exhibit I Sec. 910 Planning Commission-Powers and ~tie~Duties The planning commission shall have power and be required to: /~\ Drp~nro ~niJ m~in~n~~tor nl.~n fir ~i~in~acP nmon~T~j ri+vrc~afla-^vf nnv I~nr! r~~ ~4~ir1o hr~~ inrl~rioc+ t~i@F~.,f ~~ih inh~ in +ho t~}e-vvurrcromc~ I. e ~ ~~ ~ periodically review the city's General Plan; Make studies and plans for future civic land use, including use as public recreation facilities; /n\ Dr ro ~ 4on /'1 !1\ ~io.~r n.~ni~.~l imnr~~iomen} nrnrrrr~m rovi~or! ~nn~ ~~llv ~a s s ~~ihinh ~h.~ll X04 fr,r+h III .,f Oho n~ni4ol imnrnvemen4~ n~nfomr~Ir+4eiJ h~i 4ho covor~~l ~ffino~~ i-Ipn~~~ ~n~ ~~~ponnio~ ~f ri4~i ~nr~r~-7in~r f~ .~ ~'cv~ur-vmv~~. ~.r ~v "~ `^ycrTVr~r. yr a~c+ ~~~~~FCt'FtCt-roaf}ti--ttte-~~ai~f~ea-~"'-rRcnv`a- vr-rnr'arnrs~#A~-un rl ~ ~ ~ h m if c~ ~ ~ n h n s ~ Annually review the city's capital improvement program solely for consistency with the general plan; Exercise such functions as to land subdivisions, zoning, and other city planning as may be prescribed by ordinance. ~ By its own motion, make such studies and investigations as it may deem necessary for the formulation of planning and land use policies and report its findings and recommendations to the city council or the city manager, or to both such authorities, as it may see fit. Ordinance No. Page 15 of 18 50B-19 Exhibit J Sec. 911. Personnel board--Membership. The personnel board shall consist of seven (7) members to be appointed by the city council from the qualified electors of the city. None of the members shall be removed from office without reasonable and sufficient cause, in accordance with procedures as provided by ordinance. None of the members shall hold public office or employment in the city government or be a candidate for any other public office or position, be an officer of any local, state or national partisan political club or organization, or while a member of the personnel board or for a period of one (1) year after he has ceased for any reason to be a member, be eligible for appointment to any salaried office or employment in the service of the city. Ordinance No. Page 16 of 18 50B-20 Sec. 912. Same--Powers and duties. Exhibit K The personnel board shall have power and be required to: (a) Hear appeals pertaining to the disciplinary suspension, demotion, or dismissal of any officer or employee having permanent status in any office, position, or employment in the civil service; and as otherwise provided for in the civil service rules and regulations; (b) Consider matters that may be referred to it by the city council or the city manager and render such counsel and advice in regard thereto as may be requested by the referring authorities; (c) By its own motion, make such studies and investigations as it may deem necessary for the formulation of civil service policies, or to determine the wisdom and efficacy of the policies, plans, and procedures dealing with civil service matters and report its findings and recommendations to the city manager or the city council, or to both such authorities, as it may see fit; (d) Conduct public hearings on all proposed amendments to or repeal of civil service rules and regulations in the manner as prescribed by ordinance, and advise the council of its findings in such matters within sixty (60) days. Ordinance No. Page 17 of 18 50B-21 Exhibit L Sec. 1200. Elections--Conducting. The conduct of all municipal elections by the clerk of the council shall be under the control of the city council which shall, by ordinance or resolution, provide for the holding of all municipal elections. Ordinance No. Page 18 of 18 50B-22 Iss061406 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SECTION 2-101 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL ORGANIZATION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Section 400 of the Santa Ana Charter sets the time for a council member's term to commence following the certification of election results. B. The City Council has proposed that the voters amend Section 400 of the Santa Ana Charter to change the date of the first meeting of the newly elected council to 6:00 pm on the second Tuesday in December, following certification of election results. C. Santa Ana Municipal Code section 2-101 conflicts with the proposed amendment of Charter section 400 regarding the time for convening the newly elected council. Section 2. Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 2, Article II, Section 2-101 relating to city council organization, is hereby amended as follows: A. Section 2-101 shall be amended to read as follows: Sec. 2-101, Organization. The newly elected council shall convene as set forth in the .Santa Ana Charterer} -~----_, . _................,,.,~....,, u~ ~, - The newly elected council shall proceed to organize, and the newly elected mayor shall immediately become the presiding officer. The council shall thereafter elect a mayor pro tem. In the absence of the mayor and the mayor pro tem the clerk of the council shall call the council to order and call the roll of the members. If a quorum is found to be 50B-23 present, the council shall, by majority vote of those present, elect a chairman of the meeting to act during the meeting or until one of the regularly designated presiding officers shall appear. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective only upon the approval of the amendment of Santa Ana Charter Section 400 by a majority of the voters of the City of the Santa Ana at the November 7, 2006 general election. ADOPTED this day of , 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 50B-24 Iss061406 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDING SECTION 2-110 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COUNCIL MEMBER SALARIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Section 402 of the Santa Ana Charter provides that each member of the City Council shall receive as compensation for their services a monthly salary established by ordinance in an amount up to that established by, and calculated in accordance with, the provisions of state law for general law cities of the size of Santa Ana. B. The City Council has proposed that the voters amend Section 402 of the Santa Ana Charter to authorize the City Council, by ordinance, to set City Council salaries up to that amount permitted by Government Code Section 36516(a) for general law cities. C. With a population of 351,697, Government Code Section 36516(a) would permit a salary for the Santa Ana City Council of up to $1,000.00 per month. D. In establishing council member salary, the City Council has utilized Government Code Section 36516(a) for reference purpose only, the City Council is not relying on, nor adopting the legislature's determination of salary for general law cities. Section 2. Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 2, Article II, Section 2-110, relating to council member salary, is hereby added to read as follows: Sec. 2-110. Council Member Salary. Each member of the City Council shall receive as compensation for their services a monthly salary of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). 50B-25 Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective only upon the approval of the amendment of Santa Ana Charter Section 402 by a majority of the voters of the City of the Santa Ana at the November 7, 2006 general election. ADOPTED this day of , 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 50B-26 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 8 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CITY MANAGER'S AUTHORITY TO ENTER CONTRACTS Iss061306 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Section 421 of the Santa Ana Charter provides that the city council may authorize the city manager to bind the city on contracts in an amount not exceeding $10,000.00. B. The City Council has proposed that the voters amend Section 421 of the Santa Ana Charter to authorize the City Council to set, by ordinance, the dollar amount of the City Manager's authority to bind the city on contracts. Section 2. Section 2-801 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, relating to city manager's authority, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 2-801. City manager's authority. The city manager is authorized to bind the city to any one written contract for an amount not exceeding the sum of . twenty-five thousand dollars ($25 000 OOZ Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective only upon the approval of the amendment of Santa Ana Charter Section 421 by a majority of the voters of the City of the Santa Ana at the November 7, 2006 general election. ADOPTED this day of , 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor 50B-27 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 50B-28 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY TO CONSOLIDATE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2006 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. A special election of the City of Santa Ana (""City") will be held on November 7, 2006, for the purpose of considering adoption of certain amendments to the City's Charter. B.. There will be a City and statewide general election on this same November 7, 2006. C. It is desirable that this special election for the City of Santa Ana be consolidated with the City and statewide general election to be held on the same date and that within the City of Santa Ana, the precincts, polling places and election officers be the same for both elections, and that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange canvass the returns for both elections, in all respects as if there was only a single election. Section 2. That pursuant to the requirements at Section 10403 of the Elections Code of the State of California, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby requested to consent to and order the consolidation with the general election of November 7, 2006, of a special election of the City of Santa Ana to be held upon the same date for the purpose of considering adoption of certain amendments to the City's Charter. Section 3. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said special municipal election pursuant to Section 10411 of the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 4. The City of Santa Ana recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County of Orange for any such costs. Resolution No. 2006 Page 1 of 2 50B-29 Section 5. The Clerk of the Council is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and a certified copy of this resolution with the Registrar of Voters of the County of Orange. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Benjamin Kaufman Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers: NOES: Councilmembers: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006 Page 2 of 2 50B-30 RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS FOR CHANGES TO THE SANTA ANA CHARTER BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. A general election of the City of Santa Ana will be held on November 7, 2006, at which there will be submitted to the qualified electors of the City several City measures related to charter amendments regarding Mayor and City Council organization, term of office and salaries; adoption of ordinances; increasing the City Manager's authority to bind the City on contracts; appointive boards and commissions; civil service and elections: B. That pursuant to the requirements of the State of California, the member(s) of the City Council to measure. at Section 9282 of the Elections Code legislative body may authorize any write arguments for or against any Section 2. The City Council, as the legislative body of the City of Santa Ana, hereby authorizes the Clerk of the Council to give preference and priority to any member or members of the City Council (up to five members), then to any member or members of the Charter Amendment Citizens' Task Force, then to voters as set forth in California Elections Code section 9287, to file a written argument for or against the City measures set forth above, and to change said argument until and including the date fixed by the Clerk of the Council after which no arguments for or against said City measure may be submitted. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of June 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Resolution No. 2006- Page 1 of 2 50B-31 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Laura Sheedy Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006- Page 2 of 2 50B-32 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: TITLE: APPROVED PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ^ As Recommended SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE ~ ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 15t Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO RECOMMENDED ACTION FILE NUMBER Adopt an ordinance that transfers the duties and responsibilities of the Executive Director of Community Development to the Deputy City Manager for Development Services. DISCUSSION Currently the Executive Director of Community Development oversees and directs the various activities of the Community Development Agency. The position also serves as the Executive Director of a number of governing boards, including the Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, Santa Ana Empowerment Zone, Workforce Investment Board and industrial Development Authority. The Deputy City Manager for Development Services is responsible for providing administrative oversight and leadership for development-related .activities. The City Manager proposes to transfer the Executive Director of Community Development's duties and responsibilities to the Deputy City Manager for Development Services in order to centralize authority and ensure effective integration, continuity and leadership for all City development functions. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this ~ APPROVED r ~~~u Enrique J. Alva Francisco Executive Director Executive 50~u'~ance & action. ~S TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS: ~,,~~ Gutierrez Director Management Services Agency JWF 6/13/06 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDING SECTION 2-300.4 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO CONFERRING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT UPON THE DEPUTY CITY MANAGER OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Council is desirous of transferring the powers and duties of the Executive Director of Community Development to the Deputy City Manager for Development Services. Section 2. Section 2-300.4 is added to the Santa Ana Municipal Code to read as follows Sec. 2-300.4. Powers and Duties of Deputy City Manager for Development Services. All references in this Code, or in any resolution, agreement, regulation, authorization or directive of the city council, the city manager or any board or commission of the City of Santa Ana, or any agency or body controlled by the City of Santa Ana, or in any document whatsoever, to the executive director of community development shall be deemed references to the deputy city manager for development services, and the deputy city manager for development services shall assume all powers and duties otherwise exercised by the executive director of community development. Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance No. NS- Page 1 of 2 50C-2 ADOPTED this day of 2006 Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney AYES: NOES: Councilmembers Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify that the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Ordinance No. NS- Page 2 of 2 Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 50C-3 50C-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: AMENDMENTS TO BIG INDEPENDENT CITIES EXCESS POOL (BICEP) AGREEMENTS AND NEW PROGRAM DOCUMENTS APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution which shall: CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Approve the Amended and Restated BICEP Joint Powers Agreement among the five city members of BICEP. 2. Approve the Amended Bylaws between BICEP and the member cities. 3. Approve the Revised Master Memorandum of Liability Coverage. 4. Approve the Liability Program document. 5. Approve the Workers' Compensation Program document. DISCUSSION BICEP was initially formed in 1988 in response to the extreme difficulty cities were having in obtaining liability insurance coverage. The cities of Huntington Beach, Santa Ana, San Bernardino, Oxnard and Pomona were the charter members which formed BICEP. Subsequently, the City of Pomona withdrew and the City of West Covina joined BICEP in October 2003. In order to provide adequate reserves for liability coverage, BICEP issued bonds in 1988 and as a further consequence entered into certain legal "operating" documents to provide the necessary and required protection for bondholders. More specifically, the Liability Risk Coverage Agreement and Trust Indenture were specifically crafted to ensure that the premiums paid in and the settlements paid out under the liability coverage program, were administratively handled to protect the interest of bondholders. In October 2003, BICEP determined to retire the bonds and with the ratification of the City Councils of each Member, undertook necessary actions to defease the bonds in March 2004. With the retirement of this 55A-1 Amendments to BICEP Agreements June 19, 2006 Page 2 of 3 bonded indebtedness, the BICEP Board has been diligently working to revise the "operating" documents to remove the now unnecessary and burdensome provisions related to bondholder protection. The goal of the Board is to replace the existing operating documents with new operating documents that ensure efficiency in handling claims and provide clarity in the obligations and rights of each City member in BICEP. With these goals in mind, and in consultation with the City Attorney, the amended and restated Joint Powers Agreement, along with the new operating documents, are being presented for your review and approval. These documents are intended to fully replace the existing Joint Powers Agreement and operating documents originally entered into in 1988, with one exception. That exception relates to how a charter member(i.e., Huntington Beach, Oxnard, San Bernardino and Santa Ana)will continue to participate in the reserves for liability coverage created by the now- retired bonds. To this extent only and subject to the final disposition of all claims which occurred prior to the defeasance of the bonds, the terms and conditions of the existing Liability Risk Coverage Agreement would remain in force and effect. Otherwise, on or after July 1, 2004, the rights and obligations for coverage of any Member of BICEP would be controlled under the proposed operating documents, if approved. In drafting the new Joint Powers Agreement and each proposed new operating document, all member's City Attorney were consulted. The attached operating documents provide the following: • The Joint Powers Agreement and the proposed Bylaws will broaden the definition of "Member" from any "California city which has executed the Agreement (i.e., the Joint Powers Agreement)" to "any public agency as the term `public agency' is defined by Section 6500 of the Joint Powers Law" (the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Government Code Section 6500 et seq.). • The proposed Bylaws would include and change the eligibility criteria for admission to BICEP. • The proposed new Bylaws would clarify that the Board of BICEP has the authority to make substantive revisions to the operating documents and the terms and conditions of coverage for the Members. Each Member City continues to protect its individual interests through the City Council's designation of the representative to the Board. • Pursuant to the Bylaws, coverage for each Member of BICEP would be provided through a Memorandum of Liability Coverage and through various Risk Management Programs determined and authorized by the BICEP Board, which is a similar procedure in other such pools. 55A-2 Amendments to BICEP Agreements June 19, 2006 Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT The approval of the above five documents will make it easier for BICEP to add new members in the future; hereby, reducing the City's future premiums. Efirique J/./Al a Executiv Di ect r Personnel Ser 'ces 55A-3 (JWF 6/13/06) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE LIABILITY RISK COVERAGE AGREEMENT AND THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE BIG INDEPENDENT CITIES EXCESS POOL JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY, AUTHORIZING, RATIFYING, AND APPROVING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The City of Santa Ana is a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the constitution and laws of the State of California (the "City"); and B. The Cities of Huntington Beach, Oxnard, West Covina, San Bernardino, and Santa Ana (the "Cities") are the current Members of the Big Independent Cities Excess Pool Joint Powers Authority (BICEP), a joint exercise of powers entity organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "Authority"); and C. The Authority approved and entered into certain operating documents to carry out the purpose of the Authority to jointly develop and fund programs for comprehensive liability coverage and other coverages, including but not limited to, Bylaws, a Liability Risk Coverage Agreement, a Memorandum of Liability Coverage, and the Trust Agreement, all originally dated as of October 1, 1988 and subsequently amended from time to time (the "Original Operating Documents"); and D. The Cities and the Authority now desires to amend and restate the form of the Authority's operating documents in order to provide clarity and efficiency in providing coverages to its Members, and to allow the expansion of membership in the Authority to any public agency, as that term is defined in the California Government Code commencing at Section 6500 et seq. Section 2. The forms of the following documents are on file with the Clerk of the Council (the "Clerk") and have been submitted to this City Council for approval: Resolution No. 2006-XXX 55A-4 Page 1 of 3 (a) The Joint Powers Agreement; (b) The Amended Bylaws; (c) The Memorandum of Liability Coverage; (d) The Liability Program; (e) The Workers' Compensation Program. Section 4. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the City; to execute and deliver foregoing documents and such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof, with such non-substantive changes as may be approved by the City Attorney. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take such actions and approve such document as the City Manager, in consultation with the Risk Manager and City Attorney, deems necessary or convenient to carry out the purpose of this resolution. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 2 of 3 55A-5 AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2006-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006-XXX 55A-6 Page 3 of 3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA _ APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 1St Reading ^ Ordinance on 2nd Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ 1 CITY MANAGER -' RECOMMENDED ACTION CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER Adopt a resolution affirming consistency between the City's Circulation Element and the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. DISCUSSION Each year local agencies are required to submit documentation to the Orange County Transportation Authority to obtain and remain eligible to receive Measure M Program Funds. Additionally, every even-numbered year, the City is required to adopt a resolution affirming consistency between the City's Circulation Element and the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). The resolution attests that the City's adopted General Plan Circulation Element does not preclude implementation of the MPAH within the City of Santa Ana. Furthermore, it declares that no unilateral reduction in through-lanes has been made on MPAH arterials during Fiscal Years 2004/2005 and 2005/2006, that a uniform setback ordinance is in effect, and that provisions are in place to limit access to arterial highways in order to protect the integrity of the system. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of the resolution will enable the City to approximately $3.8 million Measure M turnback funds eligible for all Competitive Grant Funding Programs OCTA. ames G. Ross Executive Director Public Works Agency continue to receive each year and to be administered by the 55B-1 bk:6/13/06 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CONCERNING THE STATUS OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA'S GENERAL PLAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana does find, determine and declare as follows: A. The City of Santa Ana desires to maintain and improve the streets within its jurisdiction, including those arterials contained in the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). B. The City of Santa Ana has endorsed a definition of, and a process for, determining consistency of the City's Traffic Circulation Plan with the MPAH. C. The City has adopted a General Plan Circulation Element, which does not preclude implementation of the MPAH within its jurisdiction. D. The City is required to adopt a resolution every even numbered year informing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) that the City's Circulation Element is in conformance with the MPAH and whether any changes to any arterial highways of said Circulation Element have been adopted by the City during Fiscal Years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. E. The City is required to send every even numbered year to the OCTA all recommended changes to the City Circulation Element and the MPAH for the purpose of requalifying for participation in the Combined Transportation Funding Programs. F. The City is required to self certify its Pavement Management Plan (PMP) every two years and to provide OCTA with the PMP Certification in order to obtain and remain eligible for receiving Measure M Funds. Section 2. The City of Santa Ana does hereby inform OCTA of the following: A. The arterial highway portion of the City Circulation Element is in conformance with the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. B. The City attests that no unilateral reduction in through lanes has been made on any MPAH arterials during Fiscal Years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. C. The City has adopted a uniform setback ordinance providing for the preservation of rights-of-way consistent with the MPAH arterial highway classification. 55B-2 D. The City has adopted provisions for the limitation of access to arterial highways in order to protect the integrity of the system. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney By: Benjamin Kaufman Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: ABSTAI N Councilmembers Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers 55B-3 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana 55B-4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JUNE 19, 2006 TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2006-02 AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2006-01 TO CONSTRUCT THE CRAZY HORSE SQUARE DEVELOPMENT AT 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE - DYERHOLLOW PARTNERS , L ,.~~ APPLI~:Q~iT CITY ft/1ANAGER RECOMMENDED ACTION CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Ordinance on 151 Reading ^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading ^ Implementing Resolution ^ Set Public Hearing For_ CONTINUED TO FILE NUMBER 1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-109. 2. Adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2006-01 as conditioned. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION On May 22, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-109, adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 and adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2006-01 as conditioned by a vote of 6:0 (Cribb absent) to construct the Crazy Horse Square Development within the Specific Development No. 8 (SD-8) zoning district at 1580 East Warner Avenue. The Planning Commission made no changes to the recommended conditions of approval outlined in the attached staff report (Exhibit A). Staff received comments from the Airport Land Use Commission and Caltrans pertaining to the environmental documentation prepared for the project. Staff's response to these comments has been attached to the mitigated negative declaration (Exhibit B). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. ,~ Jay Trevino E c ive Director Planning & Building Agency BA:rb ba/reports2006/Crazy Horae Square.cc 75A-1 REQUEST FOR Planning Commission Action PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: MAY 22, 2006 ~~ ~~aucation Ist PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING - FILED BY DYERHOLLOW PARTNERS, L.P. FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2006-02 AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2006-01 TO CONSTRUCT THE CRAZY HORSE SQUARE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SD-8 AT 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE Prepared by Bill Apple Executive Director RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend that the City Council: APPROVED ^ As Recommended ^ As Amended ^ Set Public Hearing For DENIED ^ Applicant's Request ^ Staff Recommendation CONTINUED TO ~~- Planning Manag 1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-109. 2. Adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006- 02. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2006-01 as conditioned. DISCUSSION Request of Applicant Dyerhollow Partners, L.P. is requesting approval of a zoning ordinance amendment (ZOA) to amend Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Zone III) that will allow retail and food uses on the project site. In addition, the applicant is requesting approval of a site plan review to construct three buildings for retail/food uses within a Specific Development zone. Property Description The project site, located at 1580 East Warner Avenue, is within the 34.7-acre Brookhollow Office Park, a 25 building, 399,516 square foot master planned development. The office park is divided into two project areas. Zone I is the largest portion of the office park and primarily permits office uses. Zone II also permits office uses but also allows EXHIBIT A 75A-2 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 Site Plan Review No. 2006-O1 May 22, 2006 Page 2 retail, furniture and bulk merchandise stores with a maximum of two tenants per building. The property has a zoning designation of Specific Development No. 8 (SD-8) and a General Plan Designation of Professional and Administrative Office (PAO), which allows a Floor Area Ratio of 0.50. The property is also designated as a Major Development Area in the General Plan. The project site currently consists of three parcels, with the middle parcel containing an Edison Company utility easement for above ground transmission towers. The easement is approximately 120 feet wide by 278 feet long and runs north and south through the project site. The second parcel is vacant and was the former location of the Crazy Horse Restaurant, which was demolished in 2005. The third parcel is vacant undeveloped land. Access to the project site is from Brookhollow Drive, a private street accessible from Grand and Warner Avenues. Surrounding land uses include one and two-story office buildings and Warner Avenue to the north; a fast food restaurant and the Newport Costa Mesa (SR-55) freeway to the south; the Newport Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway to the east; and a Southern California Edison primary distribution station, Grand Avenue and hotel/motel uses to the west (Exhibits 1 and 2). Project Description The proposed project requires a zoning ordinance amendment to amend the provisions of Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Zone III) that would allow the development of 20,154 square feet of retail and food uses on the site. Three new buildings will be constructed on the site. The buildings will be limited to one and two stories and a height of 40 feet. Building A consists of a sit-down restaurant with an outdoor dining area containing 8,171 square feet. The applicant does not currently have a tenant for this building and it would be the responsibility of any future restaurant tenant to obtain any necessary entitlements such as a conditional use permit and separate City approvals for an entertainment use or liquor sales. Building B is approximately 5,302 square feet in size. The building would contain 4,315 square feet of food uses, including a 1,486 square foot coffee shop, and 987 square feet of retail uses. Building C consists of 6,681 square feet of area. The building contains 2,500 square feet of food uses and 4,211 square feet within two retail tenant spaces. 75A-3 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 Site Plan Review No. 2006-01 May 22, 2006 Page 3 The three buildings will reflect a modern architecture design. Building exteriors have a smooth troweled plaster, natural concrete and light sand plaster finishes. The finishes are accented with stone veneer, cultured stone veneer, and aluminum storefront systems. A combination of earth tone and metal paint finishes are incorporated into the design of the buildings (Exhibit 3). A total of 174 parking spaces are spaces provided. The property owner agreement with Southern California easement to park 63 vehicles. required for the project, with 175 has entered into a long term lease Edison to use the adjacent Edison The landscape palette for the project has been designed to complement the landscaping within the Brookhollow Office Park. A total of 113 trees are proposed on the finished site including 13 Canary Island Pine trees along Grand Avenue and the Newport Costa Mesa (SR-55) freeway frontage. Existing trees will be maintained where possible; however, 44 trees will be removed to facilitate construction (Exhibit 4). Analysis of the Issues The Brookhollow Office Park is governed by uses and standards outlined in Specific Development No. 8 and by Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions controlled by a Master Association. For zoning purposes, the office park is currently divided into two project areas. Zone I is the largest portion of the office park and primarily allows professional and administrative office uses. Zone II allows the same uses permitted in Zone I, but also allows retail, furniture and bulk merchandise stores with a maximum of two tenants per building. Neither project area permits multi-tenant retail uses. Zoning Ordinance Amendment A zoning ordinance amendment is proposed that will amend Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Zone III) that will permit multi-tenant retail and food uses (excluding drive through facilities) within Zone III. This will permit the multi-tenant retail component of the proposed project which is currently not permitted within the Brookhollow Office Park (Exhibit 5). 7 5A-4 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 Site Plan Review No. 2006-O1 May 22, 2006 Page 4 Various standards are proposed to be added or amended to the SD-8 zoning district. First, the minimum lot size of a parcel in Zone III needs to be 2.8 acres, which is the lot size of the proposed project. Second, other standards and uses would match those permitted in Zones I and II. Dancing and indoor entertainment uses in conjunction with a bona fide restaurant would be permitted with an approved conditional use permit. Dancing, concerts or other types of indoor entertainment are not proposed as part of this approval and would require separate permits and approvals. Due to the zoning ordinance amendment associated with this project, a consistency determination is required from the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) The project is located within one of the 60 CNEL noise contours for John Wayne Airport. It is anticipated that the ALUC hearing will take place on June 15, 2006. Southern California Edison Easement Although no formal action is required by the Planning Commission pertaining to the Southern California Edison (SCE) easement, the project will be constructed on the east and west side of an existing easement for transmission lines that will remain in place, with 63 of the required 174 parking spaces provided within the easement area. The property owner has entered into a long term lease agreement with SCE to utilize the Edison easement for required project parking. The lease has been executed for a period of 20 years with two 10 year right of extensions. The applicant has in good faith tried to secure this easement area to satisfy City parking requirements for the life of the project. Staff is comfortable with this lease arrangement; however, the possibility exists that the lease agreement could be revoked or terminated which could result in a reduction of available parking. Should this worst case scenario occur, the property would become legally non-conforming, which means the property could not be added on to, expanded or uses intensified without curing the parking deficiency. With the easement agreement in place, the project complies with City parking requirements. A parking variance was not required because city parking requirements are satisfied by parking on the Edison easement. A parking variance would have long term implications that would affect the future development of the property since it would run with the land and 75A-5 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 Site Plan Review No. 2006-O1 May 22, 2006 Page 5 transfer to future property owners. Given the circumstances of this particular case, the lease agreement that allows parking on the Edison easement seems a better long term solution for the property than granting a parking variance. Site Plan Review Section 41-593.5 (c) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires a review by the Planning Commission of all projects proposed within a specific development zone to ensure the project is in conformance with the specific development plan. Specific Development No. 8 will be amended to create a third project area that will permit multi-tenant retail uses which are not currently permitted within SD-8. The project will comply with design and development standards outlined within Zone III of the specific development plan. The property complies with the landscape standards adopted for the Brookhollow Office Park. A 10-foot landscape setback is provided along the Newport Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway. In addition, approximately 19 percent of the site will be landscaped while only 15 percent is required. Based upon the above analysis of the project, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 and Site Plan Review No. 2006-O1. CEQA Compliance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-109, has been prepared for this project (Exhibit 6). d.Q~ ~~'~Y~-~ Bill Apple Associate Planner Vince Fregoso, AICP Senior Planner BA:jm ba/reports2005/Crazy Horse Square OS-22-06.pc 75A-6 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 Ri R1 R1 R1 „„ ,~ R1 R1 R1 R1 R1 Al GENERAL AGRICULTURAL CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R7 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE -B PARKING MODIFICATION GC GOVERNMENT CENTER R2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE C-SM COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN M1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL R3 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE C7 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENTS C1•MD COMM. COMMERCIAL-MUSEUM DISTRICT MO MILITARY OPERATIONS RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL O OPEN SPACE SD SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN C3A CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST VILLAGE PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CS ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL ZOA 06-2/SPR 06-1 /~ CRAZY HORSE SQUARE ~' 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE - - =SOOFEET 1' = 1000 FEET P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y EXHIBIT 1 75A-7 ~- ~ v~i RITCHEY ST. TACO ABBOTT LIGHT W = BELL AWNING INDUSTRIAL COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES ? C7 2 ~ L I G T I N U S T R I A L w 3 WARNER AVENUE HERITAGE PAPER PIONEER PACKING S.C.E. R.V. STORAGE SPOONS RESTAURANT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL w z W Q O Z Q POOL SV. ~ ZOA 06-2/SPR 06-1 CRAZY HORSE SQUARE a l~~ 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE ~' P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y EXHIBIT 2 75A-8 < o e " 3 3" ~ e S E F' ~ Fn ~~ y '" o ~g ~~% m g ppa §~~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~' g2 6~g ~ Y " f ~ g`~ ~ ~ygjb o~ s ~ r A S ~~ ~~ ~d ! ~~ ~~'~ ~~ sq ~~ ~ ~^ 3t g e x,; gig: ~ ~ ~. ~ s~ ~p G s~ o~ g~ ~ x ~~ < ~ ~~~~2~~~8~ y~~S~a~~~ ~ ~@~~ ~;~;~~P~§ 4mi~e~ W'~~~s6~1~~~~e~~~~.e~~~~..e~@~~'~ ~ €~~ Q~ LLr ~~~ 5:a~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ - to ~ ~ `~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ es ~ ~ ~6~ ~`~~ $ yG a q6r pe ~~9 y~ ~ a ~ ~ 1y F ~V = ~ @7 =" ~, G 9E ~ ~~ s ~ ~ 4~ 3 P ~ ~ C 8 8, ~ ~_ ~~~e~ ~~E ~ ~ a' F ~~ ~ ~~ ~w~; k~ ~~ ~ ~ F °~ ~'~ 5e ~~ F' ~g~:"~ ~' ~ $~~ ~ e ~ ~ ~, y ~~ ~ ~~~ "~ n 7 995°°°"' q y~ ~ E~ p 4p m CM ~N gp ~ ~~ p ~ i ~° B S ~~' a e .$ ~ a~ ~ F~~e~ 8y~ "e 4 ~ s ~ ` ~ ~ g g~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 6 €~~5~~~ d oo ~e ~e ~R 9w e~~w~~~ ffi ~ R~~~ ~ @~ B~ ~ ~iu a :a ~5 ~ ~ ~4~~=d Ada ^a e A ~ ~ ~k z ~ ~ c ~~ ~ o~ a ~ o 1 .. ~, X101 I I I I I I I I I I I I III III I I~I I l l n o ~~ ~ o "~~ , ~='' ~ 1 ~' ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ . ~~ ~ ~ - - O $~ • ~ ~4 ~.~ ~ .. / \ ~ 4 Oj ~ ~ ~ \~6 ~ \ ~~. ~ ~ ., ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ °I I I I Y I~®~ '~° a ~ S ~ ,~ 41~ l~ 4~ II ~ ~ ~ ® ~ .. P ~ ~ m ~~ ~~ `~ ~ a,,' ~ i ~p u t~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 c5 ~ ~'" ~~ •,.,, ?~4 ~ o0 I - _=_ _==_ -_ oWC ~==~~- _____-~ Q i i i i " ~ W /~~~cn / ~~ ~~ O 4~~~ _ ~ ~ i u a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~a~@e~~ ~qr~ d ~~' ~~~~~~~~~ U ~~~ EXHIBIT 3 Page 1 of 5 ._~ ~ B E 7 ~s m~ d J d~ ~ $~ m ~_ ~I~~~ ;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ G ~ fi g y $ Q x_ err,. ,. .. nR .. 0 sc ~ a^ e~~~ 3~~ ~ 9 0 Q "~~~~~~'~~~9 ~ y~~~:~eg~g~§~~~5 ~ 9 m ~_ <LL [ _~ [_ .j m :o- _ ~ _ .e. N ..o .: ~ e r 0 ~~ ~~g ~~ 4kkg~'~~~~Y~ ~y9 ~E' ~S Y~4~' ~~ i; ~ ~ ~O pp~ 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~P~~:~~~~~~~~~es~~~p~~~ 1. _ d _ i R6d„„ „„„ .°~ R ~ „., 3 ~q E, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~~g~a ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ U Q m m c 0 c~ m w 0 .~ W LL Q ~i r~r^ V/ /W VmJ L.L U :a~ -- ~ a ...0 ~~ a E E g ~s a~ J a~ ~~ ggs ~ a= ~~~ ~~~=~1 :s' t 0 - W m -- _ ( ..o.~~ I..L~ W C _~ 4~ O O L O _O C W W 6 ~ e Q ~ r ya 4 r~ E ~ v+ W ~s € Y ~ ~~ ~ Y a O ~~ ~ ,~~g ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ U !~ P~~~-12 ~ ~~ ~~5 ~ °~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~••` id4 ~ ~gES~sl ~~~ ~~M64~E~ 'p~G'e"~~ Yp~9 ~g~n^~~etlb~2€e~~b~2c~~z ".e~~~~e~6~~~se~~d~'~°9 ~~~~ oai tc® nr p.^. r R rR R SS ~ ., ., :~~ ~ ~~ BB ~ ;gpa ^Ss ^g88 p^ yy ~ 219 2~~ja6 ~A ~F~ 3d 3R 6 ~ tl ~ ~ ~p ~ e @966 ma ~~~ ~~ ~a ~ ~ 5 ~ 9 ~ffi ~ ~ e ;o• o - u ?z - < ._o.: W W c 0 c^~, W W L 'i W W Q a C~ ~ (n E W ~s d ~~ 7 J/`1ag~ ~f 5 ~ J a~ O ~a _ ~~ ~~ ~ ~' U ~~ ~ i ~ ~ l ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ F g @ p p p y m ~t ~` ~° 9 ~g F4 e e e e e e e t e ~~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ E ~ a ~ E E ~ I ~~ ~ I~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ € ~ g ~ o~ O O a ~f ` (~~ `~ Irr a °~ ~Ra wm ~° _\~~ i \~~` y 1 e 4 a y i ~i ., _~= `~~ n ~~w y~ ~ r Z a w w F 0 Z F X w W Q 7 a N W / N, 0 I N Q U ~~ ~~~ 'I ~~s ~~~ l'~"~3~144 ! ~ 1 ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~~ ~~~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f~l~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~~ ~.~~ ~ ~ (~ t ~ ~ $ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ i ~ ~4~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..00®•e®m m®... ...a .®m o o. ®s o 75~~15 m ~ ~o w F o~, ~_ n ~';~ Q :9~ ^d ~ e~ ~y ~~ z g a m i } Q a z W R a W Q d N W I ~~ N~~'~ Q ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ c~ U~~ S fi k 5 ri iil ~ ; ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ S~ E t gp~ ~ 2 e 75316 m U ,. , W °W F ~°' ~N ~~ a ..~ . ~& N e~ ~~ e z g a w w a z J W R a W Q W I~ }~ N s ~~~ Q ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ U~~ l I ~~ ~ v~i HITCHEY ST. TACO ABBOTT LIGHT W 2 BELL AWNING INDUSTRIAL COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES ? (7 C7 ~ LIG T IN USTRIAL w 3 WARNER AVENUE HERITAGE PAPER PIONEER PACKING S.C.E. R.V. STORAGE SPOONS RESTAURANT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL w z W Q 0 Z Q POOL SV. ~ ZOA 06-2/SPR 06-1 CRAZY HORSE SQUARE ~.. 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE ~' P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y EXHIB T 75,Q~~~ SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT #8 Plan (Redline Draft) Additions General Notes Water within the district will be by private water facilities served by the City of Santa Ana facilities within adjacent public streets. 2. Sewage disposal will be by private sewers and appurtenances connected to City of Santa Ana facilities within adjacent public streets. 3. Easements shall be created for all private and public utilities which cross over, along, under or through any parcels which may be created within this district and are intended to serve other parcels within the district. 4. The development and management of Brookhollow will be subject to the supervision of the Brookhollow Office Park Association, anon-profit corporation, and to the terms and conditions of the recorded Declaration of Establishment of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of Brookhollow Office Park to insure continued maintenance of utilities, private streets, landscaping and general appearance of the development within the district. Any amendments to the CC&Rs, which affect these regulations, shall require approval of the City Attorney and Planning Department. 5. Existing private streets and driveway access to adjacent public streets shall be maintained. Additional access to adjacent public streets proposed after adoption of this ordinance shall meet the requirements and approval of the Director of Public Works. Intent and Purpose It is the intent of this district to allow a combination of multi-tenant leasehold professional and business office uses, single parcel professional and business offices uses, and single parcel retail, commercial and minimal impact industrial activity uses (as specified in this ordinance). Specific plan review shall be required for all development within this district. Site Requirements A. Site Coverage 1) Structure shall not cover more than 55 percent of the total net site area. (Net area shall be the gross area less any area used for public or private street purposes.) 2) Each parcel to be created within this district shall have a minimum average width of 1 foot for each 2.5 feet of average depth. 3) The minimum lot size for parcels within Zone III shall be 2 8 acres (121 968 square feet 75~Qg18 B. Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in Zone I: 1) Professional Offices a. Accountants b. Attorneys c. Dentist, doctors and related professions d. Engineers, architects and planners e. Research and development facilities f. Private trade, vocational or professional schools 2) Business offices, including but not limited to: a. Advertising agencies b. Banks or other financial offices c. Employment agencies d. Escrow and real estate companies e. Insurance companies f. Corporate headquarters g. Photographers, artist, etc. h. Travel agencies i. Computer or computer training centers 3) Laboratories except those, which emit offensive odors, vibrations, or may be hazardous to the public. 4) Political, civic and charitable organization uses, which shall not include bingo or other gaming activities. 5) Restaurants. 6) Union Halls 7) Museums, art galleries and libraries. 8) Religious meeting halls 9) Day care and child care facilities, nurseries, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in Zone II: 1) All uses within Zone I. 2) Minimal impact light industry. 75~~19 3) Hotels, motels and associated shops and services related to the hotel or motel uses. 4) Retail, with a maximum of two tenants per building. 5) Furniture and bulk merchandise stores with a maximum of two tenants building. The following uses shall be permitted in Zone III: 1) Professional Offices a. Accountants b. Attorneys c. Dentist, doctors and related professions d. Engineers, architects and planners e. Research and development facilities 2) Business offices, including but not limited to: a. Advertising a eg_ ncies b. Banks or other financial offices c. Employment a encies d. Escrow and real estate companies e. Insurance companies f. Corporate headquarters g. Photographers, artist, etc. h. Travel agencies 3) Commercial uses, including: a. Food and retail uses excluding drive through facilities The following uses shall be yermitted in Zone III with a Conditional Use Permit: a. Dancing or entertainment ancillary to a permitted restaurant use. b. The serving of alcohol in conjunction with a permitted food/restaurant use. C. Any use permitted herein may be prohibited by reason of noise, odor, dust or electrical interference or adverse environmental impact on adjacent uses. D. Setbacks: 1) Front setback along public street frontage shall be 20 feet minimum. 2) Front setback along private street frontage shall be: a) 10 feet within Zone I. b) 20 feet within Zone II. c) 10 feet within Zone III 75~~20 Side yard setbacks shall be 10 feet. 3) Rear yard setback shall be 10 feet. E. Building Heights: 1) Structures shall be limited to four stories and not exceed 70 feet in height in Zone I. 2) Structures shall be limited to four stories and not exceed 70 feet in height in Zone II. 3) Structures shall be limited to two stories and shall not exceed 40 feet in height in Zone III. F. Landscaping: 1) All sites shall have a minimum landscape coverage of 15 percent. 2) The landscape setback along public streets shall be 20 feet. 3) The landscape setback along private streets shall be 20 feet fully landscaped or a minimum of 10 feet parallel with and along the private street line landscaped. The remainder of the required setback area shall be used for parking and/or vehicular circulation, provided a matching square footage of such area used for parking and/or vehicular circulation, is provided on the site and is visible from either public streets, freeways or private streets. 4) Side yard landscape shall be a minimum of five feet. (This requirement applies to new construction. An area equal to this five-foot requirement maybe proposed at another location on the parcel. 5) A minimum landscape setback of 10 feet is to be maintained along the frontage; and, in addition, there shall be a 15-foot wide planter island, fully landscaped, placed an average 160 feet apart and extending into the paved area the depth of the parking spaces along said freeway frontage. No curb and gutter shall be permitted along the edge of paving parallel to the Newport Freeway right-of--way to allow for sheet flow of drainage from the rear portion of any parcels created along the frontage in accordance with the approved drainage plan on file with the City of Santa Ana. However, parking bumpers shall be required in lieu of the curb and gutter. 6) A landscape plan shall be approved by the appropriate City agency prior to issuance of building permits. 7) Landscaping shall include trees, and at least 50 percent of the trees shall be within the parking area itself so as to give visual relief to rows of parked vehicles. 8) Landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy or utility release and permanently maintained. 9) Landscape plan shall include an irrigation system to be installed and maintained. 75~~21 G. Parking Requirements: The parking requirements in this district shall conform to the requirements of Article IV, Sections 41- 614, 41-615, 41-616, and 41-617, except that there shall be no requirement that one-third (1/3) of the total lot be devoted to off street parking. Zone III. The City recognizes that a lease agreement has been entered into between the property owner and Southern California Edison to utilize the Transmission right-of-way easement to provide 63 parking spaces to satisf ~ City of Santa Ana parking requirements for the project. Should this lease be revoked or terminated resulting in the loss of parking spaces or the loss of continuous and uninterrupted circulation and access to these spaces the following remedies shall be used to cure the parking deficit: a. A parking study shall be provided by the Cit awe property owner's expense that determines if a parking deficiency has been created and examines ways the parking deficit can be cured b. Should the parking study determine that a parking deficiency exists replacement parking necessary to cure the deficiency shall be provided within 100 feet of the project site All signage within Project Area III shall comply with the Cit~~n code Division 2 Sign standards and regulations amended from time to time. I. Storage and Refuse Collection Areas: All storage and refuse areas shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot block walls and solid gates so as to eliminate unsightliness. No open outside storage shall be permitted. 75~-~22 CRAZY HORSE SQUARE Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration ER-2004-109 Prepared By City of Santa Ana Planning & Building Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Apri12006 ZOA 06-t2~1SPR 06-1 6f~B'~~ MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Lisa Bist COUNCIL MEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Carlos Bustamante Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. BOX 1988 • Santa Ana, California 92702 (714) 667-2700. Fax (714) 973-1461 wwwsanta-ana.org NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy This is to inform the general public that the City of Santa Ana proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration for the following project: Project Title: Crazy Horse Square Project Description: The proposed project consists of the following: The proposed project would require a zoning ordinance amendment (ZOA) to amend the provisions of Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Area III) that would allow the development of 20,154 square feet of retail and food uses on the project site; and Site Plan Review (SPR) approval to construct the project within a specific development zone (SD-8). Three separate parcels will be consolidated into one parcel and three new buildings would be constructed on the site. Access to the project site would be from Brookhollow Drive, a private street accessible from Grand and Warner Avenues. Project Location: 1580 East Warner Avenue Project Number: DP 04-32; ER 04-109; ZOA 06-2; SPR 06-1 Public Review Period: 4-21-06 to 5-22-06 Hearing Date: 5-22-06 Hearing Location: City of Santa Ana Council Chambers 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 The Negative Declaration and Initial Study as well as all referenced documents will be available for public review at the City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency located at 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California. Please submit any comments on the Negative Declaration to the City on or before 5-22-06. Please direct your comments to: Bill Apple, Associate Planner, City of Santa Ana, P.O. Box 1988, M-20, Santa Ana, CA, 92702. If you have any questions or would like any additional information, please contact Bill Apple, Associate Planner at (714) 667- 2747. 7~~13~4 ~s s~z MAYOR Miguel A. Pulido MAYOR PRO TEM Lisa Bist COUNCIL MEMBERS Claudia C. Alvarez Carlos Bustamante Alberta D. Christy Mike Garcia Jose Solorio CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. BOX 1988 • Santa Ana, California 92702 (714) 667-2700 . Fax (714) 973-1461 www.santa-ana.org CITY MANAGER David N. Ream CITY ATTORNEY Joseph W. Fletcher CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Patricia E. Healy MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to the Procedures of the City of Santa Ana for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Evaluator has completed an Initial Study for the project described below: Project Number: DP 04-32, ZOA 06-2, SPR 06-1, ER 04-109 Applicant: Dyerhollow Partners, L.P., a California Limited Partnership clo Dan Hunter Project Location /Address: 1580 East Warner Avenue. Project Title /Description: Crazy Horse Square /The proposed project would require a zoning ordinance amendment (ZOA) to amend the provisions of Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Area III) that would allow the development of 20,154 square feet of retail and food uses on the project site and Site Plan Review (SPR) approval to construct the project within a specific development zone (SD-8). Three separate parcels will be consolidated into one parcel and three new buildings will be constructed on the site. Access to the project site is from Brookhollow Drive, a private street accessible from Grand and Warner Avenues. And does hereby find: That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of revisions to the project and mitigation measures placed on the project, and agreed to by the applicant, reduce each impact to below a level of significance. Signature: ~ Date: April 18, 2006 Case Planner This determination is not final until adopted by the decision-making body or administrative official, and a Notice of Determination is filed. 7 5~a~~ 5 ~s s~z SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY The purpose of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is to describe the proposed project and provide an evaluation of potential environmental effects associated with the short-term construction and long-term operation of the proposed Crazy Horse Square Food, Retail and Office Center. The Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Santa Ana CEQA Environmental Procedures. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency for the proposed project. The Lead Agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving the proposed project. PROJECT APPROVAL PROCESS The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been submitted to potentially affected agencies and individuals. In accordance with Section 15072 (b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines a Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the project area. There will be a 30-day public review period for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with Section 15073 of the CEQA Guidelines. In reviewing the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, affected public agencies and the interested public should focus on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing the potential impacts on the environment and ways in which the potentially significant effects of the project are avoided or mitigated through the design of the project. Comments on the Initial Study can be sent to the following: Mr. Bill Apple, Associate Planner City of Santa Ana PO Box 1988, M-20 Santa Ana, California 92702 1 75~~6 SECTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is a request for approval of a zoning ordinance amendment to amend provisions of Specific Development No. 8, conditional use permit to allow development of retail and restaurant uses within the Specific Development Area, and to allow parking on an Edison easement, and site plan review approval for development within a specific development zone. Additionally, a lot merger is necessary to consolidate parcels. SETTING The project site is a 2.82-acre parcel located at 1580 East Warner Avenue. The project site is located within the Brookhollow Office Park. The Brookhollow Office Park consists of 34.7 acres and contains 25 buildings with a total 399,516 square feet of office area. The Brookhollow Office Park has a zoning designation of Specific Development No. 8 (SD-8) and a General Plan Designation of Professional and Administrative Office (PAO), which allows a Floor Area Ratio of 0.50. As shown on Exhibit 1, the project site is located near the intersection of Brookhollow Drive and Grand Avenue. The site is generally bounded by one and two story office buildings, Brookhollow Drive and Warner Avenue to the north; a fast food restaurant and the Costa Mesa (SR-55) freeway to the south; the Costa Mesa (SR-55) freeway to the east; and a Southern California Edison primary distribution station, vacant land and hotel/motel uses to the west The project site is composed of three parcels. One parcel contains a Southern California Edison Easement with an above ground transmission tower. The second parcel is vacant and was the former location of the Crazy Horse Restaurant, which has been demolished. The third parcel is vacant undeveloped land. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project would amend the provisions of Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Area III) that would allow the development of 20,154 square feet of retail, and food uses on the project site. The three separate parcels would be consolidated into one parcel and three new buildings would be constructed on the site. Access to the project site would be from Brookhollow Drive, a private street accessible from Grand and Warner Avenues. 2 7~~~~7 The three proposed buildings are referred to as Building A, Building B and Building C. Building A consists of 8,171 square feet of area. The building would contain a 8,171 square foot sit down restaurant with an outdoor dinning area. In the future, this restaurant may include a concert venue and/or nightclub within existing square footages which would operate exclusively during the evening hours when other uses within the office park are closed. A nightclub/concert venue would require separate City approvals. Building B would consist of 5,302 square feet of area. The building would contain 4,315 square feet of food uses including a 1,486 square foot coffee shop. In addition, 987 square feet of retail uses are proposed. Building C would consist of 6,681 square feet of area. The building would contain 2,500 square feet of food uses and two retail tenant spaces totaling 4,211 square feet. As shown on Exhibit 3 the three buildings reflect a modern architecture design. The exterior of the buildings would have a smooth troweled plaster finish, natural concrete finish and a light sand plaster finish. The exterior building finish would be accented with stone veneer, cultured stone veneer, and aluminum storefront systems. A combination of tans and metal paint finishes would be incorporated into the design of the buildings. Parking A total of 174 parking spaces are required for the project while 175 parking spaces are provided on site. In the future, the 8,060 square foot restaurant may include a concert venue and/or nightclub which would operate exclusively during the evening hours when other uses within the office park are closed. Should this occur at some future date, parking could be shared between uses within the office park since they would operate at different times. Phasing/Construction Operations The proposed project would be developed in one phase. Construction operations for the project would involve the clearing of the project site and construction of the three new buildings. 3 7 ~ei'k3~ ~ Ri R1 R1 R1 g R1 Rt R1 M1 R1 R1 R1 R1 w,„ ~. R1 R1 M- R1 R1 R1 D R2 ~ ,,,. R2 ~~' R2 R1 ~'~"r R2 nni R2 R2 M1 SD-43 // ~~ \~ cry or r~,r~~ crry or rv,rln At GENERALAGRICULTURAL CR COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE -B PARKING MODIFICATION GC GOVERNMENT CENTER R2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE C-SM COMMERCIAL SOUTH MAIN M1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL R3 MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Ct COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL R4 SUBURBAN APARTMENTS Ct-MD COMM. COMMERCIAL•MUSEUM DISTRICT MO MILITARY OPERATIONS RE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE C2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL O OPEN SPACE SD SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT C3 CENTRAL BUSINESS P PROFESSIONAL SP SPECIFIC PLAN C3-A CENTRAL BUSINESS-ARTIST' VILLAGE PCD PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C4 PLANNED SHOPPING CENTER PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT C5 ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL CRAZY HORSE SQUARE ~ 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE -=SOOFEET 1' = 1000 FEET P L A N N I N__G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y EXHIBIT 1 7~~-,~~9 N O O uo ... b uv O ~'~'3~0 am ~~3 mm"ad ;~~~~~lE ~a~;~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ pof `d a~ ym~~ i ^a4 r~4 ~i~a .i+~~RE ~~~~~ 6 k 6~ C ~6G G a gap® S E~'.. #~ ~ $$ § B $ 6 G k k C °~ a ~~•~~ ~ e ~~~l~ ~~ m~m~~ ~~ ~ ~'~~~LL~~ o~ g ~ ~ an ~ ~ >¢ ~ gg ~ ~ ~ a a o s~ w ~~~ e ~ ~~ a ~ a ~~ ~ ~ 'P ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ eg~ g ~~ a ~ ~ ~e s ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ono ~ ~~ ~s ke o n$ ~ vm ve ~ ~~ ss a4 ~~ ~e e€ ~' e„ ~~ $ ffi~ ~~~ Ev k• ~ ~~ ®o®®®oooo®®o®® oooooo®o® o®o ppg~ 6' 9 ~ d~~ £ e .~ ~ E B~ zH ~ ~ pW 4~ ~~ ~R $a n~~a~~. ~ ~ ~~~ s ~~ ~~ ~ ~w a ~ ~~ ~ a ~~~~ ~~~ ~e3 ~ ~ oooo®®o®ooooooooo®o®ooo oa ~~°~~ 3 1 ~ 111 i~ ~ -moo ' ~ ; `~ s of ~ ~ _i ' - ~ ~ c ~ y `` ., \ \ `~. y ~ Q S ~ \ '~Ol~ `fJ \ # \ `` O ~: \, 0 .~ ~~ ins ~E ~ j6 .. 2 W ~€ ~Y Y ~ P ~ ~~ 9 4 ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~i ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ;i n ~ ~ ~ R- rq a i S F ~ ~~~PPP ~®g G~! ~~o ~' ' ~ d49~8 b :G' T y~y :e.- 8 ...o.: ~ a L m a B E 7 9 g c~b m~ i J o~ m a°° a ~$$ 8= pap 6~~7 m m r ~~ ~ a ~ ~ gpg ~ ~ ~ ~ yy ~ ~;, e ~ ~ ~ ~ @gg~ pp r ~ ~LL ~y ~ ~ € ~~ g~~ ~~gLLg ? Yq ~~ 3 <~ ~ as ~~h, '~~ ~~ i 5 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ e~ ~ s6. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s §~ tai@~~a~ ~$~~~~~ !e m ~ a w ~~ _ ~,. U W Q M~_ W C W L .` W mW I..L Q ~; /C/~~ VJ 'W VJ O 2 U :a• _ E a E 7 E 8 ~S a~ e aQ~ DU ~_ oam ~~~ ~' _~ 7~-~2 a 8 LL Y ~~ °~9 ~ ~gF~ ~ ~~ ~~~a~: ~ ~~6~g~ ~ Es ~ ~ y6 ky Y 9p a yyyeep CQ a gy b mi ~ ~ i' Y ~ ~~ ~ ~ d tl q~s ~ Y ~~ k~ „ 11 ~ ~ ggg gg6 @~@ ?f sHy p~~ : d ~~. ~ ~6 Y~ 5 ~~ r ^ k ~ ~ ^ e ~ 9 ~ 2 ~`~ is ~ ? $7 `d d d 2 S `v3 d9 •. ~ ~d ~ ~d ~ ~~ ~9 ~ ~~ ~ ~ e 55~ ~ icg~a ^^s g~ g3~ e ~ k 2~ FB 5~~ dR ~€W db ap ^° ~ tl ~~g ~ ~~ ~ g~g ~~hB ~d ~~'~ ~~ €d d ~ ~ d ~ ~S ~ E o :a' t 0 u < ..o ..! W 0 ^~ W W L .` W W W Q a ~'/^J~ _" E 0 W ~s ~ m~ i ~ j ~~ O ~ ~a _~ ~_ am f ~'~~ N ~~ U ~~ 7~~~3 Discretionary Approvals • Zoning ordinance amendment (ZOA) to amend provisions and uses within SD-8. ~ Site Plan Review to construct three new buildings within SD-8. SECTION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The following is an environmental analysis on the proposed project based on the City of Santa Ana's CEQA Environmental Checklist Form. The analysis incorporates by reference the analysis and findings in the City of Santa Ana Updated General Plan Land Use Element FEIR. Additionally, a traffic impact report has been prepared for the project and has been incorporated into the environmental analysis. For each environmental issue, the analysis identifies the level of impact that is anticipated to occur. Where applicable, mitigation measures have been identified to reduce potentially significant impacts to a level considered less than significant. I. AESTHETICS A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a State highway? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is situated within an urban setting and surrounded by developed land uses. There are no scenic vistas or scenic resources within the immediate vicinity of the project site. The project site is adjacent to State Route 55 (SR-55). However, SR-55 is not a designated scenic highway, nor does it contain any scenic resources within or adjacent to its right-of- way. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to any scenic vista or scenic resources. 4 7~-~4 C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and it's surrounding? Less Than Significant The City of Santa Ana has an adopted Urban Design Element that establishes policies, programs and design elements to enhance the aesthetic environment of the City. The design elements that are relevant to the project site include; Districts, Paths, Landmarks, and the SR-55 Scenic Corridor. Districts The Urban Design Element identifies that the project site is located within the Freeway Window North Main Street Design District. The Urban Design Element establishes goals and policies to help guide the design of land uses proposed within a Design District. Specifically, land uses proposed within a Design District should exhibit high quality design and should incorporate design elements that are proportional and aesthetically related to the District setting. The proposed project has a modern architecture design that incorporates a number of building elements into its design to reflect a high quality project. The design of the project would be different from existing buildings in the area, but would still be aesthetically related to the existing setting. Implementation of the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site or the surrounding area. Paths Paths are means by which people serve as the framework for the project area, the Urban Design as a Path. The proposed project Path design element in that would be provided along Grand A travel throughout the City and City's urban form. Within the Element identifies Grand Avenue would be consistent with the a twenty foot landscape setback venue to enhance the streetscape. Landmarks Landmarks are elements of the urban form containing design features that reinforce uniqueness and memorability. Within the project area, the Urban Design Element identifies Hotel Terrace as a landmark. The proposed project would be consistent with the landmark design element in that it would provide uses that would compliment the Hotel Terrace Specific Development area. Additionally, the design of the proposed 5 75~#f3~5 project would not be inconsistent with the high quality aesthetic environment of the Hotel Terrace area. SR-55 Scenic Corridor Scenic Corridors provide views of the City and largely influence the public's aesthetic and visual experience. The Urban Design Element identifies State Route 55 as a scenic corridor. The proposed project would be consistent with the Scenic Corridor Element in that the proposed project's view from the SR-55 would reflect high quality design, landscape treatment and lighting treatment that enhance the project site's aesthetic appearance. D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is situated within an urbanized area and is surrounded by onstreet lighting. Implementation of the proposed project would not introduce substantial amounts of new sources of light and glare into the project area. Any lighting provided on the project site would be designed and located so that all direct rays are confined to the project site. II. AGRICULTURE A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agriculture use? B. Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or a Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agriculture use? No Impact According to the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site does not contain Unique Farmlands, Prime Farmlands or Farmlands of Statewide Importance. Additionally, based on a site visit conducted by the City's Environmental Coordinator, the project site is currently not in agricultural production. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of any farmlands. 6 7~#~6 III. AIR QUALITY A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or congestion Management Plan? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin and subject to the requirements of the Clear Air Act at both the Federal and State level, as implemented by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is the primary planning document to monitor if air quality standards and objectives are being achieved in the South Coast Air Basin. The air quality objectives in the AQMP are based upon population and growth projections provided in regional planning programs and local general plans. The proposed project would be consistent with the City's General Plan and the growth projection for the project area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not be in conflict with the Air Quality Management Plan. B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? D. Expose Sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated As mentioned previously, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates air quality pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin. Pollutants for which ambient standards have set are referred to as criteria pollutants. Criteria pollutants include Ozone (03), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (N02), Sulfur Dioxide (S02), and Particulate Matter (PM10) The South Coast Air Basin is currently a non-attainment area for Carbon Monoxide, Ozone and Particulate Matter. The SCAQMD considers an air quality impact to be significant if it exceeds the criteria pollutant thresholds identified in the Table A-l. 7 737 Table A-1 Emission Thresholds Of Significance Project Pollutant Construction Tons/ Operations Pounds/Day Quarter Pounds/Day Carbon Monoxide 550 24.75 550 Reactive Organic Compounds 75 2.5 55 Nitrogen Oxides 100 2.5 55 Particulate Matter 150 6.75 150 Long-term Operational Air Quality Impacts The primary source of operational emissions would be generated by vehicle travel to and from the project site. A relatively minor amount of gaseous emissions would also occur from natural gas and electricity usage. Long-term air quality impacts associated with the build out of the City's General Plan was analyzed in FEIR 97-01. FEIR 97-01 determined that build out of the General Plan would result in unavoidable adverse air quality impacts. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was adopted by the City of Santa Ana to address long-term unavoidable air quality impacts associated within implementation and build out of the General Plan. The proposed project would be developed at a lower level of intensity permitted under the General Plan. The long-term air quality impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than the air quality emissions projected in General Plan Land Use Element Update Environmental Impact report FEIR 97-1. No mitigation measures are necessary. Short-term construction Related Air Quality Impacts Construction operations associated with the proposed project could potentially result in short-term increases in particulate mater, and to a lesser degree increases in carbon monoxide and ozone. Peak day construction emissions for most pollutants would occur during the clearing, excavation and grading phases. The proposed project would require earthwork activity to provide for the construction of building slabs and onsite access ways. Using the South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook as a guideline, the threshold of potentially significant short-term air quality impacts would involve the 8 7~-,~8 grading of 1,309,000 square feet of area. Assuming grading of the entire project site, approximately 130,680 square feet of area would be graded. The proposed grading would be considerably less than the threshold of significance established by the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. To minimize dust impacts during construction, the proposed project would be subject SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403. To insure compliance with Fugitive Dust Rule 403 the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure • During construction, the contractor would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403 to suppress dust generated by construction operations. To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans and construction plans for the proposed project shall reflect the following notes: 1. All material excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering with complete coverage shall occur at least twice daily, once in the late morning and once after work is done for the day. 2. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 3. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 4. All material transported offsite shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 5. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 6. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. 7. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for onsite and offsite construction activities. 9 7 ~i~-,~ 9 E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact The long-term operation of the proposed project would not emit objectionable odors. Construction operations for the project could emit objectionable odors. However, the odors would be short-term and would not be considered significant. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or natural comanunity identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact The project site is situated within an urban setting. According to the California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base and the City's Updated General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no sensitive biological resources located on or within the nearby vicinity of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any adverse impacts to any biological resources. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? 10 7#~0 Less Than Significant Impact According to the National Register of Historical Resources and the City of Santa Ana Local Register of Historical Resources, there are no historical structures on the project site or within the Brookhollow Office Park. B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? D. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique paleontogical resource or site? Less Than Significant The proposed project would be constructed on an improved building site. According to the General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no known cultural resources on the project site. Given the fact that the site is improved, the probability for the discovery of unknown cultural resources would be low. VI. GEOLOGY/SOILS A-1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? No Impact The Seismic Hazards Mapping Act of 1991 established a statewide seismic hazard mapping and technical advisory program to assist cities and counties in protecting the public health and safety from the effects of strong ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides or other ground failure and other seismic hazards caused by earthquakes. Additionally, the Alquist-Priolo Act directs the State Geologist to delineate regulatory zones that encompass surface traces of active faults that have potential for future surface fault rupture to regulate development near active faults in order to mitigate the hazard of surface fault rupture. The Tustin Quadrangle Official Map of Seismic Hazard Zones dated January 17, 2001 was reviewed to evaluate potential seismic impacts on the project site. According to the Seismic Hazard Zone Map, the project site is not located within a current Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone for fault surface rupture 11 7~i~-,~1 hazard. Additionally, the surface traces of any active or potentially active faults are not known to pass directly through or extend towards the project site. Therefore, the potential for surface rupture due to faulting occurring beneath the project site during the design life of the proposed project is considered low. A-2. Strong Seismic Ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is situated within a highly active seismic region of southern California. A total of 38 active faults have been identified within an approximate 60-mile radius of the project site. The Newport/Inglewood Fault located approximately 13 miles south from the City of Santa Ana is considered to be one of the most dominant faults in regard to potential seismic shaking impacts. The project site could potentially be subject to a maximum credible horizontal ground acceleration of 0.30g from a magnitude 6.9 earthquake along the Newport/Inglewood fault zone. A seismic event of this scale could potentially result significant damage to the proposed project. However, the seismic risks at the project site would not be considered significantly different from other areas in the southern California region. Through the City's development review process, the proposed project would be required to prepare geotechnical study to evaluate seismic constraints and to identify design recommendations to minimize potential seismic shaking impacts. Additionally, the proposed project would be subject to the Seismic Safety Standards of the Uniform Building Code. Preparation and implementation of a geotechnical report and compliance with the Uniform Building Code would reduce potential seismic shaking impacts to a level considered less than significant. A-3. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact Soil liquefaction occurs when loose soil deposits below the water table are subjected to large ground accelerations generated from seismic events. Liquefaction is generally known to occur in saturated cohesionless soils at depths shallower than about 50-feet. According to the General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the project site has high to very high potential for liquefaction impacts. Through the City's development review process, the proposed project would be required to prepare a geotechnical study to evaluate liquefaction constraints and to identify design recommendations to minimize potential liquefaction impacts. Additionally, the proposed project would 12 75~,~2 be subject to seismic safety standards of the Uniform Building Code. Compliance with the Uniform Building Code along with the incorporation of the design recommendations identified in the project geotechnical investigation would reduce potential seismically induced liquefaction and settlement impacts to a level considered less than significant. A-4. Landslides No Impact The project area is flat without any topographical relief. According to General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no landslide planes or slopes within the project area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts in regards to landslides. B. T~Vould the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Erosion refers to the removal of soil from exposed bedrock surfaces by water or wind. The effects of erosion are intensified with an increase in slope, the narrowing of runoff channels and by the removal of groundcover, which leaves the soil exposed. Construction operations for the propose the clearing, excavation, and grading uncovered soils on the project site coul erosion and sedimentation impacts to onsi facilities. This potential impact could of rain. To reduce potential erosion considered less than significant, the measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure d project would require of onsite soils. The d potentially result in to and offsite drainage increase during periods impacts to a level following mitigation • Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geological feature? 13 7~~-~3 No Impact According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the project site does not contain any unique geologic features. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to any unique geologic feature. D. Is the project located on strata or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact According to the General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the project site contains Chino Silty Loam Drained Soils that have moderate shrink/swell potential, high potential for corrosion of uncoated steel and low potential for corrosion of concrete. Based on the soil conditions on the project site the proposed project would be geotechnically feasible. Through the City's Development review process, the proposed project would be required to prepare a site-specific geotechnical to address the geologic conditions on the project site, building loads of the project and the identification of design recommendations to ensure the long-term geotechnically stability of the proposed project. E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? No Impact The project site is located within urban setting where sewer service is available. The proposed project would not require septic tanks or alternative disposal systems. VII. HAZARDS/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact 14 7 ~~-1~4 The long-term operation of the proposed project would not involve activities that would emit hazardous emissions or involve the routine handling of large quantities of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials. However, construction operations and the long-term operation of the proposed project could potentially involve the handling and storage of incidental amounts of hazardous substances, such as paints, oils and solvents. The proposed project would be subject to compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations regarding the storage and handling of hazardous materials. Compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations would reduce the handling of hazardous materials to a level considered less than significant. C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous material sites compiles pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact According to the City of Santa Ana Fire Department and the State Regional Water Quality Control Board, the project site is not included on a list of hazardous material sites. Implementation of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles where a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Less Than Significant Impact According to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Airports Environs Land Use Plan, the project site is not located within an Accident Potential Zone or Clear Zone. However, the project site is located within Airports Environs Land Use Plan Planning Area, and will require coordination and review by the Airport Land Use Commission. The project is not located in an accident potential zone and the structures on the project site would not exceed two stories in height. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in safety hazards for people residing in or working within the project area. VIII. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY 15 7~-~5 A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? E. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? I. Resulting an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? J. Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction. K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion downstream? L. Result in increased impervious surfaces and associated increased runoff? M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow rates and volumes? N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303 (d) list. If so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of which the body is already impaired? O. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive conditions? P. Have a potentially significant environmental impact or surface water quality to either marine, fresh or wetland waters? Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact ground water quality? R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? S. Impact aquatic, wetland or riparian habitat? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated The City of Santa Ana is included within four watersheds, San Diego Creek, Santa Ana River, Talbert and Westminster. Each of these watershed areas are under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and subject to the objectives, water quality standards and Best Management Practice requirements established in the Santa Ana River Basin Plan and 16 7 ~i~#~ 6 Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan. The City of Santa Ana implements the goals, objectives and requirements of the Basin Plan and Drainage Area Management Plan through the City's Local Implementation Plan. Storm water flows from the project site would be conveyed to an underground storm drain and Lane Channel before ultimately discharging into Reach 1 of San Diego Creek. The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board has identified San Diego Creek as impaired by nutrients, sediments, metals and pesticides. The primary source of potential adverse water quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed project would be from nuisance flows. Nuisance flows is defined as runoff that occurs during periods that are not usually associated with rainfall, and are most commonly produced from landscaping irrigation, leaking pipes, and water used to wash off surfaces tributary to the street. Since nuisance flows usually originates in the street, they commonly contain many common pollutants found in streets such as oil and grease and sediment. Additionally, surface water runoff generated from the project site during construction operations could be degraded potentially resulting in adverse water quality impacts to downstream receiving waters. Additionally, the proposed project includes food preparation uses. Commercial kitchens could potentially produce grease as a by-product of their operation. If not properly disposed of, the grease could potentially create blockage of sewer lines, which could result in damages to both public and private property and potentially resulting in adverse water quality impacts. The long-term operation and short-term construction activities associated with the proposed project could potentially result adverse water quality impacts that could be in conflict with water quality standards established by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. To reduce potential water quality impacts to a level considered less than significant the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measures • Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 17 7~~#~7 • Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that depicts all applicable Site Design, Structural Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices in accordance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and the City of Santa Ana Local Implementation Plan. • Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan that would include the following: a. Site Assessment b. Site design Best Management Practices (BMP) c. Applicable Routine Source Control BMP d. Selecting and sizing the Treatment Control BMP e. Mechanisms by which funding for long-term operation and maintenance of all structural BMP will be provided f. Operation and Maintenance Plan to describe the long- term operation and maintenance requirements of all applicable structural BMP and to identify the entity in charge of implementation • Building plans for the proposed project shall reflect that all restaurant uses be fitted with a grease interceptor to the size and capacity as designated by the Building Safety Division of the City of Santa Ana to mitigate impacts on the local sanitary sewer system and regional water quality. Such grease interceptor shall be regularly maintained so as to remain fully functional. • The proposed project would be subject to City of Santa Ana Federal Clean Water Protection Enterprise Fees. B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. No Impact The proposed project would not interfere with ground water recharge because the project area is not located in an area that is known to recharge the ground water system. Additionally, construction operations for the proposed project would not 18 7~~,3~8 involve dewatering activities. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to any underground water supplies. C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off-site? D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated The proposed project would not introduce substantial amounts of new impervious surfaces onto the project site. Existing rates of surface water runoff are not anticipated to increase significantly. Through the City's development review process, the Public Works Agency has determined the existing drainage facilities within the project area could provide adequate drainage for the project. However, final drainage plans would still need to be prepared to determine the size and exact location of onsite drain facilities. Mitigation Measure • Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall submit a final surface water runoff evaluation for review and approval showing existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. F. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? G. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact The City of Santa Ana is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Communities participating in the NFIP 19 7~-~~9 must adopt and enforce minimum floodplain management standards, including identification of flood hazards and flood risks. Participation in the NFIP allows communities to purchase low cost insurance protection against losses from flooding. The published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for the project site are included on Community Panel No. 0602320278H. The project site is located entirely in Zone X, which is defined as areas beyond the limits of the 100-year flood and 500-year flood. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly increase the potential for flood risks. IX. LAND USE/PLANNING A. Physically divide an established community? Less Than Significant Impact The project site is located within an existing office park and would not physically divide any established communities. B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant General Plan The General Plan designation for the project site is Professional and Administrative Office with a Far 0.5-1.0. The Professional/Administrative Office designation applies to those areas where professional and/or administrative offices are predominant, or where such development is being encouraged. The types of land use typically located in the Professional/Administrative Office designation include, professional and administrative offices, restaurants when uses are an integral component of a planned office development and professional uses such as medical doctors. The proposed project would be consistent with the intent of the professional/administrative office designation for the following reasons: • The proposed project would have a FAR of approximately .20. • The proposed restaurant, retail and food uses would be incorporated into and would support the existing office uses in the Brookhollow office park. 20 7~~-~0 • The proposed office uses are allowed. Therefore, the proposed project would not be in conflict with the General Plan. Zoning The zoning for the project site is Specific Development SD-8. Presently, SD-8 does not allow general retail uses on the project site. The proposed project would amend Specific Development No. 8 to create a third project area (Area III) that would allow retail, food and office uses on the project site. Indoor entertainment uses would be allowed with an approved conditional use permit. With approval of the amendment the proposed project would not be in conflict with the zoning. C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community plan? No Impact According to the City's General Plan, the project site is not included within any habitat conservation plan or any natural community conservation plan. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not be in conflict with any habitat conservation plan. X. MINERAL RESOURCES A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact According to the City's Updated General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there are no areas in Santa Ana that are designated significant Mineral Aggregate Resource Areas. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of any regionally or locally important mineral resource. XI. NOISE Setting The project site is located within the City of Santa Ana and subject to noise standards and guidelines in the General Plan Noise Element and Municipal Code Noise Ordinance. The primary purpose of the City of Santa Ana Noise Element is to "Prevent significant increases in noise levels in the community and 21 7~-,~1 minimize the adverse effects of currently-existing noise sources." In accordance with the Noise Element, the City has adopted noise standards and guidelines for land use planning. These guidelines for exterior noise levels as presented in Table N-1. Table N-1 City Of Santa Ana Land Use Guidelines For Exterior Noise Land Use Noise Level (dBA CNEL or Ldn) Desirable Maximum Maximum Acceptable Low Density Residential 55 65 Medium Density Residential 60 65 High Density Residential 65 70 Schools 60 70 Commercial, Office 65 75 Industrial 70 75 The City also regulates stationary noise impacts on residential land uses and construction noise though Chapter 18, Article VI of the Municipal Code. The noise ordinance recognizes that some forms of noise are required for urban development and maintenance and are difficult to control. Section 18-314, "Special provisions," provides for these exemptions. Those applicable to the project include: • Section 18-314 (e) which exempts noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday, and A significant noise impact would occur if a proposed land uses does not comply with the General Plan noise standards identified in Table N-1, or when a proposed land use results in an 3dB increase to existing noise levels when the existing noise level is at least 65 dB CNEL. A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. C. A substantial the project project. 22 permanent increase in ambient noise levels in vicinity above levels existing without the 7~i~-~52 Less Than Significant The project site is located in an area characterized with commercial land uses. There are no sensitive receptors within the vicinity of project site. The existing noise environment surrounding the project site is primarily influenced by traffic noise from the SR-55 Freeway. The proposed project involves the construction of commercial land uses, which is allowed in areas that experience increased levels of noise. The project has been designed to minimize interior noise impacts through a combination of setbacks and conventional building practices. It is anticipated that interior noise levels would realize a 20 dB reduction. The operation of the proposed project would not significantly increase noise levels within the project site. A significant increase in noise would be a 3dB increase over existing noise levels. Typically, a 3db increase in noise levels occurs when existing traffic volumes are doubled. The proposed project would not double existing traffic volumes within the project area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in a 3db increase to existing noise levels within the project area. B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without project. Less Than Significant The construction of the structure would involve conventional construction equipment resulting in less than significant ground borne vibration impacts. No mitigation measures are necessary. Implementation of the proposed project would result in short- term construction related noise impacts. Short-term noise impacts would result from site preparation, excavation, grading, and other construction operations. The construction-related short-term noise levels would be higher than the existing or ambient noise levels in the project area today, but would no longer occur once construction of the project is complete. The Municipal Code recognizes that some forms of noise are required for urban development and maintenance and are difficult to control. Section 18-314 (e) exempts noise sources associated 23 7~,q-~3 with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. Compliance with Noise Ordinance would reduce construction noise impacts to a level considered less than significant. E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated The Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Orange County establishes policies and standards to protect the public from the adverse effects of aircraft noise. The Airport Environs Land Use Plan establishes two Noise Impact Zones around the vicinity of John Wayne Airport. Noise Impact Zone 1 is areas where the CNEL is greater than 65db CNEL. Noise Impact Zone 2 is areas where the CNEL is 60 dB or greater, but less than 65dB. The project is subject to Uniform Building Code requirements which would include California Noise Insulation Standards to achieve appropriate interior noise levels for the mix of land uses proposed for the project. According to the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan the project site is located within the Noise Impact Zone 2 and would require coordination and review by the Airport Land Use Commission. According to the Airport Environs Land Use Plan, the proposed project is permitted in Noise Impact Zone 2. However, coordination with the Airport land use commission would still be required. Mitigation Measure • Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the project developer shall coordinate with the John Wayne Airport Land Use Commission on the land use/noise compatibility of the proposed project. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly through extension of roads or other infrastructure. 24 7~~-~54 B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and would not induce substantial amounts of population growth within the project area and would not displace existing households or create need for the construction of substantial amounts of new housing. The proposed project does not include any major roadway or infrastructure improvements that would indirectly facilitate growth within the project area. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection: Less than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana Fire Department would provide fire protection and emergency services to the project site. The City maintains ten fire stations throughout the City. The stations are situated where no location in the City is outside of an approximate 1.5 radius of a fire station. Additionally, the City maintains a Mutual Aid Agreement for fire protection services with the neighboring Cities of Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Tustin, Irvine and Costa Mesa. According to the City of Santa Ana Insurance Service Organization, the City has a low fire risk rating. According to the Santa Ana Fire Department, the goal of the fire department is to have an onsite response time of 5:00 or less 80% of the time. Fire Station No. 6 located at 950 W. MacArthur Boulevard is the closest fire station to the project site. Presently, a shift at Fire Station No. 1 consists of six fire fighters, 1 fire truck, and 1 fire engine. The proposed project would result in an increased demand for fire protection and emergency services within the project area. According to the Santa Ana Fire Department under existing levels of manpower and equipment, it does not anticipate any significant constraints in providing adequate fire protection services to the proposed project. The existing fire stations in the project area would be able to adequately respond to project- related demand for fire and emergency services. Additionally, through the City's development review process, the Santa Ana Fire Department has reviewed the proposed project for 25 75~-~5 compliance with the City's Fire Code and emergency access requirements. Based on comments from the Fire Department, the project has incorporated fire/life safety systems such as automatic fire sprinkler systems, and fire alarms into the design of the project. Additionally, emergency access has been provided in accordance with Fire Department standards. The Fire Department has determined that the proposed project is in compliance with the City's Fire Code. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant long-term impacts on the ability of the Fire Department to provide adequate fire protection services. Additionally, there would be no construction-related impacts on fire protection/emergency services since most construction activities would occur on site. The project area would be temporarily fenced during construction operations to restrict public access to the project site. Construction related impacts on fire protection services would not be significant. Police Protection: Less Than Significant impact The Santa Ana Police Department would provide police protection services for the proposed project. The Police Department is headquartered at 60 Civic Center Plaza. The City of Santa Ana is subdivided into four policing districts, with each district serving a section of the City. The proposed project is located within the Southeast District. The District is considered to be an average crime area, compared to other areas in the City. Implementation of the proposed project would increase the demand for police protection services over current level of demand. The Santa Ana Police Department has indicated that under existing levels of manpower and equipment, they would have the ability to provide adequate police protection services. Through the City's development review process, the Santa Ana Police Department has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the City's Building Security Ordinance. The project is required to submit a plan indicating all structures and parking lots comply with the provisions of Building Security Ordinance. With compliance with the Building Security Ordinance implementation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts on the ability of the Santa Ana Police Department to provide adequate police protection services. School Facilities: Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated 26 7~~-;~6 The project site is within the boundaries of the Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD). Presently, overcrowding exists at nearly all schools within the SAUSD. The proposed project would not directly generate additional school service demand within the SAUSD. However, it is possible that future employees associated with the proposed project could locate into Santa Ana. Therefore, the proposed project could indirectly generate additional students and cumulative impacts to schools within SAUSD. To help fund new construction of school facilities, SAUSD levies the maximum State approved impact fee of $0.33 per square feet of commercial area. The payment of fees to the district would mitigate impacts on school services to a level considered less than significant. To insure payment of school services, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. Mitigation Measure • Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City of Santa Ana Building and Planning Department that appropriate school impact fees have been paid. Parks, Other Facilities: Less Than Significant Impacts The City of Santa Ana presently operates 35 facilities within its parks and recreation network, along with several public school grounds. The park and recreation facilities within the City of Santa Ana include 342.5 acres of land, which is equivalent to approximately one acre per 1,000 residents. According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the City's current goal for parkland is 2.0 acres per 1,000 residents. Based on the Cities current parkland goal and existing parkland to population ratio, additional parkland is needed to meet the park and recreation needs of the community. Implementation of the proposed project would not increase the population in the City and would not contribute to the imbalance of the parkland/population ratio in the City. Therefore, implementation of the propose project would result in less than significant impacts to park services and other facilities within the community. XIV. RECREATION A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 27 7€~~-,~7 B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not generate additional demands on existing recreation facilities or require the construction of new recreation facilities. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC The following analysis is based on a traffic impact study prepared for the proposed project by Kimley Horn and Associates. The traffic impact study is presented in its entirety in Appendix A Analysis Methodology The traffic study includes documentation of Existing Conditions, analysis of cumulative traffic conditions and identification of project-related impacts at the following eight study area intersections: • Grand Avenue and Warner Avenue • Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive • Grand Avenue and Dyer Road • Dyer Road and Main Street • Red hill Avenue and Dyer / Barranca Parkway • Grand Avenue and SR-55 SB off-ramp • Dyer Road and SR-55 SB off/on-ramp/Hotel Terrace Drive • Dyer Road and SR-55 NB off/on-ramp Level of Service The City of Santa Ana has established LOS D or better as the acceptable LOS for intersections in the project area. Caltrans Level of Service standard is the threshold between LOS C and D. A project is considered to have a significant adverse traffic impact at locations that would operate at acceptable LOS without the project but which would operate at an unacceptable LOS with the project. For locations that are forecast to operate worse than the acceptable LOS standard even without the project, a project is considered to have a significant adverse traffic impact if it results in an increase in intersection ICU of 0.01 at signalized intersections or an increase in roadway segment 28 7~~-~8 V/C of 0.01.1 For unsignalized intersections, the City of Santa Ana does not specifically define significance criteria. Signalized Intersections- Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)Methodology In accordance with the City of Santa Ana and the County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements, peak hour operating conditions at the signalized intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology provides a comparison of the theoretical hourly vehicular capacity of an intersection to the number of vehicles actually passing through that intersection during a given hour. The ICU calculation generates a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio that translates into a corresponding Level of Service (LOS) measure, ranging from LOS "A", representing uncongested, free- flowing conditions, to LOS "F", representing over-capacity conditions. A summary description of each Level of Service and the corresponding V/C ratio is provided on the following chart: LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of ICU Value Description Service A 0.00 - 0.60 EXCELLENT - No vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is full used. B 0.61 - 0.70 VERY GOOD - An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within ou s of vehicles. C 0.71 - 0.80 GOOD - Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; back-u s ma develo behind tumin vehicles FAIR - Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough D 0.81 - 0.90 lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive back-u s. E 0.91 - 1.00 POOR - Represents the most vehicles that the intersection approaches can accommodate; ma be lon lines of waiin vehicles throu h several si al c cles. FAILURE - Back-ups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or F > 1.00 prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous dela s with continuousl increasin ueue len hs. The following intersections will be analyzed using the ICU methodology: • Grand Avenue and Warner Avenue • Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive • Grand Avenue and Dyer Road • Dyer Road and Main Street 1 City of Santa Ana. 29 7~r~~9 • Red Hill Avenue and Dyer /Barranca Parkway Signalized Intersections - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology The following study intersections are Caltrans intersections and will therefore be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology for signalized intersections. • Grand Avenue and SR-55 SB off-ramp • Dyer Avenue and SR-55 SB off/on-ramp/Hotel Terrace Drive • Dyer Avenue and SR-55 NB off/on-ramp This methodology estimates the average total delay (in average seconds per vehicle) for each of the movements to or from the minor street, and determines the level of service for each movement. Just as with the ICU methodology, the HCM delay forecast translates to a Level of Service designation, ranging from LOS "A" to LOS "F". The descriptions of operating conditions for each Level of Service are very similar to the LOS descriptions for signalized intersections. A summary description of each Level of Service for signalized intersections, and the corresponding delay, expressed in seconds per vehicle, is provided on the following chart: LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Delay seconds/vehicle Description A < 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 - 20 Short traffic delays C > 20 - 35 Average traffic delays D > 35 - 50 Long traffic delays E > 50 - 80 Very long traffic delays F > 80 Severe congestion Setting Existing Roadway and Intersection Conditions Existing lane configurations at the study intersections are shown on Exhibit T-1. Existing peak hour operations were evaluated and the results are summarized on Table T-l. As shown 30 7~#~0 on Table 1 all study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION EXISTING CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)' ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.457 A 0.730 C 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.347 A 0.424 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.624 B 0.828 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.515 A 0.726 C 5 Redhill Ave @ DyerBarranca 0.849 D 0.723 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) 1 Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.8 B 15.8 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 28.5 C 26.6 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 17..9 B 14.3 B Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Project Build-Out Conditions The Project Build-Out Traffic Condition consists of existing peak hour traffic with an annual growth rate applied for each year between existing condition and the anticipated Build-out year for the project. The Crazy Horse Square project would be completed in 2007, so a 1% growth was applied to existing traffic to account for ambient growth in the area. Peak hour operating conditions for Project Build-out Year without the project are summarized on Table 2. As shown on Table 2, all study area intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in the Project Build-out year. 31 7 #~ 1 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION PROJECT OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)' ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.470 A 0.750 C 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.356 A 0.435 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.642 B 0.851 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.529 A 0.746 C 5 Redhill Ave @ DyerBarranca 0.873 D 0.744 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) ' Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.9 B 16.0 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.1 C 27.5 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 18.4 B 14.5 B Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Project Impacts A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system? B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less than significant impact Project Traffic Generation Trip generation estimates for the proposed Crazy Horse Square food and retail center were derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation, 7th Edition. Trip generation rates for restaurant, retail, fast food, and coffee house uses and the resulting trip generation for each component of the project are summarized on Table 3. Reductions for pass-by traffic for the food and retail uses were taken, based on ITE standards. Table 3 indicates that the Crazy Horse Sguare food and retail center would generate about 2,696 trips per day, with 96 inbound trips and 86 outbound trips in 32 7~q-~2 the morning peak hour, and 60 inbound and 41 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. Table 3 Crazy Horse Square Summary of Project Trip Generation Land Use Trip Generation Rates Project Trip Generation ITE Unit Quantit Daily AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Code y In Out In Out Daily In Out In Out Lot 1 Restaurant 931 KSF 8.171 89.95 0.66 0.15 5.02 2.47 735 5 1 41 20 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-44%) 0 0 0 -18 -9 Sub-Total Restaurant 735 5 1 23 11 Retail 820 KSF 4.211 42.94 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.95 181 3 2 8 8 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-SO%) 0 0 0 -4 -4 Sub-Total Retail 181 3 2 4 4 Food 932 KSF 2.47 127.15 5.99 5.53 6.66 4.26 314 15 14 16 11 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-43%) 0 0 0 -7 -5 Sub-Total Food 314 15 14 9 6 Total New Traffic -Lot 1 1,230 23 17 36 21 Lot 2 Coffee 933-2 KSF 1.486 716.00 37.25 35.78 14.97 13.82 1,040 55 53 22 21 Food 932 KSF 2.829 127.15 5.99 5.53 6.66 4.26 360 17 16 19 12 TE Pass-By Reduction (PM-43%) 0 0 0 -18 -14 Sub-Total Coffee /Food 1,424 72 69 23 19 Retail 820 KSF 0.987 42.94 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.95 42 1 0 2 2 ITE Pass-By Reduction (PM-50%) 0 0 0 -1 -1 Sub-Total Retail 42 1 0 1 1 Total New Traffic -Lot 2 1,466 73 69 24 20 Ne~- ~'raffic 2,6~b 86 60 41 Project Traffic Trip Distribution Project trip distribution assumptions for the project site were developed, taking into account the site uses and the location of area trip producers, such as employment centers. Trip distribution assumptions are shown on Figure 6 of the traffic analysis. The trip distribution assumptions focus on the project's use of arterials and major intersections in the vicinity of the project. While some drivers may find their way to the site through the Brookhollow development via Brookhollow Drive at Warner Avenue, the trip distribution shown assumes that 33 7~i~q-~~3 all project traffic will use the arterials, for a more conservative approach. Traffic Impacts Project Opening Year Conditions Project traffic was added to the Project Opening Year traffic volumes, and the study intersections were re-analyzed for Project Build-out year plus Project peak hour operations. The results are summarized on table T-4. As shown on Table T-4 with the addition of project-related traffic, all study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. The project would not generate a significant impact, and no off-site mitigation of project impacts would be required for the project. TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION PROJECT OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City) ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.479 A 0.756 C 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.384 A 0.448 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.655 B 0.864 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.537 A 0.748 C 5 Redhill Ave @ Dyer/Barranca 0.880 D 0.745 C ' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 17.0 B 16.0 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.2 C 27.6 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 18.5 B 14.6 B Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. 2025 General Plan Build Out Conditions An analysis of Santa Ana General Plan Build-out Year 2025 was conducted for this project. Forecast peak hour volumes for the 2025 Build-out condition were developed using the Orange County Traffic Analysis Model (OCTAM), which is developed and maintained by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The 2025 General Plan Build-out conditions assume build-out of all land uses as well as the implementation of transportation infrastructure improvements identified in the City's Circulation Element. Intersection operations for the 2025 General Plan Build-out Condition were evaluated and the results are 34 7~~#~4 summarized in Table 5. As shown in Table T-5 all study intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in the 2025 General Plan Build-out year. TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION 2025 GENERAL PLAN BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)' ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.575 A 0.814 D 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.374 A 0.403 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.648 B 0.857 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.658 B 0.853 D 5 Redhill Ave @ DyerBarranca 0.784 C 0.729 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) ' Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.7 B 15.6 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.6 C 27.9 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 20.0 B 15.3 B Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Traffic Impacts 2025 General Plan Build Out Condition Project traffic was added to the 2025 General Plan Build-out Condition traffic volumes, and the study intersections were re- analyzed. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 6. As shown in Table 6 with the addition of project- related traffic, all study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. The project would not generate a significant impact, and no off- site mitigation of project impacts would be required for the project . 35 75~-~65 TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City) ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.578 A 0.820 D 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.401 A 0.416 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.655 B 0.870 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.665 B 0.858 D 5 Redhill Ave @ DyerBarranca 0.789 C 0.732 C ' AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.8 B 15.6 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.7 C 28.0 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 20.1 C 15.4 B Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodolo C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Less Than Significant According to the Orange County Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport the project site is not located within clear zone or accident potential zone. The maximum height of the project is approximately 25-feet. The height of the project would not interfere with air traffic patterns within the area or create substantial safety risks. Implementation of the proposed project would also not increase the level of air traffic within the project area. D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature Less Than Significant Impact Through the City's development review process, the City's Public Works Department has determined that implementation of the proposed project would not increase traffic hazards within the project area. 36 7~-~#,~66 E. Result in inadequate emergency access Less Than Significant Impact As part of the City's development review process, the proposed project was reviewed by the Police Department and the Fire Department to ensure adequate emergency access. Recommendations provided through the development process have been incorporated into the proposed project. No adverse emergency access impacts would be associated with the proposed project. F. Result in inadequate parking capacity Less Than Significant Impact The project's parking requirements, based on the City of Santa Ana parking code, are summarized in Table 7. The total parking requirement for the three buildings would be 174 parking spaces. This total parking is the sum of the peak parking requirements for each of the uses proposed on the project site. The project site plan shows that 175 parking spaces would be provided. This amount of parking is 1 parking space greater than City of Santa Ana code-required parking and therefore the project complies with City parking requirements. Table 7 Crazy Horse Square Food and Retail Center Parking Requirements Site Use Parking Requirements Site Qty Parking Required Lot 2 Food 1 s ace / 100 s uare feet 10,520 SF 105.2 Retail 1 s ace / 200 s uare feet 4,120 SF 20.6 Electrical 1 s ace / 330 s uare feet 212 SF .6 Sub-Total Parking Re uirement - Lot 1 13 8 Lot 2 Food 1 space / 100 square feet 4,235 SF 42.4 Electrical 1 S ace / 330 s uare feet 78 SF .2 Sub-Total Parking Re uirement -Lot 2 47.5 Total Parkin Re uirement 174 37 7 +~d~Af3~ 7 L Shared Parking for Potential Alternative Site Use An alternative site use for Lot 1 could include a night club/concert venue component of approximately 1,900 square feet in the main restaurant. This is not part of the current proposal, but a discussion of the effect of a night club/concert venue on parking requirements is provided here for information purposes. Parking for a night club / concert venue use would have a higher parking requirement than regular restaurant use - 1 space per 28 square feet of entertainment area (including bar, dance floor area, assembly area) compared to 1 space per 100 square feet of restaurant area. For 1,900 square feet, this represents an increase in parking of 49 spaces. A summary of the parking requirements for this night club site use is provided on Table 8. With the entertainment use, the site would have a parking requirement of 223 spaces, compared to the 175 spaces provided. Although the Crazy Horse Square site would have a parking shortage compared to the City of Santa Ana parking code, the mixed-use nature of the site (a combination of retail, night club and food uses) makes it a good candidate for shared parking relationships amongst the uses. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) has developed a methodology for estimating the reduction in peak parking demand a mixed-use site can experience due to its mixed- use make-up. Table 1 Crazy Horse Square With Night Club Parking Requirements Site Use Parking Requirements Site Qty Parking Re uired Lot 1 Restaurant 1 s ace / 100 s uare feet 8,620 SF 86.2 Ni ht Club 1 s ace / 28 square feet 1,900 SF 67.9 Retail 1 s ace / 200 s uare feet 4,120 SF 20.6 Electrical 1 s ace /330 s uare feet 212 SF .6 Sub-Total Parkin Re uirement -Lot 1 175.3 Lot 2 Food 1 space / 100 square feet 4,235 SF 42.4 Retail 1 space / 200 square feet 987 SF 4.9 Electrical 1 space /330 square feet 78 SF .2 Sub-Total Parkin Re uirement - Lot 2 47.5 Total Parkin Re uirement 222.8 = 223 38 7~q-~8 The ULI Shared Parking (Second Edition, 2005) publication sets forth a methodology for evaluating shared parking relationships on a mixed-use site. The process is a multi-step process that first establishes the stand-alone peak parking requirements for the site uses, as summarized on Table 8 above. The methodology then applies a percentage to the peak requirement for each use, for each hour of the day between the hours of 6:00 AM and midnight, reflecting the fact that the parking demand for each use varies throughout the course of the day. Beneficial shared parking synergies exist between different uses whose peak operating times occur at different times of the day. Examples of complementary uses for the Crazy Horse development would be the retail, fast food, and full-service restaurant with bar and dance floor. When the retail parking demand is at 100% of its peak (at 1:00 PM on a weekday), full-service restaurant uses are at 75% and bar and night club uses are nominal, according to the ULI document, Table 2-5. At the same time, retail and fast food uses are at 50% and less when the restaurant and night club parking demand is at 100%, after 9:00 at night on a weeknight . These uses, then, can share a portion of the same parking supply without detriment to the other, rather than each providing their own distinct and complete parking supply. ULI hour-by-hour usage factors, seasonal factors, and weekday and weekend parking ratios are incorporated into a Shared Parking spreadsheet, and applied to the proposed mix of uses and square footages for the Crazy Horse Square project. Applying these factors to a particular mix of integrated land uses yields a projected peak parking requirement at a particular time of day (weekday and weekend) and season. In theory, the actual parking needs for that mix of uses will not exceed the projected peak, due to the interrelationships and benefits of shared parking synergies. Copies of the Shared Parking spreadsheets based on the ULI Shared Parking manual (Second Edition, 2005) developed for the Crazy Horse Square project are provided in Appendix C. The worksheets indicate that based on shared parking arrangements, the Crazy Horse Square project would require a maximum of 163 spaces at 7:00 PM on a typical weekday (a parking demand reduction of 62 spaces due to shared parking) and 164 spaces at 8:00 PM on the weekend (a parking demand reduction of 61 spaces due to shared parking). Based on this shared parking analysis, the proposed site parking supply of 175 spaces would be adequate to meet the peak parking needs of the Crazy Horse Square mixed-use development, including a night club/concert venue use in the main restaurant, 39 7~-~~69 throughout the day and evening, on both weekdays and weekends. In addition parking would be available on adjacent sites since office uses within the Brookhollow Office Park would not be operating in the evening hours and on week-ends when the nightclub/concert venue use is likely to occur. G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation Less Than Significant Impact The Orange County Transportation Authority operates a fixed route bus service within the project area, along Grand Avenue. Other alternative modes of transportation such as Metrolink and Amtrak Train Service would also be available through bus service to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center. The proposed project would not be in conflict with any City policies regarding alternative modes of transportation. Nor would implementation of the proposed project displace any existing modes of public transportation provided within the project area. XVI UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana Water Department would provide domestic water service for the proposed project. The City of Santa Ana produces water from two sources. The Orange County Groundwater Basin provides 66% of the annual water supply and the Metropolitan Water District provides 34% of the annual water supply. The City of Santa Ana has 19 active wells with combined capacities of approximately 42,500 gallons per minute. The City also has seven MWD connections with combined normal operating capacities of 20,700 gallons per minute. The total combined capacity of all water production facilities is 63,200 gallons per minute. The project area is improved water distribution facilities. The City's Water Department utilizes a generation rate of 100 gallons per day for each two square feet of retail and restaurant area to determine water and wastewater demands. The proposed project would have a water demand of 12,100 gallons per day. The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan and Urban Water Management Plan. No adverse impacts in 40 7 ~--,~7 0 regards to water service would be associated with the proposed project. A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? B. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments. Less Than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) would provide wastewater service to the proposed project. The project area is currently improved with wastewater sewer facilities. A combination of City of Santa Ana local sewer lines and OCSD trunk sewer lines would service the project site. Wastewater generated from the site would be treated at Orange County Sanitation District Reclamation Plant N0. 1. in the City of Fountain Valley. The treatment plan treats approximately 90 million gallons per day. As mentioned previously, the City of Santa Ana utilizes a water demand rate of 100 gallons per day for each 200 square feet of retail and restaurant area to calculate both water and wastewater demand. The wastewater demands of the project are accounted for in the City's Urban Water Management Plan. The wastewater flows generated from the proposed project would provide an incidental increase in the amount of wastewater flows to the Reclamation Plant No. 1 and would not have less than a significant impact on wastewater treatment facilities. To address cumulative wastewater service impacts within the project area the project area the proposed project would be subject to sewer connection fees with the City of Santa Ana and OCSD. C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not significant increase the amount of surface water runoff currently generated from the project site. Onsite drainage improvements would needed 41 7~~1 for the project. However, these drainage improvements would not cause significant impacts to the environment. F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact The City of Santa Ana would provide solid waste collection services to the project site. Solid waste is transported to the Environmental Service transfer station in Irvine, and then taken to the Bowerman Landfill. The Bowerman Landfill is permitted to accept 8,500 tons per day and is anticipated to close in year 2024. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) mandates all cities and counties in California to divert fifty percent of solid waste generated from landfill disposal. As part of the General Plan, the City of Santa Ana has prepared a Source Reduction and Recycling Element, which describe how the City complies with the mandates of AB 939. In order to comply with the requirements of AB 939, the City has implemented several waste reduction programs including green waste programs, source reduction programs, and recycling programs. As a worst case, a solid waste generation rate of .059 pounds per day for each square feet of restaurant uses was used to determine the solid waste disposal demand for the proposed project. The proposed project would generate 1,428 pounds per day of solid waste. The increases in solid waste would be considered minor in comparison to the 8, 500 tons of solid waste taken to the Bowerman Landfill daily. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to comply with the City's waste reduction programs to reduce the demand for solid waste disposal. Compliance with the City's recycling program would reduce long-term solid waste disposal service impacts to a level considered less than significant. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or 42 772 animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, in that no fish, wildlife populations or cultural resources are known to exist on the project site. B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Less Than Significant Impact Implementation of the proposed project would result in cumulative impacts to the environment. However, the proposed project's incremental contribution would not be considered cumulatively considerable because the proposed project would comply with the applicable requirements of the uniform building code, conditions of approval and mitigation measures, which provide specific requirements that would avoid any significant cumulative impacts within the project area. C. Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact Construction and operation of the proposed project would not involve any activities that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Mitigation measures have been identified to reduce potential impacts to the environment and human beings to a level considered less than significant. XVIII DETERMINATION Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented in the above environmental evaluation and cited references, I find that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. XVIV REFERENCES City of Santa Ana Updated General Plan Land Use Element February 1998. 43 7~,q-~3~3 City of Santa Ana Updated General Plan Land Use Element Environmental Impact, January, 1998, SCH 97071058 City of Santa Ana Zoning Ordinance, December 1998 City of Santa Ana Urban Design Element, July 6, 1998 City Santa Ana Local Register of Historic Structures National Register of Historic Structures Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 0602320278H Santa Ana Unified School District Student Generation Factor Personal Communication Santa Ana Water Division City of Santa Ana Development Review Committee, March 2005 South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993 California Environmental Quality Act Statues and Guidelines, January 1999 Crazy Horse Square Food and retail Center Traffic Impact Analysis Study, Kimley-Horn and Associates, April 2006 Site Visit by Bill Apple, Associate Planner, March 2006 Integrated Waste Management Solid Waste Generation Rate City of Santa Ana 2000 Urban Water Management Plan XX. PREPARERS Dan Bott, City of Santa Ana Environmental Coordinator, Bill Apple, Case Planner. 44 7 `JZ'or139 T Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance PLANNING DIVISION 1. Project Title: Crazy Horse Square II. Project Numbers: ER 2004-109 III. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Santa Ana Planning Division P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 IV. Environmental Coordinator and Phone Number: Bill Apple, Associate Planner (714) 667-2747 V. Location: 1580 East Warner Avenue VI. Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation, I find that: A. ^ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. B. X Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. C. ^ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D. ^ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR (EIR No. -)pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. E. ^ Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. -)has been prepared earlier and only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to make the previous EIR adequate and these changes do not raise important new issues about the significant effects on the environment. An ADDENDUM to the EIR shall be prepared. F. ^ Pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR (EIR No. -)has been prepared earlier; however, subsequent proposed changes in the project and/or new information of substantial importance will cause one or more significant effects no previously discussed. A SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared. ~~rn~U~ ~ ~- 17-D~o Signature Date B r, i_.c., t~ P P C.r L Printed Name db\forms\environmental checklist Page 1 of 1 7 ~-,~7 5 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Dan Hunter, Dyer Hollow Partners, L.P., 35 Argonaut, Suite B-2, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 General Plan Designation: Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) Description of Project: See attachment for project description. Surrounding Land Uses Surrounding land uses include one and two-story office buildings and Warner Avenue to the north; a fast food restaurant and the Costa Mesa SR-55) freeway to the south; the Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway to the east; and a Southern California Edison primary distribution station, Grand Avenue and hoteUmotel uses to the west. Zoning: SD-8 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below reflects potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project, as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. O Aesthetics O Historic Demolition O Agricultural Resources X Air Quality O Biological Resources O Cultural Resources X Geology /Soils O Hazards and Hazardous Materials X Hydrology /Water Quality O Mineral Resources O General Plan Amendment O Historic Project Review X Noise O Population /Housing X Public Services O Recreation O Transportation /Traffic O Utilities /Service Systems O Mandatory Findings of Significance db\forms\environmental checklist Page 1 of 1 7~#,~T6 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on aproject-specific screening analysis). II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IV. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less than Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact I. Aesthetics -Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ^ ^ [~ ^ B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited ^ ^ [~ ^ to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings within a state highway? C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ^ ^ [~ ^ D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ^ ^ ^ db\forms\environmental checklist Page 1 of 11 7~,~7 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact II. Agricultural Resources - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. Would the project: A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or ^ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation, maintains detailed maps of these and other categories of farmland.) B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a ^ Williamson Contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment ^ which, due to their location or nature, could individually or cumulatively result in loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ^ ^ d ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ d Air Quality -Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or III. pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ^ ^ [~ ^ applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan or Congestion Management Plan? B. Violate any stationary source air quality standard or ^ L~ ^ ^ contribute to an existing or proposed air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase ^ [~ ^ ^ of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emission which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? D. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ^ ~ ^ ^ concentrations? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 2 of 11 7 ~Qj'3~ V t i " '~~ Environmental Checklist ,~ For CEQA Compliance Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues 8~ Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ^ ^ ~ ^ number of people? IV. Biological Resources -Would the project: A. Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly ^ ^ ^ [~ or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services? B. Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian ^ ^ ^ [v]im habitat or natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Adversely impact federally protected wetlands ^ ^ ^ (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) either individually or in combination with the known or probable impacts of other activities through direct removal, filling hydrological interruption, or other means? ~ D. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ^ ^ ^ [ protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? V. Cultural Resources -Would the project: A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ [~ ^ significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the ^ ^ ~ ^ significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to define Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique ^ ^ ~ ^ paleontogical resource or site? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 3 of 11 7~q-~~9 i Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources D. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. Geology and Soils -Would the project: A. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of an known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? 3. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 4. Landslides? B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? C. Would the project result in the loss of a unique geologic feature? D. Is the project located on strata or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater, is the soil capable of supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? db\forms\environmental checklist Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ o' ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Q' ^ d ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ Page 4 of 11 7~q-~$0 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VII. Hazardous and Hazardous Materials -Would the project: ~ A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the ^ ^ Q ^ environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ^ ^ [~ ^ acutely hazardous materials, substance or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ~ C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of ^ ^ ^ [ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? D. For a project located within an airport land use plan ^ ^ [~ ^ or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles where of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality -Would the project: A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water ^ [~ ^ ^ quality standards or waste discharge requirements? B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ^ ^ ^ [~ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 5 of 11 7~q-~$1 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off- site? D. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? E. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? F. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? G. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? H. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. I. Result in an increase in pollutant discharge to receiving waters? Consider water quality parameters such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity and other typical storm water pollutants (e.g. heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, sediment, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances, and trash). J. Result in significant alterations of receiving water quality during or following construction? K. Could the proposed project result in increased erosion downstream? L. Result in increased impervious surfaces and associated increased runoff? db\forms\environmental checklist Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ r~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ~' ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ o~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ Page 6 of 11 7~$2 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Issues & Supporting Information Sources M. Create a significant adverse environmental impact to drainage patterns due to changes in runoff flow rates or volumes? N. Tributary to an already impaired water body, as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list: If so, can it result in an increase in any pollutant of which the water body is already impaired? O. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive conditions? P. Have a potentially significant environmentally impact on surface water quality to either marine, fresh, or wetland waters? Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact on ground water quality? R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? S. Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? X Land Use Planning -Would the project: A. Physically divide an established community? B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance} adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? db\forms\environmental checklist Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact o Impact ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ L~" ^ ^ ^ ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ L~ ^ ^ ^ L~ ^ ^ ^ ^ Page 7 of 11 7~~j-;~$3 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X. Mineral Resources -Would the project: ~ A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ^ ^ ^ [v important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI Noise -Would the project result in: A. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise ^ ^ ~ ^ levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ^ ^ [~ ^ groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ^ ^ ~ ^ levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? D. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ^ ^ ~ ^ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without project? ~ E. For a project located within an airport land use plan ^ [v ^ ^ or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. Population and Housing -Would the project: A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, ^ ^ [v]f ^ either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? B. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ^ ^ ~ ^ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 8 of 11 7~#~4 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance otentia y Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues S Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C. Displace substantial numbers of people, ^ ^ [~ ^ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. Public Services A. Would the project result in substantial adverse ^ ^ ^ ^ physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: Fire protection? ^ ^ [~ ^ Police protection? ^ ^ [~ ^ Schools? ^ ~ ^ ^ Parks? ^ ^ ~ ^ Other public facilities? ^ ^ ~ ^ XIV. Recreation A. Would the project increase the use of existing ^ ^ ~ ^ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. B. Does the project include recreational facilities or ^ ^ ~ ^ require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 9 of 11 7~#~5 ~~ Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XV. Transportation /Traffic A. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ^ ^ ~ ^ relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections?) B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level ^ ^ ~ ^ of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ^ ^ [~ ^ either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature ^ ^ ~ ^ (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? E. Result in inadequate emergency access? ^ ^ ~ ^ F. Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ~ ^ G. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative ^ ^ ~ ^ transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. Utilities and Service Systems A. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ^ ^ ~ ^ applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? B. Require or result in the construction of new water ^ ^ ~ ^ or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm ^ ^ ~ ^ water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 10 of 11 7~~-;~$6 Environmental Checklist For CEQA Compliance otentia y Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues ~ Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact D. Are sufficient water supplies available to serve the ^ ^ [~ ^ project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? E. Result in the determination by the wastewater ^ ^ ~ ^ treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? F. Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient ^ ^ ~ ^ permitted capacity to accommodate the project's sold waste disposal needs? / G. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and ^ ^ [v] ^ regulations related to solid waste? XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the ^ ^ ~ ^ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? B. Does the project have impacts that are individually ^ ^ [~ ^ limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). C. Does the project have environmental effects which ^ ^ []~ ^ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? db\forms\environmental checklist Page 11 of 11 7~#f~7 CRAZY HORSE SQUARE 1580 E. WARNER AVENUE / ER 2004-109 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING RESPONSIBLE AGENCY VERIFICATION To ensure compliance Prior to Building/Planning with SCAQMD Fugitive Demolition, Agency Dust Rule 403, building, Grading, Public Works grading, and demolition Building plans for the proposed permits project shall reflect the following notes: All material excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amount of dust . All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25 mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. All material transported offsite shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at 7~#~8 all times. To the extent feasible equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for onsite and offsite construction activities. Prior to issuance of Prior to Public Works grading permits, the issuanceofa prof ect developer shall Grading provide proof of Permit coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to issuance of Prior to Public Works grading permits, the issuanceofa prof ect developer shall Grading provide proof of Permit coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water 7~~-~$9 Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that depicts all applicable Site Design, Structural Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices in accordance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and the City of Santa Ana Local Implementation Plan. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan that would include the following: a. Site Assessment b. Site design Best Management Practices (BMP) c. Applicable Routine Source Control BMP d. Selecting and sizing the Treatment Control BMP e. Mechanisms by which funding for long-term operation and 7~~-~0 maintenance of all structural BMP will be provided f. Operation and Maintenance Plan to describe the long- term operation and maintenance requirements of all applicable structural BMP and to identify the entity in charge of implementation Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall submit a final surface water runoff evaluation for review and approval showing existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. Building plans for the Prior to Building/Planning proposed project shall issuance of a Agency reflect that all Building restaurant uses be permit fitted with a grease interceptor to the size and capacity as designated by the Building Safety Division of the City of Santa Ana to mitigate impacts on the local sanitary sewer system and regional water quality. Such grease interceptor shall be regularly maintained so as to remain fully 7~#~ 1 functional. The proposed project would be subject to City of Santa Ana Federal Clean Water Protection Enterprise Fees. Prior to the issuance of Prior to Building Permits, the issuanceofa project developer shall Building coordinate with the John permit Wayne Airport Land Use Commission on the land use/noise compatibility of the proposed project. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the City of Santa Ana Building and Planning Department that appropriate school impact fees have been paid. 7~-~2 ^ Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed Crazy Horse Square Food and Retail Center Prepared for: City of Santa Ana ^~^ Kimley-Horn ~ and Associates, Inc. April, 2006 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ~,~~-93 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE CRAZY HORSE SQUARE FOOD AND RETAIL CENTER IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA Prepared for: City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, California 92701 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2100 West Orangewood Avenue Suite 140 Orange, California 92868 April, 2006 7~~~~4 CRAZY HORSE SQUARE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 4 Signalized Intersections -Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology .................................. 4 Signalized Intersections -Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology ......................................... 5 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD .......................................................................................................... 6 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 6 PROJECT OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS ............................................................................................ 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................................................ 12 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................................. 12 PROJECT Il~IPACT -PROJECT OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS ..................................................... 12 2025 GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT CONDITIONS ............................................................................ 12 PROJECT IlvIPACT - 2025 GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT CONDITIONS ....................................... 12 PROJECT PARKING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................... 22 Shared Parking for Potential Alternative Site Use ................................................................................ 22 PROJECT ACCESS ................................................................................................................................. 24 CMP ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................................... 25 SLTMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 25 APPENDICES APPENDIX A -TRAFFIC COUNT SHEETS APPENDIX B -INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX C -SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 7#15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 -Project Vicinity Map .................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 2 -Project Site Plan ......................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3 -Existing Lane Configurations .................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4 -Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................... 8 Figure 5 -Project Opening Year Peak Hour Volumes .............................................................................. 10 Figure 6 -Project Trip Distribution .......................................................................................................... 14 Figure 7 -Project Peak Hour Volumes ..................................................................................................... 15 Figure 8 -Project Opening Year plus Project Peak Hour Volumes .......................................................... 16 Figure 9 - 2025 General Plan Build-0ut Peak Hour Volumes ................................................................. 18 Figure 10 - 2025 General Plan Build-0ut plus Project Peak Hour Volumes ............................................ 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 -Summary of Intersection Operations, Existing Conditions ......................................................... 9 Table 2 -Summary of Intersection Operations, Project Opening Year Conditions .................................. 11 Table 3 -Summary of Trip Generation .................................................................................................... 13 Table 4 - Summary of Intersection Operations, Project Opening Year plus Project Conditions .............. 17 Table 5 - Summary of Intersection Operations, 2025 General Plan Build-0ut Conditions ...................... 19 Table 6 -Summary of Intersection Operations, 2025 General Plan Build-0ut plus Project Conditions .. 21 Table 7 -Crazy Horse Square Food and Retail Center Parking Requirements ......................................... 22 Table 8 -Crazy Horse Square With Night Club Parking Requirements ................................................... 23 7~0#;~6 TRAFFIC IMPACT AND PARKING ANALYSIS FOR THE CRAZY HORSE SQUARE FOOD AND RETAIL CENTER IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to address the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Crazy Horse Square food and retail center located on the site of the former Crazy Horse Saloon at Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive in the City of Santa Ana. The adjacent vacant lot, which contains a Southern California Edison tower with a no-build easement under the transmission lines, has been made part of the proposed Crazy Horse Square development. The Project will consist of development on the two lots, with combined parking and shared access. The site will provide a total of 20,154 square feet of food and retail uses in three separate buildings. The scope of the analysis in this letter report is in accordance with direction provided by the City of Santa Ana Planning Department staff. This report will satisfy the Traffic Impact requirements of the County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP). The analysis will focus on off-site traffic impacts, on-site circulation, and will address the project impact on eight area intersections. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive in the City of Santa Ana, the site of the former Crazy Horse Saloon, and an adjacent vacant lot with a transmission line tower. The site is bounded by Brookhollow Drive on the north, an existing office development on the east, SR-55 ramp on the south, and Grand Avenue on the west. A regional vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. The applicant proposes to develop the site with three buildings on two lots. Buildings A and C, on Lot 1, the site of the former Crazy Horse Saloon, is to consist of afull-service restaurant, and some retail and high tumover sit-down food space. Building B, on Lot 2, the Edison tower site, is to consist of in-line shops with a coffee house, high turnover food, and retail uses. The building on Lot 2 will be located at the far south comer of the lot, outside of the no-build easement under the power lines. The Crazy Horse Square project site will take access via two full-movement driveways on Brookhollow Drive. The two lots will share parking and common access across both sites. A copy of the proposed site plan is provided on Figure 2. Figure 2 shows a total of 175 parking spaces, including 7 handicapped spaces to support the proposed Crazy Horse Square food and retail center. An evaluation of the site plan from a parking and traffic circulation standpoint and a summary of the off-site traffic-related impacts of this proposed project are provided in the following sections. Crazy Horse Square - 1 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7~q-~7 C'~.~i~''1~~ C 1 v ~~ ;~ I I i l l ~, !, of 1 1 1 1 1 ~...~ ._-- ~• ^ Q ~ .a.,~..~ ---- --- ----- - --------- ~ a ,, , ----- - o o' o 0 0 ,, ~ o ~ .R a_ ' E ri'r 1' _ \ i 1. I_ ~iu. G~ ~' a~~i O 1~ ~"~ kR ~ 0 1~ ~ I J ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ tl Q O° 1 r ~ ~~ T I ~ S .. ` Q f '1 1 1 • ~2 _ /I ~' ` ~` h _ 'f[ ~y15,~ ^ - - ~L' Y II ~•1•.Er V+1 i•rck "' ~-74''~ ~~L f y ~ ~ ~, ~ x ~ ~, ~~ V ~ r[ N t ~ [ tom' _+i ~ . Y ~ '• 1" (' i _ ]d- 3i ~ '. s Y ! ~1 it -nS 9 ~~ ~ ~~ _- ~~ ._ ~ ~- /~ q J . _ 1 `. it-. 7 . r ~" i V- - p Q p6 ________ _ __ O ~ _ ~ s ~ ;; ~ ~ y y JA ~ ~~o O ~\ y 1 I _ _______ __ O ~1-!B a _ _ ~_______ _____ / ___ ~ a .,' ~" _ _____ ~~- Q a _ _~ __. __ _ _ -__--- ' a4 ~~ Y'® i ,'~ TAN _ ____ _ _ - ~0F3 ~ J i y ~~ c o -__ - .~ _ _ ~_ _ -~- - ~o~ - - -- - -- - -- , -- --- __ - ------ - -- ___- .. , o -------_=-~- ---__- - ----- -- --- ~, y ~ ----'-' ~ A` ---- -'--- - -- -- '- - ,~ - ~-. - p~ ~ -----------' 2 .__..__-_ ____- ~ __ __. -_ _ _ __ _ ~d"'-`-' -- ____ _ f -- `__ 7 ° -" ~ ~ ~ y . 0 i Ti p"' - __ a _ \, __ _ • _____ _-_____ § tt- 1,~~ vy --- ,-~ ---- .- .- - --- ~ _ - -- • -- ~/ , \ ` •~ ~ O V ~~ `~ m ~-~. ~, a J O A \ y -~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o, ~ ,a ~ ~ ~ / ^ °~ Q / i ~o \\ \ ~ a of ~ \ \~\ `LL f i / W a 8, / L o r '`' ~~ \ \LJ \ \ ~ ~ W w J ~ / \ / Q / N \\\ \\} \ \ \ ~ ~ ~ O d I:i FO ^^ w O ~ ~ I..L Z 7 ~i~i-~ 9 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY This traffic study includes documentation of Existing Conditions, analyses of cumulative traffic conditions and identification ofproject-related impacts at the following eight study intersections: • Grand Avenue and Warner Avenue • Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive • Grand Avenue and Dyer Road • Dyer Road and Main Street • Red Hill Avenue and Dyer / Barranca Parkway • Grand Avenue and SR-55 SB off-ramp (Caltrans) • Dyer Avenue and SR-55 SB off/on-ramp/Hotel Terrace Drive (Caltrans) • Dyer Avenue and SR-55 NB off/on-ramp (Caltrans) The three intersections identified as Caltrans intersections will be evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for signalized intersections, as required by the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (June 2001). The remaining intersections will be evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, as specified by the City of Santa Ana and the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). For each of the three study intersections, five analysis scenarios will be analyzed for the morning and evening peak hours: • Existing Conditions • Project completion year (Year 2007) without project • Project completion year (Year 2007)with project • 2025 General Plan Build-Out Conditions without project • 2025 General Plan Build-0ut Conditions with project Signalized Intersections -Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Methodology In accordance with the City of Santa Ana and the County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements, peak hour operating conditions at the signalized intersections were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology provides a comparison of the theoretical hourly vehicular capacity of an intersection to the number of vehicles actually passing through that intersection during a given hour. Based on City of Santa Ana and County of Orange analysis criteria, the ICU calculation assumes aper-lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for each travel lane (through or turning lane) through the intersection. Where there is no separately striped right-turn lane, if the width of the outside through lane is 19 feet or more, and parking is prohibited during the peak period, a separate right-turn lane is assumed. A clearance factor of 0.05 (5%) of the total intersection capacity is included in the ICU calculation, to account for the effect of the red and yellow signal phases at a signalized intersection. The ICU calculation generates avolume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio that translates into a corresponding Level of Service (LOS) measure, ranging from LOS "A", representing uncongested, free-flowing conditions, to LOS "F", representing over-capacity conditions. A summary description of each Level of Service and the corresponding V/C ratio is provided on the following chart: crazy Horse Square - 4 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center ^ ~3~ 0 0 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service ICU Vatue Description A 0.00 - 0.60 EXCELLENT - No vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is full used. B 0.61 - 0.70 VERY GOOD - An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within ou s of vehicles. C 0.71 - 0.80 GOOD - Occasionally drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; back- u s ma develo behind turnip vehicles FAIR -Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough D 0.81 - 0.90 lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive back-u s. E 0.91 - 1.00 POOR -Represents the most vehicles that the intersection approaches can accommodate; ma be lop lines of waiin vehicles throu h several si al c cles. FAILURE -Back-ups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or F > 1.00 prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous dela s with continuous) increasin ueue len ths. The following intersections will be analyzed using the ICU methodology: • Grand Avenue and Avenue • Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive • Grand Avenue and Dyer Road • Dyer Road and Main Street • Red Hill Avenue and Dyer Barranca Parkway Signalized Intersections - Ilighway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology The following study intersections are Caltrans intersections and will therefore be analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology for signalized intersections. Grand Avenue and SR-55 SB off-ramp Dyer Avenue and SR-55 SB off/on-ramp/Hotel Terrace Drive Dyer Avenue and SR-55 NB off/on-ramp This methodology estimates the average total delay (in average seconds per vehicle) for each of the movements to or from the minor street, and determines the level of service for each movement. Just as with the ICU methodology, the HCM delay forecast translates to a Level of Service designation, ranging from LOS "A" to LOS "F". The descriptions of operating conditions for each Level of Service are very similar to the LOS descriptions for signalized intersections. A summary description of each Level of Service for signalized intersections, and the corresponding delay, expressed in seconds per vehicle, is provided on the following chart: Crazy Horse Square - 5 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7 ~~13~ 0 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Delay seconds/vehicle Description A < 10.0 Little or no delay B > 10.0 - 20 Short traffic delays C > 20 - 35 Average traffic delays D > 35 - 50 Long traffic delays E > 50 - 80 Very long traffic delays F > 80 Severe congestion LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD The City's Level of Service standard for intersection operation is Level of Service "D". Caltrans Level of Service standard is the threshold between LOS "C" and "D". A project impact would be considered to be significant if it causes an intersection that is operating at an acceptable Level of Service to worsen to an unacceptable Level of Service. EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing morning and evening peak hour turning movement counts were made at the study intersections during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 AM) and evening (4:00 to 6:00 PM) peak periods. Existing lane configurations at the study intersections are shown on Figure 3. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4. Copies of the count data forms are provided in the Appendix A to this report. Existing peak hour operations were evaluated and the results are summarized on Table 1. All study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. Copies of the ICU and HCS sheets for the Existing Conditions analysis are provided in Appendix B of this report. PROJECT OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS A short-term future analysis will evaluate traffic conditions in the Opening Year of the project. Short-term future traffic consists of existing peak hour traffic with an annual growth rate of 1% per year, based on direction from City staff, applied for each year between existing conditions and the Opening Year for the project. In addition, traffic from any approved prof ects in the vicinity of the proj ect is added to the peak hour volumes. The Crazy Horse Square project is anticipated to be completed in 2007. A traffic growth rate of 1.0% per year was applied to existing traffic to account for ambient growth in the area. No other approved projects in the vicinity of the project site were identified by City staff. Opening Year peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown on Figure 5. Peak hour operating conditions for the Project Opening Year without the project are summarized on Table 2. All study intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in the Project Opening Year. Crazy Horse Square - 6 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center c //~~ 7 ~ ~"I~f3~ ~ 2 i~ J~~~~~ -~11fff/~ ~. W Q U O "~~ J H O Z C F- t R' -I ~ II Z O Q o~ C~ z O U w z Q c~ ~ wz ~_ x LL w U C f/1 N O U O N N " C ^ O O I Y a 0 w x U O a w 75-~~~ 03 V C N N O U O N N ^ O C _N ~_ Y n „~ \ ~ J l S99/Zf9-- Q ~~~''~ U N O H O F Z 3nv aNda~ ;~ W J O O `2 Y Q /W ~/1 V Z X W 0 w w z U 0 a i:i Z 75~-~~ 04 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION EXISTING CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)1 ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.457 A 0.730 C 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.347 A 0.424 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.624 B 0.828 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.515 A 0.726 C 5 Redhill Ave @ DyerBarranca 0.849 D 0.723 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) 1 Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.8 B 15.8 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 28.5 C 26.6 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 17.9 B 14.4 B ` Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Crazy Horse Square - 9 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7 ~-,~~ 0 5 V C 41 N O U O N " C ^ O O 2 T _N Y VJ 5W L J 0 2 Q W Q W C~ Z_ Z W O U w O w 0 z U O a Q W 4 O 7~-~~06 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION PROJECT OPENING YEAR WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)1 ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.470 A 0.750 C 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.356 A 0.435 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.642 B 0.851 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.529 A 0.746 C 5 Redhill Ave @ DyerBarranca 0.873 D 0.744 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) 1 Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.9 B 16.0 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.1 C 27.5 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 18.4 B 14.5 B ~ Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. Crazy Horse Square - 11 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 75~-1~~ 07 PROJECT TRAFFIC Trip generation estimates for the proposed Crazy Horse Square project were derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation, 7th Edition. Trip generation rates for restaurant, retail, fast food, and coffee house uses; and the resulting trip generation for each component ofthe project are summarized on Table 3. Reductions for pass-by traffic were taken, based on ITE standards. Table 3 indicates that the Crazy Horse Square food and retail center will generate about 2,696 trips per day, with 96 inbound and 86 outbound trips in the morning peak hour, and 60 inbound and 41 outbound trips in the evening peak hour. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Project trip distribution assumptions for the project site were developed, taking into account the site uses and the location of area trip producers, such as employment centers. Trip distribution assumptions are shown on Figure 6. The trip distribution assumptions focus on the project's use of arterials and major intersections in the vicinity of the project. While some drivers may find their way to the site through the Brookhollow development via Wright Street at Warner Avenue, the trip distribution shown assumes that all project traffic will use the arterials, for a more conservative approach. Based on these trip distribution patterns, the new trips to be added to the street system by the proposed project were calculated, and are shown on Figure 7. PROJECT IMPACT -PROJECT OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS Project traffic was added to the Project Opening Year traffic volumes, and the resulting peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 8. The study intersections were re-analyzed for Project Opening Year plus Project conditions, and the results are summarized on Table 4. With the addition ofproject-related traffic, all study intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. The project will not generate a significant impact, and no off-site mitigation ofproject impacts will be required of the project. Copies of the ICU and worksheets are provided in Appendix B of this report. 2025 GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT CONDITIONS The City of Santa Ana also required that an analysis of General Plan Build-out Year 2025 be conducted for this project. Forecast peak hour volumes for the Build~ut condition were developed using the Orange County Traffic Analysis Model (OCTAM), which is developed and maintained by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). General Plan Build-0ut conditions assume build-out of all land uses as well as the transportation infrastructure assumed in each city's General Plan. General Plan Build-out peak hour volumes at the study intersections are shown on Figure 9. Intersection operations for General Plan Build-out conditions were evaluated and the results are summarized on Table 5. All study intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in the 2025 General Plan Build-0ut year. Copies of the ICU and worksheets are provided in Appendix B of this report. PROJECT IMPACT - 2025 GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT CONDITIONS Project traffic was added to the 2025 General Plan Build-out traffic volumes, and the study intersections were re-analyzed. General Plan Build-out Plus Project peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 10. The intersection analysis results are summarized on Table 6. With the addition ofproject-related traffic, all study intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. The project will not generate a significant impact, and nooff--site mitigation of project impacts will be required of the project. Copies of the ICU and worksheets are provided in Appendix B of this report. Crazy Horse Square - 12 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center C w 7 ~i•3~ Table 3 Crazy Horse Square Summary of Project Trip Generation Tri Generation Rates Project Tri Generation ITE AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Land Use Code KSF Dail In Out In Out Dail In Out In Out Lot 1 Restaurant 931 8.171 89.95 0.66 0.15 5.02 2.47 735 5 1 41 20 ITE Pass-By Reduction (PM-44%) 0 0 0 -18 -9 Sub-Total Restaurant 735 S 1 23 11 Retail 820 4.211 42.94 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.95 181 3 2 8 8 ITE Pass-By Reduction (PM-SO%) 0 0 0 -4 -4 Sub-Total Retail 181 3 2 4 4 Food 932 2.47 127.15 5.99 5.53 6.66 4.26 314 15 14 16 11 ITE Pass-By Reduction (PM-43%) 0 0 0 -7 -5 Sub-Total Food 314 1 S 14 9 6 Total New Traffic -Lot 1 1,230 23 17 36 21 Lot 2 Coffee 933-2 1.486 716.00 37.25 35.78 14.97 13.82 1,064 55 53 22 21 Food 932 2.829 127.15 5.99 5.53 6.66 4.26 360 17 16 19 12 ITEPass-ByReduction (PM-43%) 0 0 0 -18 -14 Sub-Total Coffee/Food 1,424 72 69 23 19 Retail 820 0.987 42.94 0.63 0.40 1.80 1.95 42 1 0 2 2 ITE Pass-By Reduction (PM-SO%) 0 0 0 -1 -1 Sub-Total Retail 42 1 0 1 1 Total New Traffic -Lot 2 1,466 73 69 24 20 Total New Traffic 2,696 96 86 60 41 Crazy Horse Square - 13 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7~~~~ 09 Y ~ Om mE a~ mo c_£ C i~ ~C ~i 01 C.~- ~~ O~ ~t II X X Z `O 1 m~ W_ r~ V / ~_ ~U WM LU 1..~ O /~~ IL V C vi v 0 U O N N ,1 Q O 2 cT C Y 0 a w x U a a w 7~6#~~ 10 Y C d m~ ay 01~ C L >~ m.C ~i 01 C.~- C ~, i~ O E.c ~~ x X ^V , I.L I..L~ O 2 Y Q /W f1 1 ` wU /~ _~ ^O 1 C N 4l O V O N " C O O T Y 0 a w U a a w ~S 7 5~--~111 V C vi 41 O V O f/l N „ O O S T _N ~_ Y `~l0£/9lZ 9L l/69l £b9/OSS J 1 ~ r H6l/081~ nn~ N~a ~ M ~ O N ~ N 3nv aNVa~ ,~ ~, ;; n a ~ ~ ~bL9/LOL BOL/969 W J Q U O O Z W J O _~ C~ J`/ Y W ~U O J~ LL. a 0 z U a a w 6 75~~112 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION PROJECT OPENING YEAR WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)1 ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.479 A 0.756 C 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.384 A 0.448 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.655 B 0.864 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.537 A 0.748 C 5 Redhill Ave @ Dyer/Barranca 0.880 D 0.745 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans)' Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 17.0 B 16.0 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.2 C 27.6 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 18.5 B 14.6 B ~ Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Crazy Horse Square - 17 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7a~-1~~ 13 J U O H O Z v i~ / i Y C O~ m~ am 1 010 C~ C m 01 m~ ~i Cw i~ O~ ~r II r r X x V! 5W G J Q W O J_ m Z Q J J a w °' w ~ N O U C N N O U O N N " C ^ o O 2 i. E Y a 0 w a z w i U W a a a w 1$ 7 ~~13~ 14 TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)1 ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.575 A 0.814 D 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.374 A 0.403 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.648 B 0.857 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.658 B 0.853 D 5 Redhill Ave @ Dyer/Barranca 0.784 C 0.729 C AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans)' Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.7 B 15.6 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.6 C 27.9 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 20.0 B 15.3 B ' Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. Crazy Horse Square - 19 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7 5~-,s115 Y C O~ m ad rn~ c_ C 0 p1 O` 01 C.~- ~~ O~ Es II X X V C N o_ V O N " O ^ O S I Y O O > J ~ ~ 0 m = Q Q ~ a- QU o~ w oz0 w~ w~~ ~ O J LL N ~ Q 0 w W w 0 a w -20- 7 ~q-~~ 16 TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATION GENERAL PLAN BUILD-OUT WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS AM Pea k Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (City)' ICU LOS ICU LOS 1 Grand Ave @ Warner Ave 0.578 A 0.820 D 2 Grand Ave @ Brookhollow Dr 0.401 A 0.416 A 3 Grand Ave @ Dyer Rd 0.655 B 0.870 D 4 Main St @ Dyer Rd 0.665 B 0.858 D 5 Redhill Ave @ Dyer/Barranca 0.789 C 0.732 C AM Pea k Hour PM Peak Hour No. Signalized Intersection (Caltrans) ~ Delay LOS Delay LOS 6 Grand Ave @ SR-55 SB Ramp 16.8 B 15.6 B 7 SR-55 SB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 29.7 C 28.0 C 8 SR-55 NB Ramp @ Dyer Rd 20.1 C 15.4 B ' Intersections under the control of Caltrans are evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. All others are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Crazy Horse Square - 21 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7 5~-,~117 PROJECT PARKING REQUIItEMENTS The project's parking requirements, based on the City of Santa Ana parking code, are summarized on Table 7. The total parking requirement for the two lots will be 174 parking spaces. This total parking is the sum of the peak parking requirements for each of the site uses. Table 7 Crazy Horse Square Food and Retail Center Parking Requirements Site Use Parking Requirements Site Qty Parking Re uired Lot 1 Food 1 s ace / 100 s uare feet 10,520 SF 105.2 Retail 1 s ace / 200 s uare feet 4,120 SF 20.6 Electrical 1 s ace /330 s uare feet 212 SF .6 Sub-Total Parkin Re uirement -Lot 1 126.4 Lot 2 Food 1 space / 100 square feet 4,235 SF 42.4 Retail 1 space / 200 square feet 987 SF 4.9 Electrical 1 space /330 square feet 78 SF .2 Sub-Total Parkin Re uirement -Lot 2 47.5 Total Parkin Re uirement 173.9 = 174 The project site plan shows 175 parking spaces, including 7 handicapped stalls. Therefore, the proposed parking supply will meet the code-required parking for the combined center. Shared Parking for Potential Alternative Site Use An alternative site use for Lot 1 could include a night club component of approximately 1,900 square feet in the main restaurant. This is not part of the current proposal, but a discussion of the effect of a night club on parking requirements is provided here for information purposes. The night club use would have a higher parking requirement than regular restaurant use - 1 space per 28 square feet of night club use (including bar and dance floor area) compared to 1 space per 100 square feet of restaurant area. For 1,900 square feet, this represents an increase in parking of 49 spaces. A summary of the parking requirements for this night club site use is provided on Table 8. With the night club use, the site would have a parking requirement of 223 spaces, compared to the 175 spaces provided. Although the Crazy Horse Square site would have a parking shortage compared to the City of Santa Ana parking code, the mixed-use nature of the site (a combination of retail, night club and food uses) makes it a good candidate for shared parking relationships amongst the uses. The Urban Land Institute (ULl7 has developed a methodology for estimating the reduction in peak parking demand amixed-use site can experience due to its mixed-use make-up. Crazy Horse Square - 22 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7~-,~~ 18 Table 8 Crazy Horse Square With Night Club Parking Requirements Site Use Parking Requirements Site Qty Parking Re uired Lot 1 Restaurant 1 s ace / 100 s uare feet 8,620 SF 86.2 Ni ht Ciub 1 s ace / 28 s uare feet 1,900 SF 67.9 Retail 1 s ace / 200 s uare feet 4,120 SF 20.6 Electrical 1 s ace /330 s uare feet 212 SF .6 Sub-Total Parkin Re uirement -Lot 1 175.3 Lot 2 Food 1 space / 100 square feet 4,235 SF 42.4 Retail 1 space / 200 square feet 987 SF 4.9 Electrical 1 space /330 square feet 78 SF .2 Sub-Total Parkin Re uirement - Lot Z 47.5 Total Parkin Re uirement 222.8 = 223 The ULI Shared Parking (Second Edition, 2005) publication sets forth a methodology for evaluating shared parking relationships on amixed-use site. The process is amulti-step process that first establishes the stand- alone peak parking requirements for the site uses, as summarized on Table 8 above. The methodology then applies a percentage to the peak requirement for each use, for each hour of the day between the hours of 6:00 AM and midnight, reflecting the fact that the parking demand for each use varies throughout the course of the day. Beneficial shared parking synergies exist between different uses whose peak operating times occur at different times of the day. Examples of complementary uses for the Crazy Horse development would be the retail, fast food, and full-service restaurant with bar and dance floor. When the retail parking demand is at 100% of its peak (at 1:00 PM on a weekday), full-service restaurant uses are at 75% and bar and night club uses are nominal, according to the ULI document, Table 2-5. At the same time, retail and fast food uses are at 50% and less when the restaurant and night club parking demand is at 100%, after 9:00 at night on a weeknight. These uses, then, can share a portion of the same parking supply without detriment to the other, rather than each providing their own distinct and complete parking supply. ULI hour-by-hour usage factors, seasonal factors, and weekday and weekend parking ratios are incorporated into a Shared Parking spreadsheet, and applied to the proposed mix of uses and square footages for the Crazy Horse Square project. Applying these factors to a particular mix of integrated land uses yields a projected peak parking requirement at a particular time of day (weekday and weekend) and season. In theory, the actual parking needs for that mix of uses will not exceed the projected peak, due to the interrelationships and benefits of shared parking synergies. Copies of the Shared Parking spreadsheets based on the ULI Shared Parking manual (Second Edition, 2005) developed for the Crazy Horse Square project are provided in Appendix C. The worksheets indicate that based on shared parking arrangements, the Crazy Horse Square project would require a maximum of 163 spaces at 7:00 PM on a typical weekday (a parking demand reduction of 62 spaces due to shared parking) and 164 spaces at 8:00 PM on the weekend (a parking demand reduction of 61 spaces due to shared parking). Crazy Horse Square - 23 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7~r~-~119 Based on this shared parking analysis, the proposed site parking supply of 175 spaces would be adequate to meet the peak parking needs of the Crazy Horse Square mixed-use development, including a night club use in the main restaurant, throughout the day and evening, on both weekdays and weekends. PROJECT ACCESS The Crazy Horse Square project is located on the site of the former Crazy Horse Saloon. The site is located adj acent to and immediately south of atwo-story office building that is part of the Brookhollow development. The Crazy Horse Square site plan proposes to retain access to the site as it existed when the Crazy Horse Saloon was in operation. Access A is a shared access to Brookhollow Drive with the adjacent Brookhollow office. This driveway is located 260 feet north of Grand Avenue, and allows all turning movements. From this driveway, the driver can enter either the Crazy Horse site (by driving straight ahead) or the Brookhollow office site (by making a left turn). A reciprocal access across the parking areas between the Crazy Horse and Brookhollow sites makes it easy to move from one site to the other, by vehicle or by foot. Access A leads to the parking area located along the north side of the Building 1. The northernmost row of parking on the Crazy Horse Square site directly faces and is adjacent to the southernmost row of parking in the Brookhollow parking lot that will be the subject of the reciprocal parking agreement between the two property owners. A second entrance, to the Crazy Horse site Access B, is located at roughly the middle of the site, on the outside of the bend in Brookhollow Drive, 150 feet north of Grand Avenue. This driveway is currently closed off by fencing around the site. The Crazy Horse Square project will retain this driveway, with some modifications to the internal circulation. All turning movements to and from Brookhollow Drive will be allowed. This driveway will lead to a parking aisle that runs the length of the site and serves both sides of the development. The two parcels within the Crazy Horse Square project will have reciprocal access across both lots, with all parking areas available to customers of either lot. A sight distance check was conducted at Access B, to ensure that a driver will be able to see far enough in either direction on Brookhollow to safely exit the site. Because the driveway is on the outside of the curve, sight distance is facilitated in both directions. Looking to the south (looking left), the driver has a clear view of the road all the way to the signal (approximately 150 feet) and can easily see cars turning from Grand Avenue onto Brookhollow from either direction. Looking to north (looking right) the driver has clear line of sight for approximately 310 feet before the curve takes the oncoming car out of view. The trees and hedge along the project edge should be maintained so as to not encroach into the line of sight along the road. Both driveways were evaluated for stacking capacity. Access A is located 360 feet and Access B is located 150 feet north of Grand Avenue. The distance on Brookhollow between the Grand Avenue signal and the site driveways would provide stacking at the signal for approximately 4 in either lane before the queue would reach Access B, and 12 vehicles before the queue would reach Access a. An HCS analysis shows that the average westbound queue at the intersection of Brookhollow and Grand in the evening peak hour (the highest westbound demand) would be 3.4 vehicles, indicating that the westbound queue would rarely extend far enough to block Access B. If this were to occur, only vehicles exiting Access B and turning left would be affected, and these vehicles would simply need to wait for the queue to clear on the westbound green, or would have the option to go to Access A, which is 200 feet further east. The queuing analysis indicates that the westbound demand is not likely ever to extend far enough to reach Access A. Crazy Horse Square - 24 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 7~-~~20 CMP ANALYSIS The Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) was established in 1991, to reduce traffic congestion and to provide a mechanism for coordinating land use and development decisions. Compliance with the CMP requirements ensures a city's eligibility to compete for State gas tax funds for local transportation projects. Within the City of Santa Ana, the CMP Highway System includes three arterials: Harbor Boulevard, Edinger Avenue, and ls` Street. The following intersections are CMP intersections within the City of Santa Ana: • Harbor Boulevard and ls` Street • Harbor Boulevard and Warner Avenue • I-5 SB Ramps and ls` Street • SR-55 SB Ramp and Edinger Avenue • SR-55 SB Ramps and Irvine Boulevard These intersections are all distant from the project site, and are not on the list of study intersections included in this traffic analysis. Therefore, there are no impacts to CMP facilities. SUMMARY • The Crazy Horse Square project is to consist of 20,154 square feet of retail and food uses. The project site is located at Grand Avenue and Brookhollow Drive in the City of Santa Ana, on the site of the former Crazy Horse Saloon night club. • The proposed project is estimated to generate 2,700 trips per day, with 182 trips in the morning peak hour, and 102 trips in the evening peak hour. • Eight area intersections were analyzed to determine the project's off-site traffic impacts. All study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service. • The project will not cause a significant impact at any study intersection. • The Crazy Horse Square project site will provide 175 parking spaces. Based on the City of Santa Ana parking code, the parking requirement for the project will be 174 parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed parking supply will meet the code-required parking for the combined center. • An alternative site use for Lot 1 could include a night club component of approximately 1,900 square feet in the main restaurant. This would result in a parking requirement of 223 spaces, 48 more spaces than the site will provide. A shared parking analysis was conducted to demonstrate that the parking supply will accommodate the peak parking demands of the site for weekday and weekend operations, due to shared parking synergies. • The project site will be served by two full-access driveways on Brookhollow Drive. Each access was evaluated for sight distance and stacking, and both were found to satisfy operational requirements. Crazy Horse Square - 25 - April, 2006 Food and Retail Center 75A-121 99 of 139 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNTS 71II6of139 ~~ APPENDIX B INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 7 ~13~~~ O 1 ~ E 'C > O O O O O O O O m 7 N m n N o O O o ~ O m n ~O a g O ~ ~ 'C E O O 0 0 O O O O m N V o O 0 m o N ~ m O U ~ O O O a U> ~ M 7 0 0 m O { O O O { 0 0 0 0 0 O ~ } Q U m 0 0 i0 ~ ' 0 0 ~ 7 ~ m ~ m ~ 1~ ~ t0 m C ~ W m Y U ~ 0 0 O ' c 0 O ~ m m M m O O 7 O f~ N C C ((pp m > o 0 0 ~ 0 O 0 0 0 0 O r r 0 C 0 ° Y ~ ~ U m p a j ~ o ~ ~ 0 ~ M 0 o M m c m o o i c N ~, 0 0 0 0 0 E m U 0 ~p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o . E ~ U - O -' m a m E O o v ~ E c W m E E O ~ u C E a E m in v v m o M o m M m " O c ~° ~ d E - O " ° ~ ~° ~ ~ m f~ m f~ v N N v m Ol N V1 ~ ~ W m W O o n m m . o r~ M M M r m in m M m O m 1~ ~ F. N m ~ ~O ~O 7 M m N ~O Z ~ U O ; N N N N m M m M Z ~ ~ m O c a m U d CI L m ~ H Q O > h p~ p~ 0 0 ~ O O O 0 0 0 10 Q; m Y V O O m O N O m 0 0 o a N a N o ~y U ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m a N m n N O o O O in O 10 n 10 a ' 'c ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rNi v o o o O 0 0 0 0 0 U f 0 0 0 0 a 0 m U ~ m m o o N M ~ o o m M e N n r m m v n ~ .n ~n ~ c o ~ c ro ~ U ~ o N v o m ~ M m v n m c e ~ } 6> o o .- ~ o ~ .- ~ .- '- . E U N Y _ a > .- 00 ~ ~ o ~ ~ o m o ° ~ o ° c m o 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~ U 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~ U OJ ~ N ~ ~ W a N W m R m O ~O 7 A m n 0 M M m} M m m (n 2C H m W N E ~ N m ~ f~ O f~ t~ f~ M N O m (n ~ H f 0 N 0 B , O R M ~ N tN Z W 2' (j d O N N m O lA N M N N m m M O M M O M h Z W 4' GI ~ > ; U m ~ ~q p 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 ~ ~ ~ p 0 0 O O O O O O O O O (7 U r O l0 ~ ~ ~ M ~ U n m n m M n N . y 7 n { M N N l G N N . N ~ ...._ _... ....... m G) F ~ O M O M N M N N C O M O M N M N N W -~ ~ W N U~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cri 'r o o v a m °o U E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ V ~ O o O o m ^ U o • ~ , 0 0 o f ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q a U ~ n N o o v ~n ~ o o M o m m ~ o v m o m n m aci c ~ i o ~ U n o m v o in o m o m m m ~ m aci A a> ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ o 0 o a ~ U ~ ~ a a j n ~ o o M ~ o ~ o o m '- o ~ m o in ~ m o m o m N o e o ~ = U 2 } o 0 o D o c o 0 o c o o E Eo m U - J E { c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E ° m U - 0 -' O O m o ~ ° ~ m E o u ~ E IO E ~ m N N V N 7 M m O m O 10 N 1~ 7 M m O m M m n 1~ m O ~ c ~ O ~ N O 47 } ? O O m m n Omi aM M ~ tn0 O 1~[ O (n O ~ 1- N j f0 VI N N m N Z ~ U a ~ O O M m f0 M 1~ M m Z ~ ~ O O u ~ = d •° o n m m o o ° o °' o ° o o = °i ~~ o v v o o m o N o m o 0 ~ y a> ~ Y o a> m Q a H W ~ v~ o 0 .- 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 o ~ N ~ o o ~ a n. _~ .- o a o ~ ~ o o ° a ~ 0 U o ~ ~ O a o 0 ~ U a a 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Q V Q X 0 O 0 r ~ ~ O O ~ a O O m N 0 f~ O m O Of O c m C O ~ ~ C a ~ U N f~ O 0 N M < O O 0 aa N O 0 N O 10 h W 10 01 m C > 2 ~ ~ 0 o c 0 0 0 E 0 O E ~ ~ O a> 0 0 ~ ~ 0 '~ O O N O E ~ ~ N O 0 o 0 0 o E E ~ ~ U J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E ~ m O 0 J m m E ~ ~ c c ~ m $ c ~ ~° -- U Q ~ m 01 M M M M m m o m o 7 N 1~ in m O m N m ~` n m fA ~ H m W E ~ rn n .- n Omi ~ ~ O fn 0 N ~ OO N 3 ~ N W ~ m ^ '- m ' r U1 N N m ~- N Z ~ U m O N (V ~0 ~ r n ~- O i Z ` ~ ~ ` > > "' U C 7 a 3 V ~ ~ 9 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ n a a 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 3 ; .~ a { m ,~ F 0 °' m m u ~ 5 m y m in m m O N m d 0 O~ N m m m m O M N N 7 N O a` ~ M O a` ~ of m °o n 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 am 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 n 0 y o m 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U m m c ) 10 P 7 f0 U n N n N y (7 " m ~ ~ a m ~ O M O M N M N N m ~ O M O M N M N N J J C ~~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M o ° o r a m ~ ~c E ° c E i V ~ N o o v ro U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M ~ o o ~ U (~ ~ o o c o 0 0 ~ f c o 0 0 o c c ~ E o d m E N v f U o o m v m o o o n ~ m r M N m M ~n v m r m c e o c m m v U ~ n m o o ~n o o o rn m r m o m m ~ r m n ~n c c > c m c p a> ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- o 0 0 0 E ~ h ~ c a j o .- o ~ o 0 ~ 0 o N o 0 E ~ vJ Z U 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E o ° ~ U O .~ ~ m m m o U 0 0 0 o c o c o o 0 0 0 E E oo ~' O O J ~ m ~ l` T ~ C m m tp ~ C 0 ~ > M 01 01 N V M m m 1~ R N ~ O~ O m m N N m n O! ~O (p Z ~ F- N m d ~ ~ C O y GD ~ M Ol I~ N M m m N N O V 7 I~ m m V 'd' f~ ~ ~ F- N Gl ~ ~1 ~ C ~ " m ~ ~O N N 1(I .- N Q' U m C 'F E a x > N n 10 •- •- m M •- 1~ N ~ m Z p' U m ~ 2 ° ° ° 3 c w c ~ O o. m o n o o o n o °o o° °o n °o °o °o n °o m , v L m 0 ° o 0 o 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 ~ 0 ° m ° F- U ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ c~ ~ C U r ~ r in ~ ~ m p M G v M r C O N m E '0 m E `° Z ~ ~ O M O M N M N N > w a i Z ~ ~ O M O M N M N N j w W J E m ~' E m ? O m Z Z Z ~ N (/J W W W ~ ~ ~ C ~ C i y J z K F- J r 2 f- J Q' H J d' ~ ~ C ~ E v~ ~ E z z n U U w w w 3 3 c m U H x a m m c T V U 713924 a 'c E U ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N M o o °o o o °v Q m o o d '~ > U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rmi ry c°^~ o° o i°n o ~ Q a o + 0 0 0 0 0 0 + ~ 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 `m } ~ U O 7 O 0 ~ r N 0 O 0 O 7 M M 7 0 O O M M ~O C C m m > m } ~ U m M 0 O 0 m 10 N O O O O to m N i0 O O O m ~O m C C m m i p Q~ O O 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 C CO C ~ (n ~j O 0. J O O O O N 0 0 0 O O O C C p, C ~ ~ U m 0 0 0 0 0 oa n E E p m U 0 J m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [1 o E ° m U - p J m c m m E ~ u ° c E c A m E E u '-' c E O . m m p n p N m fm0 ID r m N m u ~ ~ c ~ N m ~ M N a m M N O m N ° ~ ~ ~ ~ m m W ~ O > 2 lU ~ ( a W > m O i n M m O D M z w ~ c ) m (j a m c m t7 . ~ p _ . N d J O H O X 0 0 O O O ~ ~j O N Q; O H O N O O 0 0 0 N m 0 0 o a N Gy V ~ O O 0 0 0 0 O O m N M O 0 O 0 O < M Q ~ .C E U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O m N m O O O O M a Q ~ o 0 0 o d ~ 0 0 0 0 0 } U Q> O) 0 O 0 ~ 10 O O O O N O O M O O O O O ~" O ~O O C C O n E ~ C V) m } gy p m M O O V 10 B 0 O O O O ~O m N 0 10 O O O 01 O M m Q C O ~ ~ C U m 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o o 0 0 0 E E ~ m ~ s U ~ m d j o 0 0 0 0 D o o N c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E ~ ~ ~ U ~ °o c ~ o s c cL° m 0 m ~ p N m 0 (00 ~ ~ r ~ m m N 2G ~ m Of m M O ~ zC q ; N O r N m Z ~ V a N; m m ^ t +l f 0 ~ N m r N Z W d' ~J C p O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O ` m m O 0 O 0 O X 0 O 0 0 n 0 r 0 ~ O O a O r ~ U H ~ r r.. r r C7 U ^ m m h O h N N N N m m m ~ Q O M ~- O M O •- C Q O M Q O M O W -~ J W _ (n ~ V> O O O O O O 0 0 m N m O o O o O a M Q m O U~ O O O O O O 0 0 M N m 1° o 0 o 0 m 7 Q O O ~ O O O O G O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 O O d } U N m O 0 0 m N O O m r m V Cn N M O O O o7 O tt) cy c m C m > O ~ C ) 7 0 m ~O O m N ' r O M c m m R Q j o o N o o •- o 0 0 0 0 o e o = ~ U ~ a . d j Y o O o m ~ N o O 0 W r 0 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 m 0 c C o o, c ~ rn u Z } o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E o ~ U 0 E o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° E o m U 0 `° O O m o ~ ° c ` m o U U ~ E ~ ~ m V N b ~ 1°O ~ ~ 1[I m U 2C C m r O ~ p O 0 N N N O M M ~ m m > Z W R V Q ~ O O t 0 Z d' ~ O J O O v a • a j o ~ o ~ o 0 0 0 o p ~ o = o a j o ~ o N o 0 0 0 o N 'O o Y a a l V U~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ m N m o O °o O o m M Q LL d '~ E U ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ M N N ~ O o O o ~ v Q Q d ~ Q o 0 0 0 o d ~ o 0 0 0 0 a V U N m O 0 O 01 m 0 O 0 m ~ m O m N M O O O ~_ N N m C m C O ~ C U ~ V Y O O O m '- O O m Ol 10 r 1° r O O O ^ m m y C m C O C Z L ~ Q~ O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O = ~ d > O O O O O O O O O O O o U ~ O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 E E ~ ~ U - ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~' - ~ ; m ~ ~ C ~ m p U ~ c c V O A ' O to ~ O N r ~ ~ ~ M O m ~ ~ ~ N q ~ Y ^ V m 0 0 N N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ C ~ R d W ~ j C D t 0 2 W ~ V r m v m .- 2 W ~ t } > V R' O ~ ~ i ~ ~ v • o 2 m Q a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Q ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 j a . m ~ a m o m ~~ m O M M N O r N N O O m O O N N N N m V O N O a` ~ M O e ~ M U O ° ° 0 ° 0 ~ ° 0 ° 0 ^ 0 ~°. 0 °r ° 0 ° 0 n° 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 o O 0 o 0 U ~ ~ m y C ~ O M O M O _ N m ~ O M O M O Q J J ~ C ` ~~ '~c, > O O O O O O O O N co O 0 O o O r ~ Q C m m _• .C ~ 0 0 O O O O O O in M m ~ o O o O n a Q C m E O C ~ O O O O O >O N p~ ( V O O O O O O > N a V D U Q j O m o O O 0 10 m m O 0 0 O 0 r ~ IG1 ~ 01 N o M O 0 O O 0 W 0 N N c m C o C O ~ C o E ~ ~ L ~ U N 7 O 0 S r O o O O M 01 N r 7 0 r O O O ^ m m m C m C ~ ~ C E m m C 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 E ~ O ~ c a j o o ~ o .- o 0 0 0 o E ] h ~ Z U o E E po o ° ~ ~? J m m m o U o 0 0 0 o c o 0 o d o 0 f f ~ m ~ O O m m GA ~ U C ~ >, ~ o o U o o U (~ C O > ~ - N M ~ O m ~ m r m V 1° 01 N m ~ m fn Z ?? ~ ~ y ' d ~ V C C O N r V r r ~ GOO N V N O N M ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ V ,X ~ m N m Q V ~ a E N x > r m ~ M N N ~ r N M Z R' U m C Z w o 0 0 m~ w c O Q ~ O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ^ O 0 O o O ~= Q m o O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o O m~ V F- U U u~ of 'c c o U ~n ~n L m yc •c W ~ m m E m n, m m E m N Z N O M O M O O ~ Z ~ .- O M ~ O M ~ .- ~ O ~ ~ j~ W J E m J o m Z > N J z ~ z H z J ~ K ~ F rn J w d' w H w J ~ ~ 3 ~ ,Q D C f j y J z R~ F- z J rn ~ 1-- J w ~ H J ~ ~ ~tEpt 2a C ~ E U~ ~ E z ~ rn w w 3 ~ U~ N X c 0 m d c >. a N U 7 "Ts~ 25 a V E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N v M o o o o ~n ~ m aD $ O d ~ "~ E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rNi a °o o m Q M o + ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 + V~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 `m m } O ~ 0 Q~ 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 1~ N 0 O O ~ N m 7 O o 0 O ~ M D O O o M O m M N _ C C c m C 1 m > _ ~ j ~ m } ~ U d j o O O 0 O O o O O M S o O O m N M m m O o O O M N o O 0 m N 0 m O < O C c C m > C u m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a n [ E U 0 '~ ppp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n E ~ y p m E o y - J n o m U - J a c E ~ u E c E E u n E a u E o 0 0 0 M ~ o ~ ~ o M ^ o ~- ~ m m v ~ ~ 2< c ~' ~ m Ti o a m E ~ o 0 o .n m o ~i r~ o o n ~ o o v m M ~ (A ~' ~ c ~ cL° y u m m c ) Z W ~ V a ~ > v m a 2 Q' O o a m a, N d~ O O O N O N O O O O N O N Q~ O O O N O ~ N O O O H O ° ° a N ~y E U> o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o o o o m ~ m ~ ~c E p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c~i ~ v o °o o o r~ amD Q ~ o 0 0 0 o f 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 Q~ 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O ~ N O 0 O 0 N f~ M O O O O ~ M O O O O N O m M N C) C C O ~ E ~ C 7 ~ W m } ~ U Q ~ O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O m S 0 O O 0 N M O h O O O O M N O O h N m O m C O C ~ C ~ O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o ~ $ U ~ m , 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o o O 0 O 0 R 0 E E E ~ ~ Q U - ~ V C1 O ~ C N O O O ~ O 0 O O O 2C O O O O O ~ ~ ~ W j C] m ^ V C O Z W R' U D_ N j ~ ~ O O V M Z R' U ~ p o 0 o d o ~ ~ 0 o ^ ~ ro o 0 0 ° 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 o o `~ C9 N r i ~n V' p cgi ~ ~ r M N N ~ G N » _.,... ..... .. d ~ O O O N O O M O O N m ~ O O O N O O M O O N W J .~ W (n '£ V> O O O O O O O O 10 N O ~ O ~ O ~ lC) ~ CO M O ~ .C j O O O O O O O O m ~ h ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ et Q M 0 O ~ O O O O O O U~ O O O O m O O ~ a O Q o O 0 O o O n N o O in N m O o O °~{ ' o O M O N ycy c w 0 n > _ U ~ `O ~ U 0 0 O 0 O ~n ~ o O m N m o O m o 0 m 0 m ~ ~ C aci p C U W ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 7 0 0 0 Q ~ a a O C D S N U fq 0 0 0 f U c U E + ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o E E u O ~ O 0 m E O o o U C ~ U N 0 Q c N 0 0 0 n 0 ~ ~ O N ~ O h m ~ "O / O ~ O O O ~ O ~ N O M O v N t .1 2C C ~ ~ m ~ Z R~ U a a ~ m > Z W K p Q a J c ~ , = d O O O N O N O •- O O O N O = v G a 0 0 0 0 N O ~ N O O O O O , Y ~~ Q a V W ~ ci ~ •- 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 '- ~ 0 o N c`Oi O oD O °o O o N coo m W a 'c E ~ 0 0 0 0 •- 0 0 0 0 ~ N ~ O v O ° O o m Q Q o 0 0 p~ o 4 Q 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 . (aj ~ U °o °o °o o °o uNi ~ °o ° ~ °o rNi m ~ o a c ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O N N ~ ~ o O rn m o O n N rn m d C ~ ~ Z Q~ O O O N O N 0 0 O O N E ° Q ~ n, ~ O O O S O M ~- O N O O M O O G Q ~ O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~ U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 o E E ~ $ U O V W ~ p 0 0 S n O N < ~ O ^ O ~ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ O ^ ~ COD O O M O f00 O N U ~ F"~ ~ C) W ~ O1 ; ~ Z W d' V m O V i ~ 7 ~ Z a' U ~ ~ ~ m ~ Q v c a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 a 0~ v n Q a d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O g ~ Q ~ M m Z C O ~ O O O N O M O O O N m Q 0 0 0 0 d' O m m O a O ~ ~ { L a (~ o a p ci V o 0 0 ~ o ° ~ o ° o 0 o ~ V o 0 0 ~ o ^ ~ o ° o o ~ N m ~ O O O N O O M O O N N ~ O O O N O O M O O N a J J c c E U> O O o 0 0 0 O O m N o l`MD 0 0 o 0 a fND m m m U j O O 0 0 O O O O M 7 0 0 m Q m (!' C ~ O O O O . O ~ ~ ~ O O O O O 0 o 7 ~ U 0 0 0 O O V Q O M O M 10 c C ~ C E m o O O O r O N m 0 O m m C C ~ m ~ C Q~ 0 0 0 0 N 0 O N O O M O O N O p, E ° Q (Q ~ C D_ j O O O ~ O (`') ~ O N O O M O O E C Q U .: Z U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~ c U ~ m m U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~ p 0 ~ q e eq c ~ a~ t4 3 c L° c >~ ~ 8 M y 0 ~ 0 0 0 °m m o m ~ m Cn o ~ m m o N m m ~- w v 'o C c y o ) 0 0 0 m m O M M m O coD M O m V m N ~n ~ F J m C) ~ 'v ~ •K w ~ O m Z ~ V ~ x v in .- ~ a ~ Z K U C a ° ° ° ° d~ w 0 n w 0 0 0 o V 0 o f~ o f~ 0 o 0 ° 0 °o a{ a L O O O 0 0 Q O 0 0 M 0 0 r O 0 0 O c o 0 m~ ~ L V U to ~n ~ C7 ~ .C U M ~ ^ ~ ~ ,C W m °' Z J O O O N O S Q O M O O N E 'D O w d Z O O O O N O S Q O M O O N E `° j E ~ H c ~ E c Z > N ~ E J z ~ z H z J m H ~ ~ m J w Q' w H w J 3 ~ 3 ~ fQ j C _ j c E J z R~ z F- z J m F- m Q~ m J w R~ w F- w J 3 Q' ~ ~ ~ ID c c U~ ~ U ~ M v, x O 0) C T U 7~~;~26 E ~` ° ~n M o o ro a v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ c`OV °o o m m o a V E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~ o° o m p o + ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ + f o 0 0 0 o c m )- ~ U Q~ ao o S o o O c N rn ~n O o o O rn M N ~n n O o o O o ~ m N X o o 0 ao m 0 _ ~ C c m C m > N U m m Y ~ V d m o N o 0 O m 0 r ~n O o o O r N n rn 0 o o 0 rn a ~ v m S o o O r M N c C c m C m > r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ° _ ~ 0 m m ~ 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q _ ~ N l m n n E E v m ~ U J E 0 o E a E E v U - O J m c w m E o ~ = ° t a m o s $ c E d E M O W M O O ~ °~ r N r Ot ~n o ^ rn ~ (n ~ c ~ ~ m ~ a ~ ~ r ~ r M ~ O 1[ N 7 00 u (n 2 c ~ W G ~ ~ N N < _ ~ O ~ M ~ ~ 0 N 10 M y ( r { _ m O ~ c ~ Z W U a ~ ~ Z W K U a m m ~ N a j o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° m o m N Q > o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 cc v o v d N N U E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 ~ N N O o O o 00 ~ m 'c ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ T M ' O o O m M m p f o 0 0 c U~ ~ ~ ? O o ao o 0 0 0 0 0 °1 ~ U o °o N v°'i °o M n °o cmi °o rn c o a ~ m U ao o n r o n n o m o m ~ c ~ ~ Y Q~ S O N O O N O O 0 0 O E ~ ~ ~ a j N O V O O N 0 0 ~ ~ O N O O E C = N ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ m ~ U ~ m o 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o E E ~ ~' U - ~ c v~ s s c ~° c s tg ~ m W N ~ M W M 0 0 0 0 n n ~O ~- O O !n ~ ~ m a N E K y r ~ M 0 O N O S ~ ~ ~ N a N 0 ~ M f 0 ~ W ~ ~ ~ 10 N n V Z W Q' N O M c0 O ~ O i ~ O~ t 0 ~ N 10 ~O M v n Z W d' m ~ V A > B U 0 0 O O O 0 0 m O O O O O ~ U 0 O O O 0 m ~ ^ O O O O O O C7 N .n ~n u~ in t9 ~ U ~ ~ in ~ G N N N • w y m y m C e- O M Q O M Q O M Q O M C Q O M Q O M Q O M Q O M W ~ ~ W (n U> O O 0 0 O O O O o N r N o O o O n ~ Q m O _ L E O O O O O O O O a N O O ti U G Y ~ 0 0 o U~ O ~ o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o O a + ~ U y~ c'1 m ~ r m A o O m O o 00 m N M ~O v Of M IO m ~ m aCi C ~ > O ~ U v N M O r ~ V ~ M O c m C ~ W Q~ O ^ ~ O O N O O 0 0 ~ p 0 C E O ~ a 2~ N ~[1 M t 0 O O ^ O O A N N D O n C ~ f/J N m } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a E $ ~ U - J E 0 0 0 o c c 0 0 0 o c o E E U - U -~ n O O m o ~ w m o $ ~ E m ~ 1[ N ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ _y ~ ~_ m O >' O N m W ~ OOi n N O Obi Ono O aOD U J 2CU F-- ~ m , O ~ 2 Q' U K O O N M ~ r f0 .- a ~ ? tp _ Z IL R' O~ ,, d ~ °° ~ U a -~ O o O u ? Y a a j o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° m o m = o a j o m o 0 0 0 0 o cu a o a } Q Q o. F- a W c U~ ~ O O O O O O ~ O O o N m N o O o O rn 1~[ a W a . 'C ~ O O ~ O O O O O O X o ~ m N o O o O m r U i 0 0 0 o c ~ U~ n 0 0 0 0 0 . Q (~ ~ V ? M O ' ~ ~ 01 W O O tp O O OG ao 1fI O t0 O aD M f0 ^ c m C C p ' C d ~ U rn < N 10 OI tp O O f0 n m IA a O O W M O c m C m p ~ > C Z Q U O o 0 ~ 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 O E ~ N d~ ' N M O O ~ O O ~ N N O E ~ ~ O O o p E ~ ~ U_ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 o E o cl °' U_ J m O U C ~ m O p C 7 n O n (00 O 1n M m e ~ O ~ ~ ~ C H N ~ M aOD N M °D m r N O m OMD O ~ U !A C ~ m W m ; ~ N M ~- ~ W ~ O N ~ ~ M Z W Q' b O N M ~ r r M ~ ~ 7 r v t0 Z G W Q' y ~ V } ' U ~ ~ m 7 Q 0 n a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ > ~ Q ° a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z D g ~ Q O ~ eO N O N M N 7 M ~ tf M ~ Q O n ~ M f0 N v M ~ ~O N N t ') (, _ O M . W a a` V 0 o 0 0 0 ov 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 vo 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 o 0 o 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 n 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 M 1p M ~ U n v M ~ ~ y m y y C N O M N N ~ N O M N N N J J R C U j X 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ X 0 0 M N N N O O O O N N Q ~ m m _ .C E 0 0 ~ X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~" V N O O N U c E ~ o c o 0 0 U~ f ~, > ~ ~ o a 0 0 0 0 0 c m > E r m m > E N 'O ~ V N M tG m O t0 O~ O O O O m r f0 ~O 10 ~ t0 m f0 O m C C O d C m m C U r n y Oy GC 0 O O ~ v 01 0 O ~ ~O ~ N N N ~ C C O C C Q~ O o ~ 0 0 O 0 O N 0 O O 0 0 ~ E ~ U1 0 ~ .k d j ~ N !7 0 0 O p f7 Z V 0 0 o c o 0 o E $ ~ c U m m U o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~' ~ j O ~ m r ~ c c ~p ~ ~ O ~ O O O M O W M N N ~ ~O n V V O M (n ~ F- l0 n U ~ (p A r I O M ~O t0 Q1 10 N (q ~ F- N U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O i O r M 7 ~ .- M Z W K V ~ C b J N M ~ ~ O ~ t~0 ~ N O Y ~ n M t00 2 a' U ~ C a E x Z O W Q o 0 r 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 n ° 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 a 0 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 aci ~ .°- p W 0 ^ 0 ~ 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ^ 0 ~ E ro ~ r ~ U U ~ ~ c ,~ ~ ~ •c U ~ ~ c~ M ~ a 'c W y E m ro E m Z C N O M N N O` Z C l0 N O M N N > W ~ E m J E m H Z > y J z R~ z F z J m Q' m I--' v> J w a' w F- w J 3 a' ~ ~ a C > m J Q~ F- J Q~ H J 2~ F- -~ ~ ~ ~ c A C ~ E ~ U r ~ E z z z rn w m w w w 3 ~ O F v C m m c T v N U 7 ~~F~3~ p m N O O M m a U£ O O O O 0 0 0 0 r~i cm's °o c~ U O } ~ O O O O O O `a m m 0 ~[7 Ol O m O^ M O N C > Q Q~ O O O O O M N O S M O M C C G C ~ U m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° E U U c O m J c E E u u E 0 a ~ m~ m o n Q a? v °' m N °i w m u ~_ ~ m ~ ; m M N" V M ~O N N 7 Z~ a. U O ffi a` m ~ .• N O` j O O O 0 0 0 O O~ O~ 0 0 0 o d N N M O O O Q U~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of ~ °o c^ U f 0 0 0 0 0 ~¢ j o 00 ° o °o °n r °o ~ ~ o M°° E ~> m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E o ,°~ v V~ s u c a N? ~~ m O W N Y O B N M V ~~~ d N; ~O M N V M m N N V Z W d' U W b O O O O O O O O (7 U M O m ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ^ O O m ~ m r In m N O N - ~ X 0 0 0 0 ~ O O ~- X 0 0 .n CJ .n m o O 0 m 0 m U ~ M ? O O m O 0 0 0 0 0 R ~ c m } ~ U m a o o m m v o o r m N m o o .n o rn m o o m m w e > q Q j 0 0 0 o ry o o N N o ~ c o o ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E o ~ U m E 0 U o V u C c m m ? cb O Oml 1~ ~ „~ "' ~ W i[ T m N fn h~ W O m M Y N N n O m m ~ m ~ Z ~ U ~ ~ = a j 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn rn o o Y a Q W d '~ E o 0 0 o O O o o N ~ ~ O o O a M ~ U~ 0 Q 0 0 0 0 U ~ v o° m c~ oo ago m o0 o m ° ~ c c ~ ~ Q> O O O S O N O O N N o O ~- O o ~ ~p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o E E o ~ ~ U V m o u ~ C L W E 7 ~ ~ m m m ~O m f~ ~ N t~ m N m n v N m m M O ~ C ~ y y J r M V ~ ~ r N 1~ < r m Z W K ~ U m ' ~ ~ a ° Q ¢ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ~ ~ ~ N M m m N M m m N ~ O m O ~ M d m ~ N O M N O M Q O M r O M Q t ~ -C O O 0 0 O O O O N N M h n Y 0 O o 0 N o Ol ~ Q c m E y y U f o 0 0 0 o ro ~ c c c ~ E v ~ U v a o o ~n m o M o o m r~ m m o o m m m o o .n d c ~ O C m C Q> O O O S O N 0 0 ~ N O e- O E ~ fn ~ Z U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E ~ ~ c U D m m s s C N T ~C/ C ~ O 01 7 O 1~ m M V M ! m ~ N 10 V ~ m m ~O ~ ~ F- t0 a~ N ~ ~ ~ M < ~ ~ ~ N .- h N N 1~ I~ V r ~ M O Z K d v m. C W c E Z O °o °o °o ° ° ° ° ° m ~ U g o o o o ~ O o o n o o v H c i in c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o -cc W m m d ~ E N Z ~ N O M N O M O M O M O ~ W -' E a"'i ~ c Z _ N C J ~ F J d' H J d' F J K F- ~ ~ ~~ z z z m m m w w w ~ ~ 3 O F ° 'c E a U~ ~ o 0 + ~ `a } a U ~ °o N O > m o 0 0 a m a E ~ N ~ M O m A ; ~{ m c m ~ .~ N Q O m O O o a > N v E ~ o 0 m } Q U ~ o N m ~ 0 0 0 c '~ E N N N O ~ O Of a N 0 7 m m N O N m C A J U ~ o f U a a > d } j O j m m 'o 0 °. a > a U E ~ U a O ~ N7 O ~ ~ y ()6 ~ O O C O O C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 ° E E E U U U O C N O tm~I ~ N tm0 ~ Z 2C W ~ ~ N U o~olapololm C 0 O N~~~m~~~M~°'~z~~~~ E O ~ N N `~ `~ G ~ O N N M N 1~ m ~ N ~ V ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ Z ~ U ~ ~ a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~+ O O m M O r N V 7 m V O N U M ° ° ° 0 ° ° m 0 0 0 y o 0 0 0 or o o U ~ ~ M ~ ~1I try H m c N O M N O M Q O M Q O M J c _ .C ~ O O 0 0 O O O O O n M O O O O N M N U m E U ~ c? M d o o 0 r~ m o o 0 0 U m v o O m m O o O o f~ m m o O m N r 1~ o O v M m c e O ~ C m m d~ S O N O ~ 0 0 •- O O N O E ~ fA .L 0 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 o E E ~ ~' U - ~ m m s ~ ~. 8 o v O m O ~ v 7 m _ b m m M M M M N N h (n ~ F .-~ m 01 n a ~ m M N m .- ~ m ~ M m Z R U C ~ - a E a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ro~ 0 U 0 ~ 0 0 . 0 ~ 0 0 n 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 v e i n ~ in .n ~ a 'C m m E m O C m N O M N O M Q O M Q O M j w J 0 E m c E z z z m ai ai w w w ~ ~ ~ c c U H Q m m 00 N O X O a m m c T J U 7 ~` T3~ ~ V SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information ' ~ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associafes Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Existing Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 441 332 644 632 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 42.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou " Ca aci Control Dela ,and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 464 349 678 665 Lane group cap. 802 718 1688 2415 v/c ratio 0.58 0.49 0.40 0.28 Green ratio 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.47 Unif. delay d1 18.7 17.7 15.8 14.7 Delay factor k 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 19.7 18.2 15.9 14.7 Lane group LOS 8 B 8 B Apprch. delay 19.1 15.9 14.7 Approach LOS B B 8 Intersec. delay 16.8 Intersection LOS B HCS2000~Tt Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7 ~ 139 ~ v SHORT General Information REPORT Sife laformation Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Existing Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 313 333 628 665 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 44.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= IY= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 LaneGrou Ca ac~~ Control Dela ~~and LOS Det+drtnination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 329 351 661 700 Lane group cap. 762 682 1769 2530 v/c ratio 0.43 0.51 0.37 0.28 Green ratio 0.42 0.42 0.49 0.49 Unif. delay d1 18.4 19.2 14.4 13.6 Delay factor k 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.8 19.9 14.5 13.7 Lane group LOS g g g g Apprch. delay 19.3 14.5 13.7 Approach LOS 8 B 8 Intersec. delay 15.8 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000 ~ ~"t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~4;3~30 SHORT REPORT General Inforrrt~tion Site Inforrri~tion _ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Existing Volume and Tuning ltlput EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 78 1062 253 269 803 134 272 22 695 89 201 153 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl Thru & RT EB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 10.0 G= 24.0 G= 7.0 G= G= 28.0 G= 13.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca ac[ Control Dela ` a nd LOS_Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 82 1118 266 283 845 141 286 23 732 306 161 Lane group cap. 140 1783 556 389 1955 610 562 591 889 515 233 v/c ratio 0.59 0.63 0.48 0.73 0.43 0.23 0.51 0.04 0.82 0.59 0.69 Green ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.14 Unif. delay d1 40.1 24.7 23.2 38.7 20.8 19.1 25.4 21.6 28.7 36.0 36.6 Delay factor k 0.18 0.21 0.11 0.29 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.11 0.36 0.18 0.26 Increm. delay d2 6.2 0.7 0.7 6.7 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.0 6.3 1.9 8.4 PF factor 1.000 0.949 0.949 1.000 0.917 0.917 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 46.3 24.1 22.6 45.4 19.3 17.7 26.1 21.6 35.0 37.9 45.0 Lane group LOS D C C D B B C C D D D Apprch. delay 25.1 24.9 32.3 40.4 Approach LOS C C C D Intersec. delay 28.5 Intersection LOS C HCS2000"`' Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~413~ 31 SHORT REPORT Generallnformation Site'Informatian Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Existing Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 _ 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 119 1204 209 569 1092 81 208 2 180 120 412 190 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EB Onl Thru & RT WB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 15.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 80.0 Lane GrQU" Ca a+~i' Co"~ntrol Dela ,a nd LOS Determinati on EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 125 1267 220 599 1149 85 219 2 189 560 200 Lane group cap. 203 1876 585 701 2329 727 271 285 429 671 303 v/c ratio 0.62 0.68 0.38 0.85 0.49 0.12 0.81 0.01 0.44 0.83 0.66 Green ratio 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.19 Unif. delay d 1 33.9 21.5 18.8 30.9 15.6 12.8 32.9 28.9 30.9 31.3 30.1 Delay factor k 0.20 0.25 0.11 0.39 0.11 0.11 0.35 0.11 0.11 0.37 0.23 Increm. delay d2 5.5 1.0 0.4 10.1 0.2 0.1 16.5 0.0 0.7 9.0 5.2 PF factor 1.000 0.932 0.932 1.000 0.836 0.836 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 39.4 21.0 18.0 41.0 13.2 10.8 49.3 28.9 31.7 40.3 35.4 Lane group LOS D C 8 D 8 8 D C C D D Apprch. delay 22.0 22.1 41.1 39.0 Approach LOS C C D D Intersec. delay 26.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000~ n~ Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 7Mfof13~J ~~ _ SHORT REPORT General Information Site Informati on Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimiey-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7!7/2004 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/N8-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Existing Volume and Timin In " ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 1667 653 722 527 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N D N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 41.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grow' Ca aci Control i3ela and LOS :Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 1755 687 760 555 Lane group cap. 2358 2358 1597 736 v/c ratio 0.74 0.29 0.48 0.75 Green ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d1 20.2 15.4 17.0 20.3 Delay factor k 0.30 0.11 0.11 0.31 Increm. delay d2 1.3 0.1 0.2 4.4 PF factor 0.829 0.829 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.1 12.8 17.3 24.8 Lane group LOS B B B C Apprch. delay 18.1 12.8 20.4 Approach LOS 8 8 C Intersec. delay 17.9 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000TM Copyright ~ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7T3133 SHORT REPORT General Information kS~te Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Existing Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 868 1428 214 101 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 42.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Group Capaci ty, Control Delay... and;LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 914 1503 225 106 Lane group cap. 2415 2415 1558 718 v/c ratio 0.38 0.62 0.14 0.15 Green ratio 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d1 15.5 18.0 14.8 14.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.21 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 PF factor 0.815 0.815 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.8 15.2 14.9 15.0 Lane group LOS B 8 B B Apprch. delay 12.8 15.2 14.9 Approach LOS 8 B 8 Intersec. delay 14.4 Intersection LOS B HCS2000~M Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~~3'l34 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Informdtion _ -~ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type AI! other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 454 342 664 651 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 42.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela an d LOS Determinati on EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 478 360 699 685 Lane group cap. 802 718 1688 2415 v/c ratio 0.60 0.50 0.41 0.28 Green ratio 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.47 Unif. delay d1 18.9 17.9 15.9 14.8 Delay factor k 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 20.1 18.4 16.0 14.8 Lane group LOS C 8 B 8 Apprch. delay 19.4 16.0 14.8 Approach LOS 8 8 8 Intersec. delay 16.9 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000T~`'t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 75~It~3'~ 35 SHORT REPORT General Information` Site Information ~J Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj BO Year Volurrte and Timin in 'ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 322 343 647 685 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 44.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Dela" an d LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 339 361 681 721 Lane group cap. 762 682 1769 2530 v/c ratio 0.44 0.53 0.38 0.28 Green ratio 0.42 0.42 0.49 0.49 Unif. delay d1 18.5 19.3 14.5 13.7 Delay factor k 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.9 20.1 14.6 13.7 Lane group LOS 8 C B B Apprch. delay 19.5 14.6 13.7 Approach LOS B B B Intersec. delay ( 16.0 Intersection LOS B HCS2000T"t Copyright ~ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7T3'~ 36 SHORT REPORT _ General Information $ite Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp A!1 other areas City of Sanfa Ana Proj 80 Year Volume and Tithing Inp ut _ EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 80 ?094 261 277 827 138 280 23 716 92 207 158 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing WB Onl Thru & RT EB Ont 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Ti i G= 10.0 G= 24.0 G= 7.0 G= G= 28.0 G= 13.0 G= G= m ng Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou° Ca ac ~ Control ©eta ~~ a nd LOS Detertxili~nati on EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 84 1152 275 292 871 145 295 24 754 315 166 Lane group cap. 140 1783 556 389 1955 610 562 591 889 515 233 v/c ratio 0.60 0.65 0.49 0.75 0.45 0.24 0.52 0.04 0.85 0.61 0.71 Green ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.14 Unif. delay d1 40.1 24.9 23.3 38.8 20.9 19.1 25.5 21.6 29.0 36.1 36.7 Delay factor k 0.19 0.22 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.38 0.20 0.28 Increm. delay d2 7.0 0.8 0.7 7.9 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.0 7.8 2.1 9.8 PF factor 1.000 0.949 0.949 1.000 0.917 0.917 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 47.1 24.4 22.8 46.7 19.4 17.8 26.4 21.7 36.8 38.3 46.5 Lane group LOS D C C D B 8 C C D D D Apprch. delay 25.4 25.3 33.6 41.1 Approach LOS C C C D Intersec. delay 29.1 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TI"t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~~~~37 SHORT REPORT eneral Information ' ~ Site_lnformation Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/S8-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year Volume and Tinting Inp ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 123 1240 215 586 1125 83 214 2 185 124 424 196 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT WB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 15.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 80.0 bane Glrou " Ca aci Control Dela` a nd LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 129 1305 226 617 1184 87 225 2 195 577 206 Lane group cap. 203 1876 585 701 2329 727 271 285 429 671 303 v/c ratio 0.64 0.70 0.39 0.88 0.51 0.12 0.83 0.01 0.45 0.86 0.68 Green ratio 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.19 Unif. delay d1 33.9 21.7 18.9 31.1 15.7 12.8 33.0 28.9 31.0 31.5 30.3 Delay factor k 0.22 0.26 0.11 0.41 0.12 0.11 0.37 0.11 0.11 0.39 0.25 Increm. delay d2 6.4 1.1 0.4 12.5 0.2 0.1 19.1 0.0 0.8 11.0 6.1 PF factor 1.000 0.932 0.932 1.000 0.836 0.836 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 40.3 21.4 18.0 43.5 13.3 10.8 52.1 28.9 31.8 42.4 36.3 Lane group LOS D C B D B 8 D C C D D Apprch. delay 22.4 23.1 42.6 40.8 Approach LOS C C D D Intersec. delay 27.5 Intersection LOS C NCS2000TM Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 73138 SHORT REPORT General lnform~tion Site`lnformation Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Proj 80 Year Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 1718 673 744 543 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 41.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grow Ca aci Control De a and LOS'°Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 1808 708 783 572 Lane group cap. 2358 2358 1597 736 v/c ratio 0.77 0.30 0.49 0.78 Green ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d 1 20.5 15.5 17.2 20.6 Delay factor k 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.33 Increm. delay d2 1.6 0.1 0.2 5.3 PF factor 0.829 0.829 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.6 12.9 17.4 25.9 Lane group LOS 8 8 B C Apprch. delay 18.6 12.9 21.0 Approach LOS B 8 C Intersec. delay 18.4 Intersection LOS 8 HCS1000~M Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~t~3'~ 39 SHORT REPORT ~ General Infornt~tion Site Information ~ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Proj BO Year Volume and Timn "In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 894 1471 220 104 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 42.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grow Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determinati on EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 941 1548 232 109 Lane group cap. 2415 2415 1558 718 v/c ratio 0.39 0.64 0.15 0.15 Green ratio 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d1 15.6 18.3 14.9 14.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.1 PF factor 0.815 0.815 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.8 15.5 14.9 15.0 Lane group LOS B B B B Apprch. delay 12.8 15.5 14.9 Approach LOS 8 8 B Intersec. delay 14.5 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000TM Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~3~ 40 SHORT REPORT Genera! Irtformetjon. ~ Site Irt~'armation Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year +Proj Volume and Timin In "ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 D 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 454 352 707 698 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Timi G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 42.0 G= G= G= ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela an d LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 478 371 744 735 Lane group cap. 802 718 1688 2415 v/c ratio 0.60 0.52 0.44 0.30 Green ratio 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.47 Unif. delay d1 18.9 18.0 16.1 14.9 Delay factor k 0.18 0.12 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 1.2 0.7 0.2 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 20.1 18.7 16.3 15.0 Lane group LOS C B B 8 Apprch. delay 19.5 16.3 15.0 Approach LOS B g g Intersec. delay 17.0 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 7,~4~3~ 41 SHORT REPORT general Information 5rt~ information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type Al! other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year +Proj Volume and Timin `;ln ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 322 349 674 708 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 44.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca ac Control Dela an d LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 339 367 709 745 Lane group cap. 762 682 1769 2530 v/c ratio 0.44 0.54 0.40 0.29 Green ratio 0.42 0.42 0.49 0.49 Unif. delay d1 18.5 19.4 14.6 13.7 Delay factor k 0.11 0.14 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.9 20.3 14.8 13.8 Lane group LOS B C 8 B Apprch. delay 19.6 14.8 13.8 Approach LOS 8 8 B Intersec. delay 16.0 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000T~`t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7142 SHORT REPORT Gene ral'Irtformation Site Information.......: Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj BO Year +Proj Volume and Timn In'`ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 80 1113 261 281 844 138 280 23 716 92 207 158 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl Thru & RT EB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 10.0 G= 24.0 G= 7.0 G= G= 28.0 G= 13.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Cap~+ci Control ©ela a nd LOS Determinattion' EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 84 1172 275 296 888 145 295 24 754 315 166 Lane group cap. 140 1783 556 389 1955 610 562 591 889 515 233 v/c ratio 0.60 0.66 0.49 0.76 0.45 0.24 0.52 0.04 0.85 0.61 0.71 Green ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.14 Unif. delay d1 40.1 25.0 23.3 38.8 21.0 19.1 25.5 21.6 29.0 36.1 36.7 Delay factor k 0.19 0.23 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.38 0.20 0.28 Increm. delay d2 7.0 0.9 0.7 8.6 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.0 7.8 2.1 9.8 PF factor 1.000 0.949 0.949 1.000 0.917 0.917 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 47.1 24.6 22.8 47.4 19.5 17.8 26.4 21.7 36.8 38.3 46.5 Lane group LOS D C C D B B C C D D D Apprch. delay 25.5 25.5 33.6 41.1 Approach LOS C C C D Intersec. delay 29.2 Intersection LOS C HCS2000~M Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~~~3143 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year +Proj Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 123 1252 215 588 1133 83 214 2 185 124 424 196 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT WB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 15.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 80.0 Lade Grou Ca aci Control Dela` a nd LOS,Ueterminati on EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 129 1318 226 619 1193 87 225 2 195 577 206 Lane group cap. 203 1876 585 701 2329 727 271 285 429 671 303 v/c ratio 0.64 0.70 0.39 0.88 0.51 0.12 0.83 0.01 0.45 0.86 0.68 Green ratio 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.19 Unif. delay d1 33.9 21.8 18.9 31.1 15.7 12.8 33.0 28.9 31.0 31.5 30.3 Delay factor k 0.22 0.27 0.11 0.41 0.12 0.11 0.37 0.11 0.11 0.39 0.25 Increm. delay d2 6.4 1.2 0.4 12.8 0.2 0.1 19.1 0.0 0.8 11.0 6.1 PF factor 1.000 0.932 0.932 1.000 0.836 0.836 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 40.3 21.5 18.0 43.8 13.3 10.8 52.1 28.9 31.8 42.4 36.3 Lane group LOS D C 8 D 8 8 D C C D D Apprch. delay 22.5 23.2 42.6 40.8 Approach LOS C C D D Intersec. delay 27.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright ~ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 7T3144 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Informatiion Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year +Proj Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 1735 692 749 543 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost #ime 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 41.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela' and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 1826 728 788 572 Lane group cap. 2358 2358 1597 736 v/c ratio 0.77 0.31 0.49 0.78 Green ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d1 20.6 15.5 17.2 20.6 Delay factor k 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.33 Increm. delay d2 1.7 0.1 0.2 5.3 PF factor 0.829 0.829 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.8 12.9 17.4 25.9 Lane group LOS 8 8 8 C Apprch. delay 18.8 12.9 21.0 Approach LOS 8 B C Intersec. delay 18.5 Intersection LOS B HCS2000T~`t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le 75~~3'~45 SHORT REPORT General Information ~ Site Informati on Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas Cify of Santa Ana Proj BO Year +Proj Volume and Timing !n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 902 1483 223 104 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 92.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 42.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Deia and ..LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 949 1561 235 109 Lane group cap. 2415 2415 1558 718 v/c ratio 0.39 0.65 0.15 0.15 Green ratio 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d1 15.7 18.3 14.9 14.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.1 PF factor 0.815 0.815 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.9 15.5 14.9 15.0 Lane group LOS 8 B B 8 Apprch. delay 12.9 15.5 15.0 Approach LOS 8 8 8 Intersec. delay 14.6 Intersection LOS B HCS2000T~`'~ Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~3'~46 _ SHORT REPORT General Information $it+? Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan BO Volume and Tirnn to ' ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 461 276 574 689 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 42.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Deia an d LUSDetermination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 485 291 604 725 Lane group cap. 802 718 1688 2415 v/c ratio 0.60 0.41 0.36 0.30 Green ratio 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.47 Unif. delay d1 19.0 16.9 15.4 14.9 Delay factor k 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 20.3 17.3 15.5 15.0 Lane group LOS C 8 B B Apprch. delay 19.2 15.5 15.0 Approach LOS B B B Intersec. delay 16.7 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000Ttvt Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 73147 SHORT REPORT General Ihformation _ Site Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan BO Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 301 309 560 700 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 44.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Dela and LOSDetermination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 317 325 589 737 Lane group cap. 762 682 1769 2530 v/c ratio 0.42 0.48 0.33 0.29 Green ratio 0.42 0.42 0.49 0.49 Unif. delay d 1 18.2 18.8 14.0 13.7 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.6 19.3 14.2 13.8 Lane group LOS B B 8 8 Apprch. delay 19.0 14.2 13.8 Approach LOS B B 8 Intersec. delay 15.6 Intersection LOS 8 HCS20001 °'~ Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 7~9-~~ 48 SHORT REPORT General Information Site lrforrnation Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan BO Volume and Timirt' In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 106 1004 345 298 647 137 284 27 689 67 217 120 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P H F 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl Thru & RT EB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 10.0 G= 24.0 G= 7.0 G= G= 28.0 G= 13.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control;©ela a nd;LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 112 1057 363 314 681 144 299 28 725 299 126 Lane group cap. 140 1783 556 389 1955 610 562 591 889 516 233 v/c ratio 0.80 0.59 0.65 0.81 0.35 0.24 0.53 0.05 0.82 0.58 0.54 Green ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.14 Unif. delay d1 40.8 24.3 24.9 39.1 20.1 19.1 25.6 21.7 28.6 35.9 35.7 Delay factor k 0.34 0.18 0.23 0.35 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.36 0.17 0.14 Increm. delay d2 27.2 0.5 2.7 11.9 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 5.9 1.6 2.5 PF factor 1.000 0.949 0.949 1.000 0.917 0.917 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 68.0 23.6 26.4 51.0 18.5 17.7 26.6 21.7 34.6 37.6 38.3 Lane group LOS E C C D 8 8 C C C D D Apprch. delay 27.5 27.4 32.0 37.8 Approach LOS C C C D Intersec. delay 29.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000~ M Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~i9-~~ 49 SHORT REPORT General Inforrn~tion Site Information' ~ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan 80 Volume-andTimn ln' ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 94 1050 191 639 1241 77 220 9 179 102 360 170 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & .RT WB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Ti i G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 15.0 G= G= m ng Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 80.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control,Dela a nd LOS ©eterminati an EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 99 1105 201 673 1306 81 232 9 188 486 179 Lane group cap. 203 1876 585 701 2329 727 271 285 429 671 303 v/c ratio 0.49 0.59 0.34 0.96 0.56 0.11 0.86 0.03 0.44 0.72 0.59 Green ratio 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.19 Unif. delay d1 33.3 20.7 18.6 31.7 16.2 12.7 33.2 29.0 30.9 30.6 29.7 Delay factor k 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.47 0.16 0.11 0.39 0.11 0.11 0.28 0.18 Increm. delay d2 1.8 0.5 0.4 24.5 0.3 0.1 22.7 0.0 0.7 3.9 3.1 PF factor 1.000 0.932 0.932 1.000 0.836 0.836 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 35.2 19.8 17.7 56.2 13.8 10.7 55.8 29.1 31.7 34.4 32.7 Lane group LOS D 8 8 E 8 B E C C C C Apprch. delay 20.5 27.6 44.7 34.0 Approach LOS C C D C Intersec. delay 27.9 Intersection LOS C HCSl000Tr't Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~~ 50 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan BO Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 1935 611 658 542 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 41.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci_ Control Deta ;and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 2037 643 693 571 Lane group cap. 2358 2358 1597 736 v/c ratio 0.86 0.27 0.43 0.78 Green ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d1 22.0 15.2 16.6 20.6 Delay factor k 0.39 0.11 0.11 0.33 Increm. delay d2 3.6 0.1 0.2 5.2 PF factor 0.829 0.829 1.000 1.000 Control delay 21.8 12.7 16.8 25.9 Lane group LOS C B B C Apprch. delay 21.8 12.7 20.9 Approach LOS C B C Intersec. delay 20.0 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 75~~3151 SHORT REPORT General lnformation Site Informati on Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 7/7/2004 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Gen Plan 80 Volume and Timin In 'ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 835 1650 166 136 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 42.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Deia and .LOS Detelrminati on EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 879 1737 175 143 Lane group cap. 2415 2415 1558 718 v/c ratio 0.36 0.72 0.11 0.20 Green ratio 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d 1 15.4 19.3 14.6 15.2 Delay factor k 0.11 0.28 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.1 PF factor 0.815 0.815 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.7 16.8 14.7 15.4 Lane group LOS 8 B B B Apprch. delay 12.7 16.8 15.0 Approach LOS 8 B B Intersec. delay 15.3 Intersection LOS B HCS2000T"t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le 7-,~~ 52 SHORT REPORT General Information Siife lnforrnation Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan 80 + Proj Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 461 286 617 736 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Ti i G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 42.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y=~ Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control Deiay an d :LflS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 485 301 649 775 Lane group cap. 802 718 1688 2415 v/c ratio 0.60 0.42 0.38 0.32 Green ratio 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.47 Unif. delay d1 19.0 17.1 15.6 15.1 Delay factor k 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 20.3 17.5 15.7 15.1 Lane group LOS C B 8 8 Apprch. delay 19.2 15.7 15.1 Approach LOS B B g Intersec. delay 16.8 Intersection LOS B HCS1000TM Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 75~*3~ 53 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Grand/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan 80 + Proj Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 Lane group L R T T Volume v h 309 315 587 723 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl 02 03 04 Thru Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 44.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Grou `Ca aci ControiDela and LOS Determination' EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 317 332 618 761 Lane group cap. 762 682 1769 2530 v/c ratio 0.42 0.49 0.35 0.30 Green ratio 0.42 0.42 0.49 0.49 Unif. delay d1 18.2 18.9 14.2 13.8 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.6 19.5 14.3 13.8 Lane group LOS 8 B 8 B Apprch. delay 19.0 14.3 13.8 Approach LOS B 8 8 Intersec. delay 15.6 Intersection LOS B HCS2000""' Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 71~-~~ 54 SHORT REPORT General Information` Site Information' _ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type AI! other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan BO + Proj Volume and Tinning"Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 106 1023 345 302 664 137 284 27 689 67 217 120 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin WB Onl Thru & RT EB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timing G= 10.0 G= 24.0 G= 7.0 G= G= 28.0 G= 13.0 G= G= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C - 90.0 Lane Grou Ca aei Control Deia a nd,LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 112 1077 363 318 699 144 299 28 725 299 126 Lane group cap. 140 1783 556 389 1955 610 562 591 889 516 233 v/c ratio 0.80 0.60 0.65 0.82 0.36 0.24 0.53 0.05 0.82 0.58 0.54 Green ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.14 Unif. delay d1 40.8 24.4 24.9 39.1 20.1 19.1 25.6 21.7 28.6 35.9 35.7 Delay factor k 0.34 0.19 0.23 0.36 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.36 0.17 0.14 Increm. delay d2 27.2 0.6 2.7 12.8 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 5.9 1.6 2.5 PF factor 1.000 0.949 0.949 1.000 0.917 0.917 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 68.0 23.8 26.4 51.9 18.6 17.7 26.6 21.7 34.6 37.6 38.3 Lane group LOS E C C D B 8 C C C D D Apprch. delay 27.6 27.6 32.0 37.8 Approach LOS C C C D Intersec. delay 29.7 Intersection LOS C HCS2000""` Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4. le 7>~-~~ 55 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information _ ~J Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Dyer/SB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Gen Plan 80 + Proj _ Volume and Timm In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L LT R LT R Volume v h 94 1062 191 641 1249 77 220 9 179 102 360 170 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT WB Onl 04 N B Onl SB Onl 07 0 8 Timin G= 9.0 G= 20.0 G= 16.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 15.0 G= G= g Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 80.0 Lane Grou Ca aci Control De1a, a nd LOS~Determination' EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 99 1118 201 675 1315 81 232 9 188 486 179 Lane group cap. 203 1876 585 701 2329 727 271 285 429 671 303 v/c ratio 0.49 0.60 0.34 0.96 0.56 0.11 0.86 0.03 0.44 0.72 0.59 Green ratio 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.45 0.45 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.19 Unif. delay d1 33.3 20.7 18.6 31.7 16.2 12.7 33.2 29.0 30.9 30.6 29.7 Delay factor k 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.47 0.16 0.11 0.39 0.11 0.11 0.28 0.18 Increm. delay d2 1.8 0.5 0.4 25.1 0.3 0.1 22.7 0.0 0.7 3.9 3.1 PF factor 1.000 0.932 0.932 1.000 0.836 0.836 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 35.2 19.8 17.7 56.8 13.9 10.7 55.8 29.1 31.7 34.4 32.7 Lane group LOS D 8 8 E 8 B E C C C C Apprch. delay 20.6 27.7 44.7 34.0 Approach LOS C C D C Intersec. delay 28.0 Intersection LOS C HCS1000tt"t Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~~9-~~ 56 SHORT REPORT General Information Site It"tfior•mation ~ Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Gen Plan 80 + Proj Volume and Timin In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 1944 630 663 542 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 41.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Late Glrou Ca ace Control Dela and:L4S Determinate©n EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 2046 663 698 571 Lane group cap. 2358 2358 1597 736 v/c ratio 0.87 0.28 0.44 0.78 Green ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d1 22.1 15.3 16.7 20.6 Delay factor k 0.40 0.11 0.11 0.33 Increm. delay d2 3.7 0.1 0.2 5.2 PF factor 0.829 0.829 1.000 1.000 Control delay 22.0 12.8 16.8 25.9 Lane group LOS C 8 8 C Apprch. delay 22.0 12.8 20.9 Approach LOS C 8 C Intersec. delay 20.1 Intersection LOS C HCS2000"`'' Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7{~A~~~ 57 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period PM Peak Period Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp All other areas City of Santa Ana Gen Plan BO + Proj Volume and Timm In " ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 839 1662 169 136 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated PIA A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival t o 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasin Thru Onl 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 07 0 8 Timin G= 42.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= g Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 Lane Groin Ca aci Control Deta and I.OS Determirta#ion EB WB NB SB Adj. flow rate 883 1749 178 143 Lane group cap. 2415 2415 1558 718 v/c ratio 0.37 0.72 0.11 0.20 Green ratio 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d1 15.4 19.3 14.6 15.2 Delay factor k 0.11 0.28 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.1 PF factor 0.815 0.815 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.7 16.9 14.7 15.4 Lane group LOS B B B 8 Apprch, delay 12.7 16.9 15.0 Approach LOS 8 B B Intersec. delay 15.4 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000""' Copyright ©2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 7~-~~ 58 APPENDIX C SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 7~iA~~ 59 ~ ~' 00 l~ ., O\ N ~--~ ~ O O M M ~ M O N Vl o0 l~ 00 Vl O O\ V M ~D ~ v~ 00 c} M M ~--~ ~--~ (~ t~ O F C O O o o O O O o O o 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 ,~ U o° ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n-, 0 U o ~,; y ~ x vi O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a °z ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w w w w w w w ~ x k~~~ Q x Q d ~^ V Z ~ 00 ~ 0 0 0 N z Q G4 O O O O O O O O O O O O h O 'cF ' O~ O~ ' O\ O~ •-• N W O\ O ~ ~ 7 M ~ Vl V ) Vl 1n Z v; ~~ -- o o ~ a z U o N ~ a ~ A .ti M [~ 7 --~ O [~ 00 v 00 00 I~ ' 00 Vl 7 O 'cf (~ M L>a w ~ N M l b ~ ~ V M d vl vl M N ~-+ w ~ F ~ w i 7 U ~ ~ O O O O oo ~ `t i n i ~ ~ Ci N d p ~ H ~ Ea. Q ~ '~ N V' ~t c +i N N 'ct v i v i vi v l v i ~ N ~ o oaawzxz° n: o. a ~ °; ~ . F F ~ _ O ~--~ c} 00 vl -+ O N M N _ _ N N N 01 N l~ N O s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N ~--~ W ~ ~ ,a A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~z O U ~d ~ `~ ~ r~ d a W V ¢ N U ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d d A v, p N A w 0 d Q z > w o ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 c o o 0 0 0 C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U .~ O ,.., O U vl O O O O O O O O O h M M --~ Z C7 d ~.: o ° o 0 0 o w o 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ Qy C u, E O - O O O C O O O O O O h v) h vl v'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U .~ ° ,-. .-. ~-. U M lp ~D ~O ~O ~ ~ ~ ~ O_ _O _O O_ O vl d ~ .. .. Or x w o ° o 0 0 o x .: 0 o 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 o 0 ~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 o 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A d y v] O 0 0 0 A y 0 0 0 0 0 v'~ O O M 0 0 0 vi O O l~ O O O WW QI W R: .'~. O .-. .-. ^. ~ ~ .-. M ... .--~ O O M .-. .~ M v1 ~p [~ ~p \p ~• M ai Aw ~ ~ o ° o o ~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 o ~ 0 ~ 0 a ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 3 O ~ o _ rn ° o ~ w O ~ o, ~ a o a ° oo ° ~ o ~ v~ ~c v~ ~ o ~ ° ~ vi ~ ° o0 v', 00 ~n 0o ° rn ~n o~ ~n a~ o O 0 o v dA: a °~ x ~ x0 ~ w V] ~ .C L W rn j oo o t~ o W ~' L .O o ~ o ~ 0 ~ 0 o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ",~ on ? ~ ,-., V M a o 00 o d . ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N ° ~ o ° ° ° w _ o o o a W c ~ ° 00 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ci ~ ~ e 0 0 o F ~ c w° v' ° N ° ~ o'^o °o °o a ~ vii ~ ~ o°0 0 0 0 'o v'~ " .~,~ .~, ~ _ ' Op ~ M b 0 O 0 0 O W ~, V ~? o o o 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 ~ o 0 a o 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 o a ~ ~ d ~ ~ O W C' a ~ 7 ~ 0 0 0 0 vl d' n [~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O\ O O O O\ l~ N p 00 a V1 ~ o 0 o '~' d - o o a o 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 ~ a 0 ~ 0 o 0 o 0 h 0 o o 0 h 0 o 0 0 w, '.. N o o, o •~; -. ~n ~n ~n v', ~n ~n o vi o o v~ .n ~n o 0 0 0 0 i AC ~ ° .--. ~ U ~ M ~O 00 O\ O ~ O\ 01 O\ O~ ~ DD ~ M C w fY d L W ~ A O ° 0 0 0 0 3 Q ° o ° 0 o 0 0 ~ 0 o 0 ~ 0 o 0 ~ 0 o 0 o 0 ~ 0 o 0 \ 0 o 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 o ~ m .ti W ~ 0 0 0 .v ~ o o o rn ~ o0 o 00 ~ ~ o ~ ~n ~o o ~ 0 o v', vi o ~ 00 0, 0 0 0 U ~ V ~ ~ ~ oo a m a, a o 0 0 h L ~' O A v ~ G: O C C C U O M 0 0 0 0 y o ~ o o ~ O o o ~ 0 o ~ o ~ ~ O ~ o o ~ o O o O ~ o 0 o 0 c i w 0 0 0 0 U M O h v1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vl O l~ M ~--~ O O L. V w ~ 0 ° w M h a\ O O Q~ O~ O O D\ vl N --~ O ~C O z. o` u ~ ~' ~ O ~ iG rG !. F. ~ rG F ! ~ ~ ~ ~ F. ~ iG V w e ~ d d d d d d d . a. . a. a rG a a a ./ a 1G a a a a a F W ~n F ~ ` ~' ~ w W d ~ A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o o °o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o o °o W "~' Er A V z i R D (.r ~O 1~ 00 O\ ~ N N M V vl ~O [~ 00 O\ ° '-" N o ° ~ ~ F ' ~ ~ z~ a ~ a a ~ O' ~ `a E : 3 v"~ 0 0 t` \° 0 d N ~ N ~ II II II ~ ~ ~ d p. A q WAW a a a ~ Q d ~ a a A F A z W w O A ~ 0. d a d a o A. N ~p 0 0 N N 7+~~ 60 ~ M 00 Vl -- l~ N 00 ~ O W ~O ~-, ,-~. N -+ ~--~ N O~ W 00 O~ D\ 00 ~ c} ~ N ~D ~O vl ~O 7 V7 M N O O F O O O O O O O O o O O O O o O O O o 0 ,~ .-. U 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p ~ 0 U H ~ x y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o in ~ Gz ~ Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X C ~~~~ Q x A ~' U a Q .C O~ op ~ 0 ~ O N ~ z A O O O O O O O O O O O O I~ ~ v 00 ~D 00 ~O 00 ~D 00 ~O Z ~ --~ N W D\ O o 6 o ^ ; ;yy X O ~ ~ M 1 ,,, .- ~ ~ o ' o Q ~, Z U O N ~ d GT Qw 0 x p M ~O M O\ -~. h 7 V M ~ M l h W Vl 00 ~} ~--~ N O\ M ~O M i w ~ LL . M l O p Vl M M M Vl Vl M ^' A ~ E ~ ~ w U ~ W? g H a q a ~ H ~ 0 0 0 0 o rn •-• ~ ao 00 00 0o t~ o M t~ t~ t~ -- O w F ¢ W E" U h ~ f3: ~ M M N N N M N ~O ~O vl V1 V1 M O o `~ a w H x ~° aa. a « ~ ~ ~' ~ O M 00 M [~ ~--~ M ~O ~O h M 01 ~ M O~ ~ O 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N '--~ W `~ a ~ '~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a :~ ~ Q D A ~ ~ `~ g ~ ~ d V ¢ N U cpi O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C/1 ~~'" ~ F N Ca O O ,.a Z A Q > a w °o ° 0 0 o 0 ~n 0 o > o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o ~ o ~ 0 0 0 0 ~.y U, j Z ^ ~ `~ O ~--~ O O c 0 h O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 vl 0 M 0 M 0 --~ 0 0 0 , , ~ . . U _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ a Z ~ d' <..: °o ° 0 0 0 0 ~; 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 o 0 o o e e o o o 0 a 0 ~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 p,y c o o 0 o v~ c ° o o ° o o v-, ~n ~n ~n vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° ~ W ' '~ {{I~~~II a A x ... w °o ° o o 0 o 0 o x 0 o o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 o o 0 a v- 0 o o 0 o o 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d, d, a ~ ° 0 q ~ ~ , M 0 0 0 n o o ~ o o o A ~~ ~ ° 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 \° 0 o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 o a ~ 0 ~ 0 o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~-+ W o O °. o ~ v~ W c ~ rn v, o 0 a~ 0 oo 0 ~ 0 ~ ~n ~o v~ ~o o o v, o v~ 'n o ~n v, 0 0 ~ ` ~ O , O A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o0 00 0o rn rn a` 0 0 ~ w x w" h ~ c c e c c o c c c o c c e c c c e r .L ~ w O~ 00 ° ° ° ~• .L .a o ~ o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e ~ c ~ F O ao o ~ ,~ M ~ 0 0 0 w ~ U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N ° ~ ° ° ° ° z ~ A _ Z o o o o ~ ~ W p ~. ~ 00 O M O ('~ p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 QI i ~ ~ ~ ~ j i ~ . O O h W O O ~ ~ h ~ ° O O N O vl ` G ~ O F ` L r N M ~ ~ ~ o O '" w z C ~ w H Do O ~ M 0 0 0 w ~" ~~-' ~+ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ O 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 ~ '~ ~ N ~ O O O a CO ~ iv O O O O O vl O v' t ~ ~ O ~ o, ~ ~ ~ a i t ~ V ~ O~ O~ O\ 00 o, Vl ~ ° ° ° Q z _ o o 0 ~ 0 o 0 ~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y u, .-., N O O O { ~ 'y ~--~ vl O O O Vl O O O O Vl O O h vl O ~ h 0 L ~ ~ '~ y W a M ~n ~O oo O~ O O O~ Oi o0 t~ ~D v1 M -~ u O Gr7 ~ A o ° o o o o 3 Q 0 u 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 o o \ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 a ~ ~ pa ~ o c 0 .o W o o o rn ~ o0 o 00 h ~ o ~ v~ ~o 0 ~ 0 r 0 ~n v~ o c~ oo rn o 0 0 u~ ~ ~ oo rn a, a a o 0 0 h ~ ~ $ o A a ~ ~ o O x C C y O M O O O O y o a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 D 0 o 0 e 0 0 o 0 0 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ U w ~y O O O ~--~ O O u 0 0 N 0 ~D 0 oo 0 O~ 0 O 0 O~ 0 oo 0 ~D 0 ~t 0 N 0 '-' V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ~ ~ ° ^, .-. w O O L 0 u w L w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F Gr] ~ F ~ ~ ;+ R w Q ~ A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U "~ zFz A V ~ _ (.r ~O l~ 00 a\ O N N M ~ v'1 ~O l~ 00 a\ O '~ N O ~ ~ Q F d R ~ a ~ ~ o' a `a E` 3 v~ .~-i N ~ II II V A A~L Q ~ ~ a A A A a a ~ ~DGw oW.,aA H A w w E-i F ~ ¢ A a 0 0. k 0 .b W b C N b0 c~V a v ° 0 N v 75~y~61 / AIRPORT LAND USI= COMMISSION ORANGE COUNTY FOR ORANGE COUNTY .4Ll~G 3160 Airway Avenue • Costa Mesa, California 92626.949.252.5170 fax: 949.252.6012 May 17, 2006 ~`~~~~~~ MAY 2 2 7Q(l~ Bill Apple, Associate Planner City of Santa Ana/ Planning & Building Services e,~,Nl'~,~i~, ~€.~;1~31yG DEPT 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-20) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, Ca 92707 Subject: Crazy Horse Square Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration ER 2004-109 Dear Mr. Apple: Thank you for the opportunity to review Initial Study ER 2004-109 for the Crazy Horse Square Project in the context of the Commission's Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport (JWA AELUP) and the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Heliports. We wish to offer the following comments. The project description should include the proposed project height above mean sea level (AMSL). It is also suggested that a reference to the building height (AMSL) be included in Section VII.D. Hazards/Hazardous Materials, and Section XV.C. Transportation/Traffic. With regards to noise impacts, the initial study discusses the project's location in Noise Impact Zone 2 and states that, "The project is subject to Uniform Building Code requirements which would include California Noise Insulation Standards to achieve appropriate interior noise levels for the mix of land uses proposed for the project." Please identify what the interior noise level standard would be. If the development of Heliports/Helistops will be permitted at this project site, the initial study should address compliance with the AELUP for Heliports by incorporating the following language into the document: "The City will ensure that each applicant, seeking a Conditional Use Permit or similar approval for the construction or operation of a heliport or helistop, complies fully with the state permit procedure provided by law and with all conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by the Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County (ALUC) and by Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics. This requirement shall be in addition to all other City development requirements." EXHIBIT B 75A-162 A referral by the City to the ALUC is required for this project due to the location of the proposal within an AELUP Planning Area and due to the nature of the required City approvals (i.e. zoning amendment) under PUC Section 21676(b). In this regard, please note that the Commission wants such referrals to be submitted and agendized by the ALUC staff between the Local Agency's expected Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Since the ALUC meets on the third Thursday afternoon of each month, submittals must be received in the ALUC office by the first of the month to ensure sufficient time for review, analysis, and agendizing. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this initial study. Please contact me at (949) 252-5170 or at kri oiu(a~ocair.com if you need any additional details or information regarding the future referral of your project. Sincer ly, r r • L:~~ Kari A. Rigom Executive Officer 75A-163 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR CRAZY HORSE SQUARE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ER-2004- 109 FROM AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION 1. The project description should include the proposed project height above mean sea level (AMSL). It is also suggested that a reference to building height (AMSL) be included in Section VII.D. Hazard/hazardous Materials, and Section XV.C. Transportation/ Traffic. RESPONSE So noted. All future references to height will be made in above mean sea level (AMSL) as well as in feet and inches. The project is 28 feet tall at its highest point. The above mean sea level elevation is 62 feet, calculated using NAVD 88 datum. 2. With regards to noise impacts, the initial study discusses the project's location in Noise Impact Zone 2 and states "The project is subject to Uniform Building Code requirements which would include California Noise Insulation Standards to achieve appropriate interior noise levels for the mix of land uses proposed for the project. Please identify what the interior noise level standard would be. RESPONSE The Crazy Horse Square Project is located in Noise Impact Zone 2 (60 dB CNEL or greater, less than 65 dB CNEL). The City of Santa Ana uses the California Building Code, 2001 edition when plan checking building projects. According to the Building Department's Senior Plan Check Engineer, the Cities noise ordinance applies to residential development and the City has not adopted interior noise standards for commercial projects. Generally, a 15 dB to 20 dB drop down in decibel level is achieved between exterior and interior noise levels using conventional construction methods, so it is likely that the interior noise levels of the proposed retail and restaurant buildings will achieve the 45 dB level. The three structures will be constructed in accordance with normal City codes and standards and conventional construction methods as dictated by the California Building Code, 2001 edition. 3. If the development of Heliports/Helistops will be permitted at this project site, the initial study should address compliance with the AELUP for Heliports incorporating the following language into the document. "The City will ensure that each applicant, seeking a Conditional Use Permit or similar approval for the construction or operation of a heliport or helistop, complies fully with the state permit procedure provided by law and with all conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by the Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County (ALUC) and by 75A-164 Response to Comments Airport Land Use Commission Page 2 of 2 Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics. This requirement shall be in addition to all other City development requirements." RESPONSE The project is zoned Specific Development No. 8 (SD-8). Heliports and Helistops are not a permitted use within SD-8 by right or with a conditional use permit. Any proposed Heliport or Helistop would require a zoning ordinance amendment and would require the project to be scheduled for a formal review and determination by the Airport Land Use Commission. There are no Heliports or Helistops proposed as part of the Crazy Horse Square project. 4. A referral by the City to the ALUC is required for this project due to the location of the proposal within an AELUP Planning area and due to the nature of the required City approvals (i.e. zoning amendment) under PUC Section 21676(b). In this regard, please note that the Commission wants such referrals to be submitted and agendized by the ALUC staff between the Local Agency's expected Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Since the ALUC meets on the third Thursday afternoon of each month, submittals must be received in the ALUC office by the first of the month to ensure sufficient time for review, analysis, and agendizing. RESPONSE So noted. 2 75A-165 STATE OFCALIFORNIA-BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 12 3337 Michelson Drive, Suite 380 Irvine, CA 92612-8894 ~~~~I~E~ MAY 31 2006 S'.~`11ri ri~c~i PLk~arl,tzG DEPT May 18, 2006 Mr. Bill Apple 20 Civic Center Plaza M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 File: IGR/CEQA SCH#: 2006041111 Log #: 1725 SR: 55 Flex your power! Be energy efficientl Subject: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Crazy Horse Square Project Dear Mr. Apple: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Crazy Horse Square Project. The project proposes to develop 20,154 square feet of retail and food uses on a 2.8-acre site. The project is located at 1580 East Warner Avenue in the City of Santa Ana, California. Caltrans District 12 is a reviewing agency on this project, and has the following comments: 1. Due to the proximity to SR-55 the Environmental Document should identify anti mitigate any and all potential significant permanent and temporary impacts, including but not limited to, visual (lighting, signage, etc), traffic (access to ramps), noise, grading and storm water runoff. 2. Please check the storage queue length on the SB-55 off-ramp to Grand Avenue, especially for right turn to make sure that will not back to mainline during peak hour. 3. Figure 2 on page 3 shows that there are buildings proposed on the corner of the SB-55 off- ramp with Grand Avenue, please make sure the requirement of corner sight distance is met. rt. On page 4 under the Aesthetics section it states that SR-55 is not a designated scenic highway. On page 6, however, it states that "The Urban Design Element identifies State Route 55 as a scenic corridor." Note that According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping system, State Route 55 is not listed as a scenic highway. Please correct the discrepancy. 5. Any project work (e.g. street widening, emergency access improvements, sewer connections, sound walls, stormdrain construction, street connections, lighting and signage, etc.) proposed in the vicinity of the Caltrans Right-of-Way, would require an encroachment permit and all environmental concerns must be adequately addressed. If the environmental documentation for the project does not meet Caltrans requirements, additional documentation would be required before approval of the encroachment permit. Please coordinate with Caltrans to meet requirements for any work within or near Caltrans Right-of-Way. If an encroachment permit is needed for construction purpose, the Department of Transportation will become a "Caltrans improves mobility across California" 75A-166 responsible agency on this project. (See Attachment: Environmental Review Requirements for Encroachment Permit) 6. All work within the State Right of Way must conform to Caltrans Standard Plans and Standard Specifications for Water Pollution Control, including production of a Water Pollution Control Program (WPCP) or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required. Any runoff draining into Caltrans Right of Way from construction operations, or from the resulting project, must fully conform to the current discharge requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board to avoid impacting water quality. Measures must be incorporated to contain all vehicle loads and avoid any tracking of materials, which may fall or blow onto Caltrans roadways or facilities. Please note that all projects involving soil disturbance activities should pay extra attention to storm water pollution control during the "Rainy Season" (October ls` -April 30`h) and follow the Water Pollution Control BMPs to minimize impact to the receiving waters. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and any future developments, which could potentially impact the State transportation facilities. If you have any questions or need to contact us, please do not hesitate to call Lan Zhou at (949) 756-7827. Sincerely, - ' / ,~ /~ ~~ ~-~. RYAN CHAMBERLAIN Chief of Local DevelopmentlIntergovernmental Review Branch District 12 Attachment c: Terry Roberts, Office of Planning and Research Terri Pencovic, Caltrans HQ IGR/Community Planning Gale McIntyre, Deputy District Director for Planning and Local Assistance Permits, Mory Mohtashami Leslie Manderscheid, Environmental Planning Isaac Alonso Rice, Traffic Operations Caltrans improves mobility across California" 75A-167 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW REGIUIREMENTS FOR ENCROACHMENT PERMITS Any Party, outside of Caltrans, that does work on a State Highway or Interstate Highway in California needs to apply for an encroachment permit. To acquire any encroachment permit, environmental concerns must be addressed. Environmental review of encroachment permit applications may take 3 weeks if the application is complete or longer if the application is incomplete. For soil disturbing activities (e.g. geotechnical borings, grading, usage of unpaved roads from which dirt and other materials may be tracked onto the State/Interstate highways, etc.), compliance with Water Quality and Cultural Resources Provisions are emphasized. Surveys may/ may not be soil-disturbing activities, depending on the site and survey method. A complete application for environmental review includes the following: 1. If an environmental document (CE, EIR/EIS, ND, etc.) has been completed for the project, copy of the final, approved document must be submitted with the application. 2. Water Quality Provision: All work within the State Right of Way must conform to Caltrans Standard Plans and Standard Specifications for Water Pollution Control including production of a Water Pollution Control Program or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as required. The applicant must provide Encroachments with a copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented for construction activities impacting Caltrans Right of Way, prepared for this as required by the NPDES Statewide Storm Water Permit for General Construction Activities. If no SWPPP has been prepared for this project, then the applicant must follow the requirements described in the attached Water Pollution Control Provisions (please see attachment). 3. Cultural Resources Provisions: If not included in the environmental document, before permit approval and project construction, the encroachment permit applicant must complete a Cultural Resource Assessment pursuant to Caltrans Environmental Handbook, Volume 2, Appendix B-1, and Exhibit 1, as amended. The Cultural Resources Assessment ascertains the presence or absence of cultural resources within aone-mile radius of the project area and evaluates the impact to any historical/cultural resource. Cultural Resources include "those resources significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture, including Native American Resources" (Caltrans Environmental Handbook, Volume 2, Chapterl, as amended)]. The Cultural Resource Assessment must include: a) a clear project description and map indicating project work, staging areas, site access, etc.; b) a Record Search conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located at California State University, Fullerton. For information call (714) 278-5395; c) proof of Native American consultation. Consultation involves contacting the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), requesting a search of their Sacred Lands File, and following the recommendations provided by the NAHC. For information call (916) 653-4082; d) documentation of any historic properties (e.g. prehistoric and historic sites, buildings, structures, objects, or districts listed on, eligible for, or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places) within a one mile radius of the project area; e) and a survey by qualified archaeologist for all areas that have not been previously researched. The SCCIC and NAHC have an approximate turn around time of 2 weeks. Biological Resources Provisions: Work conducted within Caltrans Right of Way should have the appropriate plant and wildlife surveys completed by a qualified biologist. If the information is not included in the environmental document, Environmental Planning requests that the applicant submit a copy of the biological study, survey, or technical report by a qualified biologist that provides details on the existing vegetation and wildlife at the project site and any vegetation that is to be removed during project activities. Official lists and databases should also be consulted for sensitive species such as the California Natural Diversity Database and lists provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game. Any impacts that affect waterways and drainages and/or open space during construction, or that occur indirectly as a result of the project must be coordinated with the appropriate resource agencies. As guidance, we ask that the applicant include: a) clear description of project activities and the project site b) completed environmental significance checklist (not just yes and no answers, but a description should be given as to the reason for the response), c) staging/storage areas noted on project plans, d) proposed time of year for work and duration of activities (with information available), e) any proposed mitigation (if applicable to the project), f) and a record of any prior resource agency correspondence (if applicable to the project). 75A-168 .RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FOR CRAZY HORSE SQUARE MITIGATED NEGATSVE DECLARATION ER-2004-109 FROM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 Due to the proximity to the SR-55 the Environmental Document should identify and mitigate any and all potential signif cant permanent and temporary impacts, including but not limited to, visual (lighting, signage, etc), traffic (access to ramps) noise, grading and storm water runoff. RESPONSE A copy of the mitigation rrieasures that have been incorporated into the prof ect axe part of the environmental document and are available for review. Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of revisions to the project and the mitigation measures placed on the project, and agreed to by the applicant, have reduced each impact to below a level of significance. 2. Please check the storage queue length on the SB-55 off-ramp to Grand Avenue, especially for right turn to make sure that will not back to mainline during peak hour. RESPONSE The SR-55 southbound off=ramp at Grand Avenue is approximately 975 feet in length, with approximately 375 feet of a two-lane section, and the remaining 600 feet in a single lane, for a total of approximately 1,350 feet of vehicle storage. Assuming 25 feet per vehicle, the ramp would accommodate a queue of 54 vehicles before the queue backs up onto the mainline. The analysis evaluated future morning and evening peak hour operating conditions for Opening Year With Project conditions using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The results are summarized on Table A. Analysis worksheets are attached. Please see attached documentation prepared by the traffic consultant. Both the average peak hour queue and the 95~' percentile back of queue are reported. The 95th percentile back of queue means that the queue will be less than the reported queue 95% of the time. The results of the analysis indicate that the projected peak hour queues with the Crazy Horse project will not exceed the queuing capacity of the off-ramp, and will not back up onto the mainline. 75A-169 3. Figure 2 on page 3 shows that there are buildings proposed on the corner of the SB-55 off ramp with Grand Avenue, please make sL~re the requirements of corner site distance is met. RESPONSE The proposed building will be setback a minimum of 20 feet from the property line adjacent to both the 55 freeway off-ramp and from Grand Avenue. This is the setback requirement of the SD-8 zoning district. There will be no obstructions within this 20 foot by 20 foot corner cut off area. In addition, the 55 freeway off-ramp at Grand Avenue is a signalized intersection, so the traffic signal will aide in both right and left hand turning movements at the intersection. Because of the 20 foot building setback, there will be no obstructions at the intersection of the South bound 55 freeway ofF ramp and Grand Avenue as the result of this project. 4. On page 4 under the Aesthetics section it states that SR-55 is not a designated scenic highway. On page 6, however, it states that "The Urban Design Element identifies State Route 55 as a scenic corridor." Note that according to the Scenic Highway Mapping System, State Route 55 is not listed as a scenic highway. Please correct the discrepancy. .RESPONSE The City recognizes that according to the state of California Scenic Highways Mapping System that State Route 55 is not listed as a scenic Highway, however, The City of Santa Ana's Scenic Corridors Element of the General Plan identifies the Newport (State Route 55) , Santa Ana and Garden Grove Freeways as high-speed scenic corridors operating at a regional scale. They influence Santa Ana's image. The Scenic Corridor element calls for landscape edges to promote selected views into the City. The proposed project will provide extensive trees and landscaping in keeping with the requirements of the Specific Development No. 8 zoning district. Over 19 percent of the project site will be landscaped including a X O to 20 foot landscape setback adjacent to the 55 freeway south bound off-ramp and a 10 foot landscape buffer adjacent to the freeway. Over 100 new trees will be added to the project site resulting in a project that will enhance the views of motorists as they travel along the 55 freeway corridor in keeping with the Scenic Corridor element of the City's General Plan. 5. Any project work (e.g. street widening, emergency access improvements, sewer connections, sound walls, storm drain construction, street connections, lighting, signage, ect.} proposed in the vicinity of the Caltrans Right-of--Way, would require an encroachment permit and all environmental concerns must be adequately addressed. If the environmental documentation for the project-does not meet Caltrans requirements, additional documentation would be required before approval of the encroachment permit. Please coordinate with Caltrans to meet requirements for any work within or near Caltrans Right-of--Way. If an encroachment permit is needed for construction purposes, the Department of Transportation will become a responsible agency on this project. (See Attachment: Environmental Review Requirements for Encroachment Permit) 7~A-170 RESPONSE So noted. It is not anticipated that the proposed project will require encroachment permits from the State, however, proper encroachment permits will be obtained and all environmental concerns addressed by the project applicant if work is to be performed on or near the Caltrans Right -of--Way. 6. All work within the State Right of Way must conform to Caltrans Standard Plans and Standard Specifications for Water Pollution Control, including production of a Water Pollution Control Program (WPCP) or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required. Any runoff draining into Caltrans Right-of--Way from construction operations, or from the resulting project, must fully conform to the current discharge requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board to avoid impacting water quality. Measures must be incorporated to contain all vehicle loads and avoid any tracking of materials, which may fall or blow onto Caltrans roadways or facilities. Please note that all projects involving soil disturbance activities should pay extra attention to storm water pollution control during the "Rainy Season" (October 1St-Apri130t}') and follow the Water Pollution Control BMPs to minimize impact to the receiving waters. RESPONSE So noted. No work is anticipated or proposed within the Caltrans Right-of--Way. In addition, the following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project. • To ensure compliance with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, grading plans and construction plans for the proposed project shall reflect the following notes: 1. All material excavated or graded will be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering with complete coverage shall occur at least twice daily, once in the late morning and once after work is done for the day. 2. All clearing and earthwork activities shall cease during period of high winds (winds greater than 25' mph averaged over one hour) or during Stage 1 or Stage 2 smog episodes. 3. Streets surrounding the project site should be cleaned at the end of each day of construction. 4. All material transported offsite shall either be sufficiently watered or securely covexed to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 5. The amount of area disturbed by clearing and earthwork activities shall be minimized at all times. 6. Equipment engines shall be maintained in good condition and in proper tune according to manufacturer's specifications. ~5A-171 7. To the extent feasible, gasoline powered equipment shall be used for onsite and offsite construction activities. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall provide proof of coverage under NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit that includes; (a) A copy of the project's permit issued by the State Water Resource Control Board that identifies the permit number, (B) Two copies of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project developer shall submit and have approved a surface drainage/utility plan that depicts all applicable Site Design, Structural . Source Control and Treatment Control Best Management Practices in accordance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and the City of Santa Ana Local Implementation Plan. Provide two copies of the Water Quality Management Plan that would include the following: a. Site Assessment b. Site design Best Management Practices (BMP) c. Applicable Routine Source Control BMP d. Selecting and sizing the Treatment Control BMP Mechanisms by which funding for long-term operation and maintenance of all structural BMP will be provided f Operation and Maintenance Plan to describe the long-term operation and maintenance requirements of all applicable structural BMP and to identify the entity in charge of implementation. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall submit a final surface water runoff evaluation for review and approval showing existing and proposed facilities and methods of draining the site without exceeding the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility. J 5A-172 ^~~ Kimley-Horn ~ and Associates, Inc, June 5, 2006 Mr. Bill Apple City of Santa Ana, Planning Deparhnent 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92702 ^ Suite 140 2100 W. Orangewood Avenue Orange, California s2ass Subject: Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration for Crazy Horse Square Project Dear Mr. Apple: At your request, Kimley-Horn has prepared the attached queuing analysis for the SR-55 southbound off-ramp at Grand Avenue, to determine whether or not the vehicle storage distance on the off-ramp will be adequate to handle :future peak hour demand with the Crazy Horse project traffic. This analysis responds to comment #2 in the comment letter from the Deparhnent of Transportation, District 12, dated May 18, 2006. The SR-55 southbound off-ramp at Grand Avenue is approximately 975 feet in length, with approximately 375 feet of a two-lane section, and the remaining 600 feet in a single lane, for a total of approximately 1,350 feet of vehicle storage. Assuming 25 feet per vehicle, the ramp would accommodate a queue of 54 vehicles before the queue backs up onto the mainline. The analysis evaluated future morning and evening peak hour operating conditions for Opening Year With Project conditions using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS). The results are summarized on Table A. Analysis worksheets are attached. Both the average peak hour queue and the 95`~ percentile back of queue are reported. The 95~' percentile back of queue means that the queue will be less than the reported queue 95% of the time. The results of the analysis indicate that the projected peak hour queues with the Crazy Horse project will not exceed the queuing capacity of the off- ramp, and will not back up onto the mainline. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or if you need additional information. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~".~-P.cnli~-~-aL-. Serine Ciandella, AICP Vice President ^ TEL 714 939 1030 FAX 714 938 9488 75A-173 Table A Summary of Queueing Analysis SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp at Grand Avenue Crazy Horse Square -Opening Year with Project AM Peak PM Peak Condition Right Lane Left Lane Right Lane Left Lane Average Queue (a) 7.3 9.9 7.5 6.5 Queue Length ~'~ 200 250 200 175 Available Storage 1,350 1,350 Adequate? y y 95% Back of Queue ~`~ 13.8 18.3 14.2 12.5 Queue Length 350 475 375 325 Available Storage 1,350 1,350 Adequate? y y (a> Queue is expressed in terms of vehicles per lane ~'? Queue length is calculated by multiplying the number of vehicles in the queue (assuming whole vehicle values) by 25 feet per vehicle ~°~ 95% back of queue means that 95% of the time, the queue would be x vehicles or less. 75A-174 far ti ~ 4.~~ - SHORT - REPORT ~~es _.w~Qf[Qe%_ _ _ - - ~. _ - - ~. - - Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn and Associafes Date Performed 4/6/06 Time Period AM Peak Period ~~ ~n~t EB LT TH Intersection Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type A!! other areas Jurisdiction Cify of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj 80 Year - - - _ x.. ... WB NB RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT - SB TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 1718 673 744 543 Heav veh 0 0 0 0 PFfF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 Ext. eff. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 . Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N ~/ Parkin g/h r Bus stopsfhr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension ~ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin Thru On( 02 03 D4 N B Onl 06 07 08 Timing G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 41.0 G= G= G= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 ~~aF~~_~~o~G'~ a~.~.{=o:_ u~~DeCa ~a EB C cle Len th G = 90.0 cl~~~'S~De~. rri.~~a~~~n'~~~~ WB ~ NB ..,.~~~ e_v. SB AdJ. flow rate 1808 708 783 572 Lane group cap_ 2358 2358 1597 736 v/c ratio 0.77 0.30 0.49 0.78 Green ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Unif. delay d1 20.5 15.5 17.2 20.6 Delay factor k 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.33 Increm. delay d2 1.6 0.1 0 2 5.3 PF factor 0.829 0.829 1.000 1.000 'Control delay 18.6 12.9 17.4 25.9 Lane group LOS B g g C Apprch. delay 18.6 12.9 21.0 Approach LOS B B C Intersec. delay 18.4 Intersection LOS I g ~fCSl000T M Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Righu Reserved Version 4. ] e 75A-175 Back-of--Queue Worksheet Page 1 of 1 BACK-OF-QUEUE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Crazy Horse Square -Opening Year w/Project - AM Peak Hour Avera a Back of Queue EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Lane Group L R T T Initial Queue/Lane 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flow Rate/Lane Group 478 371 744 735 Satflow/Lane 1805 9615 1900 1900 Capacity/Lane Group 802 718 1688 2415 Flow Ratio 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.52 0.44 0.30 I Factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Arrival Type 3 3 3 3 Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PF Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Q1 9.0 6.7 6.5 4.2 ks 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Q2 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.3 Q Average 9.9 7 3 7 0 4.5 ~ Percentile Back of Queue {95th percentile) ~ fe% - 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 Back of Queue 18.3 13.8 13.4 8.8 queue Storage Ratio Queue Spacing 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Queue Storage 975 975 450 300 Average Queue Storage Ratio 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 95% Queue Storage Ratio 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.7 Copyright ©2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+rM Version 5.2 Generated: fi/5/2006 7:01 PM file://C:\Temp\s2k240.tmp 7 5A-17 6 6/5/2006 SHORT _ -~ _ .- - Analyst JAR Agency or Co. Kimley-Horn acrd Associates Date Performed 4/6/06 Tlme Period PM Peak Period REPORT ~ ... - Intersection Dyer/NB-55 Off-Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction City of Santa Ana Analysis Year Proj BO Year ,~~..~ EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num_ of Lanes 0 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Lane group T T L R Volume v h 894 1471 220 104 Hea veh 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.35 Actuated P/A A A A A Startu lost time 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 Ext, efF. reen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 Lane Width 120 120 12.0 12.0 , Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N N Parking/hr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 ~ 3.0 3 .0 3.0 Phasing Thru Onf 02 03 04 N B Onl 06 0 7 O8 Timing G= 42.0 G= G= G= G= 40.0 G= G= G= Y= 4 Y= Y= Y= Y= 4 Y= Y= -Y= Duration of Anal sis hrs = 0.25 C cle Len th C = 90.0 n =~a€'" _- Mv~ u`I~~ ~a~ard~t.~efe _ : rya ~~o~~~~~:~: EB WB NB ~~ SB Adj. flow rate 941 1548 232 109 Lane group cap. ~ 2415 2415 1558 718 v/c ratio 0.39 0.64 0.15 0.15 Green ratio 0.47 0,47 0.44 0.44 Unif. delay d1 15.6 18.3 14.9 14.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.22 0,11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.1 PF factor 0.815 0.815 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.8 15.5 14.9 15.0 Lane group LOS B B B B Apprch. delay 12.8 15,5 14.9 Approach LOS B g B Intersec. delay 14.5 Intersection LOS B HCS200PTM Copyright ~ 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e 75A-177 Back-of--Queue Worksheet Page 1 of 1 BACK-OF-QUEUE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Crazy Horse Square -Opening Year w/ Project - PM Peak Hour Avers a Back of Queue LT EB TH RT LT WB TH RT LT NB TH RT SB LT TH RT Lane Group L R T T Initial Queue/Lane 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flow Rate/Lane Group 339 367 709 745 Safflow/Lane 1805 1615 1900 1900 Capacity/Lane Group 762 682 1769 2530 Flow Ratio 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 v/c Ratio 0.44 D.54 0.40 0, 29 i Factor 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Arrival TVl1P ~ _ Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 v 1.00 J 1.00 PF Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Qt 60 6.9 5.9 4.1 k6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 Q2 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 Q Average 6.5 7.5 6.3 4.3 Percentile Back of Queue (95th percentile) fa°~° 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 Back of Queue 12.5 14 2 12 2 8 6 ~tueue storage Kato Queue Spacing 25.0 25.0 25.0 25,0 Queue Storage 975 975 450 300 A e age Queue Storage R { o 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 95% Queue Storage Ratio 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 Copyright ©2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tti- Version 5.2 Generated: 6/5/2006 7:03 PM file://C:\Temp\s2k26D.tanp 7 5A~ i1 7 Q 6/5/2006 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 8, CREATING A THIRD PROJECT AREA THAT WILL ALLOW RETAIL AND FOOD USES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE (ZOA NO. 2006-02) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-021 has been filed with the City of Santa Ana to amend the Specific Development No. 8 (SD-8) to create a third project area (Zone III) that will permit multi-tenant retail and food uses (excluding drive through facilities) within Zone III. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing on May 22, 2006, and by a vote of 6:0 (Cribb absent) voted to recommend that the City Council: 1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-109. 2. Adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2006-01. C. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on June 19, 2006 on Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Review No. 2004-109, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 to amend SD-8, and Site Plan Review No. 2006-01. D. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Review No. 2004-109, was approved and adopted by resolution which came before the City Council on June 19, 2006. This ordinance incorporates by reference, as though fully set forth herein, this resolution and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. Section 2. Specific Development No. 8 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Ordinance. Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 1 of 9 75A-179 Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ADOPTED this day of , 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 2 of 9 75A-180 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on ,and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 3 of 9 75A-181 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 8 (new language shown in bold, deleted language shown in strikeout for tracking purposes only): General Notes Water within the district will be by private water facilities served by the City of Santa Ana facilities within adjacent public streets. 2. Sewage disposal will be by private sewers and appurtenances connected to City of Santa Ana facilities within adjacent public streets. 3. Easements shall be created for all private and public utilities which cross over, along, under or through any parcels which may be created within this district and are intended to serve other parcels within the district. 4. The development and management of Brookhollow will be subject to the supervision of the Brookhollow Office Park Association, a non-profit corporation, and to the terms and conditions of the recorded Declaration of Establishment of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of Brookhollow Office Park to insure continued maintenance of utilities, private streets, landscaping and general appearance of the development within the district. Any amendments to the CC&Rs, which affect these regulations, shall require approval of the City Attorney and Planning Department. 5. Existing private streets and driveway access to adjacent public streets shall be maintained. Additional access to adjacent public streets proposed after adoption of this ordinance shall meet the requirements and approval of the Director of Public Works. 6. The Boundaries of Zones I. II, and III are shown on Attachment "1" attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. Intent and Puruose It is the intent of this district to allow a combination of multi-tenant leasehold professional and business office uses, single parcel professional and business offices uses, and single parcel retail, commercial and minimal impact industrial activity uses (as specified in this ordinance). Specific plan review shall be required for all development within this district Site Requirements A. Site Coverage Exhibit A Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 4 of 9 75A-182 1) Structure shall not cover more than 55 percent of the total net site area. (Net area shall be the gross area less any area used for public or private street purposes.) 2) Each parcel to be created within this district shall have a minimum average width of 1 foot for each 2.5 feet of average depth. 3) The minimum lot size for parcels within Zone III shall be 2.8 acres (121,968 square feet B. Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted in Zone I: 1) Professional Offices a. Accountants b. Attorneys c. Dentist, doctors and related professions d. Engineers, architects and planners e. Research and development facilities f. Private trade, vocational or professional schools 2) Business offices, including but not limited to: a. Advertising agencies b. Banks or other financial offices c. Employment agencies d. Escrow and real estate companies e. Insurance companies f. Corporate headquarters g. Photographers, artist, etc. h. Travel agencies i. Computer or computer training centers 3) Laboratories except those, which emit offensive odors, vibrations, or may be hazardous to the public. 4) Political, civic and charitable organization uses, which shall not include bingo or other gaming activities. 5) Restaurants. 6) Union Halls 7) Museums, art galleries and libraries. Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 5 of 9 75A-183 8) Religious meeting halls 9) Day care and child care facilities, nurseries, etc. The following uses shall be permitted in Zone II: 1) All uses within Zone I. 2) Minimal impact light industry. 3) Hotels, motels and associated shops and services related to the hotel or motel uses. 4) Retail, with a maximum of two tenants per building. 5) Furniture and bulk merchandise stores with a maximum of two tenants building. The following uses shall be permitted in Zone III: 1) Professional Offices a. Accountants b. Attorneys c. Dentist. doctors and related professions d. Engineers, architects and planners e. Research and development facilities 2) Business offices, including but not limited to: a. Advertising agencies b. Banks or other financial offices c. Employment agencies d. Escrow and real estate companies e. Insurance companies f. Corporate headquarters g. Photographers, artist, etc. h. Travel agencies 3) Commercial uses, including: a. Food and retail uses excluding drive through facilities The following uses shall be permitted in Zone III with a Conditional Use Permit: Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 6 of 9 75A-184 a. Dancing or entertainment ancillary to a permitted restaurant use. b. The serving of alcohol in conjunction with a permitted food/restaurant use. C. Any use permitted herein may be prohibited by reason of noise, odor, dust or electrical interference or adverse environmental impact on adjacent uses. D. Setbacks: 1) Front setback along public street frontage shall be 20 feet minimum. 2) Front setback along private street frontage shall be: a) 10 feet within Zone I. b) 20 feet within Zone II. c) 10 feet within Zone III 3) Side yard setbacks shall be 10 feet. 4) Rear yard setback shall be 10 feet. E. Building Heights: 1) Structures shall be limited to four stories and not exceed 70 feet in height in Zone I. 2) Structures shall be limited to four stories and not exceed 70 feet in height in Zone II. 3) Structures shall be limited to two stories and shall not exceed 40 feet in height in Zone III. F. Landscaping: 1) All sites shall have a minimum landscape coverage of 15 percent. 2) The landscape setback along public streets shall be 20 feet. 3) The landscape setback along private streets shall be 20 feet fully landscaped or a minimum of 10 feet parallel with and along the private street line landscaped. The remainder of the required setback area shall be used for parking and/or vehicular circulation, provided a matching square footage of such area used for parking Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 7 of 9 75A-185 and/or vehicular circulation, is provided on the site and is visible from either public streets, freeways or private streets. 4) Side yard landscape shall be a minimum of five feet. (This requirement applies to new construction. An area equal to this five- foot requirement may be proposed at another location on the parcel. 5) A minimum landscape setback of 10 feet is to be maintained along the frontage; and, in addition, there shall be a 15-foot wide planter island, fully landscaped, placed an average 160 feet apart and extending into the paved area the depth of the parking spaces along said freeway frontage. No curb and gutter shall be permitted along the edge of paving parallel to the Newport Freeway right-of- way to allow for sheet flow of drainage from the rear portion of any parcels created along the frontage in accordance with the approved drainage plan on file with the City of Santa Ana. However, parking bumpers shall be required in lieu of the curb and gutter. 6) A landscape plan shall be approved by the appropriate City agency prior to issuance of building permits. 7) Landscaping shall include trees, and at least 50 percent of the trees shall be within the parking area itself so as to give visual relief to rows of parked vehicles. 8) Landscaping shall be installed prior to occupancy or utility release and permanently maintained. 9) Landscape plan shall include an irrigation system to be installed and maintained. G. Parking Requirements: The parking requirements in this district shall conform to the requirements of Article IV, Sections 41-614, 41-615, 41-616, and 41-617, except that there shall be no requirement that one-third (1/3) of the total lot be devoted to off street parking. Zone III. The City recognizes that a lease agreement has been entered into between the property owner and Southern California Edison to utilize the Transmission right-of-way easement to provide 63 parking spaces to satisfy City of Santa Ana parking requirements for the project. Should this lease be revoked or terminated resulting in the loss of parking spaces or Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 8 of 9 75A-186 the loss of continuous and uninterrupted circulation and access to these spaces the following remedies shall be used to cure the parking deficit: a. A parking study shall be provided by the City at the property owner's expense that determines if a parking deficiency has been created and examines ways the parking deficit can be cured. b. Should the parking study determine that a parking deficiency exists, replacement parking necessary to cure the deficiency shall be provided within 100 feet of the project site. H ~~~j~~.~ll ho c•~ ~hion+ +~ c.i+o nl~n rc~iio~~i All signage shall comply with the City sign code, (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 41, Article XI). Storage and Refuse Collection Areas: All storage and refuse areas shall be enclosed by a minimum six-foot block walls and solid gates so as to eliminate unsightliness. No open outside storage shall be permitted. Ordinance No. NS- XXX Page 9 of 9 75A-187 J ~~ ~ v~i RITCHEY ST. ABBOTT LIGHT W = TACO AWNING INDUSTRIAL COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES 2 C7 L I G T I N U S T R I A L BELL ~ w 3 WARNER AVENUE HERITAGE PAPER PIONEER PACKING S.C.E. R.V. STORAGE SPOONS RESTAURANT CIGHT INDUSTRIAL w z W Q O Z Q POOL SV. I 0 SD-8 ---- ~~ G'J` Y P L A N N I N G A N D B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y ATTACH~ILNT 1 75A-188 KO - 6/14/06 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW NO. 2004-109 AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 2006-01 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1580 EAST WARNER AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. Applicant is requesting approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Review No. 2004-109, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02, and Site Plan Review No. 2006-01 for the property located at 1580 East Warner Avenue. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana held a duly noticed public hearing on May 22, 2006, and by a vote of 6:0 (Cribb absent) voted to recommend that the City Council: 1. Approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program, Environmental Review No. 2004-109. 2. Adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Review No. 2006-01. C. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on June 19, 2006 on Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Review No. 2004-109, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2006-02 to amend SD-8, and Site Plan Review No. 2006-01. D. Applicant is requesting approval of Site Plan Review No. 2006-01 for the property located at 1580 East Warner Avenue. E. Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-493.5 requires approval of all plans for projects within a specific development district to ensure the project is in conformity with the specific development standards. Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 1 of 3 75A-189 F. The City Council considered all testimony, written and oral, and finds the project is in compliance with all applicable development standards and the provisions outlined within Specific Development No. 8 (SD- 8). G. The Request for Council Action and all matters presented to the Council are incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the initial study and the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program for Environmental Review No. 2004-109 prepared with respect to this Project. It is determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this Project. On the basis of this review, the City Council finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the City Council has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby, approves Site Plan Review No. 2006-01. ADOPTED this day of June, 2006. Miguel A. Pulido Mayor Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 2 of 3 75A-190 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Joseph W. Fletcher City Attorney By: Kylee O. Otto Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, PATRICIA E. HEALY, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2005- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2006-XXX Page 3 of 3 75A-191 75A-192