Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FY 2006 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM -" DECEMBER 2, 2005 <br /> <br />· Define the Urban Area: For new Urban Areas, the SAA pac, in coordination with the <br />entities included in the geographic area used to determine eligibility, as outlined in <br />Chapter VII, UASI Program Guidance, must fully define the Urban Area, as it will apply <br />to FY 2006 UASI. The Urban Area definition must, at a minimum, cover the <br />geographical area used to determine eligibility through the data count and risk analysis. <br />The definition of the Urban Area is limited to jurisdictions contiguous to the geographic <br />area used to determine eligibility, or with which jurisdictions in that area have established <br />formal mutual aid agreements. States may request a waiver for this limitation for regions <br />previously established by Executive Order, law or compact. For the purposes of the FY <br />2006 UASI, the Washington, D.C. Urban Area will consist of the National Capital <br />Region (NCR) as set forth in 10 U.S.C. 2674(f)(2). <br /> <br />In coordination with the Urban Area Working Group (UA WG), the SAA pac may <br />redefine the geographic boundaries of an existing Urban Area, as it will apply to the FY <br />2006 UASI Program. The SAA pac must notify G&T of this change. <br /> <br />· Establish the Urban Area Working Group (UA WG): The geographical area <br />identified through the data count, described in Chapter VII, UASI Program Guidance, <br />must be part of the defined Urban Area and must be fully represented on the UA WG. <br />The SAA pac must determine appropriate representation for that geographic area to <br />serve on the UA WG. Furthermore, where there is a Regional Transit Security Working <br />Group (RTSWG) or a Area Maritime Security Committee active within the geographical <br />area, the UA WG should include them as functional sub-committees to their organization. <br />G&T strongly encourages that, wherever possible, previously established local working <br />groups be leveraged for this purpose. Local MMRS and Citizen Corps Council <br />representatives must be included as well. An overview ofthe UA WG structure and a list <br />of members and their associated jurisdictions must be provided to G&T along with the <br />grant application. New Urban Areas must provide to G&T an overview of the UA WG <br />structure, a list of members, and their associated jurisdictions along with the grant <br />application. Existing Urban Areas must notify G&T of any updates to the UA WG <br />structure or membership. <br /> <br />4. Single Point of Contact (SPOC) Review: Executive Order 12372, located at <br />bttD:I I www.archives. gOY I federal- regi sterl codi fication/ executive-orderl 123 72. h tml requires <br />applicants from State and local units of government or other organizations providing services <br />within a State to submit a copy of the application to the State SPOC, if one exists, and if this <br />program has been selected for review by the State. Applicants must contact their State SPOC <br />to determine if the program has been selected for State review. The date that the application <br />was sent to the SPOC or the reason such submission is not required should be provided. <br /> <br />5. Program and Capability Enhancement Plan: On October 31, 2005, G&T released <br />preliminary guidance on conducting a Program and Capability Review and developing a <br />Program and Capability Enhancement Plan. The Enhancement Plan is the key building block <br />in the process States will use to develop an Investment Justification for FY 2006 HSGP <br />funds. States should use the template disseminated on November 14,2005, in the State <br />Homeland Security Program and Capability Review Guidebook Volume II: Enhancement <br />Plan to develop their Enhancement Plans. The Enhancement Plan frames the resource needs <br /> <br />PREPAREDNESS DIRECTORATE'S OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TRAINING <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br />