My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:32:59 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 9:35:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zuniga, Diana <br />From: Jenna Zech <Jennaz@ppsocal.com> <br />Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 6:40 PM <br />To: Phan, Thai <br />Cc: eComment <br />Subject: Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2024-02 - Agenda item no. 22 <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Dear Councilmember Phan, <br />I'm writing to you today regarding the SD-84 TZC Rezoning proposal. I recognize that you've heard from many <br />stakeholders —both residents and business owners —and while the discussion has grown somewhat tense, I remain hopeful <br />that tomorrow's meeting will be guided by level-headed deliberation and a shared desire for a mutually beneficial <br />outcome. <br />I am a fourth -generation owner of Pacific Plumbing of Santa Ana. Our company has proudly served this community since <br />1929, and with a deep appreciation for our long-standing relationship with Santa Ana, I am fully committed to building a <br />prosperous and sustainable future here. That said, some of the vague language in the rezoning proposal being brought <br />forward puts my future in jeopardy. Many of the current proposed compromises seem tailored to long-time business <br />owners nearing retirement. While I deeply respect their contributions, these short-term allowances simply do not work for <br />a younger businesswoman with a bright vision for the future. The truth is that if the initiative were to be approved, it <br />would directly impact property values to the point where I could not reinvest in Santa Ana. Relocating to an industrial <br />area would not be financially feasible, nor would I be able to improve the building or grow the business to better serve our <br />community. I understand why some short-term concessions have leaned towards their concerns —they have been the most <br />vocal —but I am speaking up now to ask for a broader, future -focused perspective. <br />I am asking you to vote no tomorrow on SD-84. I am asking for the chance to collaborate with the city on a path forward <br />— one that supports economic vitality, honors our history, and empowers the next generation of Santa Ana's business <br />community. <br />I appreciate your time and the work you do. I look forward to seeing you at tomorrow's meeting. <br />Respectfully, <br />Jenna Zech <br />SINCE 1frt <br />PACIFIC <br />PLUMBING <br />OF SOUTHERN CA41FORNIA <br />Jenna Zech <br />Pacific Plumbing of Southern California <br />P 714-547-6967 x210 <br />E jennaz ppsocal.com <br />W www.pacificplumbingsocal.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.