My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:32:59 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 9:35:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Becerra, Alexis <br />From: Mark Law < <br />Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 9:22 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Cc: mlaw92626@gmail.com <br />Subject: Written comments regarding Agenda Item 22, April 1, 2025 Santa Ana City Council <br />Meeting <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />March 31, 2025 <br />My name is Mark Law. I am one of 3 members of FLP Investments LLC, the owner of the <br />building and property at 911 N. Poinsettia St. We bought the building in 2001 after a year -long <br />search and were pleased with the location and architecture that Burke developed for the 8 <br />buildings they built in the project, working closely with the city of Santa Ana. Imagine our <br />surprise in 2010, 8 short years after our building was first occupied, when the City of Santa Ana <br />presented the Renaissance Plan in which they would take away our entitled zoning and rezone <br />our property residential and open space with no compensation to us, the existing property <br />owner. There was outrage among the property and business owners, many meetings, and the <br />result was the industrial overlay on the underlying residential zoning. While not satisfied, the <br />property and business owners finally concluded they could live with this zoning structure. <br />Fast forward 15 years, now the city feels, in the words of the executive director of the city <br />planning committee, that change has not happened fast enough. Their solution is to remove <br />the overlay and subject the business and property owners to a steep devaluation of their <br />property and huge financial and human cost to the existing businesses to relocate. The <br />rationale was presented to us at the train station by Margarita saying that this decision was <br />based on 'environmental justice'. If 'environmental justice' is driving this effort why hasn't the <br />city gone after the handful of businesses who the entire community knows are the bad <br />actors? Instead, this effort to remove the overlay in the transit district is targeting all 120+ <br />industrial property owners/business owners in the district. A number of the local residents <br />agree that the bad actors must go, not all the industrial businesses that have been good <br />neighbors over the years. <br />The business which has occupied our building at 911 Poinsettia is an industrial distributor, <br />selling hose, fittings, valves, and the like to customers who are repairing their hydraulic and <br />pneumatic equipment. The business gets one UPS and FEDEX delivery in the morning, and one <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.