My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 4:32:59 PM
Creation date
3/26/2025 9:35:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Flores, Dora <br />From: Jack Haley <jhaley@lee-associates.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 5:02 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: Santa Ana Council SD-84 Rezoning April 1st Public Hearing <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Dear City Councilmen and women: <br />I am strongly against the abolishing of the industrial zone near the train station and the 5 freeway. <br />The real concerns I have are over companies being allowed to operate their businesses as they do today and how difficult <br />SA will make it to lease or sell an industrial property to another industrial user (non -conforming per the <br />Ordinance). There is some definition of "intensification of use" in the transit zone code which is good but ultimately it <br />will be up to the planning dept director to approve that incoming business. A business owner walking into the planning <br />dept may be told that they will not be allowed a Certificate of Occupancy because they are a non -conforming <br />business. Value is partially based on risk and certainty that future usage of business properties can continue. <br />What if the City told the residences that they cannot have more people live in the home or park I more car there in the <br />future then the residence has now?? You would think today that the government would not be taking away people's <br />property rights. <br />This ordinance negatively affects property values because the entire mission is to gentrify the Zone area to residential and <br />supportive commercial. The current M1 zoning today provides the largest pool of potential tenants and buyers for transit <br />zone industrial properties. <br />Jack Haley, CCIM <br />Principal <br />Lee & Associates I Orange <br />D 714.564.7172 <br />O 714.647-9100 <br />jhaleyCa�lee-associates.com <br />ASSOCIATES <br />COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE vt F <br />Corporate ID 01011260 <br />1004 W. Taft Avenue I Suite 150 <br />Orange, California 92865 <br />Uk": in f 0,5 $• 8 <br />Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the <br />intended recipient and may be confidential. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is <br />strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and <br />delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.