My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31A - 1044 EAST FOURTH ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
05/07/2007
>
31A - 1044 EAST FOURTH ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:40:06 PM
Creation date
5/2/2007 11:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31A
Date
5/7/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />: <br /> <br />'Bill Mock <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Ce: <br /> <br />Mathieu, Ron [MATHIEUR@scrra,net] <br />Tuesday, October 03, 2006 3:43 PM <br />Dinah Minteer; Bill Mock <br />Darrell Johnson; Wylie, Steve; Quirk, David <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Mason Avenue <br />1ueuing.doc (580 n. <br />Dinah, I don't feel comfortable in allowing this new tenant of the <br />building use any of the R/W adjacent to the crossing for turning trucks. <br />As a matter of fact, we don't want any trucks entering or leaving a <br />driveway that close to an existing crossing. It would present queuing, <br />line of sight and other related safety issues. We are operating on a <br />curved track there and also entering a station. The intent of the aCTA <br />Grade Crossing Study as well as SeRRA's new Sealed Corridor Study that <br />is being conducted in LA County, is to make the crossings safer and that <br />includes looking at adjacent land uses such as truck traffic impacts to <br />crossing safety. The loading docks that I see may have been doors that <br />were installed for past rail service for the previous business. We <br />donlt want to see a new tenant encourage large truck moves in and around <br />this building or to build a new loading dock in that area. It is my <br />understanding that this will be a distribution center and will have many <br />trucks coming in and out. They should use the other side of their <br />building. <br /> <br />The queuing in the attached photo in the word document is taken at a Dew <br />at-grade cro3sing isn LA County caused by a truck backing into a <br />business. Another reason to get rid of driveways adjacent to the <br />crossing is that these same Cities that are allowing them are also <br />asking for Quiet Zones. This is addressed in the new FRA Train Horn <br />Rule as well (no driveways within 60 ft. of track) . <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Ron Mathieu <br />Manager Public Projects <br />SCRRA/Metro1ink <br /> <br />(213) 452-0249 <br />(213) 452-0423 fax <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Dinah Minteer (mailto:DMinteer@octa.net] <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:33 AM <br />To: Mathieu, Ron; Bill Mock <br />Cc: Darrell Johnson <br />Subject: FW: MC02PRNT656 has been scanned <br /> <br />FYI. What now, Ron? <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Ross, Jim (mailto:JRoss@ci.santa-ana.ca.us] <br />Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 3:03 PM <br />To: Ross, Jim; Dinah Minteer <br />Cc: Paul Taylor <br />Subject: RE: MC02PRNT656 has been scanned <br /> <br />OK, my mistake, <br /> <br />I just re read it and they are <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />31A-91 <br /> <br />saying 9.61 clear total <br />Page 24 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.