Laserfiche WebLink
WORT{ ITEMS <br />The work items that are proposed here can be summarized as follows: <br />I. Revised Short -Ran a Anal sis <br />The interim report produced for the Five -City Traffic Analysis contains considerable <br />information with respect to short-range improvement needs. Questions regarding feasibility of some <br />of the projects will be resolved, and the program will be updated to reflect the seven-year time frame. <br />The steps that will be undertaken in this regard are as follows: <br />1. Prepare new land use database (1999; <br />2. Prepare new traffic forecasts <br />3. Revise improvement program <br />It is anticipated that item 3 will involve numerous iterations with respect to traffic model data, <br />and will require considerable input from the project team. The product will be a revised version of <br />the short-range improvement program. <br />2. ImRroyement Costs <br />In this work item, costs will be assembled for the improvements identified in work item i <br />above. These cost estimates will be prepared by each jurisdiction, and reviewed by AFA for <br />reasonableness. <br />3. Nexus Analysis <br />This step in.. the analysis will be a r exus evaluation of the improvement costs and land use <br />growth in the study area. The nexus procedure will relate the costs of the improvements at each <br />individual location to the growth in land use (existing to 1999). The result will be a set of costs per <br />tripend specified by individual areas within the overall study area. <br />In carrying out this analysis, a set of sub -areas will first be defined, and the growth in land <br />use in each sub -area will be estimated. Various nexus formulations will then be analyzed, taking into <br />consideration participating development, existing fee programs, etc. While at this stage it is not <br />intended that the nexus results should be directly converted into a fee program, the results will <br />Four -City Traffic Study 2 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. <br />