Laserfiche WebLink
<br />aR~fA <br /> <br />Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br /> <br />C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement <br />housing elsewhere? <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code to establish an ordinance for the regulation of indoor <br />sporting facilities would not induce substantial growth in the City or displace substantial numbers of <br />existing housing or population, in that approval of the proposed ordinance would not involve any activities <br />that would generate additional population or displaces homes and/or population. <br /> <br />PUBLIC SERVICES <br /> <br />Fire Protection, Police Protection, Schools, Parks, Other Public Facilities <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code to establish an ordinance for the regulation of <br />indoor sporting facilities would not increase the demand for additional public services over current levels of <br />service being provided in the City, in that the approval of the proposed ordinance would not involve any <br />activities that would substantially increase the demands for public services. Through the conditional use <br />permit process, future indoor sporting facilities implemented under the proposed ordinance would be <br />evaluated for potential public service impacts. <br /> <br />RECREATION <br /> <br />A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would <br />occur or be accelerated? <br />B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. <br /> <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Approval of the proposed ordinance would not increase the use of any recreational facilities or result in the <br />significant need for additional recreational facilities, in that the proposed ordinance would not involve any <br />activities that would increase the demands for recreational facilities. The proposed ordinance would in <br />fact likely reduce the demand on recreational facilities by providing additional indoor facilities to serve the <br />City's need for recreation. No adverse impacts to recreation facilities would be associated with the <br />approval of proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />TRANSPORT ATION/TRAFFIC <br /> <br />A. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and <br />capacity of the street system? <br />B. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the <br />county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? <br />C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a <br />change in location that results in substantial safety risks? <br />D. Substantially increase hazards to a design feature <br /> <br />75B-34 <br /> <br />10 <br />