My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2008-08-18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
08/18/2008
>
FULL PACKET_2008-08-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:28:49 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 11:57:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
690
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br /> CEQA Compliance <br /> Less than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially with Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />O. Tributary to other environmentally sensitive areas? ^ ^ ^ <br />If so, can it exacerbate already existing sensitive <br />conditions? <br />P. Have a potentially significant environmental impact ^ ^ ^ <br />on surface water quality to either marine, fresh, or <br />wetland waters? <br />Q. Have a potentially significant adverse impact on ^ ^ ^ <br />groundwater quality? <br />R. Cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable ^ ^ ^ <br />surface or groundwater receiving water quality <br />objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? <br />S. Impact aquatic, wetland, or riparian habitat? ^ ^ ^ <br />IX. Land Use and Planning -Would the project: <br />A. Physically divide an established community? ^ ^ ^ <br />B. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ^ ^ ^ <br />regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the <br />project (including, but not limited to the general <br />plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning <br />ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or <br />mitigating an environmental effect? <br />C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation ^ ^ ^ <br />plan or natural community conservation plan? <br />X. Mineral Resources -Would the project: <br />A. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- ^ ^ ^ <br />important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br />on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land <br />use plan? <br />75B-20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.