My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 26
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
04/15/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 9:05:02 AM
Creation date
4/14/2025 1:09:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zuniga, Diana <br /> From: <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 2:59 PM <br /> To: eComment <br /> Subject: Public Hearing SD-84 Moratorium Extension <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br /> The March 3rd Train Station meeting brought together residents and businesses ... and made clear that many <br /> residents do not support an unjustified land grab which will benefit gentrifying developers -- and will harm <br /> many good businesses and their employees. <br /> Developers will bring in thousands of additional residents - and traffic - into high density multi-story units ... <br /> right between 2 historic single-family neighborhoods. <br /> We need a balanced approach that targets"bad actor"businesses which degrade both business and residential <br /> neighborhoods. -- Residents don't want to unnecessarily shut down clean industrial businesses and eliminate <br /> jobs. <br /> The draft regulations only came out in mid-January-- Leaving little time and opportunity for stakeholders to <br /> understand, discuss and collaborate on such a complicated and consequential set of regulations <br /> ... regulations which will encompass hundreds of businesses, properties and over 1,000 jobs. <br /> Critical details need to be addressed - such as the inaccurate and subjective classification of"noxious" <br /> businesses. There are devastating consequences for labeling a business as "noxious"—as the City has already <br /> done without sufficient justification. <br /> The City should focus on: <br /> Addressing the primary nuisance and "noxious" businesses -- 90% of the businesses do not cause any <br /> problems for the City or neighborhoods—yet they are being lumped in with the problem causing operators. <br /> Clarification of regulations --This re-zoning is every bit as significant to this area as the re-zoning is in the <br /> ongoing General Plan Update --but it has not received equivalent outreach, community input, and <br /> collaboration. <br /> Consider removing the M-2 overlay -- but allowing the M-1 Light Industrial to remain ... as was done in the <br /> County of Los Angeles "Green"rezoning. <br /> At the Train Station meeting and at the Planning Commission -- residents recommended that the M-1 zone <br /> remain and that the M-2 zone designation be eliminated. <br /> We strongly urge the Council to extend the moratorium, as allowed by California law, and to engage in a <br /> process which seeks greater community understanding and collaboration, and which protects both <br /> neighborhoods and businesses. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.