Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> <br /> <br />ssues <br />New <br />Significant <br />Impacts <br /> <br />More Severe <br />Impacts No Substantial <br />Change from <br />Previous <br />Analysis <br /> e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not ^ ^ <br /> been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would <br /> the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive <br /> noise levels? <br /> f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose ^ ^ <br /> people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> VIII. Population and Housing -Would the project: <br /> a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by ^ ^ <br /> proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through <br /> extension of roads or other infrastructure)? <br />b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction ^ ^ <br />of replacement housing elsewhere? <br />c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of ^ ^ <br />replacement housing elsewhere? <br />IX. Public Services • Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered <br />governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental <br />impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ration, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public service: <br />a. Fire protection? ^ ^ <br />b. Police protection? ^ ^ <br />c. Schools? ^ ^ <br />d. Parks? ^ ^ <br />e. Other public facilities? ^ ^ <br />X. Recreation <br />a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks <br />or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the ^ ^ <br />facility would occur or be accelerated. <br />• <br />b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or ^ ^ <br />expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on <br />the environment? <br />XI. Transportation/Traffic -Would the project: <br />a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load ^ ^ ^ <br />and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either <br />the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or <br />congestion at intersections?) <br />b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established ^ ^ ^ <br />by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or <br />highways? <br />c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic ^ ^ ^ <br />levels or a change in location that results insubstantial safety risks? <br />d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or ^ ^ ^ <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />e. Result in inadequate emergency access? ^ ^ ^ <br />f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ^ <br />g. Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus ^ ^ ^ <br />turnouts, bicycle racks)? <br />XII. Utilities and Service Systems -Would the project: <br />a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water ^ ^ <br />Quality Control Board? <br />b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment ^ ^ <br />facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental effects? <br />• Resolution No. 2009-025 <br />Page 59 of 95 <br />MacArthur Place South <br />EIR Addendum <br />62 <br />