My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2010-02-01
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
02/01/2010
>
FULL PACKET_2010-02-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2016 2:54:55 PM
Creation date
1/27/2010 12:53:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
2/1/2010
Destruction Year
2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Application Processing Fee <br />February 1, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />applications from the submittal of the initial application through the <br />final recordation of the property. Indirect costs were calculated based <br />on either the number of full time positions (FTEs), the percentage of <br />budget allocation or the percent of work product generated, whichever was <br />most applicable to the type of work performed. This total indirect cost <br />was then spread proportionately over the various services based on the <br />percentage of applications /permits processed of that type. Examples of <br />indirect costs include support from agencies such as the City Manager's <br />Office, Finance and Management Services, the City Attorney's Office and <br />Personnel Services. <br />Listing Process <br />Currently there are two ways for a property to be added to the Santa Ana <br />Register of Historical Properties. The first is through a City sponsored <br />nomination process. These are properties that have been identified by <br />the City as having historic significance as a contributing property, key <br />property or landmark. The second way is through a voluntary private <br />party nomination, often called a self - nomination, by the property owner. <br />These are properties that meet the eligibility criteria established by <br />SAMC Chapter 30 - Places of Historical and Architectural Significance to <br />be added to the register, but that were not identified by the City as <br />having special historic significance. In most cases, the properties <br />nominated through private property self - nomination process fall into the <br />lowest qualifying category of Contributive. <br />Mills Act <br />The most common reason for property owners to request their properties be <br />added to the historic register is to enter into a historic property <br />preservation agreement known as a Mills Act contract. The property must <br />be listed on the Register in order to be eligible for this benefit. This <br />contract, enacted between the property owner and the City, requires the <br />property owner to protect and preserve the historic nature of the <br />property over the term of the contract. In exchange for this <br />preservation, the property owner is able to take advantage of substantial <br />property tax savings through tax credits for the life of the agreement. <br />Impact of New Fee on Future Listings <br />When the decision was made not to establish a fee for self - nominated <br />properties it was believed that the establishment of a fee would <br />discourage property owners from listing their properties. As the entire <br />listing process was new and many historically significant properties were <br />at risk of being lost of altered, the incentive provided by the free <br />application was warranted at the time. However, in the almost 10 years <br />that the program has been in existence the City, through a combination of <br />City- initiated and self - nominated applications, has added over 540 <br />properties to the Register. <br />75A -2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.