|
chapter ~ Ffr~dir~~s ~eardfn~ Pro~e~t ~~terna~~~es
<br /> :~:~~~~:~~:~~::~..:~~~::tand.tls~ Type Afferna~ve 3. ~ ~ :i~ar~s~ ~o~ing Code {SD 8~~ :.:D~fl`erence.~
<br /> Res~~~atiai ~~~iis~ 2,~~6 4,015 ~~,0~9~
<br /> Retail ~s~} 5~,~~ 81,~~~
<br /> ind~s~~iai {s~ ~~~0,~00} ~~,~DO~ ~
<br /> Commercial ~sf~ ~~24,00~} ~~24,~~~ ~
<br /> Civic ~~~,4D4~ ~2~,~00~ ~
<br /> Green ~sf~ 5~~,0~~ SB~,~~~ 0
<br /> ~'ar~in~ t~,~,o~o~ ~~,~rz,o~~ ~~~~,~~o~
<br /> ~o~~~: ~ass~.~
<br /> ~fr?(~~1?3
<br /> t~enc~~ he~•eb~T finds that specific econo~~~ic, legal, social, teci~t~ological, or ot~~er considerati~o~~s
<br /> make the adaption of~ternati~Te 3 it~feasible.
<br /> ~lltl~ough ~lte~•~~a~~te ~ would ~•educe ~ stgntficar~t and una~~oidable ~tnpact of the p~•oposed project to
<br /> aesthetics ~si~adi~~g and shado~~Fs} to ~ less than sigt~i~cant le~zei, ~t 4~ro~~ld restrict de~7eiop~nent ~~~itl~in the
<br /> it~r to la~~~ to rr~d-~~ise de~reiopmt, ~~Tl~ich v~ould ~~ot t~eet project objecti~Tes to the satr~e extent as the
<br /> proposed project.
<br /> pecif~call~?, this ~'esti~iction ~~rould ~~e~uiie a leduc~oil in housing ~i~~cluding a~'~'ordable iiousing~ fro~~
<br /> ~,~75 units to ~,o~b uz~its, ~~T}~.ch ~~ould not meet Santa ~~na's ~~egiona~ dousing deeds assessment for
<br /> 2o~G~~o~~, ~~Ti~icl~ call for 3,33 units, of ~~~hicl~ must be a~'fordabie for io~~~, ~Te~~~ lo~~, and ~xt~•exnel~~
<br /> lo~~~ income ho~~seholds, `i'l~e Cit~F of Santa Ana has a g~~eat need far affo~idable housing sixt~~ percent of
<br /> the households ~n Santa ~i~a i~a~re la~~r, ~~`er~F lo~~~, and. e~trer~el~r lo~~~ incon~es, ~~i~T of Santa Ana erieral
<br /> Flan Draft ~-~ousi~~g Element, ~ppet~dix p. foal ~ of tl~e dousing Element is to "pro~ride a
<br /> di~~ersit~t of qualit~? housiz~, affordabi~it~~ le~~els, and li~zitlg experiences that ~.ccon~i~~odate Sai~ta Ana's
<br /> ~~eidents and ~~~o~~k~arce of all housel~old t~r~?es, income ie~rels, at7d age groups to foster an iriclusi~Fe
<br /> communit~T.>' ~~lternatirre 3 ~~~ould not meet tl~is goal to tl~e same extent as tine proposed p~•oject.
<br /> Sin~ilarl~~, it ~~ould i~ot n~eet ~a~~sing Elen~ent polic~~ set fortis below, to the same extent a the
<br /> proposed p~•oject;
<br /> ~E-~.2 District renters. create l~igh intensit~r, tr~~xed~use urban ~rillages and ~~-lour
<br /> pedestrian-oriented experiences that suppo~~t tl~e inid,to hil~-rise office cei~te~is~
<br /> commercial acti~~i~~, and cult~xral acti~Tities in the ~zaried District enteric.
<br /> ~lternad.~Te ~ ~~~o~ild also fail to itnp~ernc~~t tl~e fallo~tnri dousing Element policies to the a~~e extent as
<br /> the proposed project;
<br /> ~~E-~,1 Do~~Tnto~~Tn. Strenthe~~ Santa tuna's code as a ~~i~arant mixed-use and tn~xed-i~~come
<br /> en~fiiroi~ment h}? capitali~i~~ on the go~~er~~~~ent center, a~~ts district, and ixistoric
<br /> do~vnto~~~n aid facilita~ii~ transit-oriei~ted de~relopmet~t and di~rerse
<br /> i~eighborhoods,
<br />
<br /> Transit Zoning bode ~~D 84~ EiR i=ir~dings of Fac~ltaterer~~ of ~v~rriding Considerat~ans 3_~7 {
<br /> r
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br />
<br />
|