80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - EXHIBIT A

Home Browse Search

~hapte~ ~~r~dlr~s Re~ardlr~~ Pr~~ect A~ternatfves Further, under ~ternati~~e 4, the p~0poscd park identified in the I~e~reiopei• Pia~ect ~v0uid i~o la~~er he includcd as ~ project component, The park ~~as one eler~~ent ~F se~reral in the ~~~er~~l ~T1s1on for de~telopn~e~~t of the ~gene~~-o~~Fned properties, The selection of ~lternati~r 4 eFfecti~rel~? eliminates the abi~it~T to construct a park on the bioc~ o~~ ~~~l~ich it is cui•rentl~~ en~risfon.ed gl~~en that the three structures curren~l~r located of~ the ~en.c~~-a~~FneCl properties ~v~ti~ir~ that block ~~Tould remain u~ider ~lternati~~e and tl~e Ci~r~~enc~r under ti~is scenaiio ~~ould he precluded fioin acquh~in a~~~7 .dditionat properties, ~'urthei, ~~~tei•~7ati~~e ~ ~t~ouid not meet the objecti~re the De~reloper Proposal to rede~telop all the t~genc~~-o~~ned properties, anal, as explained abo~re, it ~~~ould not meet the objecti~rc of pro~tiding ne~~r af~`ordable hous~~~g For ~atr~.ies i~~ furtherance aF the Cit~~'s affo~•dahle ho~~sin goals to the same exte~~t as the proposed pro~ect..~~lso, it is unlikel~7 that the City f ~~gc~~c~~ ~~ould be able to attract a qualit~r de~Teloper to undertake a st~~all scaie scattered site de~relop~~e~~t such as tl~at ~~l~ich ~~?ould be constructed ut~det• lternati~Te '~yhi seriousl~7 constrain the potential for pro~Tidit~g econonaicall~T S7iable rede~telop~.~c~xt. Iii light of these considerations, the t~e~lc~r rejects this altei•nati~Te as in~'casible, - It~rntiv~ : ~Va ~em~lit~~n of A~nc~r Pr~~rt~/~~catt~ enc - Y ~n~ ln~ill it~~R~h~b~litt~ in PIS ~~c~r'~tior~ '~°l~is alteii~a~.~Te ~~t0uld e~i~7ufi~te the de~olltton on the Fourteen parcels ~~~tl~in the Station district currentl~~ 0~~~~ed b~~ the Cit~t of Sa~~ta Ana Rede~Tclal~inent ~genc~~ tl~at ~~rere slated Fol~ demolition under the proposed De~~eloper l~roject see figure 5-~ ~Demolitions~~. Instead, those prope~ities ~~~ould be rehal~ihtated puce or tno~rcd to sTacant lots acid fehabiiitated, ~~rith the exceptio~l of the p~•opci•t~~ located at ~ Il~~inter Street, ~~rhich ~~Tould be demolished, ~f the propei{des identified fo~~ demolition on parcels cui•reiitl~? o~~~ned ~~7 the ~enc~~, and those that tna~~ potentiall~l be acquired in the Future, onl~r o~~e is currentl~? listed o~~ the Santa Ana Register of ~ Iistai~ical Propei~es---the ~~~l~itsonRPo~~Telsa~i pause located at ~~if ~h tr~ect~ ~`~le remaining ~~ouses ha~Te prin~arilST heer~ the s~~h~ect of "~~rinds~~ie~d" sur~Te~rs to detern~inc tlieir potential eii€bilit~~ for listing a a l~ist0ric resource, See EIR, Section anal 1~ppendi~ ~'alla4~~ti~g a cor~lprehensi~~e historic sur~~e~~ of tl~e properties, the Cit~r's Historic esoufces Coinir~ission ~~tould e~Taluate all of tine struct~~res to determine theiz• eliibilit~T for listiz~ on the Cit~T's Register of Historical P~•opertles and ~~rould nuke recoinn~et~datlons reardrn tine selec~0i~ of houses to be ma~~ed and o~~to ~~fl~ich sites the~~ shai~ld be zr~o~red. once moored ~nd~or rehabilitated the hawses ~~rould tl~e~~ he offered as For-sale affordable housing. The proposed 't`ransit honing Code ~~~ould remain tl~e sage under this ~~lter~lati~re. In total, this Alternati~re ~~~ould pro~ride appro.~i~natel~r 1~~ units ~approxirr~atel~~ ~~4 rental units and app~~axi~natel~r for sale u€~its~ 011 the .~~enc~~~o~~~ned parcels ~vithin the station District these, approl~irnatei~r i units ~~rould be rented to lo~~F, ~rei~r-lo~~F and exti•emel~FYlO~~r income households. See EIR ~~.ppendix J ~~iltei•natl~~es Testing; ~'ina.~~cial final}rsis~, Table 1, ~ltei•nati~res ~nal~~sis.~ T`l~is is the ~ sai~~e number of units that ~~~ould he rented to lo~~T, ~Tei~F-lo~v and extrerrlel~~~lo~~t inco~~.e households the proposed De~Telopcr Piaject, {Id.} ~ltei~r~ati~re 5 ~~ould also offer for sale 1 ~ lo~~~ incozrie units, ore ma erate incon~e ui11t and foul' marl~et rate units, I Transit 2onin~ Code {~D 84} EAR ~ind~n~s of Fa~t~~afe~nent of ~verr~din~ Cons~derat~or~s