80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - EXHIBIT A

Home Browse Search

~rapter ~ P~nd~r~s Re~ard~n~ Protect Alterrrat~ves merel~~ ciarif~~ al~d a.mplir file anal~xsi p~~cse~~ted in the EIR at~d do ~~ot trigger the need to reciicul~te per ~.t~. guidelines ~5~88.5~b}. Findin ~n I~ur ~~t~d ~n ~mn~ents on t~ Dry EIS e~~erai ~~.iaation measures aid alternatii~es ~~?ere p~~opoed in pubic co~r~~ne~7ts on the Draft I•~~~ Fi~~~ins far these rr~ita~ion measures and a~tc~~t~ad~res are pro~Tided beio~~F. ~~~?C~~1?~S Old ~~l~~~~1? ~~S~~~ {~1`~~ID~C~ t~ R~C~~~ ~~'I~~t;~ t4 ~CJI~#~~`~~ ~~5~~#~'C ~ ~'rvpaed ~ittatfo~ eas~~~e, l~~~a.ke the i=,~c}~ ~eii~bori~oad a s~e~ial dit~•ict b~sec~ on its i~istorical cha~~actei• and proposed a Historic eighbarhood istric~, Consel~ratio~ P~•eser~Tatian ~~~erla~? far the ~..ac~r I~e~hiaarhaad. ~ee I`i~~~.l SIR chapter ~ ~esponses to o~r~~~~c~~ts~, Letter fi•o~~ Jeff Dickmat1 comments JD-2~, -7, -35, and ~~-5.~ ~i~~dit~. 'The ~lgenc~~ finds ti~a~ speci~'~c eco~~at~~ic, legal, social, technoiagicai, or othcz• eo~~siderations made t~~is ~x~itiation i~~easure infeasibic. ~.ationa~e, 'I'he Lac~~ ne~~~barhood ~~as not beefs designated as h~sto~+ic, ~~~d ~t~ere is n.o e~Tidenee ti~at tine creatton of a i~~stor~c d€str~ct 44~~thfr~ the ~~ac~T neighborhood ~~o~~ld r~edl~ce the significant impacts of the proposed p~•oject. further} the c~•eatio~~ of a i~istoric dit~~ict ~~~it~lin the it~t is a epa~•ate p~•ocess reciuirin adoption of a local preser~Tatian ordinance and canz~ot be acco~~plished j throu~~ tine process fo~• tF~e proposed project, See Santa ulna ~~Iu~aicipai bode, Dart II, hapte~• 30.E Therefore, it is ~~ot feasible to adopt a~~d implement this rneasu~~e as part of the pro~ect~ ~ Proposed N~~t~~tion ~Vleax~Ye~ create a "~1rlaste~• ~'~an for the Prese~~Tatio~7 of ~uiturai Reso~~~ccs in t~ac'T~•ansit caning bode .~~~•ea" ti1a~ identifies pr•ope~~ties expected to be i~~pacted b~~ the project, the tape of impact expected, and mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a~xd a.~raid detnalition of i~istoric p~•ope~~ties. ~ee Final ~~R C~~apter ~ Responses to ~omtnents}, Lette~• ~~io~~ Jiff ~ickn~a~ ~D~, cazr~~ne~~t J~2~.~ ~r~di~~, Tire get~c~r f nds that specific economic, legal, social, technoiogica~, or other{ considera~ons t~~a~e this n~t~ga~or~ m.casure t~lfea~lbie. ~atio~ale. Identification of tl~e p~~operties that ~~rould be itr~pacted b}r the project, identification. of the t~rpe of i~r~pact expected, a~~d identil'icatian of mitigation ~~easures to reduce it~pacts and a~~oid den~olitio~~ of i~istaric properties leas ah•ead~~ been conducted in t}~e SIR. pecif~call~F, Table ~.~-R2 ~as modified in ~it~~l AYR hapte~,• fists all properties p~•opased far demolitio~~ ui7der the proposed Deveiope~• I~raject, a~.d the ai~al~Fsis under Impact explains that m~~ltiple studies bare been compicted that address man~F o~ tale l~~star~c~age propc~•ties ~~~iti~in the project a~eaF In ~aG, HRH conducted a rieconnaissance-st~Tle su~~re~~ end ~~istoric reea~•c~~ project in. support of the Sazata Ana renaissance pecitc Ilan prepared b~~ i1~Iaule I'ol~r~oides ~HI~ ~o~G~. 'Iy~~is project aimed to pra~Fide recornn~cndatians for i~istoi•ic preser~ratian pianni~~g ors about ~a~ acres, including ~~a~Y~w of file prope~~t~cs fauild 4~?~tiun the ~'~Fa~~sit ~o~~ing bode ~D 8~} pra~ect area, ubseciuer~t px•opert~~Yspecific studies ~~Tere conducted b~~ Jones at7d stokes ~20aG a~~d ~a~7}, ~~~llch resulted i~~ t~~e full recarda~tio a~~d e~Taluation of manor off` tine properties ~~~ithin t~~e ~'ransit ~onir~ bode LSD S~~ project area 'T'hese e~~al~~ations inclined detern~.if~ations of eligibilit~~ fo~~ t~~e NRHP, CIR, and the ~at~ta Ana Register of Historic Properties ~~RHI'}, t1n additio~~al i~istaric resources ~~~emora~adut~ for the record ~{gas the~~ piepare for se~Te~•ai praper~ies in a~ta ~~~~a bar ~appl~as Ens?ironrnet~tal, Inc, T1ll rne~~orandu~n pra~~ided reco~~.rr~e~datians about the eliibilit~~ of 30 properties for inclusio~~ in the S~I~I~I~. .el`e~~ to AYR, ~1ppedix I~.~ Tahie ~,~--I ~.st all ~ 3-~G Transit zoning Code ~4~ i~IR Findings of Fact/tatement of 4ver~idin considerations f