My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - EXHIBIT A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
06/07/2010
>
80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - FULL PACKET LISTED INDIVIDUALLY
>
80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - EXHIBIT A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:04:40 PM
Creation date
6/10/2010 1:01:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
80A
Date
6/7/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter ~~r~~~r~~s Re~ard~n~ ~ro~ect Afternat~ves <br /> .~~.dditionall~r, inRplace re~~abilitation and f ar relocatia~x ar~d rehabilitation of pra~~erties proposed for <br /> de~x~olidon oti ~enc~~-o~~~ned parcels ~~ritl~in the Lac~t Neigl~barhoad are e~raluated ire Recirculated <br /> Deft EIR Chapter 5~~~. pecificall~F, ~~lternati~~e ~ ~~~ould eliminate the dernoliaan of the <br /> structures cui'rentl~7 existing an the ~genc~~-o~~rned properties and/ox~ ider~tihed for acc~uisi~ion, and <br /> ~~auld instead require that tl~ase prapert~es be retaf~~ed and rehab~htated its the~~• current locations, <br /> t~ltei'na~.~re ~~~auid reduce the dexr~al~t~on of propeities a~~~r~ed h~~ the Rede~Telopxr~et~t ~genc~F <br /> and~or idend,ed far ac~uisidon, at~d ~~~auld instead require that tl~ase properties be rehabilitated, <br /> either in~place or ofd=site, uFiti~ the e4ce~tian a~' tiYe ~~ape~~ at CSI I il~iir~~ef~ S~~eet, ~jti~ich ~~~ould <br /> be den~alished. ~1ter~~ati~Te ~~~auld retain and rehabilitate the bungalo~~T cau~~t located at bII N~ <br /> ~~linte~~ street; ho~ue;~er, the ~•exx~ainder of the struct~xx'es located an the t~enc~~-o~~Tned parcels <br /> ~~~ould be detr~alished, Please see Chapte~• 5,0 for additional details ahaut these ~lterna~~res. <br /> ~ ~'roposed Mitigation, Creation of a cai~~unit~~ park ~~~itl~in tl~e Lace ~e~ghborhood b~~ taking <br /> the follo~~~.n actions. <br /> Close a portion of Sixth street between Poxte~~ acid Lac~r~ Relocate of the ~ritltage horses on <br /> the south side of Sixth tieet to other ~~acant land ors Fifth ~treet~ <br /> Iuild a single rro~~ of ne~~? housing along the south side of Santa 1~na Bi~~d. Use the rexx~ainder of <br /> the larid south of this single ~,'o~~~ of ne~~~ housing to c~•eate ar~other segment of tlae park. <br /> ~~cquire G~~ Sixth foi~ park purposes. al~7ae the ~~Taad campone~.ts fi•ai~~ this str~ctuiie <br /> beforie demolition, <br /> Preser~re ire puce ~0~ and ~~3 E, fifth Street. <br /> See final EIR. Chapter 3 Responses to Co~~ntnents~, Letter fioxx~ ~eff Dickman ~D}, ca~x~~~.ent <br /> I~l~din, xl~e ~genc~~ finds that spec€1`ic economic, legal, racial, technological, ai• other <br /> consideratior~s ~~ake this mitigation. m.easu~'e irfeasible. <br /> Rtianale, Clasirig a portion of Sixth Street be~~~een Porter and Lac~f is not feasible because it <br /> ~~roulcl se~rerel~~ 1~~~~t future transit planning ~~~tlitn the Cit~? and ~~Tould be ~ncansistent ~~~.tl~ tl~e <br /> 'transit honing Cade ohjecti4te of "pro~Tidirig a transit-supparti~re, pedestrian-oficz~ted <br /> de~~elapi~ent fr~rr~c~;~o~'k to support the addition of ne~v transit inf~iastructure." F~~rthel, st~'eet <br /> closures are, in general, couriter to the policies and desic~ standards contained. ~vitl~tn the proposed <br /> 'I~rarisit honing Code, il~laintainit~ a dine-grained, gi'idded street net~~~oi•k allo~~Ts for increased <br /> pedestfla~~ and ~~el~cular accesslb~.t~~ ~~?hich ser~res to disperse traffic thraul~out the area. I~~ <br /> additio~i, maintaining the e~istiri street grid allo~~~s for greater opportunities for filture <br /> transpo~•tatian alignments. <br /> Si~~~ilarl~~, building a single x'a~~~ of r~e~v housing clang tlYe south side of Santa ~~r~a BI~Td. and using <br /> the i•eti~alnder of the land sa~~tlt of <br /> ti~is single ra4v of t~e~~T l~ousir~g to create at~otl~e~~ segment of the <br /> suggested parr is infeasible because it ~~auld be inconsistent ~~~itli the De~relope~i ~'r~o~ct objecti~~e <br /> of "enhancing the streetscape and urban farm of the area, paxacularl~T clang Santa ~~~a l3oule~rard, <br /> with the constiiuc~ari of ne~~? buildings that meet the standards contained in the 'T'ransit ~~o€~ing <br /> Cade and that support future transit plan~~in," <br /> It ~~~ould also result in the lass of units that ~~~ould otl~er~~~ise be Tented to lo~~F, ~7er~F-lo~~T and <br /> e~t~~e~el~~-lo~~~ income households. Construction of affo~~dable housing units is critical to meeting <br /> the Cit~~'s Regional dousing ~~eeds ~~.sess~nent fo~• 20Db-~OI~-, and the loss of such units <br /> ~~~ould be it~cor~sistent ~~~ith the Cit~t's adapted paiic~~ to "n~a~if~i~e affordable housing on ~~genc~T4 j <br /> awned prape~~~ies tliat is of high clualit~r, sutai~~able, and a~tailable to ~rarious income le~~els," ~~ee <br /> f <br /> Santa ~~na I~ausing Element ~ZaO-~~4~, l~olic~~ ~~E-2,8,~ .~~ddid.onall~F, the loss of affordable ~ <br /> <br /> 3-~S Transit Z~nir~~ Cody ~~D 84} ~I~ i=findings of Fac~ltatement Overrid~n~ Considerations <br /> E <br /> 4 <br /> r <br /> f <br /> f <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.