My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 - Density Bonus Agreement No. 2025-02 - Santa Ana 9 Townhomes
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
06/03/2025
>
Item 19 - Density Bonus Agreement No. 2025-02 - Santa Ana 9 Townhomes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2025 5:08:00 PM
Creation date
5/28/2025 4:14:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
19
Date
6/3/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VTTM No. 2025-02 and DBA No. 2025-02 — Santa Ana 9 Townhomes <br />(125 and 205 S. Harbor Blvd.) <br />April 28, 2025 <br />Page 10 <br />Standard <br />Analysis <br />Open Space <br />(Waivers) SP-2, Ch. 3, Table 3-9. Onsite Open Space Requirements <br />The total common open space required for the project site (net) is equal to 15- <br />percent of the lot, or 9,409 sq. ft. Instead, 1,951 sq. ft. of common open space <br />(3-percent) is provided, which is a difference of 7,458 sq. ft. or 12-percent. <br />Meeting the minimum required open space would eliminate six or more units, <br />affecting project feasibility. To maintain the proposed unit count, the developer <br />would need to modify the building type and construct additional floors, potentially <br />exceeding the maximum allowable height in the Harbor Mixed Use Transit <br />Corridor Plan (SP-2) and increasing development costs. To help alleviate the <br />open space deficiency, the project proposes an average of 212 sq. ft. of private <br />open space per unit, through private balconies/decks, far exceeding the 90 sq. ft. <br />Common — Area <br />of private open space per unit required by the SP-2. <br />Although a reduction in open space is requested, the project benefits from its <br />proximity to Santa Anita Park, located directly east and accessible via a <br />pedestrian gate that the developer will provide along the Figueroa frontage. This <br />nearby public green space assists with compensating for the reduced on -site <br />open space by providing residents with convenient access to outdoor recreation, <br />thereby enhancing accessibility to recreational areas and supporting community <br />connectivity. The project's generous provision of private open space and its <br />strategic location next to Santa Anita Park collectively enhance the overall <br />community benefits and livability of the development. <br />The minimum required private open space is 90 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. Two (2) <br />of the 36 units do not meet this requirement, while the remaining thirty-four (34) <br />units fulfill the minimum area required through a combination of upper <br />balconies/decks and ground floor yards. <br />The most direct approach to meeting the minimum private open space <br />requirement would involve extending the balconies of the two non -compliant units <br />by at least three feet toward Harbor Boulevard, a busy and noisy thoroughfare. <br />Private — Area <br />This adjustment would not only compromise their livability but also reduce the <br />sense of privacy for residents as balconies would be closer to the street and more <br />exposed to public view. Furthermore, this expansion would diminish the visibility <br />of the corner unit's live/work space from the street. These changes would also <br />disrupt the cohesive design rhythm and shared building plane with the other nine <br />units along the street, creating an aesthetic imbalance that detracts from the <br />project's overall architectural harmony. <br />Private open space minimum dimensions are 6 feet in all directions. Three (3) <br />out of the 36 units (Units 1, 2, & 11) do not meet the minimum six (6) feet in all <br />directions for private area. <br />Addressing Units 1 and 2 would involve extending their balconies toward Harbor <br />Private — <br />Boulevard, a busy and noisy thoroughfare, while Unit 11 could alternatively <br />Dimensions <br />expand its ground -floor patio closer to the street. Both solutions, however, would <br />bring private areas nearer to the high -traffic corridor, reducing resident privacy <br />and diminishing the corner unit's live/work space visibility. These modifications <br />would also disrupt the cohesive design rhythm and shared building plane with the <br />other nine units, creating an aesthetic imbalance that undermines the project's <br />architectural harmony. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.