Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Orange County 63 25-29 Regional AFH <br /> <br />• In Santa Ana, the R/ECAP Tracts are predominantly Hispanic, as are all the <br />surrounding neighborhoods. <br />The following analysis describes how R/ECAPs align with the location of publicly <br />supported housing. <br />Map 6 - Publicly Supported Housing and R/ECAPs, shows the location of public-supported <br />housing in Orange County in comparison to the location of the R/ECAPs (outlined in red). <br />This map shows no overarching patterns between the location of publicly supported <br />housing and R/ECAPs. <br />• In Placentia, the R/ECAP area is home to one public housing development of 50-100 <br />units, and between 5-15% of renter-occupied units in the Tract utilize a voucher— <br />which is similar to other Tracts in the city. <br />• In Anaheim, there are no publicly supported housing units in the R/ECAP Tract, and <br />fewer than 5% of renter-occupied units in the R/ECAP Tract utilize a voucher. <br />• In Costa Mesa, the largest publicly supported housing development in the city is <br />located on the northern boundary of the R/ECAP area. There is no data on voucher <br />usage in the Tract. <br />• In Garden Grove, 15-30% of renter-occupied units in the R/ECAP tract utilize a <br />voucher, which is similar to a number of other non -R/ECAP Tr acts in the city. There <br />are no publicly supported housing developments in the R/ECAP Tract. <br />• In Santa Ana, fewer than 5% of renter-occupied housing units in the R/ECAP areas <br />utilize a voucher; however, there are various publicly supported housing <br />developments within the boundaries of the R/ECAP area. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 6