My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Public Hearing - FY 2025-29 5 Year Plan, Annual Action Plan for CDBG, HOME, and ESG Programs
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
06/03/2025 Regular
>
Item 23 - Public Hearing - FY 2025-29 5 Year Plan, Annual Action Plan for CDBG, HOME, and ESG Programs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2025 4:55:07 PM
Creation date
5/28/2025 4:46:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
23
Date
6/3/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
504
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Orange County 82 25-29 Regional AFH <br /> <br />residents and Native American residents living below FPL have the least access of <br />all groups. Compared to region, Hispanic, Black and AAPI residents in the city have <br />more access, while White residents have less access. <br />• In Laguna Niguel, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is lower than the region for <br />all groups, with little disparity between groups. Access to neighborhoods with high <br />labor force participation and human capital is high for all groups, with little disparity <br />between groups. <br />• In Lake Forest, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is relatively high, and higher <br />than region, for all groups. There is very little disparity between groups, except for <br />Black residents below FPL, who have very low access to neighborhoods close to <br />jobs. Access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital <br />is higher than in the region for all groups, with little disparity except for Hispanic, <br />AAPI, and Native American residents living below FPL, all of whom have significantly <br />less access. <br />• In Mission Viejo, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is low for all groups, with no <br />disparities between groups. Access to neighborhoods with high labor force <br />participation and human capital is high for all groups, with little disparity except for <br />Hispanics living below FPL, for whom access is relatively low compared to other city <br />residents but is still higher than in the region. <br />• In Newport Beach, access to neighborhoods close to jobs, and neighborhoods with <br />high labor force participation and human capital, is high for all groups, with very <br />little disparity between groups. <br />• In Orange, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is higher than the region, but there <br />are some disparities—access is lowest for AAPI and White residents. There are also <br />disparities in access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and <br />human capital. Black and Hispanic residents overall, and Black and AAPI residents <br />living below FPL have the least access. However, access is higher for all groups <br />(except White residents), in comparison to the region. <br />• In Rancho Santa Margarita, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is very low for all <br />groups, with no disparities between groups. Access to neighborhoods with high <br />labor force participation and human capital is high for all groups, with some <br />disparities—Hispanic residents living below FPL have the least access. <br />• In San Clemente, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is low for all groups, with <br />very little disparity between groups. Access to neighborhoods with high labor force <br />participation and human capital is high for all groups (and higher than in the region), <br />with some disparity—namely, Hispanic residents living below FPL have less access. <br />• In Santa Ana, access to neighborhoods close to jobs is higher for all groups than in <br />region, with some disparities—access is lowest for AAPI residents, especially those <br />living below FPL. Access to neighborhoods with high labor force participation and <br />human capital is lower than in the region for all groups except Black residents, and <br />EXHIBIT 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.