Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana - Public Comment Response Matrix for May 6, 2025 City Council Meeting <br />Public Hearing Item No. 21 Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Updates <br />Comment # <br />Written Public Comment Received <br />Response <br />4 (continued) <br />HPL Mechanical Inc.— Business owner and <br />A subsequent EIR is not required here, where the proposed <br />resident provided comments in opposition to <br />ordinance amendments will not result in new significant <br />the proposed amendments to the Transit <br />impacts, or substantially increase the severity of previously <br />Zoning Code (SD-84) with a comment that <br />identified significant impacts in the Transit Zoning Code EIR. <br />the City has not produced a current <br />(Pub. Resources Code, §21166; State CEQA Guidelines, <br />environmental impact report. <br />§15162.) Thus, the City has prepared an Addendum to the <br />Transit Zoning Code EIR. <br />The commenter can refer the parking and traffic safety <br />concerns to the Public Works Agency and the Santa Ana <br />Police Department. <br />5 <br />Kelly Kraus Lee- Resident - provided <br />The City acknowledges the comment. <br />comments in support of the proposed <br />amendments to the Transit Zoning Code <br />(SD-84). No questions were provided. <br />6 <br />FLP Investments LLC / Motion & Flow <br />The City acknowledges the comment. <br />Control Products, Inc. — Business owner <br />provided comments in opposition to the <br />The proposed ordinance amendments do not require any <br />proposed amendments to the Transit Zoning <br />immediate closure of businesses within the affected area. <br />Code (SD-84) with a change to remove the <br />Should individual business owners and property owners elect <br />M-2 overlay and convert current M-2 zoned <br />to modify business operations, cease operations, or redevelop <br />properties to M-1, referencing LA County's <br />properties with new uses, financial factors would be evaluated <br />program. <br />on a per- application basis. Therefore, estimating any financial <br />or economic impacts of the proposed ordinance would be <br />speculative. <br />Page 3 <br />