My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 24 - Public Hearing - Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
06/03/2025 Regular
>
Item 24 - Public Hearing - Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2025 5:16:07 PM
Creation date
5/28/2025 4:48:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
24
Date
6/3/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
705
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment #6 <br />Zuniga, Diana <br />From: Jeff Potter <jpotter@comoso.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 202S 6:08 AM <br />To: mike@tardifsheetmetal.com; Bacerra, Phil; Vazquez, Benjamin; Lopez, Jorge (SAPD); <br />Penaloza, David; Hernandez, Johnathan; Amezcua, Valerie; Phan, Thai <br />Cc: eComment; Abby Hashemi; Al Saia; Andy Schmitt; Bob Adams; Bryan Zatica; Carl <br />Tobin; Charlie Winn; Christy Taylor; Cindy Greiwe; Congressman Lou Correa; Darrell <br />Garland; Dave Elliott; David Firestone; David Roche; David Zech; dianef8923@twc.com; <br />Dick Stewart; Dylan Shershenovich; Elvis Arellano; Eoin Kreditor; F R Stewart; Fernando <br />Mora; Francisco Gonzalez; George Hansen; George Toubbeh; Graydon Greiwe; Harold <br />Seaton; Harvey Beigle; Henry Bedolla; Herb Niermann; Jack Haley; Jack Hogan; <br />jadec@ctatravel.com; Jeff Cosby; Jenna Zech; Jim Tobin; Jimmy Villaverde; Jodie; Joe <br />Castro; Joe Kunz; Joe Pfeiffer; John Moore; John Nettel; Joseph Lomax; Judith Lomax; <br />Judy & Dave Wislocki; Julie Carmody; kenhsu714@gmail.com; Kevin Tranter; Kim <br />Riker; Kyle Snailum; Lee Jakobs; legacyteinc@gmail.com; <br />LianeH@austinhardwoods.net; Linda Tobin; Marc Saltzer; Mario Gutierrez; Mark & <br />Diana Forsyth; MForcel; mlaw92626; Mark McCandless; Matt@pacific-strategies.com; <br />Matthew Nichols; Mayra Ruiz; Mike Feeley; Mike Freedman; Mike Saia; Mo Sanchez; <br />Nathan Hittle; Neil Buttermoore; Omar Reynaga; Peter Lomakin; R. Chiarini; Rachel <br />Freedman; Ray Hashemi; Richard Chiarini; Rick Kagasoff; Robert Thatcher; Roger <br />Simon; Ron Jakobs; Russell Johnson; Ryan Moore; Sammy Montoya; Scott Connelly; <br />Sean Connelly; Shawna Smith; Stacy Stell; Steven Greenhut; Susan Shelley; Rush, Tim <br />GMAIL; Toan Nguyen; Tony Richard; Travis Beigle; Walt Yaeger; Will Paul Akrawi <br />Subject: May 6th Council Meeting Public Hearing SD-84 Industrial Rezoning <br />Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br />Mayor Amezcua and City Council, <br />The SD-84 potential rezoning doesn't seem to be welcome to anyone other than gentrifying developers. From sitting in <br />most of the meetings it appears the solution, if one is being strived for, is clear. Residents and long-standing businesses <br />do not support the rezoning. The proposed "solution" is only going to make traffic and congestion issues worse, not <br />improve the neighborhood. If industrial/commercial and residential cannot coexist, where does that leave the future of the <br />city and Orange County in general? <br />If pollution is the issue there's going to be far more traffic as we are already surrounded by four major freeways (clogged <br />at one part of the day or another), a train station and Civic and Santa Ana, which are raceways many mornings and <br />afternoons. Noise is not going to improve either. Developers will bring high density luxury multi -story units and <br />thousands of additional residents - and traffic - right between 2 historic single-family neighborhoods. Most of them will <br />leave for the day for other jobs as the "work from home" era dies a slow death. <br />It would be best if the city managed the exceptions. Manage the bad actors and truly noxious businesses, like other cities <br />do and have done. We ask that you remove the M-2 overlay -- allowing the M-1 Light Industrial to remain - and <br />converting current M-2 properties to M-1. This was done successfully in LA County. Not doing so sets a bad precedent <br />for potential future business investment in your city. <br />Shutting down long-standing businesses is not the popular answer. Hopefully you will consider your constituents over <br />developers. <br />Regards, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.