Laserfiche WebLink
1-5 northbound off ramp. The improvement shall be implemented to mitigate 2035 conditions. <br />(Impact 4.11-9) <br />Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The City determined that impacts related to exceeding standards from the Orange County <br />Transportation Authority (Impact 4.111-2), change in air traffic patterns (Impact 4.11-3), hazards <br />due to a design future or incompatible uses (Impact 4.11-4), inadequate emergency access <br />(Impact 4.11-5), inadequate parking capacity (Impact 4.11-6), and alternative transportation <br />(Impact 4.11-7) were below the level of significance and did not require mitigation. Impacts <br />related to neighborhood traffic (Impact 4.11-1) and traffic increases to the existing traffic load <br />(Impact 4.11-8) were less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. <br />Impacts related to development near freeway ramps (Impacts 4.11-9) were found to be <br />significant and unavoidable and that specific economic, social, or other considerations make <br />infeasible additional mitigation. Specifically, no additional feasible mitigation measures exist that <br />would avoid or substantially reduce these impacts. <br />Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be <br />subject to a project -level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. <br />Mitigation measures MM4.11-1 through MM4.11-16 would continue to apply. <br />The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 — Current and Proposed Text <br />Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because <br />specific development projects are neither included nor required. The new regulations would <br />provide recharging spaces for electric vehicles. Also, all truck parking areas must be on paved <br />surfaces and the parking, loading or unloading of trucks associated with a business on public <br />streets is prohibited. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed <br />amendments will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated. This will result in a <br />beneficial impact to transportation. Therefore, the existing less than significant and significant <br />and unavoidable transportation impacts would not result in new or different impacts. <br />5.12 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br />This section analyzes the effects to utilities and service systems from implementing the <br />proposed zoning code regulations. <br />Would the project: <br />a. Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of <br />existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental <br />effects? <br />b. Require new or expanded water entitlements and resources if there are not sufficient <br />water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources? <br />TZC EIR Conclusions <br />• Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and <br />SD 84B) would generate an additional demand for water, but would not require water <br />supplies in excess of existing entitlements and resources or result in the need for new or <br />expanded entitlements. (Impact 4.12-1: Less Than Significant without mitigation) <br />Long-term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and <br />SD 84B) would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded water <br />January 2025 48 Environmental Analysis <br />