My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2025-06-17
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
06/17/2025
>
Agenda Packet_2025-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 3:48:54 PM
Creation date
6/11/2025 3:42:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
6/17/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL 17 JUNE 3, 2025 <br />Acting Director Pezeshkpour spoke regarding the evolution of the item, using <br />amortization as a tool, the difference between nonconforming vs. noxious, and the <br />proposed operating standards. <br /> <br />City Manager Alvaro Nuñez stated that prohibiting idling vehicles would allow the <br />Police Department and Code Enforcement to enforce any violations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Lopez inquired about carve outs in the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />City Manager Nuñez clarified that there are carve outs within the ordinance, <br />however they must be within the parameters of what is considered noxious use. <br /> <br />City Attorney Sonia Carvalho referenced an analysis of them item prepared by her <br />office for the Council and stated that Councilmember Bacerra’s proposed <br />amendments address some of the key issues, including the amortization of current <br />land use and possible challenges. <br /> <br />Mayor Amezcua spoke regarding voting history of the item, amortization, and <br />inquired about the specialized counsel staff collaborated with on the item. <br /> <br />Councilmember Bacerra inquired whether the proposed ordinance would address <br />the environmental impacts of businesses such as open air recycling centers in the <br />area, and expressed frustration at what he believes was a disconnect between City <br />Attorney staff and the Council. <br />City Attorney Carvalho addressed Councilmember Bacerra’s concerns. <br />Assistant City Manager Minh Thai stated that while the proposed ordinance does <br />address residents’ concerns, it also addresses the business’s concerns in a way <br />that staff deems equitable and noted that it will be a long process. <br /> <br />MOTION: Councilmember Hernandez moved to approve the recommended <br />action for Public Hearing Item No. 24, with the following five amendments: <br />• Section 5 SAMC 41-2002 Subsection 7 (2) to state “determined to be <br />in violation” <br />• Section 5 SAMC 41-2002 Subsection 8 changing “nonconforming <br />uses” to “noxious uses” and additional relative instances of the <br />same term <br />• Section 9 SAMC Section 41-2007 subsection (g), to remove UN-2 <br />• Section 11 to move SAMC Section 41-2009 to 41-2008 subsection <br />(m) <br />• Section 11 SAMC Subsection 4 to remove “lapses in business <br />license renewal,” seconded by Mayor Amezcua. <br /> <br /> <br />City Council 6 – 37 6/17/2025
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.