2025-023 - Addendum to Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report

Home Browse Search

pedestrians on the public streets, on site activities, and adjoining or nearby properties. No activity shall be permitted which causes excessive light and glare to be transmitted or reflected to surrounding properties at a level resulting in detrimental impacts to adjacent properties. Light sources shall generally not be permitted in landscaped, buffer, or setback areas except for those illuminating pedestrian walkways. Lighting used to illuminate parking areas shall be designed, located, and installed to be shielded and downlit and to reflect away from any nearby residential areas. Lighting for advertising signs shall not create glare or light which extends to surrounding properties. Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures MM4.1-1 through MM4.1-4 would continue to apply. Therefore, the project does not trigger new aesthetics impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more significant impacts to aesthetics and visual resources. 5.2 AIR QUALITY This section analyzes the effects to air quality from implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the proposed project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? TZC EIR Conclusions • The project would not create substantial objectionable odors. (Impact 4.2-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • The project would not create short-term quantities of criteria pollutants above the significance thresholds published by SCAQMD. (Impact 4.2-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) • Operation of the project would increase local traffic volumes, but would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial localized carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations. (Impact 4.2-3: Less Than Significant without mitigation) • The anticipated population increase of 12,225 new residents as a result of the long- term cumulative development pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code is consistent with the SCAG growth projections for Santa Ana and, therefore, would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan. (Impact 4.2-4: Less Than Significant without mitigation) January 2025 19 Environmental Analysis Resolution No. 2025-023 Page 27 of 65