My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-023 - Addendum to Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2025
>
2025-023 - Addendum to Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2025 4:38:11 PM
Creation date
6/12/2025 4:37:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Agency
Planning & Building
Doc #
2025-023
Item #
24
Date
6/3/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. <br /> Section 2. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 requires lead agencies to prepare <br /> an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions to the project are <br /> necessary, but none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR are <br /> present. The City Council has reviewed and considered the administrative record, <br /> including but not limited to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, which are all <br /> incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein, and finds that those documents <br /> taken together contain a complete and accurate reporting of all the environmental impacts <br /> associated with the Transit Zoning Code. The City Council further finds that the <br /> Addendum and the administrative record have been completed in compliance with CEQA, <br /> the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines. The City Council finds and <br /> determines that the Addendum reflects the City's independent judgment. <br /> The City Council finds that the foregoing is supported by substantial evidence in <br /> the record. <br /> Furthermore, when taking subsequent discretionary actions in furtherance of a <br /> project for which an EIR has been certified, the City is required to review any changed <br /> circumstances under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines <br /> Section 15162 to determine whether additional environmental review is required. Based <br /> on the substantial evidence set forth in the administrative record, including but not limited <br /> to the Transit Zoning Code EIR and the Addendum, the City Council finds that none of <br /> the conditions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring subsequent <br /> environmental review have occurred because the proposed ordinances: <br /> a) do not constitute substantial changes that would require major revisions to the <br /> Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br /> environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously <br /> identified effects; and <br /> b) do not constitute substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under <br /> which the project was developed that would require major revisions of the <br /> Transit Zoning Code EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br /> environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously <br /> identified significant effects; and <br /> c) do not present new information of substantial importance that was not known <br /> and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at <br /> the time the Transit Zoning Code was certified, showing any of the following: <br /> (i) that the project would have one or more significant effects not discussed in <br /> the earlier environmental documentation; (ii) that significant effects previously <br /> examined would be substantially more severe than shown in the earlier <br /> environmental documentation; (iii) that mitigation measures or alternatives <br /> previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would <br /> substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the applicant declined <br /> Resolution No. 2025-023 <br /> Page 3 of 65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.