Laserfiche WebLink
intrusions on the nest area. The appropriate buffer shall be determined in consultation <br /> with the City of Santa Ana Park Naturalist or a designee. <br /> 2. No construction vehicles shall be permitted within restricted areas (i.e., protection <br /> zones), unless directly related to the management or protection of the legally protected <br /> species. <br /> 3. If a legally protected species nest is located in a tree designated for removal, the <br /> removal shall be deferred until after August 30, or until the adults and young of the year <br /> are no longer dependent on the nest site as determined by a qualified biologist. (Impact <br /> 4.3-1) <br /> Project Analysis and Conclusion <br /> The City determined that impacts related to endangered, rare, threatened, or special status <br /> plant species or associated habitats or wildlife species, riparian habitat and sensitive natural <br /> communities, wetlands or blue line streams, wildlife movement corridors, habitat conservation <br /> plans, and biological resource policies would not have any impacts. Impacts to avian species <br /> were less than significant with implementation of the mitigation measures. <br /> The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 — Current and Proposed <br /> Text Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because <br /> the TZC area is intended to be developed for urban uses and located in an area that is <br /> completely developed for urban uses. Because TZC area is a heavily disturbed and graded <br /> area consisting of industrial and residential uses, and the project does not introduce any new <br /> types of land use, and instead removes the industrial overlay zone, there will be no impacts to <br /> biological resources. <br /> Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to <br /> a project-level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In <br /> addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that <br /> potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to biological <br /> resources. The project does not trigger new biological resource impacts requiring the <br /> preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Mitigation measure MM4.3-1 would continue <br /> to apply. There would be no new or more significant impacts to biological resources. <br /> 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> This section analyzes the effects to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources from <br /> implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. <br /> Would the project. <br /> a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as <br /> defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? <br /> b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource <br /> pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? <br /> c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic <br /> feature? <br /> d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? <br /> TZC EIR Conclusions <br /> January 2025 27 Environmental Analysis <br /> Resolution No. 2025-023 <br /> Page 35 of 65 <br />