My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 27
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
07/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2025 3:23:53 PM
Creation date
6/25/2025 8:24:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Congre,5,5 of the uniteb *tate.5 <br /> Va5oington, ME 20513 <br /> June 10, 2025 <br /> President Donald J. Trump <br /> The White House <br /> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW <br /> Washington, D.C. 20500 <br /> RE: Deployment of National Guard Troops to Los Angeles <br /> Mr. President, <br /> We are writing to express grave concern regarding the deployment of the National Guard and the <br /> activation of 700 Marines to Los Angeles. These actions were taken without the consent of <br /> California Governor Gavin Newsom and over the objections of local law enforcement. It <br /> constitutes a clear violation of constitutional principles and law, and a grave overreach of <br /> executive authority. <br /> On June 6 and 7, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement(ICE) carried out a series of <br /> immigration raids in downtown Los Angeles, which were met with widespread public protests. <br /> On the evening of June 7, you issued a formal memorandum titled "Department of Defense <br /> Security for the Protection of Department of Homeland Security Functions," authorizing the <br /> deployment of 2,000 California National Guard personnel to Los Angeles for a 60-day period. <br /> This action bypassed the state governor's authority and proceeded despite active objections from <br /> local law enforcement already managing the situation. By the time National Guard troops arrived <br /> on Sunday morning, protests had largely subsided, and the streets were calm. Instead, the <br /> National Guard presence contributed to a renewed escalation of tensions. The overwhelming <br /> majority of protestors have done so peacefully. State and local authorities have already said that <br /> they can and will arrest and prosecute the very few who have committed acts of violence. <br /> This deployment does not appear to be motivated by any public safety emergency that could not <br /> be dealt with successfully by local authorities. Instead, it coincides with a broader federal <br /> enforcement escalation involving mass ICE raids, militarized immigration tactics, and the use of <br /> tear gas and riot control methods in civilian areas. These actions undermine civil liberties, <br /> destabilize communities, erode public trust in government institutions, and violate the law. <br /> Your memorandum cited 10 U.S.C. §12406 as the legal basis for your actions. That provision <br /> allows the President to call the National Guard into federal service only in three specific <br /> circumstances: <br /> (1)the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in <br /> danger of invasion by a foreign nation; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.