Item HA 03 - Update to the Housing Choice Voucher Administrative Plan

Home Browse Search

Administrative Plan 7/1/2025 Page 12-13 12-II.D. CRITERIA FOR DECIDING TO TERMINATE ASSISTANCE Evidence For criminal activity, HUD permits the PHA to terminate assistance if a preponderance of the evidence indicates that a household member has engaged in the activity, regardless of whether the household member has been arrested or convicted [24 CFR 982.553(c)]. PHA Policy SAHA will use the concept of the preponderance of the evidence as the standard for making all termination decisions. Preponderance of the evidence is defined as evidence which is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it; that is, evidence which as a whole shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not. Preponderance of the evidence may not be determined by the number of witnesses, but by the greater weight of all evidence Use of Criminal Conviction Records after Admission [24 CFR 5.903] The regulation at 24 CFR 5.903 governs a PHA’s access to and use of criminal conviction records obtained from a “law enforcement agency” such as the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), police departments, and other law enforcement agencies that hold criminal conviction records. While the regulatory listing of permitted uses for these records includes PHA screening of applicants for admission to the HCV program, it specifically excludes the use of records for lease enforcement and eviction of HCV participants and excludes by omission a PHA’s use of records to terminate assistance for participants. While a PHA has regulatory authority to use criminal conviction records for the purpose of applicant screening for admission, there is no corresponding authority to use these records to check for criminal and illegal drug activity by participants, and therefore, PHAs may not use records for this purpose. The limitations, however, do not apply to criminal conviction information searches from non-federal sources (i.e., sources other than the “law enforcement agencies” defined in 24 CFR 5.902(b)). There is no prohibition that bars a PHA from using non-federal sources to conduct criminal background checks of program participants. Consideration of Circumstances [24 CFR 982.552(c)(2)(i)] The PHA is permitted, but not required, to consider all relevant circumstances when determining whether a family’s assistance should be terminated. SAHA Policy SAHA will consider the following facts and circumstances when making its decision to terminate assistance: The seriousness of the case, especially with respect to how it would affect other residents’ safety or property The effects that termination of assistance may have on other members of the family who were not involved in the action or failure to act EXHIBIT 1