My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 29 - Police Oversight Commission Ordinance Amendment
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
07/01/2025
>
Item 29 - Police Oversight Commission Ordinance Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2025 11:00:25 AM
Creation date
6/26/2025 10:54:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
29
Date
7/1/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
except if the public safety officer is unavailable for discipline. <br />(g) Notwithstanding the one-year time period specified in subdivision (d), an investigation may be <br />reopened against a public safety officer if both of the following circumstances exist: <br />(1) Significant new evidence has been discovered that is likely to affect the outcome of the <br />investigation. <br />(2) One of the following conditions exist: <br />(A) The evidence could not reasonably have been discovered in the normal course of investigation <br />without resorting to extraordinary measures by the agency. <br />(B) The evidence resulted from the public safety officer’s predisciplinary response or procedure. <br />(h) For those members listed in subdivision (a) of Section 830.2 of the Penal Code, the 30 -day time <br />period provided for in subdivision (f) shall not commence with the service of a preliminary notice of <br />adverse action, should the public agency elect to provide the public safety officer with such a notice. <br />(Amended by Stats. 2009, Ch. 494, Sec. 1. (AB 955) Effective January 1, 2010.) <br />3304.5. An administrative appeal instituted by a public safety officer under this chapter shall be <br />conducted in conformance with rules and procedures adopted by the local public agency. <br />(Added by Stats. 1998, Ch. 263, Sec. 1. Effective January 1, 1999.) <br />3305. No public safety officer shall have any comment adverse to his interest entered in his personnel <br />file, or any other file used for any personnel purposes by his employer, without the public safety officer <br />having first read and signed the instrument containing the adverse comment indicating he is aware of <br />such comment, except that such entry may be made if after reading such instrument the public safety <br />officer refuses to sign it. Should a public safety officer refuse to sign, that fact shall be noted on that <br />document, and signed or initialed by such officer. <br />(Added by Stats. 1976, Ch. 465.) <br />3305.5. (a) A punitive action, or denial of promotion on grounds other than merit, shall not be <br />undertaken by any public agency against any public safety officer solely because that officer’s name <br />has been placed on a Brady list, or that the officer’s name may otherwise be subject to dis closure <br />pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83. <br />(b) This section shall not prohibit a public agency from taking punitive action, denying promotion on <br />grounds other than merit, or taking other personnel action against a public safety officer based on the <br />underlying acts or omissions for which that officer’s name was placed on a Brady list, or may otherwise <br />be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, if the actions taken by the <br />public agency otherwise conform to this chapter and to the rules and procedures adopted by the local <br />agency. <br />(c) Evidence that a public safety officer’s name has been placed on a Brady list, or may otherwise be <br />subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, shall not be i ntroduced for any <br />purpose in any administrative appeal of a punitive action, except as provided in subdivision (d). <br />(d) Evidence that a public safety officer’s name was placed on a Brady list may only be introduced if, <br />during the administrative appeal of a punitive action against an officer, the underlying act or omission <br />for which that officer’s name was placed on a Brady list is proven and the officer is found to be subject <br />to some form of punitive action. If the hearing officer or other administrative ap peal tribunal finds or <br />determines that a public safety officer has committed the underlying acts or omissions that will result in <br />a punitive action, denial of a promotion on grounds other than merit, or any other adverse personnel <br />action, and evidence exists that a public safety officer’s name has been placed on a Brady list, or may <br />otherwise be subject to disclosure pursuant to Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, then the evidence <br />shall be introduced for the sole purpose of determining the type or level of punitive action to be <br />imposed. <br />(e) For purposes of this section, “Brady list” means any system, index, list, or other record containing <br />the names of peace officers whose personnel files are likely to contain evidence of dishonesty or bias, <br />which is maintained by a prosecutorial agency or office in accordance with the holding in Brady v. <br />Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83. <br />(Added by Stats. 2013, Ch. 779, Sec. 1. (SB 313) Effective January 1, 2014.)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.