Laserfiche WebLink
(a) A statement that the officer’s pin or other item violates an existing rule, regulation, policy, or local <br />agency agreement or contract regarding the wearing of a pin, or the displaying of any other item, <br />containing the American flag. <br />(b) A citation to the specific rule, regulation, policy, or local agency agreement or contract that the pin <br />or other item violates. <br />(c) A statement that the officer may file an appeal against the employer challenging the alleged <br />violation pursuant to applicable grievance or appeal procedures adopted by the department or public <br />agency that otherwise comply with existing law. <br />(Added by Stats. 2002, Ch. 170, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2003.) <br />3313. In the 2005–06 fiscal year, the Commission on State Mandates shall review its statement of <br />decision regarding the Peace Officer Procedural Bill of Rights test claim and make any modifications <br />necessary to this decision to clarify whether the subject legislation imposed a mandate consistent with <br />the California Supreme Court Decision in San Diego Unified School Dist. v. Commission on State <br />Mandates (2004) 33 Cal.4th 859 and other applicable court decisions. If the Commission on State <br />Mandates revises its statement of decision regarding the Peace Officer Procedural Bi ll of Rights test <br />claim, the revised decision shall apply to local government Peace Officer Procedural Bill of Rights <br />activities occurring after the date the revised decision is adopted. <br />(Added by Stats. 2005, Ch. 72, Sec. 6. Effective July 19, 2005.)